ML19305C986
| ML19305C986 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Three Mile Island  |
| Issue date: | 03/17/1980 |
| From: | Trowbridge G METROPOLITAN EDISON CO., SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE |
| To: | PENNSYLVANIA, COMMONWEALTH OF |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8004110516 | |
| Download: ML19305C986 (29) | |
Text
. .
t March 17, 1980 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )
)
METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-289
) (Restart)
(Three Mile Island Nuclear )
Station, Unit No. 1) )
LICENSEE'S RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORIES (FIRST SET) OF THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION INTERROGATORY NO. 1 State the name, address, position and occupation, place of em-ployment and subject matter of testimony of all witnesses who will be called by Met Ed in this proceeding to testify on any aspect of Met Ed's financial position and capabilities, either past, present or future.
RESPONSE
Met Ed has as yet made no selection of witnesses to Met Ed's financial position and capabilities. It is reasonable to expect, however, that any witnesses for Met Ed will include Mr.
John G. Graham, Treasurer, General Public Utilities Corporation.
I:1TERROGATORY NO. 2 State the name, address, position and occupation, place of em-ployment and subject matter of testimony of all witnesses who will be called by Met Ed in this proceeding to testify on any aspect of Met Ed's managerial capability or competence, past, present or future.
RESPONSE
Met Ed has as yet made no selection of witnesses as to Met Ed's managerial capability or competence. It is reasonable to 800411015:\G7
. t except that any witnesses for Met Ed will include Mr. Herman Dieckamp, President of General Public Utilities Corporation and of GPU Service Corporation, and Mr. Robert C. Arnold, Vice-President of GPU Service Corporation and Senior Vice-President of Metropolitan Edison Company.
INTERROGATORY NO. 3 For each person named in response to Nos. 1 and 2 above who wi]l testify to matters of opinion based upon asserted expertise in some recognized discipline, profession or occupation, state all educational institutions attended after secondary school, all undergraduate and graduate degrees granted, areas of concentration, titles of theses, professional articles and books authored or co-authored; caption, docket number, date, place and subject matter summary of any prior testimony in any state or federal judicial or administrative proceeding, as well as the name of the party for whom appearing.
RESPONSE
Since witnesses have not as yet been selected, it is not possible at thic time to respond to this interrogatory. However, background and qualifications of any experts who may be offered by Met Ed as witnesses will be included in prepared testimony filed with all participants in advance of the hearing session at which such witnesses may appear.
INTERROGATORY NO. 4 How does Met Ed define " financially qualified" in the context of this proceeding? If financial tests or ratios are referenced, specify methodology employed.
RESPONSE
In the context of this proceeding, Met Ed defines " financially qualified" as meaning that Met Ed must be financially qualified to operate TMI-l safely in accordance with NRC regulations (10 C.F.R. S 50.40(b)). The only financial tests specified by NRC I
. t regulations for determining financial qualifications are those implicit in the financial information required to be supplied by applicants for operating licenses pursuant to 10 C.F.R. S 50.33(f) and Appendix C to 10 C.F.R. Part 50. Additional factors considered j by the NRC may be inferred from information requested by the NRC staff in the course of licensing reviews, in Staff Safety Evalua-tion Reports and in decisions by Atomic Safety and Licensing ,
Boards. These factors frequently include past and prospective rate treatment of applicants by State regulatory agencies.
INTERROGATORY NO. 5 What facts or opinions demonstrate that Met Ed is financially qualified to operate TMI-l? If reference is'made to documents, at t.tch them or provide verbatim summaries therof. -
RESPONSE l t
The testimony and exhibits of Mr. John G. Graham submitted in the Pennsylvania Rate Proceeding Docket No. I-79040308 demonstrate that Met Ed is financially qualified.
Mr. Graham's testimony is identified as Met Ed/Penelec State-ment A-1, Supplement No. 1. The relevant exhibits are identified as Met Ed/Penelec Exhibit A-23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 35, 36, ,
t !
37, 38, 39, 45, 46, 49, 57, 60, 61 and 72.
INTERROGATORY NO. 6 Have any cash flow studies been prepared by or for Met Ed? If so, state by whom they have been prepared, the dates of preparation and source and nature of assumptions used. Attach copies or l verbatim summaries thereof.
RESPONSE
The most recent cash flow and short-term debt forecast was prepared under the direct supervision of Mr. John G. Graham and
, t was submitted in the Pennsylvania Rate Proceeding Docket No.
I-79040308 on February 20, 1980 as Met Ud/Penelec Exhibit A-72.
The major assumptions underlying the forecast are detailed in the testimony of Mr. Graham in the above-referenced proceeding (Met Ed/Penelec Statement A-1, Supplement No. 1, pp. 6, 7 and 8).
Any changes in those assumptions are footnoted on Exhibit A-72.
A series of earlier cash flow projections were made in April, May and June of 1979. These projections were incorporated as a part of the testimony and exhibits of Mr. John G. Graham in Docket No. I-79040308. The testimony and relevant exhibits from that proceeding are identified as follows:
Testimong Exhibits Statement A A-1, 2, 14, 15, 16, 17 Statement A, Supplement 1 A-20, 21 Statement A, Supplement 2 A-14a, 16a, 20a, 21a, 22, 23 Statement A, Supplement 3 A-14b, 15a, 16b, 17a, 20b, 21b INTERROGATORY NO. 7 How does Met Ed define " managerially capable" in the context of this proceeding?
RESPONSE
Met Ed views the question of " managerial capability" to be essentially synonymous with the question considered in all NRC proceedings involving the issuance of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, i.e., whether the applicant or licensee is technically qualified to operate the reactor safely in accordance with NRC regulations. The tests specified by NRC regulations for determining technical qualifications are those implicit in
, i the information required to be suppl 8.ed by applicants for operating licenses pursuant to 10 C.F.R. S 50.34 (b) and in the quality assurance program requirements .of Appendix B to 10 C.F.R. Part 50.
In this proceeding, however, the commission has issued an Order (CLI-80-5, dated March 6, 1980) which supplements its regulations by specifying in some detail the elements of management capability which the Licensing Board should consider.
INTERROGATORY NO. 8 What facts or opinions demonstrate that Met Ed is managerially capable to operate TMI-1, while maintaining TMI-II in a safe configuration and supervising cleanup and decontamination tasks?
If reference is made to documents, attach them or provide ver-batim summaries thereof.
RESPONSE
[ NOTE: The following response was prepared without the benefit of information in the most recent amendment to the Restart Report, Amendment 14. This response will be supplemented to include the most recent information.)
The fact that Met Ed is managerially capable of safely operating TMI-l while decontaminating and restoring Unit 2 is illustrated by the strengthened manage aent and technical support fully committed to TMI in the combined Met Ed and GPU Service !
Company Generating Division technical and management resources presently known as the TMI Generatior. Group. Pending the approval of various Regulatory Agencies we anticipate that the existing TMI Generation Group with its organizational structure and resources will become the GPU Nuclear Corporation. This single organizational en-tity, the TMI Generation Group /GPU Nuclear Corporation which is headed by R.C. Arnold, who is Senior Vice President of Met Ed and
continues to serve as a Vice Fresident to GPU Service Corporation, is responsible for operation of TMI-1, TMI-2 activities, and support activities for both units.
Mr. Arnold as head of the TMI Generating Grcup and the future Presiden. of GPU Nuclear, reports to Herman M. Dieckamp, President of GPU and GPUSC, and acting President of Met Ed. This reporting structure provides a direct link from the Chief C, erating Officer of these three Companies to the activities at TMI.
Reporting to Mr. Arnold within the TMI Generation Group are:
Mr. Phil Clark the future Executive Vice President of the GPU i
Nuclear Corporation, who has over 25 years of Naval Reactor Program experience and who will share the office of the new Corporation President with Mr. Arnold; and, five division heads which in the GPU Nuclear Corporation will be Vice Presidents.
Using the GPU Nuclear titles of the five division heads (whose functions are the same in the TMI Generation Group), a more detailed description of the divisionsis included in Attachment A.
Further detail is included in the organization descriptions provided in Section 5 of the Restart Report, copies of which are available in the Licensee's Discovery Reading Room and have been provided to the participants in the hearing.
INTERROGATORY NO. 11 State in chronological sequence separately for TMI-l and 2 the nature, date and disposition of every NRC-alleged or reported violation, infraction or other item of noncompliance with NRC regulations or technical specifications. For each such viola-tion, infraction or noncompliance, state the name of the NRC inspector making the report, and the report number.
4 P
RESPONSE
See attached Tables A (Unit 1) and B (Unit 2). ,
1 A
i Respectfully submitted, l t
.I SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE By Jruj
- Nr y) y rg F. Trowbridge [
l l
Dated: March 17, 1980. l t
I l
~
t a
i
! i I
7 r
i l [
i L
L I
P I
[
?
f i
f b
y -y- ~ . , - . ,,py y- - -y,. .9-- - -
- --- - ,_ , , , _ -_m .-
l 1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD ;
I I
In the Matter of )
) i METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-289 (Three Mile Island Nuclear (Restart)
Station, Unit No. 1) ) ;
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE i
i I hereby certify that copies of " Licensee's Response to l Interrogatories (First Set) of The Pennsylvania Public Utility l
Commission" were served upon those persons on the attached l Service List by deposit in the United States mail, postage l prepaid, this 17th day of March, 1980.
14sr1
- N 2 i
' f 'GEffrge F. Trowbridp Dated: March 17, 1980.
f
- L s
~
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR RZGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING 30ARD In the Matter of )
)
MZTROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-289
) (Restart)
(Three Mile Island Nuclear )
Station, Unit No. 1) )
SERVICE LIST Ivan W. Smith, Esquire John A. Levin, Esquire Chairman Assistant Counsel Atomic Safety and Licensing Pennsylvania Public Utility Comm.
Board Panel Post Office Box 3265 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Washington., D. C.
~
20555 Karin W. Carter, Esquire Dr. Walter H. Jordan Assistant Attorney General Atomic Safety and Licensing 505 Executive House Board Panel 101 South Second Street
'851 West Outer Ridge Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Oak Ridge , Tennessee 37839 John E. Minnich Dr. Little W. Little Chairman, Dauphin County Board Atcmic Safety and Licensing of Commissioners Board Panel Dauphin County Courthouse 5000 Hermitage Drive Front and Market Streets Raleigh, North Carolina 27612 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101 James R. Tourtellotte, Esquire Walter W. Cohen, Esquire Of fice of the Executive Legal Consumer Advocate Director Office of Consumer Advocate U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l'th Floor, Strawberry Square Washington, D. C. 20555 Hurrisburg, Pennsylvania ^17127 Docketing and Service Section Jordan D. Cunningham, Esquire Office of the Secretary Attorney for Newberry Township U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission T.M.I. Steering Committee Washington, D. C. 20555 2320 North Second Street Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110 Theodore A. Adler, Esquire Widoff Reager Selkowitz & Adler Ellyn R. Weiss, Esquire Post Office Box 1547 Attorney for the Union of Concerns Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105 Scientists Sheldon, Harmon & Weiss 1725 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 506
. Washington, D. C. 20006
Steven C. Shelly 304 South Market Street Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania 17055 '
Gail Bradford Holly S. Keck Legislation Chairman Anti-Nuclear Group Representing York 245 West Philadelphia Street York, Pennsylvania 17404 Karin P. Sheldon, Esquire Attorney for People Against Nuclear Energy Sheldon, Harmon &.w eiss 1725 Eye Street, N, W., Suite 506 Washington, D.C. 20006 Robert O. Pollard Chesapeake Energy Alliance 609 Montpelier Street Baltimore, Maryland 21218 Chauncey Kepford Judith H. Johnrud Environmental Coalition on Nuclear Power 433 Orlando Avenue.
I State College, Pennsylvania 16801 Marvin I. Lewis 6504 Bradford Terrace Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19149 Majorie M. Aamodt R. D. 5 Coatesville, Pennsylvania 19320
- l l ATTACHMENT A [
! Response to' Interrogatory 8 I i i i
t
)
The five Division Vice Presidents head the following TMI Ceneration f r
,' Functional Divisions:
j
. TMI-l ,
. TMI-2
. Technical Functions i
. Nuclear Assurance ?
! . Administration [
l This overall realignment, compared to the resources available to TMI I i'
prior to the accident, has more than tripled the number of professionals
- that have TMI as their primary responsibility. It has also significantly 1 i j increased the technical experience level of the group assigned to TMI, -
) The TMI Ceneration Group and the new GPU Corporation with the Office {
i of the President and the Division Vice Presidents has a full time {
dedicated management charged solely with single minded, safe, ef fective I l operation of nuclear facilities.
i J !
I t '
The functional responsibility alignments under the five Division Vice Presidents are summarized below:
I 1
i l !
I f I. Vice President TMI-l j l . operations and maintenance {
. plant engineering
. Radiological. Controls
. staff administration including Security Force TMI-l operational safety.reviev I
' r s
< _ ,, p 1 ,y 4 _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . , _ . _ . . __ . , _ , , . _ 4_ , - . _ . _ . - m_ ,,
ATTACHMENT A (cont.) .
II. Vice President TMI-2
. recovery operations and maintenance
, plant engineering
. waste processing operations
. decontamination
. contractor supervision
. staff administration including Security Force TMI-2 III. Vice President Technical Functions
. Systems Engineering Engineering and Design
. Project Engineering Management Licensing and Environmental Engineering
. Independent Technical Review IV. Vice President Nuclear Assurance
. Quality Assurance Training and Operational Safety Support
. Nuclear Safety Assessment
. Emergency Planning Coordination V. Vice President Administration Fiscal and Administrative Management
. Materials Management Personnel and Labor Relations Management
. Personnel Safety, Security, and Facilities Management I.
TMI-1,As previously indicated the Division organization for the operation of TMI-l is under the fulltime direction of a Vice Presi-dent. His sole responsibility is TMI-1. Reporting to him are five managers: Manager Plant Engineering, Manager Unit 1, ,
Manager Administration and Services, Manager Radiological Controls, and the Safety Review Manager. Reporting to the Manager Unit 1 is a Superintendent of Maintenance and a Supervisor of Operations. A significant increase in the number of maintenance personnel and the
ATTACHMENT A (cont.)
I 4
i.
reporting of the Maintenance Superintendent to the Manager Unit 1
- provide greater maintenance capability and the needed ability to cordinate and schedule priorities for maintenance activities with operational requirements. The direct reporting of the Manager Radiological Controls to the TMI-l Vice President and separation of Radiological Controls from Plant Chemistry activities provide [
increased management control and greater emphasis on Radiation Protection programs. Shift crew capability has been strengthened by the addition of a Shif t Technical Advisor to each of six (6) operating shifts.
- 4 We have established, as part of the TMI-l Emergency Plan, an On-site Emergency Organization under an Emergency Director, an d
Offsite Emergency Organization under an Emergency ' Support Director, and a Long-Term Recovery Organization under the President, CPU.
One improved aspect of these modified organizations is the pro-vision for technical resources needed to cope with varying size ;
incidents, including one as large as the TMI-2 accident, t
The direct reporting of the Safety Review Manager (PORC Chairman) I to the TMI-l Vice President will provide increased management con-trol and an emphasized focus on the Plant Operations Review Com- [
mittee activities regarding their review of operational activities important to safety which are required by the plant technical i specifications.
Improvements in the management controls for plant operational activities include the following:
- 1. Shift relief turnover check lists which will require identi-fication of control room valve and switch positions for all SEAS and EFW systems and state the required and actual valve ,
r t
ATTACHMENT A (cont.)
and switch positions to fully indicate system status at time of transfer of responsibilities.
- 2. Periodic verification of all SFAS and EFW valve and switch positions for those valves and switch positions that are not indicated in the control room.
- 3. Independent verification of valve and breaker lineups for correct positions following maintenance, surveillance, or special operation on SFAS and EFW systems.
- 4. System checklists will be completed by the control room watch, primary plant, secondary plant, and out-building auxiliary operators during their shift. These system checklists will be reviewed and signed by the off-going and on-coming auxiliary operators and control room watch to assure knowledge of system status at shift turnover time.
- 5. Revisions to the Operational Quality Assurance Program (see below).
- 6. Revisions to the Radiation Protection Program (see below).
- These activities will provide improved management information on and control over TMI-l plant operational activities.
l l
I
', A'rTACHMENT A (cont.)
II. Technical Functions Division The Technical Functions Division reporting to the Vice President Technical Functions consists of the following engineering departments:
Systems Engineering, Engineering & Design,. Project Engineering, Manage-ment including TMI-2 Recovery and Environmental Health and Safety and Licensing. These groups provide offsite experienced support for TMI-l as specified below.
The Technical Functions Group Management personnel each have at least a B.S. Degree in Engineering or Science and the following experience:
Years of Eng. Years of Nuc.
Experience Experience Title,_
Director, Technical Functions 26 24 Manager, Sy stems Engineering 22 22 Manager, Engineering & Design 20 14 Manager, TMI-2 Recovery Engineering 14 14 Manager, Environmental Health and 30 23 Safety & Licensing A. The Systems Engineering Department is responsible for providing support in the areas of Nuclear Analysis and Fuels, process computers, Control and Safety Analysis and Plant Performance Analysis.
B. The Engineering & Design Department provides a centralized capability in the general mechanical, civil, electrical and instrumentation, and engineering mechanics areas.
C. The Project Engineering Management Group is responsible for coordinating and directing of assigned projects including all out of plant technical support for TMI operations.
D.
The TMI-2 Recovery Engineering Department is responsible for coordinating and directing assigned projects dealing with TMI-2 Recovery, including radwaste reactor systems and containment and in-containment res tora tion
ATTACHMENT A (cont.) '
projects. This department also provides onsite engineering support in the following areas:
Fluid and electrical systems, radiation and radiochemistry I analysis, and process and waste management systems.
E. The Environmental Health and Safety and Licensing Department is responsible for providing the interface relationship between the NRC, EPA and various state and local agencies. It includes environmental engineering support for plant and licensing support activities.
III. Nuclear Assurance Division The Nuclear Assurance Division reporting to the Vice President of Nuclear Assurance consists of the following three departments:
A. Quality Assurance B. Training and Operational Safety Support C. Nuclear Safety Assessment A. Quality Assurance Department The Assurance Department under the direction of the Manager of Quality Assurance reports to the Vice President Nuclear Assurance. Both the Manager of Quality Assurance and the Vice President Nuclear Assurance are independent of design, procurement, manufacturing, construction, operations, or maintenance and report at a sufficiently high enough level to provide an independent assessment and evaluation of the effectiveness of the implementation of the.QA Program.
The Manager of Quality Assurance has the overall authority and organizational freedom to identify quality or management control problems and provide recommended solutions. This authority and responsibility includes the stoppage of work or the recommendation that an operating nuclear unit be shut down.
The Quality Assurance Department consists of the following five major sections which report to the Manager Quality Assurance.
. . ATTACHMENT A (cont.)
. Design and Procurement "
. Manufacturing
. Modifications / Operations t
. Methods, Operations & Audit
. Material Technology
- 1. Quality Acaurance Design and Procurement The Quality Assurance Design and Procurement Section is responsible for establishing quality programs and inspection requirements in -
support of design and procurement activities in compliance with the generating unit Quality Assurance Programs. These activities include: approval of vendor quality programs, reporting of quality trends and the review and acceptance of design control procedures.
- 2. Quality Assurance Manufacturing Assurance
- The QA Manufacturing Assurance Section performs the n<.cessary post-award quality-related activities in compliance with the generating unit Quality Assurance Programs required to assure that vendor products are designed, manufactured, tested and/or inspected in accordance with the procuremr.ac specifications. These activities include post-c, ward surveys and surveillances, and source inspections.
- 3. Quality Assurance Modifications / Operations The Quality Assurance Modifications / Operations Section monitors the implementation and effectiveness of the Quality Assurance Programs onsite. These activities include the establishment of adequate site monitoring and inspection programs necessary to verify conformance to Quality Assurance Program requirements. In addition, the section reviews site procedures from a QA/QC standpoint and provides non-destructive examination support for the TMI station. The Section reports directly to the bbnager of Quality Assurance and periodically reports on the implementation and effectiveness of the Operational Quality Assurance Programs to the Vice Presidents of the TMI units.
ATTACHMENT A- (cont. )
- 4. Quality Assurance Methods / Operations / Audits The Quality Assurance Methods / Operations / Audits Section maintains the Quality Assurance Plans, and all those procedures applicable to the activities of the QAD.
The Quality Assurance Methods / Operations / Audits Manager maintains a full-time staff of Quality Assurance Engineers and auditors at both the corporate and site offices. The results of the audit activities are provided to the audited organization and to Safety Review groups who in turn, provide to management assessments of the significance of the audit findings and the effectiveness of the Quality Assurance Program.
- 5. Materials Technology The Materials Technology Section directs the offsite engineering organizations which have the responsiblity for the activities in the establishment of requirements for welding, inser9 ice inspection, materials, and materials evaluations. Materials Technology provides NDE and ISI program flow analysis and reporting, technical require-ments for repair and repair programs and related corrective action recommendations to Engineering. Additionally, the Section supports the evaluation of system materials technology problems.
B. Training and Operational Safety Support The Director of Operational Safety Support reports to the Nuclear Assurance Vice President and manages the following three major sections.
. Chemistry Laboratory
. Radiation Control and Emergency Planning
. Training
- 1. Chemistry System Laboratory The Manager System Laboratory and his staff which consist of environmental and chemical groups perform chemistry analysis and provide technical assistance to TMI Units 1 and 2.
L
?
(
' ATTACHMENT A (cont.)
- 2. Radiation Control & Emergency Planning The Radiation Control and Emergency Planning Group will provide staff support and coordination for radiation control and emergency planning activities.
i 1
The Emergency Planning Coordinator and team develop and maintain the detailed Emergency Plans for each Unit including coordination with all off-site organizations. The team also schedules, plans, implements, and evaluates the necessary drills to test the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan.
- 3. Training The technical and administrative direction of the TMI 1 and 2 training l programs is provided by the TMI Training Department Manager.
Training programs include:
i
- a. Management Skills and Supervisor Training
- b. Licensed Operator Training (R0 and SRO) ,
- c. Maintenance Training <
1 d. Health Physics and Radiological Control Training
- e. Emergency Plan Training j f. Quality Assurance Training
- g. Chemistry Technician Training
- h. General Employee Indoctrination and Training
- 1. Instructor Training
- j. Specialized Technical Training Final evaluation and certification of trainees rests with the individual managers within the THI-1, TMI-2, Technical Functions, ,
- Nuclear Assurance and Administration Divisions. ;
Training of TMI-l Operating Staff To satisfy requirements for operator retraining and to further !
i enhance TMI-l Reactor Operator and Senior Reactor Operator performance, i we have completed a comprehensive Operator Accelerated Retraining Program (OARP). The major objectives of the OARP included:
112ACHMENT A (_ con t . )
- a. Improvement of operator performance during small break LOCAs.
- b. Assurance that the operator can recognize and respond to conditions of inadequate core cooling.
- c. Assurance that the TMI-l operators have an in-depth understanding of the TMI-2 accident and associated lessons learned.
- d. Assurance that the operators are provided with an in-depth understanding of the methods required te establish maintain natural circulation.
- e. Assurance that the operators are provided with a review of major administrative, normal, abnormal, and emergency procedures.
- f. Assurance that all TMI-l licensed operators receive training on the B&W simulator covering the TMI-2 accident.
The instruction provided by the TMI training department was supplemented with that provided by personnel drawn from the TMI Staff, GPU Service Corporation, Babcock and Wilcox, Gilbert Associates, inc., General Physics, and NUS Corporation. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the training provided in the OARP will be made by an independent consultant, Personnel Qualification Services, during the conduct of an audit examination. As a final check, all licensed TMI-1 personnel who have successfully completed the OARP and audit examination will be required to take an NRC administered written and oral license examination.
C. Nuclear Safety Assessment The Nuclear Safety Assessment Department under the Manager of Nuclear Safety Assessment who reports to the Vice President Nuclear Assurance (1) conducts assessments of all facets of nuclear power plant design and operation and considers their potential for compromising nuclear safety and (2) recommends necessary improvements as a result of these assessments. The primary functions include:
- 1. Identify potential problems in nuclear plant design and operation which may compromise nuclear safety and recommend improvements
- ATTACHMENT A (cont.)
where appropriate in areas of staffing, training, operations, budget priorities, maintenance and procedures.
- 2. Investigate and assess the functional controls presently in existence for nuclear plant design and operations and their adequacy to properly assure nuclear safety.
- 3. Advise and assist Functional Managers in developing additional controls, criteria and/or procedures which may be required to control the design and operation of nuclear plants in meeting nuclear safety considerations.
- 4. Provide staff support functions for the Ceneral Office Review Boards and Generation Review Committees for the nuclear plants as required.
- 5. Serve as an office of ombudsman for all members of the Corporation having a concern for nuclear safety.
L.
. ATTACHMENT A (con t. )
- 17. Administration The Administrative Division is headed by the TMI Generation Group Director of Administrative and Personnel Resources Manager, Mr. Fred Glickman.
Mr. Glickman, T4u) for the past six years had headed the Materials Management Function for the GPU Service Company and also has 20 yearsofpriorexperienceinhightechnologyassignmentswiththe General Electric Company, will be named Vice President of Administration in the new GPU Nuclear Corporation.
The Administrative Division is responsible for providing the TMI Generation Group Administrative Service in the following four areas:
Fiscal and Administrative Management
. Materials Management Personnel and Labor Relations Management Safety, Security, and Facilities Management Consolidation of these various Administrative Functions within a dedicated Service Group will significantly ease the administrative work load placed on the other TMI Generation Group Vice Presidents.
This will, in turn, allow them to focus their Division efforts and resources to insure the quality of TMI Operations and Maintenance, Engineering, and Quality Assurance activities important to safety.
L. -
C
-TABLE A
. . . TMI-I INSPEC ION REPORTS YEAR I.R. NO. DATED RESPONSE DATE GQL 1976 76-01 2-27-76 *
'3-22-76 0428 76-02 7-16-76 NA ' '
76-03 3-25-76 4-15-76 0560 76-04 3-4-76 NA 76-05 3-31-76 , NA 76-06 4-1-76 NA 76-07 4-20-76 NA 76-08 5-6-76 6-4-76 0810 7-9-76 0973 76-09 5-13-76 6-4-76 0818 76-10 5-24-76 6-14-76 0870 76-11 5-28-76 6 76 0882 76-12 6-24-76 NA 76-13 7-2-76 7-28-76 1057
, 8-5-76 1116 76-14 7-7-76 NA _
76-15 8-9-76 8-30-76 1241 76-16 8-2-76 8-20-76 1197 76-17 9-15-76 10-5-76 1398 76-18 9-20-76 10-11-76 1423 76-19 8-27-76 9-21-76'- 1318 76'-20 9-15-76 10-7-76 1418
, 76-21 9-27-76 .10-18-76 1438 76-22 9-23-76 NA 76-23 9-24-76 NA 76-24 11-9-76 11-29-76 1622
- s m (Em w ,-%--... #
TABLE A (cont.)
YEAR I.R. NO. DATED RESPONSE DATE GOL 1976 76-25 11-18-76 12-8-76 1687 76-27 12-3'76 NA 76-28 12-30-76 NA 76-29 1-25-77 NA ,
1977 77-01 2-17-77 3-9-77 0279 77-02 3-7-77 NA 77-03 3-4-77 NA 77-04 4-11-77 4-29-77 0570 77-05 3-23-77 4-12-77 0469 77-06 3-24-77 NA 77-07 3-31-77 NA 77-08 4-6-77 NA 77 09 4-8-77 NA 77-10 5-2-77 NA 77-11 6-16-77 5-27-77 0727 77-12 5-16-77 6-3-77 :
77-13 5-10-77 NA 77-14 5-6-77 NA 77-15 5-19-77 6-8-77 0789 77-16 6-8-77 NA 77-17 6-17-77 NA 77-18 7-12-77 8-4-77 1057 77-19 7-6-77 NA 77-20 7-26-77 8-16-77 1135
~
77-21 8-12-77 NA L ,-
TABLE A (cont.)
YEMt. I.R. NO. DATED RESPONSE DATE GOL 1977 77-22 7-28-77 - - NA 77-23 8-19-77 NA ,,
77-24 9-19-77 10-6-77 1369 .
77-25 9-21-77 NA 77-26 9-19-77 _
NA 77-27 9-21-77 10-14-77 1375 77-28 10-3-77 'NA 77-29 10-20-77 11-11-77 1514 l.
77-30 10-5-77 NA 77-31 10-13-77 NA 77-32 10-31-77 11-18-77 1526 77-33 11-10-77 NA 77-34 12-20-77 1-11-78 0012 77-35 12-7-77 12-28-77 1778 77-36 12-19-77 1-5-78 0008 77-37 12-21-77 1-6-78 0020 1978 78-01 1-31-78 2-21-78 0274 78-02 3-6-78 NA 78-03 3-28-78 4-19-78 0705 78-04 3-16-78 NA
- 78-05 4-20-78 NA 78-06 5-11-78 6-1-78 1002 78-07 5-5-78 5-19-78 0959 78-08 5-31-78 6-20-78 1088 78-09 5-25-78 NA 78-10 6-7-78 -
NA ,
TABLE A (con t . )
YEAR I.R. NO. DATED RES?ONSE DATE COL 1978 78-11 6-7-78 . ., NA 78-12 6-30-78 7-25-78
.j 78-13 6-28-78 NA I 78-14 7-7-78 7-21-78 1249 78-15 8-11-78 8-29-78 1450 t
78-16 8-16-78 9-6-78 1481 78-17 9-11-78 NA 78-18 11-21-78 12-22-78 2047 2-8-79 0204 78-19 12-7-78 12-29-78 2071
, 78-20 11-3-78 NA 78-21 11-17-78 'NA 78-22 1-10-79 NA 78-23 1-9-79 NA 78 24 1-5-79 2-1-79 0173 78-25 1-17-79 NA 78-26 1-9-79 1-29-79 0134 1979 79-01 1-29-79 NA _
79-02 2-20-79 NA 79-03 4-20-79 8-29-79 1126 79-04 2-20-79 NA 79-05 3-20-79 NA 79-06 3-21-79 NA 79-07 9-15-79 10-8-79 1232
~
79-08 4-20-79 NA 79-09 6-21-79 NA
TABLE A (cont.)
YEAR I.R. NO. DATED RESPONSE DATE GOL 1979 79-10 9-6-79 10.4-79 1222 79-11 5-21-79 NA 79-12 10-24-79 NA 79-13 8-27-79 NA 79-14 9-7-79 . NA 79-15 11-7-79 NA 79-16 9-7-79 10-8-79 1233 79-17 10-26-79 NA 79-18 10-1-79 NA 79-19 1-14-80 2-5-80 033 79-20 11-26-79 NA
, 79-21 '1-9-80 NA 79-22 12-13-80 NA .
e W
L -
' . a-
. . TABLE B
. 1 .
TMI-II INSPECTION REPORTS i
YEAR I.R. NO. DATED RESPONSE DATE GOL -
1979 79-01 1-27-79 NA 79-02 2-7-79 NA 79-03 2-23-79 NA 79-04 4-20-79 8-29-79 1126 79-05 2-26-7? NA 79-06 9-14-79 10-8-79 1232 11-20-79 12-17-79 1542 1-18-80 79-07 4-20-79 NA 79-08 6-21-79 NA 79-09 6-26-79 NA 79-10 8-1-79 NA 10-25-79 12-5-79 79-11 Not yet issued .
79-12 8-16-79 NA 79-13 8-8-79 NA -
79-14 10-24-79 NA 79-15 8-27-79 9-14-79 1180
- 79-16 9-18-79 NA
- 79-17 8-27-79 NA 79-18 10-19-79 NA 79-19 9-26-79 NA 79-20 9-7-79 10-8-79 1233 79-21 11-5-79 NA 79-22 10-1-79 NA
(
79-23 11-26-79 NA 4
- 2, .,
TABLE-B (cont.)
2-YEAR I.R. NO. DATED RESPONSE DATI GOL 1979 79-24 10-12-79 NA 79-25 1-14-80 .
2-5-80 TLL 033 - -
i 79-26 11-26-80 1-2-80 '1583 i 79-27 Not yet received .
79-28 Not yet received f
79-29 1-9-80
^
TLL 041 i
i i
e
?
l f
i i
i 5
?
i
) l i .
i -- .
,- ,---, ~ , w-- -- - -
-?