ML19305A245
| ML19305A245 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 01/16/1979 |
| From: | Agee J, Hunnicutt D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19305A244 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900280 NUDOCS 7903080172 | |
| Download: ML19305A245 (8) | |
Text
O U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION IV 1
Report No.
99900280/78-01 program No. 51400 Compan /:
Westinghouse Electric Corporation Computer and Instrumentation Division 1441 Alameda Drive Tempe, Arizona 85282 Inspection Conducted: December 18-19, 1978 Inspect::r:
d[ [de
/M4 77
/
JgR. AgeepContractor Inspector, Vendor
'Date Inspection Branch Approved by:
4
/
[
2 D. M. Hunnicutt, phief, ComponentsSection II, Date Vendor Inspection Branch Sumary Inspection conducted on December 18-19,1978(99900280/78-01).
Areas Inscected:
Implementation of Quality Assurance Manual to 10 CFR 50, Appendix S, including action on previous inspection finding; management meeting, design tests / production tests.
The inspection involved sixteen (16) inspector-hours on site by one (1) NRC inspector.
Results :
In the three (3) areas inspected no deviations were identified while one (1) unresolved item was identified in one (1) area. A description of the unresolved item is in the following paragraph.
Deviations: None.
Unresolved. Item: Design tests / production tests - final design / qualification tests are awaiting final evaluation and documentation to verify fulfillment of requirements to satisfy criteria for Class IE products (Details Section 4
D.3.b).
i 7903080l'79-
~
. Details Section A.
Persons Contacted
- A. E. Ellis, Manager of Projects
- T. R. Fisher, Operations Manager
- J. H. Murphy, Manager, Quality Control
- G. E. Waldron, Development Manager
- Attended the exit interview.
B.
Action on Previous Irisoection Findings I
1.
(Closed) Deviation (Report 77-01):
Failure to review supplier quality assurance program in compliance with written procedure.
The inspector verified that written procedures had been implemented to review suoplier quality assurance programs and that the approved supplier list had been updated.
2.
(Closed) Deviation (Report 77-01):
Failure to maintain documentation pertinent to orders that had been placed, specifically Equipment Specificatica 677413.
(1) The inspector verified that the Equipment Spe;ification 677413 which originated at the Westinghouse Industrial Lystem Division office has been submitted to the Westinghouse Ccmputer and Instrumentation Division office where it is maintained as a controlled copy.
(2) The inspector verified that the Quality Assurance Manual, " Quality Control Program, Nuclear Products", QM-102, Revision 2, dated August 9,1978, addresses the quality assurance functions referenced in Customer Specification No. 2323-MS-613, specifically; training, document control, desiga control, procurement control, audits and qualification of audits.
3.
(Closed) Deviation (Report 77-01):
Corporate Standard No.11.60, dated September 1976, was being used for document control without prior approval by the Engineering and Quality Assurance Managers.
The inspector verified the Corporate Standard No.11.60 was not issued at the time of the inspection covered by Report No. 77-01.
Quality functions for document control that would have been included in that corporate standard have since been incorporated in the Engineering Department Procedure (EDP)-01 dated October 16, 1978.
4.
(Closed) Deviation (Report 77-01):
Seismic Specification No.
12AF8725E was erroneously carried for.vard as No.12AF8425E but
8 i related products, namely pressur and differential pressure transmitters to the nuclear induscry and will do so in compliance with applicable regulatory requirements, codes and standards imposed on them by the industry.
D.
Design Tests / Production Tests 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that:
a.
Products are designed and manufactured in compliance with established national codes and regulatory and customer requirements.
b.
Products are designed and manufactured in compliance with authorized specifications and drawings.
c.
Certified documentation is provided for all nuclear safety-related products manufactured.
2.
Method of Accomolishment
?
The preceding objectives were accomplished by:
3 a.
Discussions with design engineering personnel responsible for the design and development of the pressure and differential pressure transmitters that are produced.
b.
Review of Section 3, Design Control of the Quality Assurance Manual, Quality Control Program, Nuclear Products, QM-102, Revision 2, dated August 9, 1978.
c.
Review of the design specifications, procedures, drawings and documents including the following:
(1.) Engineering Design Procedure, EDP-10, Design Control, dated October 16, 1978.
(2) Engineering Design Procedure, EDP-04, Design Verification, dated October 16, 1978.
(3) Nuclear Energy Systems (W) PWR Systems Division, Control and Electrical Systems Standards, Electronic Pressure Transmitters, Section 2.30 dated September 26, 1974.
(12) Customer Purchase Order 546-ALC-280220-BP, July 18, 1978.
(13) Engineering Book No. 155816 which documents radiation test program for Level A Transmitters.
3.
Findings a.
Deviations None.
b.
Unresolved Item Although the safety-related, Class IE, Level B transmitters are currently in production the final qualification test documentation has not been published.
This data is in the final evaluation stage for approval prior to shipment of the products. Since the final documentation was not available for review this item will remain open for review in a subsequent inspection.
E.
Quality Assurance Manual / Program Implementation 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that:
a.
The QA Manual had been revised and implemented to meet applicable customer requirements and the intent of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B for the production of nuclear safety related products.
b.
Adequate QA procedures had been implemented.
2.
Method of Accomolishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by:
a.
Discussions with QA management personnel regarding the status of the QA program related to the production of nuclear safety-related products, b.
Review of the Quality Assurance, Quality Control Program, Nuclear Products Manual, QM-102, Revision 2, August 9,1978.
(This manual with related procedures was compiled and implemented specifically for the design and production of Class IE, safety-related products for the nuclear industry).
. F.
Exit Interview The inspector met with Management representatives (denoted by asterisk, paragraph A) at the conclusion of the inspection on December 19, 1978.
The inspector summarized the scope of the inspection which included the following areas in which one (1) unresolved item was identified:
1.
Management Meeting.
2.
Action on previous inspection findings.
3.
Design Tests / Production Tests.
4.
Quality Assurance Manual program implementation.
The management representatives had no comments in response to each of the areas discussed by the inspector.
e