ML19303A822
| ML19303A822 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 11/20/1981 |
| From: | Mattson R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19303A823 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-FIN-A-3320-2, FOIA-84-237 20-82-051, 20-82-51, NUDOCS 8201140095 | |
| Download: ML19303A822 (7) | |
Text
.
NRC,F ORM 173 u.s. nucle AR REcutATO v couMiss ON ORDE R FrVMIE R (2-78) 20-82-051~
^'
STANDARD ORDER FOR DOE WORK November 20, 1981 ISSUED TO: IDOE Office)
ISSUE D BY: (NRC Of f ace)
ACCOUNTING CIT ATION Brookhaven Area Office Office of Nuclear Reactor APPROPRIATIOl'. SYMBOL Regulation, DSI 31X0200.202 B&R NUMBER PERFORMING ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION 20-19-40-42-3 Brookhaven National Laboratory F IN NUMDE R A3320-2 Upton, New York WORK PERIOD THIS ORDE R FIN TITLE FIXED D ESTIMATED Z Mark III LOCA Pool Dynamic Program (I) g"3)f79 Tfj/01/82 OBLIGATION AVAILABILITY PROVIDED Bv:
A. THIS ORDER
$50,000 B.
TOTAL OF ORDERS PLACED PRIOR TO THIS DATE WITH 1HE PERFORMING ORGANIZ ATION UND R S M PP 1 ATION SYMBOL" AND THE FIRST FOUR DIGITS OF THE s 493,000 C. TOTAL ORDERS TO DATE (TOTAL A & B) s 543,000 D. AMOUNT INCLUDED IN C" APPLICABLE TO THE " FIN NUMBER" CITED IN THIS ORDE R.
$ 50,000 FINANCIAL FLEXf BILITY:
@ FUNDS WILL NOT BE REPROGRAMMED BETWEEN FINS. LINE D CONSTITUTES A LIMITATION ON OBLIGATIONS 3
AUTHORIZE D.
O FUNDS MAY BE REPROGRAMMED NOT TO EXCEED 110% OF FIN LEVEL UP TO $50K. LINE C CONSTITUTES A LIMITATION ON OBLIGATIONS AUTHORIZED.
STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS PROVIDED DOE ARE CONSIDERED PART OF THIS ORDER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
ATTACHMENTS:
THE FOLLOWING ATTACHMENTS ARE HEREBY SECURITY:
MADE A PART OF THIS ORDER:
$ WORK ON THIS ORDER l$ NOT CLASSIFIED.
Q STATEMENT OF WORK (Modification)
O WORK ON THIS ORDER INVOLVES CLASSIFIED D ADDITIONALTERMS AND CONDITIONS INFORMATION. NRC FORM 187 IS ATTACHED.
O OTHER REMAR KS:
This order modifies the work for this project identified in the BNL proposal dated May 30,1980 and NRR Order 20-81-41 and provides incremental funds for initiation of Task 5.
A revised proposal that reflects the entire effort for this work should be submitted within 60 days.
Please provide a copy of the revised proposal to B. L. Grenier, NRR.
After acceptance, please send to the NRC Office of the Controller, ATTN: D. Dandois, and provide a copy to the OffiLe of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, ATTN: D. Corley, d$sVING AUTHORITY ACCEPTING ORGANIZATION
$oger Ma
&l TITL E TtTLE Division of Systems Integration DATE NRCFORM 173 (2 78) 8201240095 811120 CF SUBJ Up0fL--JLjt CF
Statement of Work
Title:
Mark III LOCA Pool Dynamics Program (1) rIN #:
A3320 l
B&R #:
20-19-40-42-3 l
Technical Monitor:
Mel B. Fields (FTS 492-9417).
Cognizant Branch Chief: Walter R. Butler (FTS 492-9412) l Back:;-ound Mark III containment suppression pools must be able to wit. stand the effects of
)
a loss of coolant accident (LOCA). General Electric has conducted numerous ex-l perimental and analytical studies in order to define the LOCA loads sufficiently.
In order to evaluate the loads, the studies must be reviewed to assure that they i
are technically sound and will result in conservative load definition.
Objective j
The objective of this work is to have BNL review the Mark III LOCA containment I
loads obtained from analytical and experimental studies submitted by General Electric and the Mark III owners, and to advise the NRC of the adequacy of these methodologies.
Work Requirements j
i TASK 1 Review Containment Loads Report (CLR) i The estimated completion dates have been changed because of delays on.the part of General Electric (GE) and unexpected difficulties in resolving differences between the NRC and GE (identified as an additional task. Task 5).
No change is expected in the funding requirements.
Subtasks Estimated Completion Date a.
Review the Containment Loads Report (CLR)
GESSAR-II Appendix 3B, and evaluate the tech-nical adequacy of the LOCA related load metho-odologies presented in this report.
August 1,1980 b.
Assess General Electric's reply to the staff's review of the CLR.
August 1,1980 c.
Submit draft SER on the CLR.
January 1,1982 d.
Provide final report on CLR for inclusion in 4
the publication of the NUREG for the Mark III i
program.
March 1,1982 i
i Enclosure '2--
.l
' TASK 2 Full-Scale Chugging Tests The estimated completion dates have been changed because of delays on the part of General Electric (GE) and unexpected difficulties in resolving differences be-tween the NRC and GE (identified as an additional task Task 5). No change is expected in the funding requirements.
babtasks
. Estimated Completion Date a.
Review the full-scale test program results con-tained in GE document NEDE-21853-P, August 1978 and evaluate the technical adequacy of the chug-ging loads and thermal stratification loads, in order that better load definition may be obtained for the Mark III containments.
August 7,1980 b.
Assess GE's reply to the staff's review of the full-scale chugging tests.
August 1,1981 c.
Submit draft report on the full-scale chugging tests.
January 1,1982 d.
Provide final report on the full-scale chugging tests for inclusion in the NUREG to be published on the Mark III program.
March 1,1982 TASK 3 Horizontal Vent Interaction Tests The estbated complet. ion dates have been changed because of delays on the part of General Eletric (GE) and unexpected difficulties in resolving differences be-tween the NRC and GE (identified as an additional task, Task 5). No change is expected in the funding requirements.
Subtasks Estimated Completion Date a.
Review the 1/9th scale horizontal vent interaction test results contained in GE document NEDE-24648-P, May 1979 to determine the adequacy cf the pool small loads, steam condensation loads 4.nd thermal stratification loads as presented in the ICLP, for Mark III containments.
August 7,1980 b.
Assess GE's reply to the staff's rev.iew of the' hori-zontal vent interaction tests.
August 1,1981 c.
Submit draft report on horizontal vent interaction j
tests.
January 1,1982 1
d.
Provide final report on the horizontal vent inter-i action tests for incorporation into the Mark III I
NUREG publication.
~
March 1,1982 1
I
j
. Formulation of Independent AC i
TASK 4 The estimated completion dates have been changed because of delays on the part of General Electric (GE) and unexpected difficulties in resolving differences be-!
tween the NRC and GE (identified as an additional task Task 5). No change is expected in the funding requirements.
Subtasks Estimated Completion Date a.
In the loading areas where the vendors' methods are judged unacceptable, formulate independent I
acceptance criteria for inclusion into the draft SER.
January 1, 1982 i
b.
Document the AC in a form suitable for inclusion
[
in the NRC Mark III NUREG.
March 1,1982 Resolve Differences Between GE Load Specifications and NRC Position TASK 5 Because of the problems created by unexpected difficulties in resolving the pool dynamic issues with GE, greater effort is required to resolve these problems. The est,imated level of effort required for this task is 6 man-months'.
Subtasks Estimated Completion Date a.
In the areas that require extra effort to resolve, submit draft report on resolution of these topics.
January 1,1982 I
b.
Document this resolution in a form suitable for in-clusion in the Mark III NUREG.
March 1,1982 Level of Effort and Period of Performance f
The level of effort for this modification is 6 man-months.- The total. project effort it estimate / at 2.5 man years over a 28 month period.
Reporting Requirements 4
1.
Submit draft reports on Tasks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 approximately 30 days before submittal of final topical reports.
I 2.
Upon completion of Tasks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, prepare and submit a reproducible l
topical report for each task to the cognizant branch chief containing all sig-nificant technical conclusions arising from the review, and all analyses upon which these conclusions were drawn.
?
4-3.
A monthly business letter re) ort will be submitted by the 15th of the month to the cognizant branc1 chief with a copy to the Director, DSS, Attn:
B. L. Grenier. These reports will contain the following:
l A summary of the progress and work completed during the period, i
including milestones reached or if missed, an exp;anation provided; The amount of funds expended during the period and cumulative to date; If problers are encountered or anticipated, a description of the plans for their resolution, the schedule of their implementation and their impact on the overall program; r
Plans for the next reporting period.
MEETINGS AND TRAVEL i
Two trips of three people eacN to San Jose, California and approximately four trips to Bethesda, MD to reet with the Owners Group and GE concerning the MARK III Program should be planned and budgeted. Three BNL personnel are l
expected for each trip. The dates will be determined between the Technical Monitor and BNL.
NRC FURNISHED MATERIALS j
NRC staff will furnish BNL under separate cover with copies of the referenced General Electric Company reports, applicant submittals. NUREG documents, related foreign r; ports and NRC staff Task Action Plans. Some of this material i
will contain proprietary data, which must be held in confidence by the contractor.
i BILLING REQUIREMENTS j
Vouchers submitted for payment should list expenditures for manpower, computer services, and any other major items of expenditure.
f f
.--ew m.--,-.-
....%_,.s w __
.a
u..
FROP35t.'. COSTENT The minimum items required in all proposals are:
1.
performing organization's name and location.
2.
FIN Title, FIN Namber, and BLR Humber (NRC's) (as on statement of we'rk) 3.
Peric.c.ing o ganization's key personnel, program manager, or principal investigatr, their resumes and F15 phone number.
4.
Background (definition of the problem including the objective (s) to be attained).
5.
Work to be performed (Provide a concise description of tasks to be performed and expected results for the period of performance. Note technical data requirements, potential problems, and other technical information needed to fully explain the effort. Highlight changes from prior authorized 50W's, if any, identify changes in performance, schedule, er costs).
6.
Identify major subcontracts, including consultants.
-- 7.
Costs estimated to be incurred by DDE contractors, subcontractors, and consultants. List by fiscal year to completion:
Manyears of Technical Support (KTS) a.
b.
Costs:
i (1) Direct Salaries (Labor) for MTS
~
i (2) Material and Services (excluding ADP)
(3) Total ADP Support (4) Subcontracts (5) Capital Equipment i
(6) Direct Travel Expense (Foreign travel must be shown separately)
(7) General and Administrative Expense (Include indirect lab'cr cost)
- c. Total Estimated Cost:
8.
Forecasts:
Milestone Chart for accomplishing the work.
a.
4 i
peugug> *ee eeuw.. -
-r
~e 1-2 l
b.
Planned monthly rate of costs by fiscal year. This may be provided with the first report of an authorized progra, if j
not known at time of proposal submittal. At the beginning of each subsequent year, reports should include the planned monthly rate of costs for the ensuing year.
S.
Conflict of Interest:
In order to assist the Conrnission in its evaluation, the DDE Contracting i
Officer.shall describe any significant contractual and organizational relationships of the DDE, its contractor, their employees, or expected subcontractors or consultants on this proposal, with industries regulated by the NRC (e-g. utilities, etc.) and suppliers thereof (e.g. architect engineers and reattor manufacturers, etc.) that might give rise to an apparent or actual conflict of interest.
- 10. Reportirsg Requirements (as on statement of Uk).
l
~
}
i t
t l
h k
h
]__
.L
= = - - - -
r m