ML19296C392
| ML19296C392 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Calvert Cliffs  |
| Issue date: | 02/14/1980 |
| From: | Conner E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Reid R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8002250778 | |
| Download: ML19296C392 (3) | |
Text
(.
[()-}
((
~
MEETING fl0TICE DISTRIBUTION ORB #4 Docket File W. Gammill
/ACPDR L. Shao L PDR J. Miller, D0R ORB #4 Rdg P. T. Kuo (seismic reviews only) flRR Rdg H. Gaut, State Programs H. Denton AE0D E. G. Case g
r D. Eisenhut R. Vollmer W. Russell
~
B. Grimes T. J. Carter
[~
A. Schwencer D. Ziemann T. Ippolito R. Reid V. floonan P. Check G. Lainas G. Knighton Project fianager-M. Conner OELD OI&E(3)
OSD S. Showe, I&E (PWR)
R. Ingram Receptionist, Bethesda R. Fraley, ACRS (16)
Program Support Branch TERA J. R. Buchanan Meeting flotice File fiRC Participants G. Knighton W. Pasedag M. Wohl 8009250 7 7 f
.=
Enclosure STAFF'S CONCERNS CALVERT CLIFFS LNG CONTINGENCY PLAN REVIEW l.
Discuss your continuing efforts in the area of LNG vapor cloud detection technology.
2.
Describe your experience with the nonitoring of broadcast comunication links with the Coast Guard.
Discuss the status of progress of letters of agreement between the Coast Guard and Cove Point with respect to notifying the plant of any difficulty with LHG spills / handling.
3.
State why the control room is an acceptable place to assemble and store breathing apparatus.
State the number of people to be processed, the number of airpacks on hand, and the time required to complete this protective measure.
4.
Assume an LNG vapor cloud on-site.
a.
Provide estimates of the duration of the plant's immersion in the cloud, and correlate those estimates with the proposed emergency actions.
b.
Discuss the basis for inhibiting the diesel generators from starting.
Describe the means of and time requirements for inhibiting the c.
diesels from starting d.
Discuss the means of purging the diesel rooms of vaporized LNG after the cloud disperses.
Discuss means of protection of the battery room from LNG vapor hazards.
e.
f.
Discuss the available power sources after the batteries are exhausted (including system / component sequencing).
g.
In light of the possible non-availability of the diesel generators, explain the reason for the two hour duration availability of the D.C. battery power supply, and state why this is considered to be adequate.
h.
Discuss the impact on the switchyard of detonation / deflagration of the LNG cloud.
- i. Discuss the need for and availability of alternative access ways to the site if a cloud detonation / deflagration were to occur.
pa atcoq S
UNITED STATES
[ty ', (f' 'g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION S, k @f:#cf/
5/'
C WASHING TON, D. C. 20555 e
February 14, 1980 Dockets Nos. 50-317 & 318 MEP.0RANDUM FOR:
Robert W. Reid, Chief, Operating Reactors Branch #4, Division of Operating Reactors FROM:
E. L. Conner, Project Manager, Operating Reactors Branch #4, Division of Operating Reactors
SUBJECT:
FORTHCOMING MEETING WITH BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC (BG&E) ON THE LNG CONTINGENCY PLAN FOR CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT (CCNPP)
Date & Time:
Thursday, February 21, 1980 1:00 p.m.
Location:
P-ll4, Phillips Building, Bethesda, Maryland
Purpose:
To discuss the enclosed staff concerns related to the LNG contingency plan review for CCNPP.
Particants:
NRC G. Knighton, W. Pasedag, M. Wohl, M. Conner BGRE R. Olson & R. Denton
. $. byv~J f
w E. L. Conner, Project Manager Operating Reactors Branch #4 Division of Operating Reactors
Enclosure:
Staff's Concerns cc w/ enclosure: See last page