ML19296B078
| ML19296B078 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/08/1980 |
| From: | Felton J NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Braun M AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| References | |
| FOIA-80-44 NUDOCS 8002200014 | |
| Download: ML19296B078 (2) | |
Text
LLf LY j [l' X
(!L) 8',,,,, e #'
UNITED STATES
/
[ 'yp ry'%'g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[ r lid '[f s; rg/,14
% (\\.~;
.,j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 t '!gMHg#g February 8, 1980 Mr. Mike Braun 503 E. Stoughton Street Apartment 2 IN RESPONSE REFER Champaign, IL 61820 TO FOIA-80-44
Dear Mr. Braun:
This is in further response to your letter dated January 16,1980, in which you requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, copies of the Reed Report and the list of 27 safety related considerations, and any records which NRC relied on in determining that these issues were previously known.
Copies of the documents listed in Appendix A are enclosed.
Sincere y, ff JE5k
/J
. M. Felton, Director Division of Rules and Records Office of Administration
Enclosures:
As stated 8002200 b I
' bb Ib F01A-80-44 (YCO L L
(,
APPENDIX A
~
1.
October 30, 1978, MEMORAt1DUM IN SUPPORT OF GENERAL ELECTRIC MOTI0'l TO QUASH (Black Fox Stations Units 1 and 2) Docket Nos. STfl 50-556 and STN 50-557 (47 pages) a.
February 25, 1976, Attachment 4 to Seciton II.D By:
Ben C. Ruche pages 883-884 (2 pages) b.
February 29, 1978, Affidavit of Robert it. Ketchel Docket Nos.
STf1 50-556 and 50-557 (2 pages) c.
March 6, 1978 T0:
Dr. Sherwood FROM:
Roger J. flattson, Director (2 pages) d.
March 22, 1978, T0:
Dr. Roger J. Mattson, Director FROM:
Glenn G.
Sherwood, Manager
SUBJECT:
Request for Reed Report Information (5 pages) e.
May 26, 1978 T0: General Electric Company FROM:
Glenn Sherwood
SUBJECT:
Request for Reed Report Information (5 pages) f.
July 10,1978, T0:
Dr. Glenn Sherwood FROM:
Roger J. Mattson, Director SUBJECT Request for withholding Information from Public Disclosure (2 pages) 9.'
October 27, 1978 Affidavit of Glenn G. Shenvood (5 pages) h.
October 30, 1978 Certificate.of Service Docket Nos. STN 50-556 and STN 50-557 (2 pages) 1.
October 30, 1978 Notice of Special Appearance, George L. Edgar, Docket Nos. STN 50-556 and STN 50-557 (2 pages)
- j. October 30, 1978 Notice of Special Appearance,)Kevin P. Galler, Docket Nos. STN 50-556 and STN 50-557 (2 pages f
2.
November 7, 1978, Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board --
Applicants' Brief in Support of General Electric's Motion to quash Subpoena, Docket Nos. STN 50-556 and STN 50-557 (23 pages)
5L LC(L
, y O( hqj
~
l
(
9 503 E. Stoughton St. Apt.2 Champaign, IL 61820 (217) 398-5061 Jan. 16, 1980 dr~ctor, C f i c e of P A-ini r tratj ot FiiEEDOIA OF INFOM/.ATION
.ucisar w,1ntarv C om.1 e r i c-
/sCT REQUEST y,. -.
f0.&J00 ~ h.h.-
unnh,nrton,
.>.C.
3C " c i
g /g f y g g
Dear cir:
Thic ir n W-uo"+ ur er the Tre c i cr o f In 'cr~.ation ac t an amended d
( < 'I. 3. C. 5 %2 ).
I wri te to requect a copy of the 1975 General Elcetric Product Im-provement Study on Boiling Water Reactors (also known as the Reed Report) and a copy of the 27 safety related incues that was extracted from this Report.
In addition, the NRC Staff Report, Other Issues Raised by Messrs. Pol-lard. Bridenbaugh, et.n1-found in the Hearings before the Joint Com-34 th Congress, second session, vol.2, appen-mittee on Atomic Energy, dix 14, page 1495, a copy of which is enclosed, states that the NRC I request a copy had previously been aware of all 27 safety issues.
of any records which the URC relied on in determining that these is-sues were previously known.
the amended Act provides that if some parts of a file As you know, exempt from release that " reasonably segregable" portions shall are I therefore request that if you determine that some por-be provided.tions of the requested records are exempt, you provide me immediately with a copy of the remainder of the record.
If you determine that some or all of the documents are exempt from I would appreciate your advising me as to which exemption
- release, you believe covers the material which you are withholding.
The amended Act allows for the waiver of fees if it "is in the public interest because furnishing theinformation can be considered as pri-I believe this request plainly fits marily benefitting the public."
that category and ask you to waive any fees.
As provided for in the amended Act. I will expect to receive a reply within ten working days.
Sincerely yours, l}
Q.iuawL Mike Braun c-en l
7002 nom