ML19295B865
| ML19295B865 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 09/15/1980 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19295B864 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8010100416 | |
| Download: ML19295B865 (9) | |
Text
.
License No. 25-17563-01 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Based on the results of the NRC inspection conducted on August 27, 1980, certain activities appear to be in noncompliance with NRC regulations and the conditions of your NRC License No. 25-17563-01 as indicated below:
1.
License Condition 12 requires that licensed material be used by, or under the supervision of, specified individuals.
Contrary to this requirement, individuals other than those specified were supervising use of material at the time of the inspection.
This is an infraction.
2.
License Condition 13. A(1) requires that sealed sources shall be tested for leakage and/or contamination at intervals not to exceed six months.
Con + iry to this requirement, a Troxler gauge Model 3411, serial number 5061, containing an 8 millicurie cesium-137 sealed source and a 40 millicurie americium-241 sealed source, was not tested during the period February 21, 1978, to May 9, 1980.
This is an infraction.
3.
10 CFR 19.11(a)(b) requires that each licensee shall post current copies of specified regulations and the license or a notice specifying where such documents may be examined.
Contrary to this requirement, neither the documents nor a notice were posted at the time of the inspection.
This is a deficiency.
4.
10 CFR 20.407 requires that a personnel monitoring report be submitted to the NRC within the calendar quarter of 1980 for the total number of individuals from whom personnel monitoring was required or provided during calender year 1979.
Contrary to this requirement, such a report was not submitted by the licensee.
This is a deficiency.
8010100 @
- -.. - ~ ~ ~
[
UNITED STATES f y*' 7.
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION h,l *.
WASHINGTON, D.C.
20545 o
December 31, 1974 To: All AEC Licensees CRI - A FOR DE M INING ENFORCEMENT ACTION AND CATEGORIES OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITR AEC REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS - MODIFICATIONS On Scvember 1,1972, the Co:=11ssion issued criteria for enforcement actions to be taken for noncompliance with its rules and with license conditions in accordance with Sections 161, 186, and 234 of the Atomic Energy Act and Subpart B of Part 2, 10 CFR.
On June 5, 1973, the Coretission notified licensees that categories of violation with AEC regulatory requirements had been~ established because the Commission and the nuclear industry recognized that the significance of violations varies in the potential for affecting the health and safety of the public, the com=on defense and security, and the environment.
Based on a review of the experience with the criteria for determining enforcement action and the categories of noncompliance, modifications of the use of these criteria and these categories are being :tade.
Comments explaining the modifications are enclosed as Attach =ents A and B.
The changes in th'e cr'iteria and categories are primarily administrativa in nature and should result in a higher level of understanding of the enforcement progra= - and the results of the program - on the part of the public and the industry. The basic purpose of the enforcecent program - enhance =ent of-the health and safety of the public, the coc: mon defense and security, and the environment - re=ains the same. The long standing practice of requiring corrective action for each identified item of noncompliance (Violations) is not changed.
The enforcement program continues to emphasize corrective action where necessary to assure that regulated activities meet applicable requirements and are. conducted with due regard for public health and safety, co==on defence and security and protection of the environ =ent.
The codifications clarify the enforcement criteria and categori'es of nonce =pliance in the areas of safeguards and environ = ental ::atters and provide core explicit def.initions to aid in a better understanding of the enforce =ent progran. These definitions make clear the applicability of the progra= in =atters of quality assurance, =anagement control, and syst se the Cocmission relies to a degree on re ective action is taken important =atters DUPLICATE DOCUMENT Entire document previously entered into system under:
ANO M <:6 % M d 6 %
No. of pages:
h
,