Beyond Nuclear, Inc.'S Motion for Leave to File Reply to Oppositions to Motion to Reopen the Record of Proceeding for Subsequent License Renewal of Peach Bottom Operating LicenseML19294C305 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Peach Bottom |
---|
Issue date: |
10/21/2019 |
---|
From: |
Curran D Beyond Nuclear, Harmon, Curran, Harmon, Curran, Spielberg & Eisenberg, LLP |
---|
To: |
NRC/OCM |
---|
SECY RAS |
References |
---|
50-277-SLR, 50-278-SLR, ASLBP 19-960-01-SLR-BD01, RAS 55378 |
Download: ML19294C305 (3) |
|
|
---|
Category:Legal-Pleading
MONTHYEARML22090A2712022-03-31031 March 2022 Constellation Response to Beyond Nuclear and Staff Views in Response to CLI-22-04 ML22090A2492022-03-31031 March 2022 Staff Response to Views on Practical Effects ML22090A2692022-03-31031 March 2022 Beyond Nuclears Response to Constellation Energy Generation, LLCs and NRC Staffs Views on CLI-22-04 ML22080A2752022-03-21021 March 2022 Renewed License - Attachment to NRC Staff Views ML22080A2762022-03-21021 March 2022 Renewed License - Attachment to NRC Staff Views ML22080A2742022-03-21021 March 2022 NRC Staff Views on the Practical Effects of (1) the Subsequent Renewed Licenses Continuing in Place and (2) the Previous Licenses Being Reinstated ML22080A2502022-03-21021 March 2022 Constellation Energys Response to Commission Request for Views in CLI-22-04 ML22076A0892022-03-17017 March 2022 Beyond Nuclears Response to Constellation Energys Petition for Partial Reconsideration of CLI-22-04 and Beyond Nuclears Views in Response to CLI-22-04 ML22066B3352022-03-0707 March 2022 Constellation Energy Generations Petition for Partial Reconsideration of CLI-22-04 ML22001A0032022-01-0101 January 2022 Notice of Withdrawal of Mitzi Young on Behalf of NRC Staff ML21328A2492021-11-24024 November 2021 Notice of Withdrawal of the People of the State of Illinoiss Hearing Request and Petition for Leave to Intervene ML21225A7632021-08-13013 August 2021 People of the State of Illinoiss Reply to Exelons Answer to Their Request for a Hearing Regarding Exelon Generation Company, LLCs Facility Operating License Transfer Application ML21218A1702021-08-0606 August 2021 The Environmental Law and Policy Centers Reply to Applicants Answer ML21218A1712021-08-0606 August 2021 Certificate of Service ML21218A1982021-08-0606 August 2021 Exelons Answer Opposing Petition of the State of Illinois for Leave to Intervene and Request for a Hearing ML21211A5932021-07-30030 July 2021 Exelons Answer Opposing the Petition of the Environmental Law and Policy Center for Leave to Intervene and for a Hearing ML21200A2292021-07-19019 July 2021 Reply to Exelons Answer Opposing Petition of Edf Inc. for Leave to Intervene and Request a Hearing ML21193A3282021-07-12012 July 2021 Notice of Appearance of Susan L. Satter ML21193A3292021-07-12012 July 2021 Certificate of Service ML21193A3642021-07-12012 July 2021 Exelons Answer Opposing the Petition of Eric Joseph Epstein and Three Mile Island Alert, Inc for Leave to Intervene and for a Hearing ML21193A3652021-07-12012 July 2021 Exelons Answer Opposing Petition of Edf Inc. for Leave to Intervene and Request for a Hearing ML21181A3762021-06-30030 June 2021 Combined Motion of Exelon to File Its Answers to the Edf and Epstein-TMIA Hearing Requests on Illinois New Hearing Request Deadline and Motion of Elpc to Move Exelon Deadline to Answer Elpc Hearing Request to July 30 2021 ML21171A0092021-06-20020 June 2021 Exelons Answer Opposing the State of Illinoiss Motion to Yet Again Amend the Protective Order ML21155A1212021-06-0404 June 2021 Joint Motion to Amend Protective Order ML21155A1222021-06-0404 June 2021 Proposed Order Granting Joint Motion to Amend Protective Order ML21141A3482021-05-21021 May 2021 Applicants Answer Opposing Environmental Law and Policy Centers Motion to Extend Hearing Request Deadline ML21130A6782021-05-10010 May 2021 Joint Motion for Entry of a Protective Order ML20064H0952020-03-0404 March 2020 Notification of NRC Staff Communication with the Commission Regarding EPA ML20042F8342020-02-11011 February 2020 Notice of Availability of FSEIS ML19310G5512019-11-0606 November 2019 Notice of Withdrawal for Rebecca Susko ML19304A2062019-10-31031 October 2019 Exelon'S Answer Opposing Beyond Nuclear'S Motion for Leave to File Reply to Oppositions to Motion to Reopen the Record ML19304C5952019-10-31031 October 2019 NRC Staff Answer to Beyond Nuclear, Inc.'S Motion for Leave to Reply ML19294C3032019-10-21021 October 2019 Beyond Nuclear, Inc.'S Reply to Oppositions to Motion to Reopen the Record of Proceeding for Subsequent License Renewal of Peach Bottom Operating License ML19294C3052019-10-21021 October 2019 Beyond Nuclear, Inc.'S Motion for Leave to File Reply to Oppositions to Motion to Reopen the Record of Proceeding for Subsequent License Renewal of Peach Bottom Operating License ML19294C3082019-10-21021 October 2019 Beyond Nuclear, Inc.'S Reply to Oppositions to Motion for Leave to File a New Contention Based on Draft Supplement 10 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement for Subsequent License Renewal of Peach Bottom Operating License ML19276J7462019-10-0303 October 2019 NRC Staff Answer to Beyond Nuclear Inc.'S: Motion for Leave to File New Contention Based on Draft Supplement to Generic Environmental Impact Statement; and Motion to Reopen the Record and for Consideration of Arguments Out of Time ML19276F6132019-10-0303 October 2019 Exelon'S Answer Opposing Beyond Nuclear'S Motion for Leave to File a New Contention and Motion to Reopen the Record ML19265A0062019-09-22022 September 2019 Beyond Nuclear, Inc.'S Motion to Reopen the Record for Purposes of Considering and Admitting a New Contention Based on Draft Supplement 10 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement for Subsequent License Renewal of Peach Bottom ML19265A0072019-09-22022 September 2019 Beyond Nuclear, Inc.'S Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Reply to Exelon'S and NRC Staff'S Responses to Beyond Nuclear'S Motion for Leave to File New Contention ML19248D0922019-09-0505 September 2019 Errata to Beyond Nuclear, Inc.'S Motion for Leave to File New Contention Based on Draft Supplement 10 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement for Subsequent License Renewal of Peach Bottom Operating License ML19248D0952019-09-0505 September 2019 Beyond Nuclear, Inc.'S Motion for Leave to File New Contention Based on Draft Supplement 10 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement for Subsequent License Renewal of Peach Bottom Operating License (Corrected) ML19246C3012019-09-0303 September 2019 Beyond Nuclear, Inc.'S Motion for Leave to File New Contention Based on Draft Supplement 10 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement for Subsequent License Renewal of Peach Bottom Operating License ML19241B3712019-08-29029 August 2019 NRC Staff Answer to Beyond Nuclear Motion for Leave to Reply ML19241A3772019-08-29029 August 2019 Answer Opposing Beyond Nuclear'S Motion to File a Reply Brief ML19231A4722019-08-19019 August 2019 Beyond Nuclear Motion for Leave to Reply in Part to Oppositions to Beyond Nuclear'S Brief on Appeal of LBP-19-05 ML19231A4772019-08-19019 August 2019 Beyond Nuclear Reply Brief on Appeal of LBP-19-05 (Refiled) ML19231A4732019-08-19019 August 2019 Beyond Nuclear Reply Brief on Appeal of LBP-19-05 ML19221B5352019-08-0909 August 2019 Exelon'S Brief in Opposition to Beyond Nuclear'S Appeal of LBP-19-05 ML19221B7382019-08-0909 August 2019 NRC Staff Brief in Opposition to Beyond Nuclear Appeal of LBP-19-05 ML19196A3712019-07-15015 July 2019 Beyond Nuclear'S Notice of Appeal of LBP-19-05 2022-03-07
[Table view] |
Text
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION
___________________________________
)
In the Matter of )
Exelon Generation Company, LLC ) Docket Nos. 50-277/278 SLR Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, ) October 21, 2019 Units 2 & 3 )
___________________________________ )
BEYOND NUCLEAR, INC.S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO OPPOSITIONS TO MOTION TO REOPEN THE RECORD OF PROCEEDING FOR SUBSEQUENT LICENSE RENEWAL OF PEACH BOTTOM OPERATING LICENSE Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 2.323(b), Beyond Nuclear, Inc. (Beyond Nuclear) hereby moves for leave to submit the attached reply to oppositions by Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) Staff to Beyond Nuclears Motion to Reopen the Record for Purposes of Considering and Admitting a New Contention Based on Draft Supplement 10 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement for Subsequent License Renewal of Peach Bottom Operating License and Request for Consideration of some Elements of the Motion Out of Time (Sept. 23, 2019) (Motion to Reopen).1 Beyond Nuclear respectfully submits that the circumstances giving rise to this motion are compelling and warrant a reply in order to ensure that a complete and meaningful record is made on Beyond Nuclears motion. First, Beyond Nuclear could not have anticipated the legal arguments made by Exelon and the NRC Staff interpreting relevant judicial precedents, including Union of Concerned Scientists v. NRC, 920 F.2d 50 (D.C. Cir. 1990) and New Jersey 1
See Exelons Answer Opposing Beyond Nuclears Motion for Leave to File a New Contention and Motion to Reopen the Record (Oct. 3, 2019) (Exelon Response); NRC Staff Answer to Beyond Nuclear Inc.s: Motion for Leave to File New Contention Based on Draft Supplement to Generic Environmental Impact Statement; and Motion to Reopen the Record and for Consideration of Arguments Out of Time (Oct. 2, 2019) (NRC Staff Response).
Environmental Federation v. NRC, 645 F.3d 220 (3rd Cir. 2011), which are either inconsistent with the language of the decisions or inapplicable to the circumstances of this case. Beyond Nuclear also could not have anticipated Exelons interpretation of NRC caselaw, including Virginia Elec. and Power Co. (North Anna Power Station, Unit 3), CLI-12-14, 75 N.R.C. 692, 700 (2012). Beyond Nuclear seeks an opportunity to address the applicability of those precedents to the circumstances of this case.
Beyond Nuclear also seeks an opportunity to address Exelons and the NRC Staffs argument that Beyond Nuclears failure to file its motion to reopen the record at the same time as its Motion to Admit Contention 3 constitutes a fatal defect that may not be excused. Beyond Nuclear seeks to point out that the error of its counsel was excusable, give the regulations lack of clarity; and that the only relevant information submitted out of time consisted of two standing declarations, to which neither Exelon nor the Staff has objected.
Respectfully submitted,
___/signed electronically by/__
Diane Curran Harmon, Curran, Spielberg, & Eisenberg, L.L.P.
1725 DeSales Street N.W., Suite 500 Washington, D.C. 20036 240-393-9285 dcurran@harmoncurran.com October 21, 2019 CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL PURSUANT TO 10 C.F.R. § 2.323(b)
I certify that on October 18, 2019, I contacted counsel for Exelon and the NRC in a sincere effort to resolve the issues raised in this motion. Counsel for both Exelon and the Staff stated that they will oppose the motion.
___/signed electronically by/__
Diane Curran 2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION
___________________________________
)
In the Matter of )
Exelon Generation Company, LLC ) Docket Nos. 50-277/278 SLR Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, )
Units 2 & 3 )
___________________________________ )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on October 21, 2019, I posted copies of the foregoing BEYOND NUCLEAR, INC.S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO OPPOSITIONS TO MOTION TO REOPEN THE RECORD OF PROCEEDING FOR SUBSEQUENT LICENSE RENEWAL OF PEACH BOTTOM OPERATING LICENSE on the NRCs Electronic Information Exchange System.
___/signed electronically by/__
Diane Curran 3