ML19294B918
| ML19294B918 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Marble Hill |
| Issue date: | 01/21/1980 |
| From: | Ahearne J NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Gilinsky V, Hendrie J, Kennedy R NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19294B912 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8003060391 | |
| Download: ML19294B918 (1) | |
Text
P f'"+. ',Ro
- g
. UNITED STATES
-,,. g NUCLeSR REGULATORY COMMISSION ~
'r
,/
g6 wAssincTon, c. c. zosss y
e x _.
s' wAmun-1 January 21, 1980 MEMORANDUM FOR:
Comissioner Gilinsky Commissioner Kennedy Commissioner Hendrie
. p ?.'-,
Commissioner Bradford I. h e FROM:
John Ahearne SbBJECT:
RESUMPTION OFsCONSTRUCTION AT MANSLE HILL Construction at Marble Hill is still suspended because of the quality assurance concerns.
I believe the Commission should be involved with the decision to allow construction to resume since that decision may involve important policy considerations.
' Consequently, I suggest we instruct the Staff to brief us when they believe the situation is sufficiently improved to allow construction to resume so we may discuss that decision with them.
I am asking SECY to poll the Co=nissioners on this cuestion.
r i
i 5#
_ 7"Y' cC:
b VAC Ms.
i OPE N..
E t
l
\\QIk k
d f G ). J. ws c
\\ g a. y.;
yb.t j
W
-1 m.
- g., %
/.
m 4
5-r,.
l s0030603 e
u W H. HAMIL.TCN 2oo Rarm=== skauwe
- 97m Dines:7. lew.n Was e D.C.
msis TILIPMorrL (E2) 225-1313 CoM M m
,,,,,,,,,c,,,
Congrc14 of the,e,initch 5tatcg u- =r- - -
- ==9
,_r,om mT,-
C-.
n=,
m
%)ouse of Representatibeg
'CE'iE E.I%
JOINT ECONOMIC g-.---
MNIgt0!I, D.C. 20515
'='c^=' = $= "
W4. :
STANDARDS OF CFFIOl AL CONDUCT Jeseu laci4mA 47130
- ..
- .:.y TsisFMcNL (t11J 134 J141 ny-]
n "..
- 0******
0.5 55 Av eaa, laowen c30t TILtrocar.4 (812) 92M35
_.nau.
Mr. Joseph M. Hendrie gg Chairman g,.
yfy g,,y g g g g f g.gg Nuclear Regulatory Commission
,n.T 7
1717 H. St. NW sion:
72o7 g.
yg Washington, D.C. 20555 C
FMI Q C/1s
?..
Dear-Mr. Chairman,
ME
==
- U^5 Thank you for the recent response to my letter supporting
-iE Congressman Moffett's suggestion that the Commissioners make KdE the final decision on restarting construction at the Marble ggi; Hill nuclear power plant in my congressional district, which p@:
was sent to me by Mr. Bickwit. I appreciate hearing from the M
Commission.
+kY
5 I would like some further clarification on the response I recieved. In his letter, Mr. Bickwit states that the FE
Commission has "already taken action to participate -
a decision to restart construction at Marble Hill." He als
- .E.
~=
s states that "the Commission requested that-it be briefed J
by the staff prior to a lifting of the suspension order."
isiss th.8 To what extent has the Commission participated in the Im=
decisi~on-making process? If the Commission has requested E
that it be briefed on any staff decision, does that mean Isti_~
the Conmissioners plan to simply concur with a staff de-cision, or will they examine any staff decision before Eff!
allowing construction to restart.
I would also appreciate a further exulanation as to e.
the relationship between this request and'the pending hearing'
=
request before the Commission.
q=;
' Thank you for your continued.-consideration in this
- ?l;?
mat'ter. I look forward to heari(g # rom you in the near E
. future.
4f Simcerely.yo rs,,
n l
l
-N:.
- LEr H. 'HA'II LTON, M. C.
- ,gh / ; a r NJ[
~
6pcpJ36 & &
.