ML19291D746

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Agrees That Transcript Pages Designated by Hudson River Fishermens Association & Save Our Stripers Should Be Incorporated by Ref Into Unit 3 Proceeding Except as Mods Listed Below
ML19291D746
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 11/27/1973
From: Oestmann M
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To: Karman M, Treby S
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
NUDOCS 8111200050
Download: ML19291D746 (2)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:h4,Q ^ f, W w NS' DISTRIBUTION: a l ,S D0cLet File (Environ)(2)<( M I RP Reading g3}ig9eading HSpector RWoodruff i c 2 71973 AGiambussa. DDRP MGew) RB yd, ADDPP CSkovholt I s Docket Nos. 50-286 and 50-247 EStruxness, ORNL g n on

EP T

0 MJ0estmann g RCDMoung Myron Karnan/S. Treby, OSC CMCarter, ORNL [ 4 assaHo ~ THRU: George W. Knighton, Chief. EP4 s CONSOLIDATIO:: OF I:OIAN POINT UNITS NOS. 2 AND 3 HEARINGS { By motion dated January 2, 1973, the Hudson River Fishermen's Association f (HRFA) and Save Our Stripers (505) moved that the comission consolidete -l 4 the hearings of Indian Point Units Nos. 2 and 3, pri-arily based on the E On January 19, intervenors' cnntentions regarding environmental < the applicant repited by opposing the motion to ', da te. On January 23, 1973, the intervenors provided additional st ing documentat'un regarding this nation. A special ASLB issued a her.orandum and Order on Febrary 28, 1973 which stated that the Intervention Board had no jurisdiction to consider the motion but invited all petitioners to re-3,p spond to the intervenors' riotion and referred the notion to the Licensing ASLB. The sane Licensing AS' B as that in the IP-2 case was established on February 28, 1973. On March 0,1973, the applicant filed a motion i g for reconsideration of the Intervention Board's Order to withdraw the ~ L invitation to respond to the HRFA and SOS raction to consolidate. P 3 Af ter a special prehearing confc.'ence en May 21, 1973 to discuss issues j of contention and plans for future hearings, the ASLB requested that j the partiet agree to stipulate to incorporate the record of the Docket 4 No. 50-247 proceeding by reference into the Docket No. 50-286 proceeding ,j rather than consolidate the two proceedires. On August 3, 1973, all the parties stipulated and on August 17, 1973, the Board ordered, among / 'i other matters, that the parties designate portions of the transcript a in the Docket No. 50-247 proceeding to be incorporated into the Coctet 7 d No. 50-286 proceeding. In response to the order, the HRFA and 505 submitted on Septenber 24, 1973 a list of pages of the transcripts of '1 h Docket 30. 50-247 to be transferred into the Docket No. 50-286 proceeding. (Attachment I). e e 9 I have reviewed this list of pages and have the following comments: M 1. Gn the whole I generally agree that the transcript pages

,.7 3 4esignated by HPFA and 505 be incorporated by reference into t

the Unit No. 3 proceeding except for the modifications 'f 1 presented below. .f l 8111200050 73:127 7' [l CF ADOCK 05000247 CF '115_^30 % omer-si g svamr* g p1 r' DME& 4" y,_ _.,_., %MFI/phw ;fSM4.tW%WMe %% weca yp~m-- - -

e, \\ , s.y 4 piv [ 1

  1. 27 2 Myron Kemsn/S. Treby, OCC q f

Un 2. Inccrporate in addittoa the follwing transcript pa9cs: Jj (' pp. 3999-4096 Nov.17, 1971) I 1 pp. 4325-4335 Dec. 14,1971) pp. 4351-4473 Jan.11,1972) f pp. 4689-4751 (Jan. 12, 1972) pp. 4764-4794 (Apr. 5, 1972) pp. 5678-5592 (May 19,1972) pp. 5919-6060 (June 20, 1972) o i pp. 10,824-10,827 (April 11,197M J pp. 11,028* (April 12,.1973) l pp. 11,579-11.580 (Sept.12,1973) .g + j pp. 11,584-11,645 (Sept.12,1973) t pp. 11,650-?l,652 (Sept.12,1973) f pp. 11,791-11,801 (Sept. 12,1973) j 'I 3. Incorporate the following infom.ation from oral agguments (July 2, 1973) i pp. 1-4 pp. 9-69 i pp. 97-125 I pp. 134-142 pp. 145-178 4. Since the Benefit-Cost Andysis Supplement No. 3 to the applicant's Enviromental Report for Unit No. 2 (February 15,1972) never [, became an exhibit in the IP-2 proceeding, would it be possible l! to have this docur.cnt presented in the IP-3 proceedin9 The applicant's Exhibits are: ') 3A = ER Supplement. IP-2, ER Supplement No.1 and No. 2 (TR. 4325) 3B = ER Supplement, Appendices, Vol I (TR 4325) 3C = ER Supplement, Appendices Vol II (TR 4325 .[' 5. The letter dated March 17, 1972 from Regulatory Staff (TR 4765) should also be incorporated. ned by 04IBBg 3 g..J.OtSF'g.n 7 M}1 '1 y j M. J. Oestmann, Project fianager Enviramental Projects Branch No. I f p Qp Directorate of Licensing t 4 % 7 EE-l. L 1,,l(.,L

orricr,

,g q MJ0e,tmann:rt GWrji%fton - ,f 'y -== 11/26/73 11/://73 -{,;d; R i. - ---------= n 4 form ALC4 s e late. 9 51a AICM c240 g} [~l. seo c4a is e in e s., eas.e te j 4 '}}