ML19291D369
| ML19291D369 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 99902028 |
| Issue date: | 10/17/2019 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Rowley J | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19291D231 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML19291D369 (12) | |
Text
Licensing Action Workload Initiatives October 17, 2019
Recent Activities
- Workload Management Enhancement Working Group
- Integrated Review Teams
- Fee Validation
- Mission Analytics Portal (MAP)
Workload Management Working Group
- MISSION Strengthen and expand the foundation of integrated program management in NRR
- Completed assessments of NRR workload management program needs
- Implemented fee validation and NEIMA requirements
- Developed recommendations for improvement
- Developing plans for implementing recommendations 3
Program Enhancements Cascading Metrics and KPIs Enhanced Workload Management Guidance & Technology Training Improvements
& Innovation
Future Actions
- Integration of Operating Reactor and New Reactor Programs
- Focused Analytics
- Periodic Reassessments
- External Dashboard 5
TSTF-505 Reviews PILOT VS. PLANT-SPECIFIC VS. REV 2 GOAL
- Completed Reviews
- Calvert Cliffs 1,2 Nov-2018 60 Vogtle
- Turkey Point Dec-2018
- Palo Verde May-2019 50 St. Lucie Turkey Point
- St. Lucie Jul-2019 Age (Months) 40 Palo Verde
- Farley 1,2 Jul-2019 Calvert Cliffs
- Ongoing Review Targets 30
- Limerick Sep-2020 20 Rev 2
- Byron/Braidwood Sep-2020 Goal 10
- Tracking ahead of schedule Farley
- Technical Issues Resolution Results 0 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000
- 67% Hours Reductions over Vogtle Effort (Hours)
- 24% Age Reduction over Vogtle
- Post TSTF-505, Rev 2 (Farley)
- 85% Hours Reductions over Vogtle
- 80% Age Reduction over Vogtle 6
TSTF-505 Review Trend 10 CFR 50.69 Reviews
- Overall Trend: REVIEW TREND
- Initial 10 submittals Palo Verde Byron /
- 3 withdrawn 12 Braidwood
- 4 < 12 months 10
- 2 - 13 months Goal Age (Months) 8 Reduce hours Brunswick
- 1 - 14 months 6
- Next 5 4
- Completed in 15-18 months Hatch
- Ongoing Reviews 2
- Most expected to complete < 12 months 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
- Plant-Specific Review Factors Effort (Hours)
- Palo Verde: 14 months, 1600 hours0.0185 days <br />0.444 hours <br />0.00265 weeks <br />6.088e-4 months <br />
- Last full scope peer review in 1999
- Brunswick: 18 months, 2000 hours0.0231 days <br />0.556 hours <br />0.00331 weeks <br />7.61e-4 months <br />
- Includes external hazard PRA models that have not been commonly submitted
- Hatch: 23 months/1200 hours (est.)
- Link to separate NFPA-805 review 8
50.69 Review Trend Projected Submittals January 2019
Submitted & Projected October 2019
Questions and Comments