ML19290E104

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summarizes ACRS 800207-09 238th Meeting Re Review of NRC Acceptance Criteria for Mark I Containment long-term Program.Program Can Be Concluded & Mods to Individual Mark I BWRs Can Be Implemented Over Next 18 Months
ML19290E104
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/13/1980
From: Plesset M
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
To: Ahearne J
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
References
ACRS-R-0862, ACRS-R-862, NUDOCS 8003040266
Download: ML19290E104 (2)


Text

'

ACRS DISTRIBUTION e

NRC PDR EDO W. Dircks MEMORANDUM DATED Task Force Directors Division Directors

~~

R. Mattson, P-1102 (DSS)

D. Eisenhut,(Acting), 528 (DOR)

R. Vollmer, 542 D. Muller. (Acting). P-202 (DSE)

5. Hanauer, P-822 B. Grimes, 542B D. Ross 278 (DPf4)

Deputy Directors F. Schroeder, P-1102 (DSS)

R. Tedesco 528 (DOR Assistant Directors L. Shao, (Acting), 520 W. Kreger, P-514A W. Gammill,(Acting), 340A V. Regan (Acting), P-302A G. Lainas, (Acting) 416B J. Knight, P-932B J. M111er, (Acting), 228A V. Moore, (Acting), P-518 R. Denise, (Acting), P-328 S. Varga, (Acting), 110B G. Lainas (Acting) 416B D. Skovholt, 266A Branch Chiefs D. Crutchfield, 540 V. Houston, P-608B D. Ziemann, 314A J. Collins, THI Site V. Noonan, 440A T. Murphy, P-712C L. Hulman, P-214A A. Schwencer, 316A R. Ballard, P-528 T. Ippolito, 336 D. Sells (Acting), P-522A R. Reid, 328 B. Youngblood, P-302C PSB, 416B G. Lear P-234C P. Check, 516B R. Bosnak, P-924C R. Clark, 224

5. Pawlicki, P-1000B F. Pagano, 212 F. Schauer, P-1022A G. Knighton, 231 J. Stolz, ll4A R. Jackson, P-312 V. Benaroya, P-802B R. Baer, 148
0. Parr, 124 R. Satterfield, P-722B L. Rubenstein, ll6B F. Rosa, P-832B P. Collins, 358 Z. Rosztoczy, P-1030C K. Knici, P-ill4B V. Haass, P-320D T. Spels, 268A T. Novak, P-1132C C. Heltemes, 242A V. Butler, P-932B H. Berkow, (Acting),P-433 V. Russell, (Acting), P-433 J.,Saltzman, P-415 w

8 0 0s o so l gg,

e{pa arog(o UNITED STATES

!?,ef '

q.

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

$.fN

. 2 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

, MM J[

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 J

February 13, 1980 Honorable John F. Ahearne Chairman U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555

SUBJECT:

NRC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR THE MARK I CONTAINMENT IDNG TERM PROGRAM

Dear Dr. Ahearne:

During its 238th meeting, February 7-9, 1980, the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards reviewed the NRC Acceptance Criteria for the Mark I Containment Long Term Program.

This matter was considered at /CRS Fluid Dynamics Subcommittee meetings held on May 23, 1978, November 28-30, 1978, September 13-14, 1979, and November 16, 1979.

During its review, the Committee had the benefit of discussions with representatives of the NRC Staff and the Mark I Owners Group.

The NRC Acceptance Criteria for the Mark I Containment Long Term Program are intended to establish design basis loads that are appropriate for the anticipated life of each Mark I BWR facility and to rer. ore the originally intended design safety margins to each Mark I containment system.

The Mark I program was initiated in 1975 in response to loss of coolant accident and safety relief valve (SRV) dynamic loads identified by the General Electric Company during the course of performing large scale testing for the Mark III pressure-suppression containment in 1972-1974.

A period of reevaluation resulted in issuance of the Short Term Program Acceptance Criteria in December 1975 which established interim design bases for continued operation of the Mark I BWRs.

'Ihe Acceptance Criteria for the Long Term Program have been developed from a program of small and full scale tests in two and three dimensional geometries.

The Mark I Owners submitted proposed loads in the " Mark I Containment Program Ioad Definition Report" in December 1978 and detailed the methods to be used in plant unique analyses in the " Mark I Containment Program Structural Acceptance Criteria Plant Unique Analysis Applications Guide."

Following review of the available information, the NRC Staff determined that certain changes and clarifications to the criteria proposed by the Mark I Owners were necessary. The NRC Staff technical requirements were delinealed in the "NRC Acceptance Criteria for the Mark I containment Long Term Program" issued in October 1979 and also in several additions to the acceptance criteria as discussed during the 238th ACRS meeting.

The additions to the Acceptance Criteria were intended, in part, to alleviate some of the difficulties the Mark I Cwnera had in calculating credible structural responses to SRV actuations.

~

Honorable John F. Ahearne February 13, 1980 The Committee recognizes the thoroughness of the efforts taken by the NRC Staff and the Mark I owners to resolve the generic Mark I issues and believes that the NRC Acceptance Criteria and additions, as proposed, provide a suitably conservative basis for performing the Long Term Mark I Containment structural response analyses. We Mark I owners indicated that they continue to have significant difficulty in calculating credible structural resp 3nses to some SRV loads and they would like to continue to work with the Staff on a generic basis to resolve these difficulties. The NRC Staff wuld like to complete the generic ferk I program and resolve any remaining problems as they arise from the plant unique analyses.

The Committee believes that the individual Mark I owners can work with the Staff to resolve any additional difficulties that may arise from the plant unique analyses as mMifications are being made to the containment struc-tures.

The Committee believes that the Staff should assure the adequacy of the requirements for verification of the design, fabrication, and inservice inspaction of the Mark I containment modifications and, in particular, the SRV discharge piping in the wetwll airspace.

Further, in the interim period while the turk I modifications are being performed, the Staff should investigate the potential for and consequences of a failure in the SRV discharge piping in the wetwell airspace for the existing designs.

%e Committee wishes to be kept informed on this matter.

%e Committee believes that, with due consideration to the above items, the generic Mark I Long Term Program can be concluded and the modifications to the individual Mark I BWRs can be implemented on a reasonable schedule over the next 18 months.

Sincerely, A

Milton S. Plesset Gairman

References:

1.

General Electric Company, " Mark I Containment Program Inad Definition Report," Revision 0, NEDO 21888, December 1978.

2.

General Electric Company, " Mark I Containment Program Structural Acceptance Criteria Plant Unique Analysis Applications Guide," NEDO 24583, December 1978.

3.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "NRC Acceptance Criteria for the Mark I Containment Long Term Program," October 1979, and additions includeo in the February 8,1980, transcript of the 238th ACRS Meeting.