ML19290D991
| ML19290D991 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 12/27/1979 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19290D985 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-312-79-22, NUDOCS 8002290621 | |
| Download: ML19290D991 (2) | |
Text
-
APPENDIX A Sacramento 'tunicipal Utility District P. O. Box 15380 Sacranento, California 95813 Docket ilo. 50-312 License No. DPR-54 NCTICE OF VIOLATIONS Based on the results of the NRC inspection conducted on October 29-November 1, 1979, it appears that certain of your activities were not in full compliance with the conditions of your license, as indicated below:
A.
Technical Specia cation 6.8.1.c states that written procedures shall be established, implemented and maintained covering... surveillance and test activities of safety related equipment.
Technical specification 6.8.3.c states that temporary changes to the procedures of 6.8.1 may be made provided (among other conditions) the change is documented, reviewed by the PRC and approveri by the Plant Superintendent within 7 days of implementation.
Contrary to the above, a tenporary change was made to SFAS Digital Channel 1B P.efueling Test Procedure (SP 203.01B) on November 18, 1978 and the temporary change was implemented on December 18, 1978.
The temporary change was not reviewed by the PRC and approved by the Plant Superintendent until February 16, 1979, approximately 60 days after completion of the surveillance procedure.
This is an infraction.
B.
Technical Specificat-ion 6.8.3.b states that temporary changes to the procedures of 6.8.1 may be made provided (among other conditions) the change is approved by two menbers of the plaat management staff, at least one of whom holds a Senior Reactor Operator's License on the unit affected.
Contrary to the above, a temporary change was made to Quarterly Makeup Pump and Valves Inspection and Surveillance Test Procedure (SP 203.02C) on March 8, 1979.
One of the two required approval signatures was that of a control room operator who is not a menber of the plant management staff.
This is an infraction.
8002290hM
. C.
Technical Specification 6.5.2.8.b states that audits of facility ac-tivities shall be performed under the cognizance of the fiSRC.
These audits shall encompass the performance, training and qualifications of the entire facility staff at least once per year.
Contrary to the above, the licensee had not audited the qualifications of the facility staff during the year preceding the dates of the inspec-tion (October 29-flovember 1,1979).
This is a deficiency.