ML19290D641
| ML19290D641 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 01/23/1980 |
| From: | Gossick L NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| To: | Bradley B SENATE |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19290D642 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8002220444 | |
| Download: ML19290D641 (1) | |
Text
-
C{f ytp* * *%q'o.,
UNITED STATES y )[T e (~ 3
~
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION E
WASHINGTON, 0. C. 20555 5
hws, vl/
g6-Z l a l
g3 - b) b J
The Honorable Bill Bradley United States Ser. ate Washington, D. C.
20510
Dear Senator Bradley:
We have reviewed the letter from Jeanne Covert, Chairperson, Committee on Nuclear Power of the Cumberland Conservation League to James Miller, NRC, and to Senator Williams, Representative Huches and you. Attached to this let'.er, for your information, is a copy of our response to Ms. Covert. We are returning the letter from Ms. Covert per your request.
Sincerely, CTA Lee V. Gossick Executive Director for Operations
Enclosures:
1.
Letter to Ms. Covert dated 1/10/80 2.
Letter from Ms. Covert dated 10/11/79 l>
ea 1
1-h 0%
C-L 9
c/
8002220
,i L
[
~%
UNITED STATES
!" > c j
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION E
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 e
f
/
January 10, 1980 Ms. Jeanne Covert, Chairperson Comittee on Nuclear Power Cumberland Conservation League P. O. Box 114 Port Norris, New Jersey 08349
Dear Ms. Covert:
Your letter of October 11, 1979, expressed a number of concerns of the Cumberland Conservation League relative to emergency planning in the environs of the Salem Nuclear Generating Station. NRC has an aggressive program for upgrading emergency plans that is responsive to many of your concerns as the program includes site visits by Emergency Planning teams, meetings with local and State authorities and meetings with the public.
New and more stringent requirements are explained at these meetings. On October 12, 1979, such a meeting was held for the Salem plant at the Lower Alloways Township Municipal Building.
The 10-mile emergency planning zone for the plume exposure pathway is the recomendation of a joint U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission /U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency Task Force. Their report, NUREG-0396, is enclosed with this letter.
The emergency plan review teams that are now reviewing all operating nuclear power plants are requiring that planning should include early alerting of the public for serious accidents, and that the initial instruction in most cases should be to go indoors, close doors and windows, and listen to radio or television for further instructions.
NRC acceptance criteria for a licensee's emergency plan includes the provision that a licensee is responsible for periodic dissemination to the public of information on how they would be notified and what their initial action should be in an emergency. Means for accomplishing this could include information in the telephone book (such as evacuation routes, basic informa-tion on sheltering and respiratory protection, and a number to call for non-emergency information on radiation), information included with utility bills and postings in areas of transient occupancy. Assurance of continued notification capability will be done on a statistical basis. The licensee's emergency plans shall provide that once each year, a statistical sample of the residents of all areas within 10 miles of a power reactor will be made to assess the public's awareness of the prompt notification system and the availability of information on what to do in an emergency. The NRC review of the integrated state of emergency preparedness of the licensee, local and State authorities will include special provisions necessary for institutionalized, and for handicapped, persons.
[y 8002dG000r
Ms. Jeanne Covert January 10. 1980 Your expressed concern about financing of emergency planning refers to the Act of the New Jersey Legislative - Assembly No.1272, approved Oct~ober 22, 1979, that provides that a mur.icipality that may be affected by an emergency at a nuclear power plant, may receive up to $250,000 annually for preparing, testing, and inplementing nuclear (mergency response plans. The act does not specify that the source of the funds would be the involved utility.
Laws passed by other States have specified that funds for emergency planning are to be furnished from a special tax levied on the owner / operator of the p>er reactors. Oregon Senate Bill No.1084, Chapter 726, Laws 1979, approvec July 24, 1979; Illinois Senate Bill No.1G84, Public Act 81-577, approved September 14, 1979; California Senate Bill No.1183, Chapter 956, Laws 1979, approved September 22, 1979, are examples of recent State laws that require financing of emergency preparedness by the responsibility utility.
We trust that this information is helpful to you.
Si nce rely,
/
/
_.~r.:o l /M, 4?// "
/
James R. MiklerkepNy DirMor Emergency Preparedness Task Group 4,/.' Of fice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
'rclosure:
.i L' REG-0396 l