ML19290A018

Deposition of Wj Dircks (NRC) on 790727 in Silver Spring,Md. Pp 1-18

ML19290A018
Person / Time
Site:	Crane
Issue date:	07/27/1979
From:	Dircks W, Helfman S NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS), PRESIDENT'S COMMISSION ON THE ACCIDENT AT THREE MILE
To:
References
TASK-TF, TASK-TMR NUDOCS 7908280825
Download: ML19290A018 (18)

Text

,*

_k__

_ l_

Transcript of Proceedings o

o.

d UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 9

4 PRESIDENT'S CCMhISSION ON THE ACCIDENT AT g

THREE MILE ISLM1D o

a o

o o

o o

o O

DEPOSITICN OF:

WILLIAM J.

DIRCKS e

o 0

o 4

il 0

0 o

o Silver Spring, Maryland July 27, 1979 g

g o

o Il il f

')

II 189 G l4 o

e Acme Reporting Company e

<y O.fi:ial Repor:ers 1411 < S:reet. N.W.

s Wasnmsten. O. 2. *CC05

'>./

(200) 6:3-4888 4

0 m.

h e w,p me e6-GN

-N*M entum.

h

'=

n, I

1 I

.....e. n.

e n.v.r n w c.4

.n._

9 e

p.e r. o..n. r s - i g s., s.v ".. S S ? "T< N... "" r.

AC w~A n r'.4'".

i, ce en 4

.e n.s.,

.. -e r

.v. - u

.% =

3 4

t t

i i

e

,i v

i i

I 6

.i t

%*h CEPCSI"IC:1 Or:

'C 1.LI AM J. DIRCKS I

h

,J j

t l

.n.

i j

Roo:n 9 70, Willste Building

' i 7915 Eastern Avenue Silver Spring, Maryland I

6.

ay,.

u -.',:. ~ ~.,

n. o. n. o.

l i

r

4. A

.n ia 4;30 o' clock.

p.m.

N, AIFE ARANCES :

I t

U; On Behal" of the Cor:.nis s ion :

i f

is.

3..u, e ur evy<.

e S o..

s4 Assistant Chi e f CO '.'.n s e l l'

2100 M Street, N.

W.

l h

Washin ton, D.

C.

2003

'i on Behalf cf the Ceccnent:

19 i

.,..,, y,..., m.

n, a.s.u

,.r.

u..., :. S c.s.

20 ;

Office of Sencral Counsel Nuclear Regula cry Com.ission 2 '- ]

Was.hing cn. CC 4

• = l{

I

.a i

1 189f015

4 1

ll Acme Reporting Company i

i l

i

-..N_ :-

2

'dITNESS PAGE 3

'a' LLI AM J. DIRCKS Examinaticn b;,

2.

Helfman 3

4 5

j 6!

.E_.X H.I 3..I_.T S._

i g

-l Depo. No.

1, Resume 4

i Depo. Nc.

2, Memorandum 12 e

9, 1

i tol l

11

3 j

14 i

16 I

I l' !

n I

19l l

.3 l

I n

i

,,, l I

i

.3.,

.t I

3 l:l i

ll u !!

l895~QIS I

Acme Reporting Company i

m.......

I I'l I

3 l

I

=u _0 *== = _D =~ N _G _S l

=

7; Whereupon, 3

a-a-t v. n g a+. n 7 9 C.v. c a

was called as a witness and, after bein5 firs duly sworn 4

5 by the Notary Public, was examined and testified as f011cws:

l e

r!

..j EXAMINATION t

i I

5v.

.v.g..

=.=...v.vA.y 3

Q Would you please state your full name for the 10

record,

.V.r.

Dircks?

A William J. Dircks.

1 Q

Have you ever hac your depos' tion taken before?

I i

A Yes.

a0 M?.. HELFMAN:

Let me go over just a few peints y-l i

1 as to the characteristics of a deposition.

g g

Your testimony that you will be giving new is sworn and will have the same solemnity and effect as though

..e... a...e... es-.-

4.. - ~ ~ ur o.c g

y,

w...

-m

.k,e '.a-.'

c..",

.w

-w.

.a 1

i 3 l you give will be reduced to a transcript, and you will be

~

I l

'o 1 provided with a ecpy Of it and af ferded an opp c.~: unity to g, I make any changes that you desire to =ake.

Mcwever, it is l

i 1

2 imp o rt ant that you try to be as accurate as possible cday',

s i

3 because, i.' you make subs tantial changes ' n the deposition, i

a y

_$.# #a. *. *. y * ".".*

• a. d ' * ' ' ' '..v.

4 3 3 l

-n n..

nu. =.

m..t =- = e

e., -.-s...

a-

.J i

t j

Acme Reporting Compcny i

n i

'l 4

l t

i MR. HELFMAN:

It is important, for the benefit I

I 2

of the Reporter, to wait until I cc=plete my questions 3

before you begin your answe rs, and I will try c wait until I

4 you finish your answer before I begin my nex: question.

5

is also necessary that you give audible responses so that s

t. 3 Reperter can take them down.

l 4

If you don't understand any questic n that I ask, j

i

c. lease ask =e to clarif.y it.

l 9

It is our normal practice, at the conclusicn of 10 a deposition, to continue it rather than terminate it.

In 1:

the event there is sc=ething further we want 0 as k y cu,

i l

2 we reconvene the deposition.

i i

13 Do yc2 have any questions about any o f that ?

u

HF WITNESS :

Nothin5-1 I

i 15 Q

Did you bring a resume with you?

16 i A

Yes, I did, i

i 1: !

O May I have that, please ?

I t

..= !

A (Witness Oc= plies.)

i 1

i 49 MR. HELFMAN:

I would like to have this =arked i

i I

I as Exhibit 1 to the Depcsition.

e0

. i i

I (Resume marked for identification I

t I

l as Dircks Dec.csition Exhibit n.,

__ i I

i 23 NC-1-)

i i

I 24

!s this resume an accurate reflection of your

,5 ;

educational, professional and empicyr.ent history?

Acme Reporting Company lO O l 8' t

2:2' 529 4989

I i

5 l

1 A

Yes, it is accurate.

2l Q

Could you please state for the record what your i

3 title is at the.T9C and generally what your responsibilities sl are?

r I

5 A

I am the Director of the Nuclear.v.terial Safety a

i a.d S a.' a. -. a.- d. s '.'.'.'

a.. ". k. e o.". _' c a.

_ e, e s p a..s '. *, _' a.

. '.. -..*. a d

3

.I i.

7!

licensing ar.d regulatcry activities of all aspects of l

ii nuclear fuel cycle outside of the reactor.

i s

Q Would your responsibilities include disposal 10 i of radioactive wastes?

1 1

11 A

Yes.

t t, I g

n. w,.,,

a.,

y-,

ye,y.a.

5 e d _' s-y o s a _'

2..

3 e

c.c

-n a _a, a,,..

N...<a..e

.o.cm.w.

,,w...

v._4_e

_rs _,.,... a s.

c a

a.

14 power plant?

l 15 '

A We would be involved with the transportation le of the waste; we-would be involved with the eventual 17 disposal of the waste in a low-level waste burial grcund.

ye,-. >>,. g a

.e-y _..,,.w.

.w.

.... e c.e ees o

.w.n

.g n

I l

t

"..e a a..a.-.. a -"..' a - n... a. was.a

.w. a.. w.a. w as.e a v-.. '.d.

"e.

w

. a. i a

-3 l

nn. i s.w.4, m A.

4 gp. a 4..

g.w. o.

.c o.

....o.

yg3.. w o t,_, a w,.

.a s,y o s.o g

.w 4

l y.

i I

I 21 p, Q

So, you are also, to s cme e xtent, responsible i

'I

~ ir the form of which the waste would take during shipmenc?

i f

r l

~

it

... o n

-u.

w._

e. __ _. wo.

.a. c.. '.

a. e... e

a.. ? _' _'. _'.

.a i

...e y-l e

a".. 5. '

v., w a.

b e _' _' a_ ve w e *.. = v a.

."..a..'...'__dc' a"..".o__*,.",

. ok

o..".a

.*.~. s."._'.~.~. _'. _s s.._ ppa.d.

n d.

V I,

Acme Reporting ComPan i

.,1

.z......

A

'I i

{

l O

Is there another department of agency within l

i l

the NRC that has exolicit authority for that?

l G

o.

i A

There is the Office of Nuclear Reactor Rec _ulation eJ l

that reviews the coeration of low-level waste treatment 4

5 systems at the reactor sites; so, they have the authority there.

In addition to NRR and curselves, the Department j

q

't al of Transportation has authority over the packaging that 3

i, the waste would be moved in cross-countrv..

9,,

i

.i l

I Q

Is the detemination as to the form that the i0 i

l waste will take exclusively an NRR determination?

I l

A That is a subject that we a.~e discussing with j

t

,, I NRR.

They believe it is and we believe it isn't.

l 1

Q Is there some reason for your department wishing

3.,.

t to have some control over that decision eith respect to i

i. o.

l I

m..v..- - 2 '.

,e t

l A

'dith respec to TMI-2 specifica1Iv 3

es.

'41th v

.-o

. a_ s c. e c '. *. o *. k..a.

..'. a.*. _*.. 3 w a_ _=. a.'-..

..k.e

.~~a. -o'._'..-

. = =. = _ ~ ~. ~. ~ ~.

3

,e :

also yes.

t i

Q Ynat is your specific concern with respect to gl i

,_-2,.

.i I

22l A

The concern we have is that we would net like

\\.

to see the wastes acved in the fcm cf what we call " resin

,-a p i

l b e ads -. "

What we would like to do is to see that waste 3,.

i l

o.

sc__,e

,.s.

s..

w... a _.,

.4 c..,.i w

..,..,e....._._...

_... c

.x.

.i il 1895 020 Acme Reporting Company i

a::........

l

'l I

were an accident on the read, and not contain any liquid 1

G 2l in the disposal Of that waste cf that ' rase in a 1cw-level l

l l

i 3

was te burial g_round.

i 4

Q The waste that you are referring to is presently l

1 5

where in the reactor?

i e,

A

".".a.

w as. a. s. ". =. w a.

_=.-a.

.a.#e-.'..-

.. w

_'d_

- n, 3

ii generally consist of resin beads which form part of the ion-l 3'

exchange process.

Essentially, the waste that we are

.,,. _d.. 3 a*e eu. w cu.' d ". a s "m _'.,. ". -..... ". e..- a. a. e.. ^.*. ". e e

9, i

i, i

conta

• nated water in the reacter.

0 l

... e c e m... a _... a... ". u d _' d_ _'. - *.

I n

r,

.w 3

l A

7.7 *".e a c... ai 7. - a..*.

b u.i ' d d n,, a..d.

.d

..h a

.$."., '.' _' _a a v

__ e 12 l

I e

u_ i 3 u _. _, _. _ _

. ~.,,

s._,......

s..]..,,,u,

.s..,.

.3, ta=inated water through 10n-exchange columns or waste-1 13l treatment plants, or sc=e sort of treatment system.

The i

i i

16 remnants -- what we are talking about as " wastes" -- are j

i I

the resin beads.

i i

j.

i 3

n, 4

a.

. *. =. s a.. a d.*

• a -. ' < a..-a.'..

" a. _n d_ _e *

,1 a

m.. l A

" hey would contain radioactive material, right.

• e w a s,. e s,.'.. *..*. e _d. c. ~ a. s e.a..

.s..

.' s..._ s j

o i

'__d a ui d_

o s w _'.'. d _ '.. _., s u..- a. a. e ". s. a..a

. a. s e... _'..* *.

a I

A Presently, it is water, liquid.

n, I

7 i

s I

3 n' n,

m' _ q,, _4 A 9 1895 021 i

ras.

I

.i

g. s _.._. _. a

.,-._._'d.."...b=.

m. e c e s s a. d.

_a.

.". a. s.' e '.

s

_3

=

s Acme Reporting Company s w,,,..,,,

l' 3

i c

l A

lt would be processed through their waste-i 1

l treatment plant.

I 3

Q And this would produce what you referred to as l

" resin b eads "?

4 A

Resin beads, resin slush, resin sludge.

5 o

g :

Q Or radioactive liqueur?

l A

Something like that.

What they try to do is to l

i' dewater that slush as much as they can.

But it is still 1

i in a semi-solid state.

9 1

l Q

Or semi-licuid?

~

0 i

l A

Semi-liquid state.

What we want to do is look

,i 1

1 l

other processes such as turning the sludge into a cement.

at m

'-l l

i 13 Q

What is the danger that you perceive from 14 transporting this semi-liquid radioactive waste?

5 A

Well, it would present considerable problems if I

16 there were an accident on the road and the cask broke open; i

g and the sludge would be extremely difficult to clean up.

Q How far does this sludge have te be transported 13,

frcm the site to the burial site?

l 19 h

.;g l A

From what 1 gather, the plans are to move it to l

1

.;; I burial sites in Hanford, Washington, which is apprcximately 22 2,600 =11es across country.

.,3 Q

Would this be transported by truck er by train?

.,.l A

sy truck.

1895 022

.I i

B

.u.

How man.y truckloads do.vou envisien would te I

Acme Reporting Company j

\\.

F 1

9 1

required?

2 A

I heard an estimate somewhere around 500 truckloads..

3 Q

Apparently, you have an alternative approach to 4

preparing the was te for transport.

Could you describe 5I briefly what for= the vaste would take?

I.

t

..a..c..,

3.' " a..vou '.cu..

-e=,

s.'... a.

'd

~

3"

.s a-

. v

.I g

- f involved technically 'in the description of the process.

d

~

5 gather wha: the plan er what the proposal of the people j

i in Our Iow-level Vaste Managemen 3 ranch would be to --

e' l

10 Q

These are people in Nuclear Material Safety and r

I i

l i

o c 1.

e3._,-ae n4 v d. s ^. n '.

_o i

i I

t la. ';

A

m. 5 a *,' s. 4

• ". a *,, ' s a b.- *....". w _' '. ". _'.. k. a.

.'lu c ' e _=.~

3 I

Material Safety and Safeguards Office,3 in the Waste Manage-is m... D _i v_' s ' -...

I i

15 '

The plan would be to devise a process that would i

is b2 at the tail end of the current low-level waste tre atment 1

i 1-process at TMI, which would take the sludge and conver:

{

i i

5 !. it inte a s olid su

h as a cement er bitumen.

a i

, o.

.e.,

w..a..~ 3 _=

.".a.

,. ". ". ".. s

-a. vd. a. w _. 3 v _' _' _

1 e.

i I

i to '

be develeping a plan - or licensee will be developing a i

1 33. w. 4

.w. w _ _3 _, s e..ye.we _ w./

.sim..u..

w e

w s

i I

22l Q

Sy " licensee, " you are referring 0 GPU or Met. Ed.?'

t d,

i 23 "

A GPU or Met. Ed.

They will look at alternative l

w. s,,.,

so__,.44.c.,4

..w. e,..,, c e s a.

_.. _... s..

4

.s m

- s _. 3

___..a.

I 25, Jud; lent On the basis Of cost benefit, and so on. 1 M 5 W.

I iII i

Acme R e p o rtin a, C o m o. o n y g

22 sas..ese

1^

=

V i

I Our discussions with NRR so far have indicated 2l that they will discuss this pla. with us before they =ake 3

any de cisions.

I think the dispute is that we would like 4

to have more thar. the tail end of the discussion.

We 5

want to be involved in the development of the solution.

s '. I O

Would it be accurate te say that NRR presently i

i i

- l favors dewaterizing the waste and shipping it in a semi-l I

5 liquid form to the burial site, whereas your office favors I

9!

solidify:.ng the waste and shipping it in a totally solidified j i

i 10l

1. cr=?

11 A

"' hat's fair to say.

i O

You mentioned a cost-bene fit analysis?

3 A

Yes.

1 14 Q

Would it be accurate to say that a cost-benefit I

i i

is l analysis would involve weighing safety risks versus the 1

l 16 expense of the procedu-a" I

t i

i A

It would be fair to say what the cenefit analysis i

i i

I

5 '

would do would be to determine.-hat, safety benefits ycu t

i 19 l get versus wnat is the cost of dcing process.

t t

20 0

Which of the two processes would you estima:e

i would be the most expensive, that proposed, at this stage, by NRR or that proposed, at this stage by your Office?

i i

s 1,

'eu 5

A

'"he p ro c e s s we are recc=.ing would add costs.

d%

i i

.,4 u n.. s.. ~..u...x.n e, n. s. s a.

. e.- s u., _n y.,,.

o.e __.n..,

,a

. u. e l

n lJ estimate I hea d was somewhere around 3-3 ^ 3, 0 9 9. 2, e -." 4 c um s l

f tu.1Gu (s44 A.

Acme Reporting Company 4

i 1895 024 m........

I 1

I think the main cost would be in terms cf time.

l l

t 2

The objective of NRR is to deal with the contaminated 3

water at the site as quickly as possible and get it off l

the site.

If they adopted our approach I am sure it would I

5 take a little bit lenger to deal with the water.

l Q

Wculd you consider the preposal tha: your Office gii 1i.

I j

has supported to be the safer of the two methods of shipping i

i g

the waste?

9 A

Frcm cur perspective, it would be safer.

We j

i c

are looking at the transportation aspect and the effect i

,r u

on the dispcsal site itself.

t I

1n.

Q Could you tell me the names of the people at NRR l.

13 with whc= your Office has been dealing on this sub'ect?

v. a. s. W a. h. av a.

d_ _' s a. " s s a. d. _.d..

e., ".=.-. w-~

1,,

a ~

n y

i i

i t

15 with Richard Vollmer, who is located in Bethesda. We have j

i 16 had meetings with Vollmer, and we have had discussions l

1 g

with John Collins, who is locate d at the site of TMI, and l

we h ave had --

.)

l I.

w' 7s

.V 4

. o _ _ _d.a. s w '..*.... e a' ~.4. "..

,3 i

29 :

A Yes.

And we have had a memorandum fre C011 ins I

2:

on that subj e:t of the =cve=ent of the waste.

i 0

Do you have that memcrandum available 'n this

.3o.;

I

.,. i e..c_., e..e i

i 24 ',

A I'=

su."e we do.

3 Q

C0uld y0u prcvide us with a ecpy?

1895 025 i

l l

Acme Reporting Company l

i a.....

l 12 A

I '= s ure.

1 i

i Q

Let =e take a look and see if we even want it.

l A

(Witness cc= plies.)

4 (Discussion off the record.)

l 5

MR. HEL? MAN:

Back on the record.

eo

.=. v..n..

. w r.e...ta,s.. ( -.., _ i _ 3 i,

3, li Q

Could you please provide us with a ecpy of the

}

1etter to which you have referred?

9l A

(Witness cc= plies.)

"'his is the =e=o Of John f

10 '

Col'. ins to Robert Browning, of July 25, 1979 MR. HELFMAN:

"'h ank

.y o u.

12 Could we please have this =arked as Exhibi: 2 to 13 the Depcsition.

It is a two-page document dated July 25, 1979

,4,

r..v..

_, _. a,

._ aM. a_ d_ "..-

u' -

T_.."._'".,'.

a la.

.J o 2,

.e.n.

< a e n. a..en. a n..a.n,,...)

s n

.n is Q

Mr. Dircks, have there been past ac::ident n,

experiences with the transport of semi-liquid radioactive i,

w o,. s *_ - ~ ~,~. s

..".a.

~ ~.. -,, ~.~...'c._'

s ***,,e - e.

'l l

,9 A

I don't know.

I knew that there had been a 22 gl recent case where so-called "dewatered resins" were l

.. d received at the 3eatty site in Nevada recent'y that was i

.s,

l 22 lj packed in a leaking container that was leaking radioactive q

23 :

water.

Tne Governcr of Nevada asked that the waste be I

!\\

.._..., y._ a_

.w.

3 _., e a..d

.". a..- -

..,a..f

.'._a. s e... _'.

m

,.4 3

., 1 o,

j g.c.) 026 w.

.a_

ya_3,_,__4.,._..-_,,_a...s.

3.__..

1 l

Acme Reportine Company

i 1*

l 3

I l

1 Q

Have.vou received complaints frc= the Governors i.

i i

2 of any other states regarding the transport of liquid waste through their states or the burial of semi-liquid l

3 6

I l

wasts in their states?

A The Governer of South Carolina has refused to I

i allow liquid wastes in any form to be buried in his state,

j H

The Governor of Nevada now has also done the same thing.

I i

- ll I guess it is only the Governor of Washington that has not I

l 9

yet taken action.

10 Q

This letter which you have provided, frem John i

l T.

Collins to Rcbert 3rowning, refers to a meeting on 1:

i

., I July o,1979, between Mr. Collf as and NRC Chairman, I

i yl Mr. Hendrie.

Were there any represents of your office

4 cr division at that meeting?

A No.

13 l

l 16 Q

The letter also refers to a visit to the site I

of TMI-2 by Chain:an Hendrie, where there was a meeting i

i I

3 with representatives Of 0?C/ Met-Ed.

Were there any

.i

.I ig q representatives of your effice at that meeting?

i i

20 i A

No.

i i

Q On Page 2, the letter refers to a copy of a trip 2:

i i

reptrt authcred by Oale Smith, addressed to John Martin, f

4 f

(

23 i' reviewed by Mr. Cc111ns.

Have you seen that trip report?

i I

24 j A

I haven't seen it, no.

25 l The third paragraph, en Page 2 Of this menc, it-i i895 027 j

Acme Reporting Company 2:2' f,9-4 9 8 9

i a

l 3

stt0es, "the current pcsition by NER is that the resins will not be solidified. "

Is thic your understanding of 2

the present position of NRR?

3 A

That 's a nixed breed, I would say.

I was under 4

the impression that the Director of NRR was in favor of O

g !j solidifi:ation, Harold Denten.

I Q

Where did you hear that?

gi A

I heard it in a meeting where I brought up I

\\

l s olidifi cation.

I think it was in a Chair =an-staff teeting - I 2,

I

,o i

! d n't know the date.

In discussion of it, I got this l

i

,,l imoression that Harold Denton was in favor of it.

i Q

When was that meeting?

. o.

A Ch, I'll have to check.

I dcn't know.

I can

,3 l

find that out.

But I don't know richt now.

3.,.

Q Within the las: =cnth?

, o.

16jl

\\

A Ch, yes, within the las month.

1 Q

Within the last week?

3...

I A

.No, no.

i Q

Within the last two weeks?

l 2 ;

t 29 A

Three weeks, at the outset, I believe.

i 2

Su then I got word that maybe 'l:11=er was nc i

in favor of it.

And I sucoose Vollmer was not in favor i

e,

1 i

~

3l cf it because he had heard fro = Collins, who was not in 1

favor of it.

So, I am not exactly sure wha: the position 3

cf NER is right new.

~ 1895 028 Acme Reporting Commeny l

t

ne4ee,

l' l

t n,

On.2a-.

o.,.wa....s

_...e

, a..he e d o.c

... e

.c

,s.

.w e.

p a. a,. ar.u.,

.a.. s. a ~., e s, n C'.. a_.,. a.:. s. a....... _e _

,a a.,s.

u..,..

.a 0

a e

I t

his opinion, it was not necessary at this time to solidify l

the resins from EPICOR-II prior to shipment."

Is that your unders tandine of Chai.- =an Hendrie 's 5

pcsition, or do you know n'.s position?

i

't Il A

At the meeting I was "eferring to, say, three 5l weeks ago, at the Chair =an-s taff meeting, I was under the f

g i=pression that the Chairman was in favor of solidification.

10 Q

Was that subsequent to his visit to TMI-2?

I,s A

No.

That was before his visit.

Q And, therefore, prior to the promulgation of i

1

. < s... _ o.,

d..

3 A

Yes.

14

,5 M?.. HIL.S.AN:

"'hese are all the questicns I I

have for Mr. Dircks at t his t i=e.

Therefore, unless there

.O f

i are questions from NRC counsel --

I l

.v m...v.m,3 v.

.w.gy.

a-*e

.. ~,... s a. n...e..

r.

..o I

.v.m...t:r. v.va3.

__w. we,,

m.a. e4cu.-..

..".a.

d e e p e s...-...

e.

.a

.,0 Thank y ou, M. Dir cks.

i i,

t

, l (Whereupon,at 5

02 p.m., the depositi n was a.1o..

.s..)

l.

s m....

I have read the ferec.cin: e a c. e s,!,

s

- 1 throuch 15, and they are a true and a curate reecrd of -/ testimen

..*. e --"- -.. ~a u ' a A..

ec.

7 l'

f

.ju 25,! Subscribed e_.d swe r. :: before WCLL';'J:'. CI P.CX5 me this day 0 f 1379

~ iM5 0M Acme Reporting Company f

y c. : a. -_.=.c....=, _:. :

m. n......

i t.

i 1

-s,.-.,..

l

A.... s.s.

W.-

. v...r..-...,

n,s a,. A '.

r o

t e

G I

T.,

a g.,.

.c..a. a. n g -,

. u.. n. : :. :.... u.:...

y u. n ~... a..

e s...

O I

t a.

Cg

.a..

an

.u....f

...a:y

..g.

. u.,.

--y

.. +.. ano 4

i

. 4.... e s.c **.*. 5 e. a.s *..#.* ^..v,

~. '

a y'*y.a. s.'..

..b.a.

~***

s" *..'.. s e "yC s.# * ' * ".

n

-- a w

5

..a.

e Wgg A*,'y g yg m... hy a.g..,

..g.

. b.... c

• 4..=...a =. y a J.

c.s. _4 A w i. *. =... c t i

0

• i l

, p W a. 3

'.f, g.m.

3... g 3. w y.h..e

• 9 y f =..,,

3J

.'....e.."...

4.".a. 4 e.2-

'o

.G i

l l'.

.v,,y.,e

2.. :. 3 w,f..

w.

2.

2<...u...

....a.

3 I i

r.

... -.....a.

s.

l

.... s..

..... S e.,

e,.,

...a..;

t

..w..

.w

,-..y f.

f Q

i l

i i

i

... a.

.a. *..# a.s

..k.a.

.e...d a.. '. '. w '..#.". '..'..' s d a.. c < '..# -. was

o,

I 3..a..:........,. a..

..m...o.

a

.e'a.dva..-. e y.' a v a. a.

11 i

3, y.-. 3. 3..y e.

een 3..

... y..e.

s. f

..e

..e,s

..... 3 s

l l

.. :., -. y

.z.a.,

.e.... e c..

4.

.. c,...,..

l

...s i

i.

i 14l l

I' I

15 l l

,e.

i i

s n i, e

y,,....,., w e.

...c

, e,

.c i

a.o,;

i i

i n.

l I

s.1..

u a ss4.,.

,-.s.

July 1, 1982 f

ne.,r t

1' u

i i

I

, i 4

~

1895 030 1'

Acme Recorting Commeny i

... +.,,.

CEr.IPICATE I certify that I have read this transcript and corrected any errors in the transcription that I have been able to identify, except for uninportant punctuation errors.

Date:

1895 031