ML19289G006

Plaintiffs First Set of Interrogatories in Civil Action 79-1185,US District Court for Eastern District,Pa

ML19289G006
Person / Time
Site:	Crane
Issue date:	05/18/1979
From:	Johnsrud J AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
References
NUDOCS 7906220068
Download: ML19289G006 (17)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:. s 4W~m- - m.m. m=. _ ae 3%CWw.wwwytMm- !y, r n M / 3 u y; ~ w. q g u b, ='...ys.. m; &m :; - Q) b s.;J sJ gau p,a mr fg y w p-g, [ )J l p, g4 ua g 3 =u as IN TUC UNI E OTATFO DIOTRICT COURT

===J FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA .a m o=--- l ~ vUDITH EAYS JOHNSRUD, et a1., a L22=4

s.,

{ __ = a Plaintiffs isse v. CIVIL ACTION F~~ .. NO. 79-1185 M J'MY CAR S i ~ and W l iNITED STATES CF AMERICA,. z. 5 --~~? l asaw.rr n . : Defan d anta r a-- s PLAINTIFFS' FIRST SET OF INTERRCCATORIES 'ro DEFENDANTS ~

==$

o-x I. nr:=wwrS : ~ -

[ L-".'_ M S You' re; hereby dequestedi.pusuant to Rule ;33,, Federal [. c

• g Kul'e s of civi-f Ficc e dtfrd/ to an s 'c.r -in -wri ting und er.ca t.h.the.,

y s wm s, _ _.; fo11cvi=g Lni&!rMaio'fics Mthin.seven. days. af ter : service.of.the g ~. i 'aw. %nd to su'pger5e:it azissers so: filed :in-accordancg with the s m-w p' rov'ision's 'of"Ruie 26 {eFFFede.ral Rules tof a Civil Procedure. g' 1' f 'ForMhe ;3u.4. 55e5 6f ens 9efing-these2interroga, tor $es, the 0 Q 'fcil"l.cMing 'inhEfuctions15.idadefinitions-are provided.t-.-... o.. Z 'ihede 3.nE riigatories are.directeii to you and the h "~# ~ A. q) ansve'rs he'reto a.re to be complete,d to t'.he b.est of yob knowledge ~ o g or the knowledge of your attorneys investigators, agents,. g y

=

e=ployees or other representa'tive's' ol you and your attorney. O ~I O

=

B. These interrogatories are' to be regarded as con-g tinuing and you are requested to provide by way of s~upplementary 6 L respcases thereto, such additi'onal information as may hereafter _ = - - -

== be, obtained by you or any persen on your behalf, which will augment l~ . _. = - = otherwis6 modify any answers now given to th'e following2 4 (3 Ot0 1 w

k l. WQM&ML%"Mi@%r9%%dierMGL*WMiMWC ~V _m_ % 9 M @ U. O.. il,. 9-l' y ,re, G @.4 / g, .),

>)

q L - ll1 a d. .s y /

+

o i ,y t..__, .j, q.J, % > a a u w. ~%aaeN r-W' _ ~ ~ =, served upon the plaint.iffs within three (3) days after receipt of such information, but no later than,24 hours preceding the hearing ] --~. l cn *-he preliminary injunction. ~ ^. ~ 7 i C. Where an interrogatory calls for an answer which y I -2701yes more than ene p-rt, each part of the answer should be l =e > e le:.rly set forth and nmhered and lettered to correspond with g

q r

-- = 7 .h e eppropriate suh-psit of Og inte;;ogatory. ~ { D. Where the identity of an individual is requested, Q l 1 2s provide his or her full name, hcme address, occupa tion and. _ t t _w w o: m. t. y'g M_- fork and here telephone numbers. l =m E. The term

• docur-ent" as used in these interrogatories

~ =- z===; w =ouc ny rueerd, corroepondence, mernnr a n d um, note, diary, or nther written er typed raterial of any kind. When" asked to m = _ =. " identify: docwuent. cr record, medical or genetic or otherwise, T E 17 a please describe in detail (1) the form of the document (written, t

s===,

recorded, or otherwise) ; (2) the title or name of the do,cument; m (3). the nature of the conte.nts of the document; (4) the purpose _1._ _, of the' document (why it was originally created) ; (5) the da'te of -- ~h the dccu=ent; (6) the subject of the document; (7) the names, addresses,.afficial titles, nature -of participation and relation-EM ship'to defendants of all creators, authors, other persons m responsible for researching, writing, or preparing the docunent; .__Z 4 (2) the location of the document giving the name and address of ~ 2 m

.ha custodian of it.

n r ?. Tfle term "licensen" as used in these interrogatcries th y=_s $Q seans Metropolitan Edisen Cc=pany, ') 4 p, ~ b (} j ' -M ! +- ---- E .-_-.....~.,..~._[ il ._1-

I t, - - - - -.~ ~, rwr:tRRDCATonIrc $l w==< 1. 1. Please identify each person who has supplged - j., 1m Y hrdmuYo. usoa in anew. ring theca interrocatori$s and specify c;yg-==- +,.-u g .r t$e' inte2r;. stories for which he or she is responsible. $3 uh.g ~ ~ .Lc.:.% ._w-f,.. [2. How many off-site Thermoluminescent Dosimeters

b

' ~ did the licensee have in place on,naren 28, 197s at E - g-m.s-), 'the eccent of the initial indication that en unusual event was {,,[ g a:. m tak hg place? = (a) specify the location of each. g:p :: T2 C2 ET5 1 .(b) Specify when each was initially placed in p-ym e. ee cosition it occupied on March 2 8, 1979. 65 @Z

=_==.==

(c) Specify the sensitivity range of each. - ((f m' i ~- (d) Describe the kinds of radiation and the energy 52 m mg levels within each kind that the.dLD's were able to detect. !=* 3.' To the best of your knowledge did anyone other' than tha licensee have off-site TLD's in place at the time of the -7 initial occurrence on March 28, 1979? If so: ~1 (a) Specify the location of each. 7 . m__ Z (b) Specify when each was initially placed in the - -w position it occupied on March 28, 1979. (c) specify the sensitivity range,of each. 5 ~

===i (d) Describe the kinds of radiation and the energy ~7== levels within each kind that the ';'L_D_ 's were ab].e to detect. Z T. _ at (e). Give the cumulative dose detected by, the TLD's 'T] C that have been read at the present the. ~ (f) If there were TLD's in place at the time of 1-d, the initial occurrence en March 28, 1979 that have not been read at the present time, state why these ha, not been read. f ". =i q s 24fl%;p r3, - ~ ~Q ~ ~ ' ' ' ~ - ~ ~ - - -.. _ -. _ _ _ _ _ ~' '**?T -- I-n

Im e 9:m. Um, s w :Tm 651g# e nm s.c

s. - (eene. y m

nagw gg > "Lte w p

w. - - --

(g) If TI.D's were pun in 905a. iona t <: A - ** r=~7 t==, or oi! site after the initial occurrence, and they have ~been [=m read at the present time, state the feading they showed, the m rm d te they. Vere. P aced, the date they were read, and the loca- ~ l

• 'fg 4. : ?.. :4

. E.'# ! 'i 3 1 tion where they were placed. g - 4. I.:. . sow many on-site.real time radiation dosimeters Q, .k. ' 1-a-s

ere.in pnee and funt tiening at the time of the initial occurrence?

E3 (a) specify the 1ccation of each. y m =2 (b) Spe.cify the sen.!.tivity range of each. [_= g wW (c) ne sacriba the M nrh nf radiation and the. energy ~ levels within,each kind that the real ti=te dosi=eter was =+s gm = - = - able to detect. = _-=J Z 5 (d)- Give the dose-ra tes d etected for. th.e. real time.. M .. = -1 g =m dozineter for as long as it was/is operational.up to and C =.. including the present time.

===x . (e) + If real t:..;me dosimeters, or dose rate meters 1 ~= or scintilla.t. ion.. count,ers, or geiger counters were placed on =m: a site or off. site.,,afte.r. t.he in,i.t.i,a. l. occ.urre.nce, give their 5 ns readings at the.v.ar.i.o.us..t,imes..that they have.been 5ead up to + :...- .a and give their locations. d and.3 luding.the present,........

5., For the. off site tic.'s during the period frem

~~ j. a.. =3 March 28, 1979 to. the. ev.e_n.i.n.g.o.f. Ma.r.c.h. 3 0., 1.9.7 9.,. how,=.a.ny. d,iff.ere.n..t 7 labs were involved,in reading. the.radiatic,n measured.on t.he T.Ia. 's? f -= .; m (a) In particular for, the TI.D's placed by the M_-'- _ 4 g= _-. -. licensee, were. th.ere. more. tha.n..one..la.b involved in the F==---- 1 3--, .i e g _.., readings? ? Ca (b) Was,it cc:= con practice to hang TI.D's. side by (Zus side in the same loc.ation and send one to cne lab for reading $-== _= ~ G.

=

L

:::==

0 U. b Y &vh' W$$k }d)Q

I [^T m m p' ~'m t= = S.* (cont.) ]

y [N $ 6,5 Q,.f!,9 !

y[L ~ P- - t. u a _ Ji n g.'. l, n and the other to a different lab? E.,tu J c C -. c. lf u,j d, %.j 4 j - (c) Would cross checxing ny using <tirrerenr labs i. -m to read TLD's from the sane location tend to ensure greater i m overall accuracy i_n off-site radiat2.on nessurement? a-2 a; -3 (d) Give the names of all labs that were used to Es wm read of f-site TLD's taken ;Ln af ter the occurrence began on p_. . March 26, 1978 but by midnight on the night of March 30,.1979. gt-e ( 6. For the of f-site TLDis Place and taken in af ter WE x w=- .m midnight March 30, 1979 but up to and including the pr e s en t'. tin e, i2=5

-- =

how ny different labs.;ere involved in reading the radiation %.== neasurements. frc= those C's? (a) Was any cross checking of the kind described in the previous question done en these' later TLD's? m =- (b) How many different official state or federal C' La orga.nizations were placing TLD's of f site or one site after =- midnight of March 30, 19797 ] (c) In particular, were any TLD's place by the v===

_

Department of Energy, Nuclear Regulatory Co:cnission, Federal- -C 2 n, ronmental Protection Agency, Department of Defense, ,= 4 Focd and Drug Administration, the Licensee or agents therecr, ZI State Environmental Protection Agency, State Bureau of u- _::.g Radiological Health, Atomic Energy Commission, Lawrence i_ ~ Liver = ore Laboratories? m - -- 5_...___ (d) Are there any discrepancies known at the present O y- -- r--= -- time between the reading from TLD's placed by different y official organizations but read by different laboratories? Z _~ s r-- -= - ~ Explain your answer fully. L"5 246 064 d 5_ c=n -=~

I 3 's p-~ t, ta r

o. e P /?. D O b, S, j't

~ l' f . a y 12 . d. g o ; o > s. L. m ~ Y, o.. ' ? G. >..,* ; ;. u u u,A y=~j s u s.- ., 1 y m __ y3 7. For dose rate meters used to make any measurements . g--- r..bsequent to March 28, 1979, describe their method of calibration. ] .. m (a) Who calibrated them? e m f +2= ~ Ecw often was.this done? (b) -'=~T' m (c) Ecv was it donc? A t= m (d. ),, What were-the confidence limits for readings 7-C__ taken from these instruments when properly calibrated? N L:-5 Laz== [S. her r$diatics detectors inside the reactor contain-F_9_. .h ~ ....: 1 -.: :: Cm = r,ent bu.1 ng, s ta te : I =_y (a) Their readings for all tirnes read frca the d mcrning of March 28, 1979 up to and inc1'uding the present ti=e r-_;

f. m z

(b) I n d i'c a t.'c' wNe the:n-Oo sz e inc tru*mants' uculd be "=i = : . ~ expoet d to prnauce accurate readings' if they ' ere contaminate @.- w ~ with radioactive materials.

• -- - =

_:...r

1. =

(c) If any instruments of hi.s tind have been " lost" =j t .. state how they Verc lost if that is known. ~; .+=== ~ --~~- =-m =: =, ,- i 9.\\ -Ha v e-Eby: m M..u.r me-.nz.be.en...ma de

f. ground fan out o

4-g ig the area withi.n. twenty. m.i.le..s., of"t.he.Teacto.r?. ' If so, state: -J -a .(a.) The m.cthed.use.d to..t ake these measurements. L=d m = (b) The pean 1ts of these measurements which are Z-n== available at the prese.nt. time. or.otherwise k.nown to you.. m, N (c). In particular, state whether any I-131, Cs-137,- -6 e sr-90, Sr-- 8. 9,.Xe-13 5...Kr-8 5, 17p-- 23 9, :3a-14 0, Y-9 0, A=-241, %w E-- - --R U-235 or U-238 have been relecsed in greater than usual amounM_= s e %_ . since March 28, 1979. Fcr each of these which has been d m-3 o r t n i c;- .. __. a v v. - e

~ sin'ce March 78r 1971., where they were detected, and what the [ ~ ~ ~ -= total anodnt for each that is 'celmilated to be off site at .i as a result of the occurrence. { the present' time, ~ ,0. :f 3-Q:M. ~. d If for any reams part c cf M c gestion can-

==-m j"..n( ) - :9.?.9 s -Cb%~ E Edw'e.-

f* 4 noi b red co=pletely, or you feel that 'the calculation L5

'~ . uw,;. -:: - . g vys:-; = ~ ' M, I,cannot be done in a meaningful way, just give the a. mount of G .=_ =_ ~ .s, i_ any officimi eacn of the radivnucliden det.ected by.you or ste= agency of which you presently share information and have , = = - = w 1s knowledge for tne pert'nent t6e period. cive the location. C g-s and times and amounts for each of the radionuclides of which. you.have knowicdge, in particular the agencies listed in E =- cuestion 6. Part (c). Q_m D 5 10 W11 h r eostra t.o t.hc u2 f or ma tion sought 1.n the fore-c: , oing questions, state what correction was made fo$ background C g -- a levels or radiation or radionuclides in the area. (a) In particular, were any cacxground reference 1 TLD's or dosimeters kept? If so, state where they were 'kept. =m (b).What steps were taken to be certain that the m reference dosimeters, if there were any, read th'e correct _.M normal background radiation? (c) Were the reference instruments set up to measure w w , gross beta and ga==a radiation, or gross beta, or gross ga m, -w or gross alpha, beta and ga m or in some other way? Explain, M your answer. 92551 11. When did the first team from Brookhaven. arrive at C-W the s: ta. p= = fa) After their arrival did they at anY time set up a r-a. n r. p o q q i' ' w - s =7~~,, }' . a. M \\. /,. J _.,.a i sJ L2 m) y ----- 3 &*[W'Q~ =5 ___.__,..___7 }~ ---=--- [ g G p l

, f. t 8 =- s 1 (cont.) . __M

== _w G=_. - radiation monitors using biological radistion maniters such ma Il . - =w as Tradescantia Stamen E ir counting (Spiderwort KU-9), or ^ t-- white cell chromosome checking? M! ...t..'.'G . ~~ (b) nas nny biologica1'radiat. ion raonit.oring been ] i ..,.. - w. done by anyone else to your knowledge? Z l r-(c) If either or both of the ensw s to parts (a)

t. _ ;

m ~ and (b) of this question are in the at:1rmative, pleana ---t w_; state the results as they. are presently known of this = ~ = _ w biological radinHon monitoring. b 1 ' aesq t=- _=- ..(d ) !!e s +--M any 1.est.ing been done by any of the agehcies sw listed in question 6, part (c), en the subject of Iodine yee s checking by examining th: thyrgide g;l ;p. s, nics, @ eep, or _ m.M goa ts ? Please giv'e all results kncvn at this time of such. M tenting. L. r l' -i m 12. Describe im detail-the results of' all aerial-surVe'ys - i _.e rrom Y..ucp 28,1979 up tp.and. including the presant. time. x_ _ ; L-]=4 (a). In par.ticular state the intensity;a.nd dire.ction me of,.all_ plumes.dg.tected, e:id of. any. other. radioacti+e :ha 6dlal - =- 2 detected either en the-: ground'or in the air by means.cf __,4 Eerial survey. Z ..,.n , _.. n.. y,,..; ,= Q)..In particular,.. gin the.isodese plots or a:iy. -- m .===__2_ car.in forma t-ion sonorated bh. th=I A.R.M. c. he'licoptern End/or Gj planen. -J ws.= >4 (c') ' State specifically whether a y equipment en ij n board during official conduct-ed aerial n= rurvoyc was able to perfor:= the. functions of a. scintillemeter with a multi-channel ' ".__"_5

==a analyser or a pulse height analyseb. p 9 -'. 7. [a.fhi~ .s. ~ ()8cf'Lh>s!..Jej b M C M ) y

a.,.

( y 3 3 i 5 C/o 1 h sg/ w b. M z 24.6 Ou, n -- s - a.=. .~ _ _ ~ :_ : s .. - + - ~ *- =-

r=== y~ L1L FAN P" i 12 (cont. ) .=._ j (d) If the answer to part (c) is in the.affirr:ative, P-A state whether anv effort was made to determine the precise c e . ~*- t q '. ' [ ci.uposir. ion or the plumes or other cetected radioactive M m= ~ ' =aterial in the air or On the ground. [i? (e) If any scintillation spectrometry was done S = allcuing differential analysis of the radionuclides released, L==e + = = state in specificity each piece of information that is known ' gy at this ~3 e en this subject with specia'l reference to the c p -4 x cf gases ccming frc= the stache. Alce include any inform j ration of ground ga==a concentrations measured by airborne pg crystal spectremetry and the energy levels and associated i n i radionuclides for each place and ime for which inforr.ation is ~~i available. em b-w y --- (f) If an.v. air sar.oline. d evic e s w er e ca rri ed h.v.. M w helicopters or planes attempting to measure picoeurien per cubic meter of air by drawing sa=ples of air through a filter R and then measuring their radiation ecming out of the filter, =-_.- give the results and state the relative confidence factc you ra, .__[' have in.these results campared to the other types of as w =-. radiation measure. ment techniques used. D ~ I)\\ ~~ ( 13 y Ntc with apccificity s11 data now available to M sic:a you on the enries released pe.r second from the stacks of the i-. _ 2 ~ _., 7 varicus buildings en site for all :ncments after t.he morning of q ' arch 28, 197F,when th.e incident was first *:nown of. i (a) Give the wind' directions and speeds at all. - - - - = m.,., n.n) r rs. a...l_E55, times for which data is available to you.,c _ ', ' ' ' c 3:6. "a,;=,w..;yN, F. L C - m .m. t c. -.. - = ) I4 (4 >f d' 'bp ?% l- '.. gd j~ .2% UWW \\ .Q. i,l.%.h %

• = ^^*

g o_ t> 'a - - - -u S

• O 2_46 06o

=- ?,

I [7. Arnont.) (b) Give the spectral ecmposition of all materials 2 m ,.t released as it =sy be available to you. In answering this question. identify specifically I-131 and Sr-90 frca all the ql other radionuclides if that can be done und state their M t m . ~. concentrations at the various times when measurements w.re b -~ 'd i,= = m = pcrformed. i L- ' r--* [ (c) 2.xplain, if possibic, the apparent discrepancy between' the dose rate in the cloud of 1200:tr/h as related on =- tho tolophone tapos of the Nuclour Re guls b= ry Cor=is sioners "] =- w transcript, and the public statement that there was only 6 to. _r _= e O m -/h. in t.5 a t sar$ cloud at the same time (a s n.nnounced in __ =. - _ ao m5o < > - C =2 m (d) Was the reference in the PNO only.to the external p_- garuna dose dosimete$ readings such as could be

• aken with a i~ -

ge:.ger counter? ~~'(e) Was the inhalation dose left out of the dose =- given in the P 5's?" ~ ~~~ ~ C ....Ar$ thE tE-$a dere: likely to have been 100. ' ~] (f) i - -^ -:. : ~ times greater than that reflect 6d in the PNO's if tl inhala- -

==- - a.::.: ; -. u.: ::.. :- tion dose is taken into account? '~-d -_=;. . - :+1 -..:t. : : : s -= -1 -~ -- -m (g) Would this, in your opinion, be consistent with =m the testimony given by K.Z. Morga.n at the time of the Kennedy ~f hearings 'in Washington, on April 4, 19797 55 ~ ~~ 14. Docs Dr. Allen nrodsky presen tly hold a position at ......i s. r -._ a the Nuclear Regulatory Cc=ml.ssion? c==4 =- - fa$. Has he been consulted with by the NRC foT-i' I- -I purposes of making calculations on the arnount of inhalaticn =" s n p Ti T M N L= p. m o n p' 10 - iNv ' w . i m--- w s - h Y U 0 NNYbV 'M ? d f). 069 U m3 d

14. (cont.)

P- - do$e to persons within various distances from the reactor? EU. ~ WD[ ~ (b) Has he r.ade any c N "'=* b e ui n ~ gard to [ s1 ; doccc to the lung and bone cind v t.he critical v2 9cws z[ a as a e' aC result o# inhalation of beta emitting radionuclides? gg p=: (c) Does -the NRC hold to be generally valid,or

• =#

b_3 generally invalid the methods and results of Drodsky's paper h r[m published in Sealth Physic ~s, Volume II, pp. 1017-1032 (1965). 2 - - _ _ _ = (d) In particular, does the NRC agree or disagree p _ r;. - y= sed with the statement made on page 1018 of that paper + o the "E l=N effect that external beta doses will be small ec= pared to the-x= biological insult to the various internal crgans and the beta C I

==- tm e_xposures to the lung and G1 tract? r- =-- t=rd (e) In particular, does the NRC agree or disagree u _ _ _ w vi h the infomtion centained en table 3 on page 1022 entitled, " Multiples of acceptable e:nergency doses for inbr.la-La tien of Ic/see-C " and with Tatble B on page 1022 atn t i tl e d,. E 9: r =_ m i "D:pected effects of exposure to 1. 0 c-sec/m in a radioactive 3 cloud containing mixed fission products from 150-day operation -=M - _ = and 2-day decay"?

==^ n p ~- 15. If the radia*._-lan lev =1= in +ha air ra2 Aa,9 e:nn ew curies per cubic meter of air per hour and an expectant rother E= ~

= =

inhaled that air for 1 hour, how ma..ny millircias par Mux Wuid the. m ,' s n' l b; e, 9 -t p 2etus receive? ~ h ' k=s ;.

==, p. / "sa, .r.- W t!)( d M d u d kiJ b u

• ==i:

a m 16. Do the defendants have any knowledge or belie concerning f--;. u. hich radionuclides if any that : night be present in a cicud of ~-M nixed fission products, are able to pass the placental barrier: C m (a) Tf the ansvar is yac, pleace etate with M J ~ specificity the radionuclides believed to be capable of passing (-[==,4 .).k " )

== = - -. 3 ~'

t r._ u .=4 16. (cont. ) T=W ! = f the placental barrier. m, y =m t' > aq e#_

17.

• Do the defendants have any knowledge or belief h

ccmcerning how tauch radiation to the fetus doubles its chances of t= m r E-- J m getti.g cancer after it is born? t.4 (a) If the answer is yes, please state with .=4 t=ra. i specificity the ambunt cf radiation balicvad to dcuble the- .,,, ty, chances that the ' fetus Mll contract cancer af ter-it-is born.- t-_q F ~ ~3 G w:= 18. a; l

• 4as Radiation Management Corporation of Pilladelphia

-===

for tr.aking any radiation measurements concerning de:;e= k d' u=== respons Aa L received at or near_ the site a.t any time af ter. p 2: I ~ the accident / 29 I (a) In particular, did the licensee hire Radiation Mana9ement Corpora tion.to do radiation monitoring of any of l t-its personnel 1 m - ~ = - =- (b)., In particular, was Radiation Manacement Corp 5ra- _m i _= ", tion employed or contracted kith by any State or Federal - : ?....- - : -- - - Official cr Agancy for purposes of doing radiation ~ ev&luai.icna ~ =" m_-- .i__ .., c. a. Q3 -. Sm %h

m. Ga., h;.ap: a,s?.,<

-3 2 t. 1. d ~W ; .,, h

,, w.., V e y a<

g r y. n. a e s v~.,.,. s. iT v u 246 D7r e 1

1 -t ~ -{ L n. 16. (cen t. ) m. the placental barrier. ~i .==r e=.s . w

17. " Do the defendants have any kncvledge. or L-lief

,7--q ccrncerning hev tuch radiation to the fetus doubles its chances of R rwa =, getting cancer after it is born? (a) If the answer is yes, please s ta te with fi G =~ 2L specificity the arcur.t cf radiation halicv-d to double the-h2 chances that the, fetus will contrset cancer af ter-it is born.- t-=a f-

u. =u

't W& 18.

• 7as Radiation Management Corporation of' Philadelphia bY r

Ls=i for taaking any radiation measurements ccacerning doses [M re s_=c = s: a a received at or near_the site at any time af ter the accident? '=5 nm ~ .. ~ .s z=s: (a) In particular, did the licensee hire Ridiation Manage =ent Corporation.to do radiation monitoring of a.ny of l its personnel? $_~=2 (b)., In particular, was Radiation Management Corpora-m i =~ tion employed or contracted kith by any State or Federal m2

. ?...-

Official or Agancy far purposes of doing radisticn' avaluat.icra i== d gy[f)f}fdDa h>n sk6 1 Y .-m.., v 1.n[?. +...~# -ty ve yy 3 '?f'. . ', N-

n. ' O

{2 u } 4 U(

• )

/ A u v l l

~

18. (cont. )

f l fallouchire, cPonsorships, equir.m-uh cr cther c6biributions _a fm a12, state or federal acep,,qjpe t n ?:dia tion Managenent u'-~~ a I L=ds Corp. either directly or indirectly and any contributions A ~ . known by you made by Philadelphia Electric Company or any ,=a ' other utility to, that same firm either directly or through ^m

==a cniversity of' Pennsylvania; [9f' @ fi} )$f}] J, !H .<.:g4

J g,i ;c v. *

t.' :' T.4 a n d b,m a r,; m r=Es 4.

,dv b 1 se, ' u u u 19. Were any documents prepared under the SEE: supervision cf the National Security Council or by Mr. =a Jack Watson or by Dr. (= migniev arte:Inski curing the period from March 28, 1979, up to E=i w _nd 1.ncluding the pres *'nt ti~e in which ccntingency plans were. = =,.:

w.r- ~3 I

laid cut for a worst case scenario in which there was a reactor ~ ~~ a=a meltdown or other event resulting 'in a sudden release of massive ,2 cunts of radiation? (a) If the answer is in the af fir =s tivo pl aa se s-=-

==m s ta te-npeifically what contemizantion . = = levels were contemplated Q fer the Susquehanna River and for the Chesapeake Bay, i (b). State how these levels would have affected = evacuatien plans. = -- (c) State how much lead time was cente=olated fo2- ' evacuation from t'2a time a de,cisio,n might have.be' n reached e that it was necessary until the point where it would no '

===i 1m=]- longer be to any avail. ~ ~ v_. u_, (d) State how many people could have been moved. = how far during that & c. O a .,"_ 4 (e) At any time. during the days since March 28,-1979, hn er c = 11'e ate errorts neen =tade by officials cr agencies 57e cf the Federal er State govern cnt to confuse, mislead ar Q Nr6 073

L

-?3-1, -w

. ' s.... ~ ',19. (cont. ) ~ withhold infomtion from the public for any reason whatsoeve_r? r %- i If no please state the reason. 20 ,as there a large, by co.mparison, release of W radioactive material from the plant on the morning of Marchi 30, =m. 19797 =a ~ ~q s (a) At any time on March 30, 1979 was there a re-y ~ .. tease tnat was coming out at nore than 6 0 cu r t a s: mr cocend? M W (b) If the answer to either of the former secticas i~-3 is in the affirmative,' p'le'asc state what was the total dura-m r== - tion of Um.veriod of elevazed venting.

• ?> p}[p ik,If f'

Give' the total curies releasdd..!and hive -@;,h - e n... um ;; e - (c) p C M' time versus the release rate so that a release rate profi1= ~ could be plotted. =

=

.ers ~ ff it is possible for defendants to do so (d) , please esti=Ytc tha tstal parsen-rem exposure for that release, include both ihtern'al~and ext ~crnal doses in "the calculation m= -:2=- if that is poss10.Le. ~~. m '(e3' 'da'1c#. ulate th~e' 'to'ta'l 'p'e'rson-rem exposUe to date 5E ar,- resu.2x od une ac'cichhtad Thrnt! Mile Island.- ' - cs a i= = M t.

1.. 2.

7- - 21 cive all,re:suity,,or pnalyses cone.on primary,and,_ r--- [ second ccctant. wat.6;t. - { -(a ) In. particular tell when these were done and how M zw : the water s tmples.dere physically recovered to be analysed. mr= a

==-i (b) .in particular state whether any employee of the mm _.J n licensee, the state, or the federal government was ever exposed i Z_ to amounts of radiation signifi.cantly above backgrcund E radiation in attempting. to collect ori i.n c'ellecting any water 2 sample frem any building er pipe on the premises of the pl =- r_a _ 14 - ant! R '/d6 07b ,-G j ~, . < t t w I iW*" g W-- --]--"

tr q L-s2 [7% 1 Qy 2'2 Were there any employees of the licensee who ' b

e,ceivec.

-ho might have received relatively high doses of radia-bEai m, i esa '_ien eitbar in the contain:nent building or in the auxiliary j - m=.s d1 ding or in the control room? pm en (a) If the answer is in the a ffi ma H v.a. Mc -H er - the employees and state where are* their film badges now, d = vho took them, were they ever used, wha t was 1.lm reading. 'T AJ .,.e l~=Ea (b) Please give the beta activity as measured in picocuries per cubic =eter by the autnutic measuring =m ir. 2 *mr.cr. t_a in the Control rocn. ~ _ __g (c) State at what peint the men in the control roon'~ t ===_ C=m

=2 were instructed to donc respirators.

=~" (d) What was the radiation 9dDhh hIthb b D.e ds 2! g l e v e l ?

• s Q'VJ) d n.

(0 h h d[@V $ J " "*gtb' gff e d D 23._ State the contents in tummary form of all press O L _ leases given out by defendants concerning the occurrence at Three y 'le Island from March 28. 1979 to date. r m-L- - - - (a) Is there any piece of inforr.ation in.cny of those press releases which now appears to defendants to be !== = untrue? 1.._ - (b) Is there any statents concerning the status '

==.d cf. the public health as affected by the incident it Three C niza" zola.nc waren appears to require revision in the light . '_ m m of more' complete k.nowledge? C, 1 24/ -_ 4 At the tima the excess water spilled over ihto the J =*

ilia x=a building w s there ever any danger that a significant rt of radiation could issue frem the plant and affect adversely

..M,

_= '

24 6 ](g .... j { ~ t , p- ;-- 4 -e

0 g_ 2 c ont. ) t- -- L -.m the heal 6 of persons in the currcundL-.g rc m (a) was the public adequa'tely infor:,ed of the ,a= = circumstances under which actions were taken at that time? M=- x ,..s -w (b) Is the public adequately informed of the cir-F =_=_ uzma cumstances under which actions are now being taken which W u.==t {n-pm might adversely affect them?

P W

a w 2 n.==

m omr_2.9 25. Is there any danger whatsoever of recriticality i Un [~ ..o r.. . ncur--ing frem this point forward? .. f: eY-N (a).could recriticality occur if a hich pressure 2c "x < = "- pu=p trips out and the reactor goes into a forcod m t u--1 E' I~Z ~ circulation m-de?, gs p _d a m, __... (b) Could recriticality occur if a high pressure

) I y

pu.p is tripped off en purpose for the sake of bringing..

~O]

w J about a natural ^cKrcu...lation mo.de? m = ^ - M ei { ' (c) ' is :it tr6e diat' eventually a117 of-the ; high l =" y pressure pumps will be off either'by going off themcalv== t ..s_. or by being turned of 27- -.. L :. 2.. . _ _g _1 26. What is core embrittlement?- " _. ~ - (a) Would ehrittlement be a likely :or unlikely. .... ;. ~. : :. : _-3 phencmenon.iy high. Dressure hy(! regen in colu tien came in 3 contact with zirconium alloy? - A, (b) p-i Under.the.chove described --M * -a might any = = = = > chemical reaction take place? (c) If a chemical reaction' took place, what ~ ould ..==-s w ' ' ~ = = happen to the hydrogen, what ccmpound would be formed, what =

===2 n m are the physical characteristics of this ec= pound? 7 - ja Ul e W s.

== . ~. - g w e Mb

/ i= " m ~ _. g-n ~ 2'7. Could a ccmbination of high pressure, relatively G -.s cool te=perature, =, and a sudden mechanical vibration causa a brittle -a 4 a fracture of the core fuel rods? ~ d %a (a) I If this brittle fracture occurr.ed and fuel ..--a i pellats got beneath the core support grid, would recriticality L~ l t-EE3 ~

• be penalbIa:

m a (b) If the answer to (a) is af firma tive, state the @~2 F~ m eiretrastances. specifically under which i 12 L tha ponibili ty of recriticality might occur. W- -~ ~ , = -a us 22 Are there any pages of the NRC transcripts of the = = - - i %_Ei, ' ~-- 's sion c^"# enc =c en the Telcphone Tapes that have not been 75

.ade public at the present

'd e? .. =j (a) . ~i r' If there is a transcript gap, please explain Z why. l,- (b) Prcduce all pages of the aforementioned e q' T -4,. transcripts that have "M- '-- --de public at this point. >=4 i._==4 29. If we sssum6 L=1 that imelth effects as a result of the 'ETT, 2 ree Mile Island incident are a certainty rathe.: than a possiblity, ~ x1d the Ncclear Regulate.-y Cc:=nission rece= mend that nuclear eacters be allowed to continue to operate in the ~] , _ -a United States? ,M

==- _;. 30. What are the error bounds of the Nuclear Regulator,f '] e==insion's health. risk effects estimates frem the Three Mile 1 ~ 1 %.ei

land incident, if any.est# ates have been done?

~ C -===; ~, ,n .(a) Can an upper bound be established for how much =: m

=:t radioactive ::aterial has.been released from the reactor?...

wp u_ _ .1.7s, 3 in,4. m,.n %,. w.dm]m. F-i . A.np ar L d h,i,. w _= a m ' ' ' ~ ., 17

• f;,

4T k, u u, wJ w;

• L] b a t L -

!4 s;j.u 4 a .--+w-g}}