ML19289E026
| ML19289E026 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 01/08/1979 |
| From: | Seyfrit K NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Derienzo P GIBBS & HILL, INC. (SUBS. OF DRAVO CORP.) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19289E022 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900524 NUDOCS 7903210367 | |
| Download: ML19289E026 (3) | |
Text
[p *Ecg%,
UNITED STATES
[ ',.,, g '
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION R EGION IV 2
g 611 RYAN PLAZA ORIVE,SUlTE 1C00
[
ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011
%..v...f
,s.csn3 Docket No. 99900524/78-02 Gibbs & Hill Incorporated ATTN: Mr. P. P. DeRienzo Vice President, Consultant Engineering and Quality Assurance 393 Seventh Avenue New York, New York 10001 Gentlemen:
This refers to the QA Program Inspection conducted by Mr. R. H. Brickley of this office on December 11-15, 1978, of your facility at New York, New York, and to the discussions of our findings with you and members of your staff at t!.e conclusion of the inspection.
Areas examined during the QA program inspection and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.
During this inspection it v'ias found that the implementation of your QA program failed to meet certain NRC requirements. The specific findings and referer..es to the pertinent requirements are identified in the enclosures to this letter.
Please provide us within thirty (30) days a written statement containing, (1) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to correct this items, (2) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence, and (3) the dates your corrective actions and preventive measures were or will be completed.
In our previous letter of transmittal dated April 6,1978 (Inspection Report No. 78-01) we expressed our concern regarding the implementation of your qualicy assurance program. The results of this inspection indicate the need for us to reemphasize our concern and remind you that the QA program implementation approval letter you received from us dated March 31, 1977, states that if your record of deficiencies is such as to indicate chronically poor implementation of your quality assurance program the letter will be wi thdrawn. The basis for our concern is typified by the following.
790321o % 7
Gibbs & Hill Incorporated In addition to the deviations identified in the enclosure to this letter, you failed to meet certain of the commitments contained in your letter of response dated May 4,1978, as follows:
1.
The master list of all vendors with conditionally approved QA programs and the Vendor Document & Drawing Status list have not been up-dated and issued on a bi-weekly basis as stated in your response to Devia-tion A of our 78-01 inspection.
2.
The audits of Purchasing, Central Files, and Applied Mechanics have not been completed and the audits of the Print Department, Projects, and Instrumentation & Controls were completed in November even though Paragraph 3.1 under Deviation B in your response dated:
" Internal auditing is currently underway, and this series will be completed by June 15, 1978."
In addition to the need for corrective action regarding the specific examples above, your reply should describe in particular, those actions + n or planned to improve the effectiveness of your quality assurance pi-am and when these actions will be completed.
Your reply and the results of our next inspection will form the besis for our decision regarding the withdrawal of your letter.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the Commission's " Rules of Practice,"
Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter with enclosure and your reply together with the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the Commission's Public Document Room.
If this report contains any information that you believe to be proprietary, it is necessary that you make a written application within thirty (30) days to this office to withhold such information from public disclosure. Any such application must include a full statement of the reasons on the basis of which it is claimed that the information is proprietary, and should be prepared so that proprietary information identified in t.ne application is contained in a separate part of the document.
If we do not hear from you in this regard within the specified period, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.
Gibbs & Hill Incorporated Should you have any questions concernin9 this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely,
.l nad?p
/m.}
Karl V. Seyfr i
Director
Enclosures:
1.
Notice of Deviation 2.
Inspection Report tio.
99900524/78-02 cc:
A. Matuik, President en
tI$s>
sk?<
+4
'+
_ eEE A<e 1,em TEST TARGET (MT-3) llUn BM l.0 ll RE u
L" EB l.8 1.25 1.4 l
1.6 s..
=
MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART
- 4 44
- %$>'k
_ b+%f
,7 e
v
...... = _.. - - ~. - _,
't M<>++% f9*<
b A
eEEv <e 1,e~
TEST TARGET (MT-3) 1.0 E!aa 234 y @ LE I.l j,
- EM l.8 1.25 1.4 1.6 6~
MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART 4*e%
+<$+6
'5
- %f *///;/
4)<:9 5,,,
e
(
L.. _. __. _ __ii. _._- - -.
m