ML19289D981
| ML19289D981 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07002623 |
| Issue date: | 03/06/1979 |
| From: | Ketchen E NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19289D982 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7903210231 | |
| Download: ML19289D981 (3) | |
Text
.
DT-
//
/
UilITED STATES OF AMERICA i;UCLEAR REGULATORY CD:',AISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AT;D LICEtiSI!;G BOARD In the Matter of DUKE POWER COMPA:1Y
)
Docket tio. 70-2623
)
(Amendment to Materials License
)
Stim-1773 for Oconee fluclear Station
)
Spent Fuel Transportation and Storage )
at McGuire iluclear Station)
)
ilRC STAFF IriTERR0GATORIES TO CAROLINA EflVIR0iiMENTAL STUDY GROUP (CESG)
Pursuant to 10 CFR 52.740b, the fiRC Staff serves the following interro-gatories on Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc. (CESG), Intervenor, in accordance with the Licensing Board's Order of February 23, 1979.
1.
With respect to each of your contentions set out in the stipulation of October 18, 1978 as approved by the Licensing Board in its Order of February 23, 1979. S (c)
State the name, business and resident address of each person expected to be called as an expert witness at the evidentiary hearing; (b) With respect to each person named in response to interro-gatory 1(a), state the subject matter on which that person is expected to testify; and
_1f " Order Concerning Discovery, Contentions and Scheduling (February 23, 1979)."
'g 9 0 3 e t u M
- (c)
With respect to each person named in response to interroga-tory 1(a), state; (1) which contention (s) will be addressed, (2) the substance of that person's testimony, and (3) what you expect the testimeny to prove.
2.
With respect to each of your contentions set forth in the stipulation of October 18, 1973 is approved by the Board's Order of February 23, 1979:
(a)
State the name, business, and resident address of any person expected to be called as a witness at the evident-iary hearing except those already identified in response to interrogatory l',
(b) With respect to each person named in response to interroga-tory 2(a), state the subject matter on which that person is expected to testify; and (c) With respect to each person named in response to interrogatory 2(a), state; (1) which contention (s) will be addressed, (2) the substance of that person's testimony, and (3) what you expect the testimony to prove.
Section 2.740(e) of the Commission's Rules of Practice states that a party is under a duty seasonably to supplement his response with respect to questions directly addressed to (i) the identity and location of persons having knowledge of discoverable matters and (ii) the identity uf each person expected to be called as an expert witness at the hearing, the subject matter en which he is expected to testify, and the substance of his testimony; and to seasonably amend a prior response if he obtains information that the response was incorrect hen made, or he knows that the response, though correct when made, is no longer true and the circumstances are such that failure to amend the response is in substance a knowing concealment.
Respectfully submitted,
/
x s
\\;
Edward G. Ketchen Counsel for NRC Staff Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this 6th day of March, 1979.