ML19282B694
| ML19282B694 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 01/19/1979 |
| From: | Brown R, Hale C, Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19282B689 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900616 NUDOCS 7903160130 | |
| Download: ML19282B694 (4) | |
Text
g REPORT OF INSPECTION U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION IV Report Number 99900616/79-01 Program Number 51000 Organization: American Society of Mechanical Engineers United Engineering Center 345 East Forty Seventh Street New York, New York 10017 Dates of Inspection: January 3-5, 1979 Inspector:
~
7 [79 w
u_ u Ross L. Brown, Inspector, Vendor Inspection Date Branch I
4 Reviewed by:
k
/- D C. J.Nia.1d, Chief, Vendor Program Evaluation Date
- Section, spection Branch I
b
{- \\@-
1 bvVJNL-v%a-Approved by:
C UldisPotapovs,Ch'ief,VyndorInspectionBranch Date Summary Inspection conducted January 3-5,1979,(99900616/79-01) during the ASME Nuclear Certification Survey at Dravo Corporation facility at Marietta, Ohio.
Areas Inspected: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Nuclear Survey Team Performance in the following areas:
1.
Program Survey 2.
Manual Review and Acceptance Criteria 3.
Program Implementation 4.
Certification of Authorization Status 5.
Survey Team Report 6.
The inspection involved twenty-nine (29) inspector-hours on site, q903160lb
. DETAILS SECTION A.
Persons Contacted R. E. Tilton, ASME Team Leader E. C. Petrie, ASME Team Member I. Been, Utility Representative (American Electric Power)
Team Member R. P. Holt, National Board (NB) Team Member R. E. Jagger, State of Ohio, Team Member R. F. Slack, Authorized Nuclear Inspector Specialist (ANIS)
(Hartford Steam Boiler) Team Member H. G. Rishel, Authorized Nuclear Inspector (ANI) (Hartford Steam Boiler) Team Member C. R. Sindle, Authorized Nuclear Inspector Supervisor (ANIS)
Observer (Hartford Steam Boiler)
This survey team appears to be in conformance with the team makeup as described in the SCNC Procedures Manual, Appendix I, Table 1.
B.
Program Survey The vendor (Dravo Corporation) requested this survey for renewal of their N and NPT Certificates.
The survey team reviewed the Presurvey Questionaire submitted to the Society (ASME) by Dravo on January 3, 1979. The survey team determined that the application for N and NPT Certificates is in compliance with the ASME requirements.
C.
Manual Review and Acceptance Criteria The entire survey team reviewed the general sections of the manual (e.g., colicy statement, glossary, organization, and quality program).
At the conclusion of the above review, the survey team leader made the team member assignments (three (3) groups) for the review of the remainder of the manual and program implementation survey.
These groups met to review those sections of the manual relative to their assignment.
Each group recorded the manual changes required in order to comply with the code requirements.
This list of manual changes was given to the team leader, who with the ANIS (group 3) discussed the required changes with Dravo Manage-ment for their consideration.
D.
Program Implementation 1.
The two (2) groups reviewed the QA Program implementation relative to code requirements in the following categories:
order entry, document control, procurement control, material control, engineering and design control, manufacturing control, control of nonconformance and corrective action, control of measuring and test equipment, audits, quality records, control of nondestructive examination and control of welding and heat treatment.
i The inspector observed each group during part of their survey.
The group members reviewed documents relative to the applicable discipline (e.g., receiving inspection reports; purchase orders; qualified vendors list; production planning standards; shop travelers; weld control records (including welding materials);
calibration records; heat treatment records and charts; quali-fications of nondestructive examination procedures and personnel; welding procedure qualifications; corrective action requests, disposition and follow-up; indoctrination and training schedule, agenda and attendance list; document files; and quality records storage).
2.
The team leader conducted a meeting of the entire survey team to discuss the findings made during the implementation survey.
The meeting covered the following:
a.
Progress made with the manual changes (group 3). Changes were very extensive and Dravo will rot complete the changes j
prior to conclusion of the survey.
b.
Group 1 and 2 presented findings, which included several code deficiencies.
The entire survey team (seven (7) members) voted to recommend to SCNC that a resurvey be conducted after the deficiencies have been corrected.
E.
Certificate of Authorization Status The team leader conducted a meeting with Dravo management at the conclusion of the survey. The following items were discussed:
1.
The survey team leader covered the scope of the survey.
2.
The survey team leader stated that during the survey, it was determined that the suggested changes in the manual had not been satisfactorily completed, and that during the evaluation
. of the program implementation the survey team identified several deficiencies relative to code requirements.
3.
The survey team leader informed Dravo management that the survey team will recommend to SCNC that a resurvey be conducted after the necessary corrective actions have been completed and a resurvey date arranged with ASME Headquarters.
The current certificate expires on March 1,1979.
F.
Survey Team Report
~
A draft of the survey team leader's report was not available for review by the inspector.
1 i
i 1
_