ML19281C634

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of 800813 Request & Forwards Exercise Scenario for 800716 Emergency Exercise Conducted at Tmi.Certificate of Svc & Svc List Encl
ML19281C634
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/22/1980
From: Carter K
PENNSYLVANIA, COMMONWEALTH OF
To: Aamodt M
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
References
NUDOCS 8008280350
Download: ML19281C634 (66)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:riIS D.00VMEgf%i/ylfb POOR QUAUTY PAGES g is _-d.- r J_'k. ' j \\% COSISIONWEALTil OF PENNSYLVANIA u 4 c c-7 E DEPARTi1ENT OF ENVIRON'.1 ENTAL RESOURCES Bureau of Regulatory Counsel 5' 505 Executive House, P.O. Box 2357 ~ Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 hs August 22, 1980 .. 3 6; c..s.:c *e 3 .< a.::a y - _ ~ ....,.. g 7 ~

', l Ms. Marjorie M. Azcdt Lf-hG R.D. #5 Coatesville, Pennsylvania 19320

Dear Ms. Aacedt:

In response to your request of August 13, 1980, attached is a ecpy of the " exercise scenario" stich formed the basis for the July 16, 1980, e.ergency exercise conducted with respect to Three Mile Island nuclear power station. This documenc has also been distributed to intervenors Sbolly and R;GRY. Also enclo. sed is a copy of the "after-action recort" which PDR has prepared, alcng with its " Action Irg" of the exercise. Very truly yours, 1 - / g [ j(),(ll-t D KARDI t7. CARTER Assistant Attorney General 'GC: d:n Enclosures O S o '3 c? Ij 80082So35D

4 S. ..m.. ....a..~. m..... 5.....5..g.r. ., p e.;,......; .....x....s a.o .~. 1 ,.....),....,r~ u. . w SA. f , A.m., k... s 3.. A..,) m t.v : i.. .,.... -,.,.,...,,..:... n un . 4. a..) p I,,..w,, ., p. p.:. s. a (* r i....- r.r.). -, L r_a. p... c..c. t L.r. f e.e..v.e S.. m.. t w -.-.m

n....,d.... C,.:,.> r,4 ;..,. ;) m. A v..

A L A.. .v... s.N

v. ~
y. 4.I.

e.,,..s e. r, A v L.,.nC v.s c. aC e.s.,,0 e n.s. 'I'hree Mile Island Unit I has been in operation for approxina:cly one year at full prehetion of electric po ter. Durin;; :he very early norning hour, on July 16, several low pressura reac:or coolant alarns flash a.g a p '.- a...

a. u e ~.. e

'...d.'.c.a.'. ~.=', a..*r-=. .j o n ~.5. c N..... 1 C,, n w-. o '. P.. ~.. s..t '.a..ap.4 4 - 3 in prOCOSS. r e.,.... A. o". t0 A.sg S h 4. :. 2,.p.3./.so no.4:..._4e =. n. a t e,. n.4 n C a t s .w .. -. 4 ...w a e.... y

v...., z....

.p.,. ~..,f ( D W.'s.i.- a..d '. e.... a v..' va n. ' 7. =. - =. a..c ": '.d.a m..., a. an. e*.~s =...." / * '".'. ) d s...- . 5 an", an,,A. --n h a.; Dut'/ u.erson t.aa:

w. era is an anergency e'.*ent in,;. '.nt A u ru w s o.'. w..,. a. e.i.d e s.. 4 m.?d4 3. a.

. '., - o.: ..,n.. 62e.Tggc4 A,J.e .O ...?. A 4 1 e .e n. bee 3. .s. a w 1. St. a e

o.,.., C r 4.o

/ m o.s. ), a.A .C... o ..o :4..: i C3.. <.. o.e s u,, u o. e. A 4. 4,.. s. .w- .c... I \\ "*,4....4.<.,.*. v...,. 4.e 4. e.%. 4., n -.g. c a. 3.41 a %.a. T a.. A. (.!=. '6 A ). 3.

w..s gu.,.,

o.G .,,.,n

m.... 2 3s.

y r A. n.e m, L...; 11 e. a SH. t n 7

  • C 0 a*. '.'.., " 'n.'k "s' u m.,
  • P. S v n

..o ~.'. ' '. 8 S **'.'.s n e ~. ' '. 3 "6.s v.'.' '..~ ~. ^ ef

  • o g' o
  • m.a.. ". #..". '

a '*.a. '.'). .. Jn "'4.3 S /.**,,,'.*."o,*.4.$*.* (3, 6

  • Cdl. S E C,' ' 0 *..* 2 ),.' '.*.d

'c' u a. .~.-.~~..5#.'*_"..."; v"t'.*."'*.#.".~. '.u'"....**. C o I'.d. #. *. #.. G, * * * * #. J '...o'0..'...'v'"- ^#

  • ~**

' 3 ,,..s.,,.. r '... ....3 .~; 4 4 n.2 1' ., A.. ( T.r e. J .a if,*-'.* -' a ', C. C v, 3 a

r. ^. v*,...., = -

.AJ A. t, 3 r*., e ,. 4,, a,... 71* .4 t' 3.. 3.4... t A.. ._s .a s ..a . ) *. 4..J 4.g.4 sgg, O

e.,,...

a f 3

4. a. 3 e.. a. C,

3 % 4.,p,.....o ",..,. ,J....n a. u d. ;, s...... A. a.1.'

c. 4 a-

..su. a 3.aw ....w u.. ... n' b * * - * - 3 ..,s.~..r...

a.,.,. 7 e.

~a,- 2 . N.. 2 4 ....' m. ...J. a. 4. 4. ,? 3 9,. s. C,.s.a . o .7.' ^ m ...s..s.- wa .~. .w. ?n.4 .. *** / ~ ~ *.i ? 1)

    • c 24 4

n.,. 4. 7. .i., l'a.1 .s e. o,. 3.,. w... ',.f. r.. n 8

a..,....

,bb*'*/ '

    • s**
  • -- * * * ' " * " ' ~

m y ..- 3 M..g,S [ *." *y,' ...g. V....... g.v. p,3.. J, 3 i ...1 .p. " *.. 4 v.N r*,g .J,.", is g.7 3...3,......

  • g-
  • q ws

.e ..a ?.,.;.,

2. a..s~a.

-.. ). :....',.A. 2.. s,. 4 s. * %w d

e. e m

...*wwa.j o L. a. y. "...?. D.%:,. O. 4....,;. 7m.. .g. */ sV n..., ...a. .3 6 1 ? ...w

a... = 3 >..a

.4*%~;., b..,.. .a. ~). .1 o...a. ..ca ,3,. ..t v.r..a a.* " d %, a. ..y .<.g. J..w. s

of off-site power. 3R? :o Dif "HGTLINC" ac:iva ted; n!! advisories will be from 3RP direct to PCG: situn:!.on may c::calata :n "OE::ERAL die"GE::C'.'" within next f ew hours; potential now exists f or significant off-site Iodins .(- (I-131) relense. Re:c=:end :o:21 nobilita: ion of all State resour:ec. ':o :if y all risk counties and central area. At 7:30 A.:1., ?E!A ec==ences notification for all State Agency Emergency Response Teams :o man and support Sta:e ECC on a 24-hour basis until fur:her notic.e. Sans request sen: to FCG R-3, PD!.A Central Area mobili:ad and ?D!A Area Directors commence alerting suppor: counties. At 7: 45 AJI., 3R? Situation Report (SI RI?) to ?EJA: "Iedine Indica:or off-scale; in HIGE ALA?l!. Eas tern site boundary ef fluent moni:or levels - 50 ar/hr increasing; of f-site conitoring :ean repor:s substan:ia:e si:e beundary dose rate reading. tiind: 270 degrees /3nph. Recommended protective accion: Sheltering 5 miles d unwind :o Ilizabeth::un 2cro and State Hospital; thyroid prophylaxis for ener;ency ucrhers and dcunvind ( population; respirator'/ pro:actio-: and protective clo:hing for emergency workers near site boundary. Agriculture assessing need to place nils animals wi:hin 10 miles downwind on secred feed." At S:00 A.M., SITRE? 'b.1 to all arens and counties: "2!: ecer;ency not under contr:1; State ICC cnd all Risk Coun:y ICC's f ully :,pera:itcal on a 24-hour basis; cll opera:ional ac:ivities are f ocused on advan:in; readiness posture f or full energency respense to 2C incident; presen: D': Jai: 1 v..e s s... ~: " . c r.. S..L. a...n..,..as ,.,.,.,.<a ,s ..,.<o .o n ~ r.r,..s.. a.. , ww.... a..

r. e 3. w "... r.

.r a rq. t' n. a.. r.v. ~a r c i. ra .%.b v>L. av , e v..r e. - r 3,.3..s.- =. r L.n.....J. - r ., 6. a.1 us. se en s 7.wu n.s{., ' ,e ... a " ;. ".e..s. u

a. r... r..~n~.r a2..,

.o.,.=,. 3 ps., o. < < < e s. A...,. .,I ,,.as

em..a.

.s s physical control of facili:y; po:ential exists for siSnifi:an a-Ospheri: re., eas cs. All response trans preparaf :o execu:e : heir :-2sponsibili:les ander 3._,,, ,=,y, v...,,.. no - ,n,,) 3.,,,..,.,;.s y, g, 7, r. ..... e r....t. 2,3 g g,, ae.. f= y o.K L. r.i.n W r.,7 s-< ,c.O,.,,,. <-Jn-w..a ,.= e e s... s. e.. g g..J...,., s e r s.. 2.3.,, m;. 2.. ...o =,. r.*.wa r.v. ~a.[

  • -..e.7,.,.
s.. u..s....v-e ( r.....,
v....,

-s

7.. e..

3 ,,y .e.. ., o u. .s ... s mu ..-D

e e RES?CNS!CILITIES, Attention is direc:cd to (1) CONC 2?? 0F OPERATIONS (2) plans. (a) Common to All S:ste Agencies, and (b) Assigned to specific Scate Government State Agencies, and (3) Appendices for specific S:ste Agencies. - All State Agency Emergency Response Teams will determine the stntus of their "RES?0NSI3ILITIES" cs scen as possible and submit reports to PEMA 10:00 A.M. followed by hourly "upda:es'" thereaf:er :hroeshou: Oper:: ions a: 111 be used for inputs to the duration of the e.xercise. Status reports 7: Governor's Press Secre:ary in the prepara:ica of public adviscries and press r eleas es. State Agencies with specific ras;0nsibilities for Prc:ec:ive Action access control and :hyroid prophylaxis) shall Guidanca (shel:cr, evacuatica, 1 changing condi:icas =cke recec=endations :o ?DL\\ corcensurate with TMI Uni: during exercise period. At 1:43 ?.M., 3R? notified by TMI: Loss of con:ainment in:cgrity is poss ible. Recommend evacuate 10 mile radius. A: 2:13 ?.M., 3R? no:ifies PDf,'* A: 2:30 P.M., Gcvernor crier: 10 mile evacua:ica. (IZE2CISE p an.... v _n..... y.. 2y. x._. g v...e... r..,_u..-..,D S. s

e PENNSYLVANIA DIEROC;CY MANAGDIENT AGC;CY TRANSPCRTATION AND SAFETY BUILDING HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA FIXED NUCLEAR FACILIT EXERCISE THREE MILE ISLATD NUCLEAR FOWER STATION (July 16, 1980) t g AFM-ACTION REFORT AND EVALUATION I. Exercise Preparation Activities A.

Background

1. Pennsylvania E=ergency Managemen Agency (?EMAlMe=orandum Dece=ber 31, 1979, provided the following infor ation to State Agencies for planning purposes: The State Plan for Fixed Nuclear Facility Inciden:s =ust a. be evaluated prior to Federal Governmen: concurrence. b. To fulfill this requirement, PEMA is planning a : reining exercise to be condue:ad at the State and Central Area E=ergency Operations Center on Wednesday, April 30, 1980. c. The exercise also will fulfill the quarterly training requirement for the 1st quar:er of 1980. d. A1: hough the concept for the conduct cf :he exercise has no t been f or=ula:ed, it is envisioned that the Three Mile Island Facili:y, one risk coun:7 and several of its juris-dictional municipalities, and one supper county thereto will participa:e in :he exercise. Each State Agency is requested to insure :ha: i:s energency a. plans are updated and support the draf: Annex E, E=ergency Nuclear Incidents :o :he Co=monwealth Disaster Operations Plan. Further, that response :ean.enbers ara trained to respond :o agency respensibilities during stergen:ies. f. Additional information and guidance will be promulga:ed as planning is developed. 2. PEXA Teletype Message, 12/31/79 12:0, no:ified :he Central Area Director and all Central Area Counties regarding :he above exercise planning informa: ion. I: also designa:ed the Cen:ral Area Heal-quarters with its State Agency Respense Tests to participate as the Coordinator of support counties. 3. Planning 1. PERA Ener:ise Directive, January 9, 1950, instructed the Opera: ions Officer to prepare an exercise to evalua:e the effectiveness of State, c:unty and local municipal subdi.csion plans to respond :o

a fixed nuclear facility incident. It also specified; a. Selection of Three Mile Island as the f acility site an1 a request to Metropolitan Edison Company for participation in this effort. b. Invitation tc all five counties within ten miles of the facility site to parti:1pate, but ?EMA evaluation only of the Dauphin County Radiological E=argency Response Plan. c. Selection, in coordination with the Dauphin Ccunty Emergency Manage =ent Coordinator, of 3-4 local =unicipalities to fully participate in the exercise. Selection should be in the close-in and mid range distance from the facility and possess differing characteristics such as population, industrial and agricul:ure to be represen:stive of :he Dauphin Coun:y muni-cipalities within the risk area. Others say par:icipate as desired. d. Selection of support counties within the Central Area to par:icipate in the exercise. Si=ulations at county and cunicipal level for those being evaluated e. should be held :o absolute mini =us, f. Conduct of the exercise will be scheduled on April 30 frc= 0900-1430 hours. Exercise time vill be based upon real world time. g. Related schedules are: (1) Orientations and requisite : raining of simulators and observers - prior to April 30. (2) Cri:ique - =orning of May 2. (3) Aug=entee par:icipation as evalua: ors - duty week of April 23. h. Invi:acion to Federal Esergency Manage =en: Agency and Nuclear Regula:ory Coc=ission to observe exercise :o the ex:ent desired. 1. Designa: ion of three ?IMA Staff Members to ect=ence exercise participation. The effer: of this tea = will include development ef: (1) Scenario (2) Message Plan (3) Cbjec:ives (4) Check Lists for Evalus:crs (5) Critique Plan j. Team au:horiced to coordinate vi:h designated si=ula: ors, 5:ste Agencies, coun:1es, municipali:ies, Metropoli:an Edison C mpany, Federal Emergency Managemen: Agency, Nuclear Regula:Ory Commission and others required in the development of the exercise play. k. Team should also develop a public awareness pian in :cordination with the Inforna:1on Cfficer. 1. Overall obj e::ive of :he exercise is :he de:ermina; en of :he workability of the Sta:e, ceunty and muni:ipal Radiological Energency Respor.se Plan. Realis: :o be stressed. 2. The inicial effort of the exercise team was concentrated on develop- =ent and preparation of the overview for the fixed nuclear facility exercise. I: specifies the purpose, schedule, participants, goal, objective, and concept in ter=s of parameters and =ethodology. I: defines the three general phases of the exercise as :he (1) Develop =ent Phase (2) I=plementation Phase and (3) Critique Phase. The OVERVIEN is provided in Tab A of the exercise caterial. 3. The SCENARIO (Tab A) set the stage and was designed to play the three e=ergency action levels for nuclear power f acilities defined in U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Co==ission, Federal E=ergency Manage =en: Agency NUREG-0654, FEF.A-REP-1, January 1980, " Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Esergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants". The :i=e span was set to start with an ALERT due to a loss of coolant accident, progress to a SITE IMERGENCY, and finally upgrade :o a GE;ERAL DiERGD;CY. On February 7, 1980, the exercise tea = =et w1:h represen:acives of Metropoli:an Edison, General Public Utili:7 and the Buresu of Radiation ? otection at :he Three Mile Island Observation Center to discuss :he scenario in detail. On the basis of this discussion and subsequent =eetings at the Cancer on February 23 and March 6,1980, several revisions were =ade prior to ce=pletion of the final scenario which was satisf actory to the facility, Bureau of Radiacien ?rotection and this Agency. The declaration of a GENERAL DfERGE;CY was ti=ed to occur at 9:00 A.M., which signaled :he start of exercise participation by all Response Tea =s so that all Sta:e Agencies would have a =axi=u= opportunity to execute their responsi-bili:ies during the 51/2 hour exercise. It was designed to provide each S: ate E=ergency Respense Tea = a period of one hour to deter =ine the status of their responsibilities under provisions of COMMONWEALTH OF PE'NSTLVANTA DISASTER OPERATIONS ?LAN, AN';EX E - D!E20E';CY NUCLEAR INCIDENTS (F LXED NUCLEAR F ACILITY) and all existing supportive plans. It was deemed particularly i=portant for those State Agencies with specific responsibili les for =aking rec:==enda:1ons on ?rotective Action Guidance (shel:ar, evacuation, access control and thyroid prophylaxis) co==ensurate wi:h changing facility condi:1ons during the exercise period. 4. PEMA Memorandu=, March 26, 1980, notified Sta:e Agencies tha: :he exercise was pos:poned until July 16, 1980, because ?EMA recently received guidelines providing new criteria for concurrence of Sta:e The sa=e infor 2: ion plans concerning Fixed Nuclear Facili:7 exer:ises. was sent by le::er :o all other interested parties. In view of :his develop =ent, PEMA decided to condue: a :able-:cp exercise on April 30, 1980. The Af ter Action Report for this preliminary exercise was cc=- rei: era:ed pleted and distributed on May 3,1550, and therefore is not in this repor:. 3. During the week of July 7,1980, the las: planning effor: of the exercise planners (?IMA, 3RP and TMI) included a review of the scenario and reports of moni:or readings devised for :rans=ission frc= the facility for the purpose of insuring :ha: these inputs would drive :he exercise on the preconceived schedule. 6. On Monday, July 14, 1990, a briefing for exercise observers was conducted a: PIMA for the foll wing purpose: a. To outline the exercise by highlighting the scenario, objectives, and role of the observers. b. To explain requisite ad=inistrative details. c. To distribute the individual observer packets and describe procedures for cespletion of the checklists. Composition of the materials in the observer packet is provided in the overall su==ary of exercise material described in paragraph I.3.9. 7. On Tuesday, July 15, 1980, a short exercise briefing was conducted in the morning for PEMA clerical personnel to familiari:e them with the scope of the exercise, their role, administrative details, and a request for their full cooperation to assist in =eeting the exercise objectives. 8. On Tuesday afterncon, July 15, 1980, a briefing for tae exercise players from all participa:ing agencies was c:ndue:ed at ?EMA for the following purposes : a. To outline the exercise scenario, objec:ives and role of the players. b. To reiterate the need for and proper use of Standard Operating Procedures for the PEMA Imergency Operations Cen:er (folder will be located on the desk of each State Agency E=ergency Response Team). c. To invite particular attention of new participants to State emergency procedures (inexperienced personnel inevitably find ini:ial difficul:y in coping with unaccus:Omed procedures). d. To explain requisi:e administrative details, To distribute player exercise aterial for all si:uations and e. events preceding and leading up :o the TMI declaration of a GELERAL EMERGENCY at 9:00 A.M. (July 16, 1930) - :i=e which full exercise participation by Response Teams cec =ences. 9. The condue: of an emergency exercise involving an acciden: at a fixed nuclear f acili:y is only one of three new =ajor requirements specified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and U.S. Nuclear Regula:ory Commission in January 1980 via NUREG-065a/7EMA.RE?-l f:r reviewers in determining the adequacy of State, local and nuclear pcwer plant operater emergency plans and preparedness. The other two major requiremen:s are the adequacy of (1) contents of the emergency plans and (1) desi;n of the exercise :o fully test the plans pursuan: to the recent Federal cri:eria for evaluation. For reviewers or persons otherwise concerned wi:h the adequacy of the exarcise material, the foll: wing overall su==ary of the exercise =a:erial con:ents is provided for :0nvenien: reference: _4

FIXED NUCLEAR FACILITY EXERCISE T"4REE MILE ISLAND NL' CLEAR POWER STATION TABLE OF CONTENTS TA3 A..... INTRODUCTION 1. OVERVIEW:

a. Purpose - Test and evaluate plans, and construction in a =anner to serve as a codel for future exercises.
b. When.
c. Who.
d. Coal.
e. Critique,
f. After Action Report.
g. Concept Parameters.
h. Concept Methodology (1) Development Phase (2) Implementation Phase (3) Critique Phase.

2. SCENARIO: Loss of reactor coolant accident co=mencing at 6:30 A.M. with a facility declaration of an ALERT, escalacion to a SITE EMERGENCY at 7:30 A.M., and full escalation to a GENERAL EMERGENCY at 9:00 A.M. with fur:her deteriora: ion of the plant situation to the ultimate worst event at 2:30 ?.M. Governor's order for a 10-mile evacuation (End of Exercise). 3. DECISION MATRIX: Tabulation of all State Emergency Response Teams with responsibilities for protective actions in :cres of (1) Recom=endation (2) Authori:7 for Decision (3) Coordination in accordance wi:h :he Co==cnweal:h of Pennsylvania Disas ter Operations ?lan, Annex E - Fixed Nuclear Facili:ies. 4. TIME SCHEDULE: Time sequence for controllers to regulate the play, orderly progress fro = the least :o worst event, and permi: adequate consideration of all available protective action options. Purposely designed to obviate the necessity for players to improvise exercise emergencias ince=patible with :he time sequence in scenario. ?re=ised upon thorough familiarity with scenario by State A;encies having primary responsibilities for nuclear facility accidents. 5. OBSERVER ASSIGNMENTS: Observers (13) loca:ed at ?EMA Emergency Operations Center (ECC), Risk Coun:7 ECCs, Municipalities and Hospitals. 6. DISASTER PRCCLAMAT!CN: Suggested ?rocla ation of Disaster Emergency (State Governor). LG 3..... ?E'A OBSERVER No. 1 (State Departments of Transportation, Mili:ary Af f airs, Sta:e Police plus ?ublic Information Of fice and ?EMA Cpera: ions) 1. CUIDANCE TO C3SER"ER: Task to svaluate plans and capabili:ies of the assigned Response Tears using chechlists, situations and message problems. s .h.

2. CHECKLIST: A. Initial Notification Procedures 3. Public Infor=ation C. Transportation D. Pennsylvania State ?olice E. National Guard F. Coordinaticn of Unnet Needs 3. SITUATION: A. Initial Actions: Message proble=s and solutions (1-4) to pre-exercise events: (1) Initial Incident Message f c= Facility (2) Accident Assess =ent and Consequence Evaluation (3) Escalation to Si:e Emergency 3. Public Infor=ation: Message problem for necessary actions to ensure that the general public receiv.ts necessary infor- =ation regarding prospec:ive offsite iodine radiological ha:ard. 4 MESSAGES: A. I-83 Cons true: ion: I: pact a: Exi: 13 on anticipated 10 =ile evacuation. 3. Request for Detour Signs and Roadblocks: Assignmen to State Police for response to I-83 Construction at Exi: 13. C. Cur:ailmen: AMTRAK, Cc==ercial Air Traffic, and Inconing Traffi: on Turnpike: Assignmen to Transportation for execution. 3. Request to Ac:ivate F.o Lines-Special telephone lines recently installed for nuclear facili:/ accidents ONLY. TAB C..... PEMA 03SER'IER 50. 2 (State Departments of Commer:e, Labor and Industry, Agriculture, ?u'elic Welfare, General Services, and Public J ility Co==ission' l. GUIDAMCE TO OBSER'IER: (Sace as Cbserver No. 1) 2. APPRO?RIATE SECTION OF A55EZ E: Responsibilities of Agriculture and Publi: Welfare. 3. CHECKLIST: A. Welfare 3. Agriculture (Addi:ional list for Field Obserier for Protective Response in the Ingestion F2:hway) 4 SITUATICNS A. Number 1 - Initial Acticas (All Response Tes=s - sa:e as Tab 3) _6_

3. Number 2[ - Public U:ility Cc= mission: Problem concerning ability of utili:7 companies to continue normal electric service outside of the risk area. C. Number 3 - Depart =en: of Cc=merce: Problem concerning industries and business in the event of evacuation. D. Number 4 - Deparrsent of Labor and Industry: Problem con-cerning ce==erce in the event of evacuation. Requires coordination with Labor and Industry., E. Number j[ - Department of Agriculture: Cc=prehensive problem concerning readiness for protec: ion of the Ingestion Exposure ?achway. 7. Number 6 - Multiple Agencies: Proble= concerning phased shutdown of business and indus:ry. G. Number J, - Department of General Services: Problem concerning establishment of supply poin:s :o suppor: evacua:icn. TA3 D..... ? EMA OB S ERVER NO. 3 (State Departments of Education, Environ = ental Rescurces, C: muni:y Affairs, Aging and the Red Cross) 1. GUIDANCE TO OBSERVER: (Same as Observer No.1) 2. A??ROPRIATE SECTION OF ANNEI E: 2esponsibill:1es of Educa:icn and Environ = ental Resources. ~ 3. CHICKLIST A. Department of Educacica (?rocedures for protective actions for school children). 4. SITUATIONS: A. Initial Actions (All Response Tears - same as Tab 3) 3. Red Cross: Multiple respense and coordination problem. C. Department of Aging: Problem concerning acco==odation of aged a: Mass Care Centets in the evenc of evacuation. 33 E..... DE?ARTME'C OF MEAL 7d 1. GUIDANCE TO 03 SERVER: Task to evalua:e 5:2:e heal:h plans, nursing homes evacua:ica plans, and hospi:a1 evacuation plans in the risk area using checklists, si:ua: ices and =essage problems. 2. APPROPRIATE SECTION OF ANNEX I: Responsibili:ies of Health. u.,. u:m i s. A. Radiological Energency Response 3. Hospital and Nursing H:ne Eva:ua:i:n ?lans _7

4 4 MESSAGES AND SITUATIONS A. Initial Actions (Same as Tab 3) 3. SSKI Not Available: ? robles concerning preparation of policy statement on issuance of SSKI considering actual availabili:y of drug. TAB F..... CENT?AL AREA AND HOST COUNTIES 1. CUIDANCE TO OBSERVERS: (Si=1lar to Cbserver No. 1) 2. APPROPRIATE SECTION CF ANNEX E: Responsibilities of Suppor: Coun ty. 3. CHECKLIST A. Mass Care 3. ?ublic Infor=ation C. Activation of E=ergency Operations Center m3 G..... RISK CCC';TY 1. GUTDANCE TO 03 SERVERS: (Sisilar to Obser-ter No. 1) 2. APPROPRIATE SECTION OF ANNEX E: Responsibilities of Risk County. 3. CHECKLIST A. Notification and Warning 3. Activation of E=ergency Operations Center C. Public Inf or=ation D. Risk Municipal':y 4 S!"*JAT'ONS ASD ?R03LD!S A. Initial Actions (Same as Tab 3) 3. Decontamination: Problem concerning readiness :o perform radiological decontamina:ica of perso nnel. C. Notification: Probles concerning readiness for evacus:icn. D. Alert and Warning: Probles concerning length of ti=e :o warn the public. E. Rumor Control: ?roblem concerning government ac:icn to coun:eract ru= ors. F. Closing of Schools: Problem concerning actions of agencies responsible for school ad=ints ration. TA3 E..... RISK MUNIC!?ALI~~f 1. GUIDANCE TO OBSERVERS: (Similar to Observer No. 1; 2. DAUPHIN COUNTY'S CUIDANCE TO RISK SJNICI?ALITf-Sample Local Government E=ergency Evacuation Plan for ?ixed Nuclear Facili:7 Incident. 3. CHICKLIST A. Risk Municipality 3. Ac:ivation cf E=ergency Operations Cen:er C. Notification and Warning 3. Public Info: a: ion _3

4, SITUATIONS A. Closing of Schools: Problem concerning actions or risk municipality in ef f ecting school closures. TAS I..... BUREAU OF RADIATION PROTECTICN 1. GUIDANCE TO OBSERVERS: Iask of 3RP Observer No.1 is to evaluate the plans and capabilities of the 3R? Assessment Team. Task of BRP Observer No. 2 is to evaluate the response and capabilities of the 3RP Field Monitoring Tets. 2. CHECKLIST A. 3RP Field Monitoring Team 3. 3RP Assessment Team TA3 J.....E"ERCISE CONTROL (LI'4ITED DISTRI3UTION) 1. GUIDAT'?. TO CONTROL: Initiate and maintain the flow of the exercise by (A) Pre-developed situations and proble=s inser:ed by control on either a pre-ti=ed or as needed basis (3) Situations and proble=s developed during the exercise and inser:ed by or through control to elici; exercise response or continui:y, and (C) Situations and problems developed as outcomes from ac:1vity by exercise participan:s. 2. CONTROL TIME SECUENCE A. 6:30AM to 7:15AM (0630) Issue 1-1-81 v/ solution to CPS (1) Activate notifications sys:em (0640) Issue I-1-31 v/ solu: ions A L 3 :o OPS (2) Moni: ors repor: to 3R? regional offices for equipment (3) PEMA key staff report :o State E=ergency Opera: ions Cen:er 3. 7:30AM to 9:00AM (0730) Issue 3-1-91 v/ solutions A & 3 :o OPS (1) Incident upgraded to si:e emergency (0745) Issue 4-1-31 to 0?S (2) E35 anncuncemen: (sinulated) (0300) Issue 5-1-31 :o OPS (3) Increased readiness a: I=e:gency Oceraticas Cen:er (4) Dispatch monitors (5) Recom=end placing animals en stored f eed and sheltering to two miles C. 9 : 00 A>! :o 2 : 30PM* (0900) Issue 1 :hr: ugh 5-1-81 :o all players (0900) Issue 6-1-31 :o CPS (0900) Issue 7 through 10-1-31 to C?S (1) E3S anncuncement (simula:ed) (2) Total ecoili:a: ion _g_

(3) 11:00AM press conference (4) Increased protective actions (5) Unmet needs identified for a 10 mile evacuation (6) KI issued to e=ergency forces (7) Agriculture protective accions increased (3) Mass transportation curtailed (9) Schools - su==er sessions and colleges discontinued (10) Activate National Guard (11) Preposition traf fic control and security forces (12) Reduce patient load at hospital (13) Evacuate nursing homes and hospitals (14) Close businesses (15) Shut down industries (16) Curtail incoming traffic on cajor evacuation rou:es (17) Clear insti:utions (18) Close parks and ca=ps in risk and hos: counties (19) Res trict food shipments into and from area (20) 2?M press conference NOTE: Problem - 22 through 34-1-31 issued as exercise flow indicates

  • Exereire is based on free flowing f erma:.

Specific ti=ing of actions is a.t.11: of 3R? assess:ent of reactor condi: ions and radiological readings. 3RP reco=senda: ions vill be channeled :o Governor /L:. Governor for decisions. 3. CONTROL MASTER INDEX A. ?RE-EXERCISE EVENTS TIME E7ENT 03 JECT!VE 0630 Notification Me: hods and Test Cc==onwealth of Pennsylvania Procedures - Ini:ial Message Disaster Opera: ions ?lan, Annex I - frem Plant E=ergency Nuclear :ncidents (Eixed Probles 11-1-31 Nuclear Facili:y) Appendix 3, page 3-1 Initial No:ificati:n Procedures 0640 Acciden: Assessmen: and Tes: Cctmor.vealth of Pennsylvania Consequence Ivalu : ion Disaster Operati:ns ?lan, Annex I - Problen 42-1-31 Emergency Nuclear Incidents (Ftced Nuclear Facili:y) Paragraph II, Subparagraph A3, Page 9 - Acciden: Assessment 0730 Escalation to site Energency Tes: C ::enveal:5 of Pennsylvania Problem 43-1-31 Disaster Opera:ica ?lan, Annex I - E=ergency Nuclear Incidents (Fixed Nuclea: Facili:y) Paragraph VIII, Subparagraph I, Ac:ivation of Ener-gency Response System 0745 BR? SITRE? 'Jith Reco=mendations Tes t Co==onweal:h of Pennsylvania For Covernor to PEMA Disaster Operations Plan, Annex E - Problem 4-1-81 Emergency Nuclear Incidents (Fixed Nuclear Facility) Capabili:y of E=ergency Personnel to use plan with respect to coordination and informa-tion flow. 0800 SITREF 11 to Counties Test Co==onwealth of Pennsylvania Problem 15-1-81 Disaster Operacions Plan, Annex E - Paragraph VIII Capability of E=ergency Personnel to use plans with respect to coordina-tion and infor=ation flow. 3. TIMED EXERCISE EVENTS OBJECTIVE TIME EVENT 0900 Escalation to General Emergency Test Pennsylvania E=ergency Response Problem 16-1-31 System with respect to a general emergency condition at :he Fixed Nuclear Facility. 0900 Public Infor ation Test Commonweal:h of Pennsylvania Problem 17-1-31 Disaster Operations Plan, Annex I - Paragraph VIII, M, News Media Orientation. 0900 Dept. of Heal:h Tes: the plans and policies for Problem 18-1-31 issuance KI for protective ac:1on in a fixed nuclear facili:y inciden:. 0900 Closing of 3usiness and Tesc policies and procedures for Shutdown of Indus try preparing for an evccuation of a Problem 19-1-31 fixed nuclear facili:y. 0900 Closing of Schools Evaluate decision aking mechanism Problem 110-1-31 and lines of auchcri:7 5 coordina: ion for the closing of schools. 0930 Industrial Recovery 5 != pac: Ivalua:e and estina:e :he possible ? oblem 111-1-31 damage to industry and :he a s.tions Problem 110-1-81 that =ay be :aken :o reduce the damage. 0930 Agricul: ural difficul:ies Ivaluate :he response :o problems created by escalating situation, associated wi:h the 50 mile food Problem 113-1-81 pathway. Es tablish supply poin:s for the 0930 Supply Points Problem 114-1-31 receipt of evacua:1on materials. C920 Special Meads of the aging Evalua:e :he appropriateness of Problem 113-1-31 the policies and procedures developed for easing the rigors of an evacuation on elderly persons. 0930 Dept. of Environ = ental Determine time require =ents for Resources 'Less 3RP) mass care facilities and feasibili:y Inspection Certification of using state parks as =sss care and Survey of Mass Care Centers, facilities. Problem dl6-1-81 0930 Cc== unity Activities with Evaluate the plans, policy and pro-cedures to develop cce= uni 3 activi:y relationship to sass care at =sss care centers.

centers, Problem 117-1-81 0930 Training of mass care staff and Test the plans and procedures to care for evacuees at = ass care feeding of evacuees Problem #18-1-81 centers.

9920 Decontamination Procedures Tes: :he plans and procedures for decontamina: ion of persons exposed Problem J19-1-81 to radioactive particles. 1000 Freparation for 11.00 A.M. To test the responsiveness of News Conf erence players in sub=itting information Problem #20-1-81 that =ay be presented to the news media. 1000 Analy:e the impact of To implement procedures to meet evacuation on supply of elec:rical power needs, electrical pcwer to the populace outside the 10 sile TM! radius. Problem 121-1-81 C. UNTIMED EXERCISE EVENTS OBJECTIVE TTME EVENT Acquisition of self-contained To test procedures for emergency breath:ng appara:us for emergency requisi:1oning of supplies. Workers. Problem 422-1-81 To evaluate the capabili:7 of

  • Curtailmen: of :sss :rans-
he transportation responsa teon portation around the TMI o control mass transpor:ation.

facility. 7:oblem #23-1-C1 To evalua:e :he plans and procedures Rumor Control ?roblem 124-1-81

o investiga:e and respond to rumors.

To eciculate the specific feeding Transportation & Teeding Resources supplied through and transportation resources tha: may be u:ilized through Dept. of Dept. of Aging. Problem 125-1-81 Aging resour:es. Road Cons:ruction on 2-33 To evalua:e the capability of the energency response rechanis

o at Exit 13.

? oblem 925-1-31 adjust evacuation routes as a ? robles 127-1-31 result of road cons: rue:1on. Welfare Computer shu:s down To evaluate the probless associa:ed at Middle tevn. with transf erring computer infor-Problem d2S-1-C1 macion from one location to another. Food Ingestion Pathway To evaluate the plans and procedures Advisory for issuing public advisories. Problem J29-1-31 Red Cross Mass Care To evaluate the inspection and Centers and Nursing Ec=es certification of = ass care centers Problem 030-1-31 by DE2; to evaluate the =eans to care for pets at = ass care centers; to evaluate the assistance Red Cross would provide in evacuation of nursing ho=es and hospi:als. Food Ingestion Pathway To evaluate agri:ul:ure inpu: in Probles J.31-1-31 the developnent of receanendations to devise public advisories for the food ingestion pathway. To evaluate the system established Ru=or Control Problem 132-1-31 to handle rumors. Issuance of KI :o emergency To evaluate the plans and procedures to issue KI :o e=ergency workers. forces. Problem 133-1-31 Conta=ina:1on of Agricul ure To evaluate the response of the agriculture ce== unity to feed Products Problem J34-1-31 contamina: ion.

  • Insert if no: 3R? genera:ed.

4 SITL'AT!ONS AND PRO 3LEMS A. PRE-EXERCISE EVENTS: ? roble =s correspond to events listed in Con:rol Master Index - Paragraph 3.A. (Tab J) 3. T!MED EXERCI5I ITENTS: Problems correspond to events listed in Con:rol Master Index - Paragraph 3.3. (Tab J' C. UNTIMED EXERCISE EVINTS: Froblems correspond :o even:s listed in Control Master Index - Paragraph 3.C. (Tab J) Ibereise A. General 1. The Fixed Nuclear Facili:7 Exercise for Three Mile Island Nuclear Power Station was condue:ed on '.Jednesday, July 16, 1930, beginning at 9:00 A.M. and :erminating a 2:00 ?.M. The following even:s were part of :he exercise process: a. Pre-exercise events were actually played be the PEMA Duty Person (Operations Officer), TMI Unit 1 Shif t Sepervisor, 3RP Director, PEMA Deputy Director and PEMA Director. For exercise purposes, these events could have been s1=ulated, but ccmple:e participa: ion was selected to stress realiss and fully test :his phase of the related emergency plans. The cceplete sequence of even:s is contained in the Pre-exercise Duty Person Action Log (A::achment 1). b. The major pre-exercise events were: (1) IMI declaration of an U'; USUAL EVENT at 6:35 A.M. (2) TMI declaration of a SITE DIERGE CY at 7:35 A.M. (3) 3RP recocaendation to cancel schools and sporting events; shu: devn heavy indus:ry; close State parks, casping sites, airpor: and highway non-essential traffic; evacuate mobile ho=es, reduce hospi:al loads at 7:50 A.M. (4) 3RP report to PEMA at 7:55 A.M. that escala:1:n to a GENUAL OfERGE;CY could be expec:ed within the nex: fav hours. 2. The timing of the pre-exercise events was closely in accord with the scenario. Proper initial notifica: ions were made to Dauphin, Cumberland, fork, Lebanon and Lancaster counties. 3. Although :he scenario specified an ALERT as the first event, :he TM! declaration of an UNUSUAL E7ENT caused no significant i= pact on :he early progress of the exercise. 4 The protective actions rec== ended by 3R? vere several hours ahead of

he scenario, and this early input seri usly conflic:ed with the design and objectives of the exercise. The exercise briefing was condue:ed on the af ternoon preceding :he exercise so : hat all par:icipants veuld be thoroughly familiar with :he scenario and :he si:uation at the 9:00AM commencacent of the exercise, Several Sta:e Agencies with major respon-sibilities for protective acti:ns vere pr:grammed :o check the adequacy of their e=ergency plans and their abili:y to execute :he requirements.

The scenario designed :hese efforts :o c:==ence a: 9:00 A.M. and to be completed at 2:30 ?M. 3. Conduct of Exercisc 1. The play of :he exercise began at 9:05 A.M. vi:5 the input of pr:ble=s 6-1-31 :hrough 10-1-31 by ne Exercise Centrollers. These pr:ble=s which are su=marized on page 11 of :his reper: se: :he stage for :he folleving ac:1vi:y-Risk County Esergency Management Agency prepara: ion and readiness a. for a possible 10-mile evacua:icn vi hin the next several hours due to the CC declaration of a GEUI?.AL O!IRGENCY. b. Ac: ions by Public :nfor:ation Officer to ensure tha: :he general public receives the necessary informa:icn. c. ?EMA Council Meeting at 9:15 A.M. vi:h L:. Coverner direc:ing Depar::ent of Heal:h :o prepara a poli:7 statemen: On :he issue of ?otassium !cdida (KI) with censidera: ion for the actual availability of :he drug. d. Implementing instructions based on emergency plan responsibill:1es assigned to Co== unity Affairs, Commerce, Labor and Industry, Public Utilities Co=sission, Risk County and Municipali:1es, and ?EMA Operations for the phased shut down of business and industry. Actions by Education, State Police, Transportation, and Risk County e. and Municipalities to close all schools in the risk area. 2. Controller input of problems 11-1-81 through 21-1-31 (pages 11 and 12) generated =ultiple activities for Co=nerce, Labor and Industry, Agriculture, General Services, Aging, Environ = ental Resources, Co== unity A lairs, Education, Public Utility Cocsission, other State Response Teams, Risk and F.ost Counties in the following categories: Esti=ation of possible da= age :o industry due :o evacuation, accions a. to reduce impact, steps for recovery, and environmental :hreat from unattended chemical plants (explosive, toxic, fla==able, poisonous and other hazardous sacerials). b. Response :o agricultural problems associated w1:h the risk area and the 50 mile ingestion pathway, Establishment of supply points for evacuation supper: with priori:1es c. on husan life support, health and welfare ite=s, and procedures for receipt and issue of chese emergency supplies. d. Preparation and readiness to mee: :he special neads of :he aging at mass care centers, Environmental survey, inspection and cer:1fics:ian of = ass care e. centers in hos: counties. f. Acquisition and provision of trailers at sea:e parks for evacuee housing. Training mass care s:sff personnel and feeding evacuees a: cass 3 cart centers. h. Preparation and readines-of risk coun:ies for radiological decontasination of evacuated population. 1. Preparation of News Conference :: provide current information and reduce ru= ors in :he media.

j. Adjus==en:s required for manage =en and Opera:1:n of utili:ies for provision of service cu: side of the risk area.

3. Centroller input of problems 11-1-31 to 19-1-31 at 9 : 30 A.M. and 10 31

o 21-1-31 a: 10:C0 A.M. comple:ed the injecti:n of all timed exercise even:s into :he system. A: this ti=e, Con:::ller exercise inpu: Of :hese 11 proble=s plus the 5 pr:ble=s injected 2: the s: art of :he exer:ise
ge:her vi:h :he 5 pr:blems distribu:ed a: :he exercise briefing shculd have saturated.cs: exercise participan:s f:r :he dura:ica of the exercise.

In the Con: roller Room representing the ou: side world. :he pace of the exercise could be adjus:ed only by :he :imely injecti:n of

he 13 problems in :he L*n:i=ed Ixercise Iven:s (pages 12 and 13).

need :n speedup activity for :he ecri:us exercise participan:s Apparen: was based on <cheduled reper:s f r n the Observers, observa: ions of S:a:e EOC activity by the controllers when time permitted, and directions from PEMA Operations. Controller response to needs for untimed exercise events is su=nariced as follows: At 10:10 A.M., PEMA Cbservers No. 3 repor:ed that all Response a. Teams are busy except General Services, b. At 10:20 A.M., PEHA Observer No.11 (Cur aerland County) was advised by Controller that National Guard, Transportation and yire 7olice are relatively inactive. Need more exercise play. reported all Response Teams are c. At 10:34 A.M., PEMA Observer No. 4 busy and flowing smoothly, d. At 11:00A.M., PEMA Observer No. 4 (Dauphin County) was advised by Controller that exercisa play from the coun:y was slow and no Dauphin problems were being received by the State ICC. At 11:06 A.M., FEMA Observer No.12 (Lancaster. County) was advised e. by Controller that traf fic frem the county was slow, but was picking up as the exercise play was perceived as beneficial, and the problem play was realistic. f. A: 11:10 A.M., Lebanon County Emergency Manage =en: Coordinator was advised by Controller that exercise play for his County was realis:ic and moving smoothly, g. At 11:30 A.M., Controller requested a report from PEMA Observer No. 1. h. At 11:40 A.M., Controller injec:ed a ce=nerce problem requiring an es:imated damage assessmen: on the impact of evacuation on commerce activi:7 in time frames of one week, two weeks and one son:h. 1, yrom 11: 40 A.M. :o 2: 40 ?.M. when the Exercise Controller Log was terminated, there were several inputs and outpu:s to generate activity for the exercise. 4 The comple:e sequence of exercise events is contained in the Exercise PEMA Operations Log (A::achment 2). 5. The play of the problems encountered :he usual State exercise dif ficulties. Confusion in the use of procedures, action logs and requisi:e a. response in the ?EMA State Operations Cen:er (loca: ion of State Govercaco-for all emergencies), b. t; s s wr; king knculedge relating to various State Agency

f ;+

ibili:1es and the methodology needed f or in:eraction ..a t io n. Improper h4:dling and repor:ing of ::mple:ed ac:i:n exer:ise c. prcblems by sesigned State imergency Response Tests. d. Some State Agencies did not fully exercise their Agency role and respons?bilities. Several brought : heir total 24-hour tear of players to use the exercise primarily as a training vehicle. III. Critique A. Sources of Evaluation 1. This phase involves evaluation of the exercise play and related exercise plans to determine areas of strength and weakness. The =aterial su==arized herein has been obtained from the following sources: PEMA Observer debriefing conducted by the PEMA Exercise a. Controllers on Thursday, July 17, 1980. b. Checklists submitted by ?EMA Observers. Written Af ter-Exercise Repor:s from the Heads of participating c. S tate Agencies. d. Remarks of Speakers from selected State Agencies at the f o rmal Critique in the William Penn Audi:orium on Friday morning, July 18, 1980. Regional Director, Federal Emergency Management Agency, e. Region !!I letter of July 25, 1980 with assess =cnts of the regional staff and evalua:icns of the Federal observers. 3. Composition of Cri:ique Material 1. Significant observations from the five sources of evaluatioc will be su==arized by individual participating State Agencies, Risk Counties, Risk Municipali:ies and Ecspitals. 2. Si=ilar ectments from =ul:1ple observers regarding exercise strengths and weaknesses will be c:=bined and listed separa:ely. 3. The final par: of the Critique ?hase will su=marize Conclusions and Recc=mendations based upon significan: evalua:1:ns evident frem tha Cri:ique. 4 The detailed Cbserver Checklis:s vill no: be appended :o the Af:er Action Report and Evalua:icn, but will be reesined by ?EMA for staff use in the development of future exercises and eliminating any weaknesses in the associa:ed Sta:e, County and local emergency plans. C. Cc=ments ca State Agencies are su==arized below: 1. Acinz a. Observer repor: and debriefing indi:sted the Response Team was no: knculedgeable regarding State ICC opera:icns, bu: they had a good at:itude :cuard playing the exercise. The Ocpartman: is mainly a source of guidance 21:h very ' d-4 -ad rescurces. Infor=sti:n on rescurces for the aging is generally not physic:lly available and mus: be obtained for :he area in question fr:m the County Department of Aging or lower level. 3elieve no plan exists for moving the Harrisburg of fice in event of evacuation, b. The written report of the Department indicated their feeling that it was a good educational experience for the Response Team since they were much more involved with =essages and respenses than the previcus exercise. Specific ce==ents were: (1) Not sure how to properly handle action =essages, how to coordinate with other State agencies and how detailed a response was necessary. Desire to meet with PEMA staff to review involvement, clearly define role of Aging and improve inter-departmental ce==unications. (2) Needed = ore infor=ation on the sequence of disaster events and the outcc=e of their action responses. ' d in" (3) Uncertain whether each Area Agency on Aging was with the appropriate Risk County Energency Manage =en: Agencies. They will contact all Area Agencies to insure they develop ef f ective ce==unications with County EMA's. (4) Did not have adequate contact with other agencies with si=11ar interests or concerns, For exs=ple, they did not co==unicate with Welfare about :he needs of the elderly in Mass Care Cen:ers. (5) Difficulty reading handwritten =essages fro = se=e c:her agencies. 2. Aericulture a. Observer report, debriefing and wri: ten report indicated the exercise provided a vehicle to present an overview of the Agriculture Energency ?lan and pertinent response actions to observers frc= various govern =en:al agencies - particularly those frc= USDA in Harrisburg and Washing:en. Specific cc==en:s were: (1) Exercise was considered very beneficial, but se=e difficulty in the play was encountered in the flew of si:uation =essages. Some of this was caused by simula-

icn of :he normal cl:se rela:icnship with other Sta:e agencies. For example, Agriculture's Milk Division wi:h the Bureau of Radia:icn's laboratory.

This placed a ec==unica:icn lead :n the =essage center and response team by depic:ing simulated ac:ivi:ies at the S tate ECC and at the Agriculture 3uilding (loca:icn for : heir field monitoring operatiens). (2) Duration and play of the exercise was not long enough to answer all questions frc= :he govern = ental cbservers. A lit:le longer exercise would have provided such opportuni:j For example, sampling in response := a con:amina:1on si:ua-tion and interdiction of the feed inges: ion pathwaj could not be de=ctstra:ed because this exercise situation aas not reached...

(3) Messages received fres :he Bureau of Radiation Protection generated confusion because they contained radiation readings with no indication of response desired from Agriculture. (4) Federal observers tasked State Agriculture with some functions that should be perfor ed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. b. Field Observer report on protective response for the ingestion pathway indica:ed that the sa=pling system is impressive and is used on a daily basis. The operation in a nuclear incident would remain substantially :he sa=e except sampling would be conducted in a = ore defined area. For exercise play, they simulated sending sa=ples to the Bureau of Radiation Protection Laboratory for radioactive analysis. Field =onitors use cerephone cc==unication only. There was no play for the county agents which they use only to pass information to the f armers. In the case of evacuation, the far=ers register with the county agents. Specific cc=ments were: (1) Exercise activity appeared narrow-minded in tha: it s tressed sa=pling only. (2) No input was received from the Agricul:urc Response Tems. (3) Ex:ent of play by Agricul ure at the State ICC seemed to be a discussion with the observers about wha: the Team would do rather than ac:ually doing anything. A rather passive role where they :alked around problems rather than a: them. Grea: lack of inter-ccccunication be:veen agencies. So=e problems discussed required coordination with other agencies but did not get i:. 3. Commerce Observer report and debriefing indicated that activi:7 during a. early portien of exercise was very slow. Evacuatica would most sericusly impac: on small business due to problem of capital. 3est response action would be =aking interin loans quickly available. Specific Oc= cents vera: (1) Team had adequate resource listings available fer use. yor example, :here are abcu: 7,0C0 businesses and industries in the risk area. (2) Si:uation reports were not as frequent or detailed as =ay be necessary in a real emergency. (3) Key message regarding closing of industry was not received. (a) Teas fel: :ha: there is need for coordination with other allied func:1:ns adminis:ered by Labor and indus try and Cc== unity Affairs. (5) Tea = believed that other State Agencies were not fully aware of Ce==erce Department capabilities. (6) No thought given to vital records required to =aintain services under crisis conditions. 4. Co== unity Affairs Observer report and debriefing indicated that the Agency a. appeared to be prepared for the exercise, and willing to provide their services and equipment. Agency has =any resources for use during an energency including pu=ps, generators, saws, se=i-trailers, =any types of vehicles, building tools, ladders, street sweepers and =obile hc=es. Specific co==ents were: (1) Agency resource list includes ::ailer dealers and =anuf acturers plus fire companies and available equipment. (2) Resources include converted buses used ',r transporting equipment. (3) Agency does not have an evacuation plan nor a plan for continuing operations outside of Harrisburg. b. The written report expressed the opinion that the exercise was of some benefit to the Depar: ent since various in:ernal proble=s or inefficiencies were identified. Specific c==nents were: (1) Play for the Tea: 9as such too slow. (2) Insuf ficiently informed on "over-all picture" and insufficient inter-agency con =unications. Tea = was never infor ed on the nu=ber of = ass care centers or their locations, approxi= ate nu=ber of persons to be evacuated, and :he evacuation rou:es. (3) Mos: =essages were :otally unreadable. (4) Each participating S:a:e Agency should have been issued an evacuation =ap identifying hort and risk counties by a color coding system. (f) Proble=s presented :o the Department ver t of such a nature that pre-planning would be = ore logical than on the spo: response. (6) Depart =ent plans to review, in depth, various in-house resources available :o Com= unity Affairs, and to perhaps i=plement a central deposi:ory for a consolidated infor- =ation sys:e=. 5. Educa tion Observer report and debriefing indicated that the personnel a. appeared prepared for the exercise and had documents required for their mission. Their resource list included, but was not limi:ed to: (1) all schools and buildings in the State (2) key personnel (3).available buses and (4) school capabili-ties as to feeding and other items for mass care support. Specific co=ments were: (1) Concern regarding which schools were designated for use as Mass Care Centers. (2) Request for evacuation route =aps. (3) Concern regarding lack of control over school buses. 6. Environmental Resources Observer report and debriefing indicated that the Response a. Team was well staffed and well informed. Many have previously participated in emergancies and exercises. Appeared to have all reference =aterial and performed very professionally. Specific coc=ents were: (1) Message system appeared :o be slow and inadequate. (2) Loud speaker system should be available in Sta:e ECC to announce i==ediate informa: ion on critical actions. (3) Situatica reports should be posted on a timely basis. b. The written report stated :ha: :he exercise on the whole was a success for the Department. It provided a good oppor: unity to test parts of the DER response mechanism guite thoroughly. The Bureau of Co== unity Environmen:al Con:rol performed in-office checks of = ass care facilities as : hey would during an actual event to deter =ine what field inspections were required. This required close coordination wi:5 the Red Cross and county agencies. In addition, staff fres :he Bureaus of State ? arks and Forestry reacted to requests :o close f acilities and determine : heir capacity to accept evacuees. The exercise fid point out the following problems (3ureau cf Radiati:n ?rotec:icn will provide exercise cc =ents separately). (1) Need s review of ICC procedures :o speed exchange of informa:icn between ?EMA and agencies. For example, Team was 2naware that Governor had ordered all State Parks in the risk area closed until more than 2 hours af ter :he announcement. Reques:s for informa:icn on hes: counties f or evacuees were no t answered. Finally, team nenbers were forced :o bypass :he message center entirely and

alk directly with ?E"A or c her agencies (recogni:ing the fac: tha: in an actual energency :his would pr:bchly happen frequen:ly).

(2) There was very little introduction to ECC message procedures, and there did not seem to be anyone available to answer ques: ions when they arose. If duty folders could be made available to our Depart =en:,' we could train our personnel in these procedures to insure better response. Our personnel in the Central Area State EOC at Selinsgrove found this to be a problem also. (3) It was our observation : hat our BRP representative was at times toe busy to handle the incoming information and still comply with ECC procedures. Other DER Response Team Members were able to help upon arrival at :he Center. For nuclear emergencies, it might be better to activate the entire DER Response Team at once, or at least one other person to assist 3R?. (4) We found action message traffic to DER to be very light. If we had not initiated actions shortly af:er arrival, there would have been no:hing requiring response until about 10:30 A.M. Response Team Me=bers at the Selinsgrove Center found the =essage flow even lighter. (5) The Depart =ent is presen:ly doing an in-house critique to determine if our response to this type of emergency was proper. c. Field observer report and debriefing indicated 3R? Monitoring Team perf ormed very well. They were equipped with new instru-ments (recent 3R? purchase), and knew how to use the= properly. They reported by radio :o 3RP Control (Fulton 3uilding) every half hour from 9:00 A.M. :o 2:00 ?.M. They were provided with a simulated list of readings for making reports, but Control frequently injected mathema:ical ccnversion problems which required calculaticas during field operatiens (via radio from Control). Specific comments were-(1) Communication was excellent and no radio difficulties were encountered. (2) At 9:10 A.M., 3R? Control initiated a pro tective action for the moni: ors by dire :ing the Tasm to take Potassium !cdide (KI) for iodine prophylaxis. (3) A: 1:43 ?.M., 3R? Control ini:iated a second protective actica for :he moni: ors by directing the Team :o depart from the monitoring site, and proceed south to avoid the airborne radioactive plume. Upon arrival at 3ainbridge, the Team repor:ed by radio to 3R? Control and was advised

o remain there pending further ins tru:: ions.

(4) At 2:10 P.M., the Team was recalled and arrived a: :he Fulton Zuilding a: 3:00 ?.M. d. The wri ten report covers the evaluations of four observers (t-v observed the the Assessment Team and two observed the Field Monitoring Team) plus the 3R? in-house co==ents as follows: (1) Field Monitoring Team correctly asse= bled the air sampling system and co==unicated the results to 3RP. (2) 3RP Assess =ent Team should follow-up on all reco==enda-tions to PEM.A to assure they were received by the proper person. PEMA should acknowledge to 3RP. (3) A status board should be used in the Assese=en: Center. (4) The Incident Manager should have more ti=e to direct the operatica and no t be involved in the detailed coc=u-nications to all participants. (5) Los sheets of =essages should be kept. (6) Scmeone should be assigned to record and graph data. (7) Bureau and utilities should synchronize clocks and watches. (8) The objective of the 3RP Field Monitoring Tea =s cculd be redefined as doing ini:ial =enitoring to verify the reactor operator's data and then aiding e=ergency workers or monitoring evacuees. (9) Letters of agreement should be obtained :o cover inc: ming assis tanc e. (10) Early samples should be brough: :o the lab :o confirm iodine readings. (11) Additional inpu: on assess =en: can be ob:ained from NRC Region I. Additional telephone lines from the 3RP to the ECF will be requested. These will cap in:o :he health physics da:a transmitted between utili:y and NRC. (12) There should be a manpower res:ar for :he firs: 24-43 hours. (13) There was no f eedback of 3R? da:a to the utility. (14) The call-cu: cascade should be defined. (15) The censecuences of the loss of electrical power at off-si:e agencies should be considered. (16) Field instruments must be calibrated at rec:enended intervals and at appropriate energies. (17) The e=ergency kits should include be::er maps of monitoring 1::s tions. (13) There should be a separa:e area in :he 3R? of fi:es dedicated to energency res;cnse. (19) Problem of 713 and pocket d: size:er use by energency workers has not been resoleed. The Bureau has begun to seek solutions to the above proble=s. e. Remarks of Speaker at Formal Critique were as follows: The comments of the Direc:or of the 3ureau of Radiation Protection which were taken out of context in local news-paper accounts were related only to the Bureau of Radiation Protection response to the imaginary scenario. The response of the Bureau was very good overall. We did, however, have some specific Sureau related problems with the scenario as we received it from TMI. Let se first emphasize the positive points: (1) Cc==unications were outstanding frc= the plant to the Bureau and fr:s the 3ureau to FEMA. Dedicated phone lines from TMI and fr:s PExl offices to the Bureau worked extre=ely well. (This was a major problem during last year's accident). (2) The information flow between the TMI I staff and the Bureau nuclear engineur was outstanding. We received over the speaker phone on the direct line responses :o all queries concerning plant parameters. In order to answer these queries, which was beyond the scope of :he pre-packaged infor ation available :o the cperators, : hey had to improvise answers to ques ions. The TMI RES?ONSE WAS WELL 3EYOND ' GAT WE 2.AD ET?ECTED. ~ hey did an cut-standing job. (3) The field survey tea =s were able to use successfully new field monitoring equipment for airborne sampling and general radia:icn levels. The pre-selected moni:oring station maps were also helpful. Data from :he field tests was being provided promptly. (4) Evaluation of of f-si:e exposures was performed successfully by both IMI and Radia:10n ?retec icn 3ureau staff. The Bureau was able to verify :he TMI calculations. (5) All of our persennel perf ormed in an cuestanding manner. With respect to the acciden: scenario, the early en indica:i:ns of ecsplete core uncevering led us :o raccr=end full scale evacuation prior :o any significant release of radioactive =aterial. I: has been e ;hasized and re-emphasized by :he ?IMA and NRC planning people : hat such ac:icn should be taken as precautionary since :he u:ility had los t of f-si:e and On-si:e power. We reali:ed : hat this wculd cause problems for the res cf :he exercising agencies and ?EMA, and so expressed ourselves :: : hen. But since we were not aware Of the continuin; scenario, va became slightly confused c0ncerning what protective ac:icns :: rece= rend Ir.:er :n in the exercise. The core was later success-fully covered, bu: off-site and en-si:e power reliability ::s in sericus question. TMI informed us in early afternoon that they had to alter the scenario (which they did very successfully) to satisfy our goals, Similar proble=s exist in any scerario designed to tes: the non-radiation response capabill:1es of other agencies. It is extremely difficult to construct a scenario with 'the spread-out ti=e frame to test all agency responses equally. I as recommending that testing of the Bureau of Radiation Protection response and the utility response with real time field monitoring data reporting and laboratory response be held separately from an overall exercise, and that such drills be held = ore frequently at different plants to determine our response capabilities in a variety of ways and with a variety of actions. For the overall test on each facility, the 3ureau staff will fully participa:e in designing an exercise which will re=ove us from a test role, but relay pre-packaged information to ?EMA for action by the various agencies. I have no serious complaints about the drill. It was primarily designed to tes: the capability of the re=aining State agencies, and PEMA is in the best position to evaluate that response. Within our Bureau, we did find come problems with our response plans, our ability to func: ion secochly, and our ability to get return information from PEMA hadquarters. These can easily be corrected. That is the purpose of the exercise. 7. General Serrices Observer debriefing indicated that this Response Team has had a. previous emergency and exercise experience, and is generally familiar wi:h State EOC procedures. They indicated tha: they learned a lot f ca :his exercise. Speed #d- ~~- ents were: (1) Department has not given any attention :o the responsibility for a notification fanout to their f acili:1es (for example, at Middletown), and have not askad local govern =ent to do so. (2) They do not have any approved or wri::en intra-department emergency plan. 3. Heal:S a. Observer debriefing indicated that this Response Team has had previous emergency and exer:ise experience, but still has internal depar:: ental pr:blems with response. They did not refer to their nul:1ple responsibili:ies listed in the Depar: rent of Health Radiation Emergency Response ?lan - Appendix C

o Annex E - Co==onwealth of Pennsylvania Oisaster Operations ?lan for Fixed Nuclear Facili:y Incidents.

This was called to their at:ention by the PD!A Observer who provided a copy of the plan. Specific pr:blems are addressed in the felicwing wri::en report. b. The wri::en report, 4hich ras also the na:erial used for the speaker's remarks delivered at the Formal Critique, indica:ed -2f-

generally that the Department of Health learned a lot from the disaster drill. First, the test confirmed the fact that they do have good and direct access to the Eureau of Radiation Protection. On three occasions, it was a mat:er of seconds until the Director was on the line. This is very important as we must rely heavily on their expertise in keeping us informed. Specific connents were: (1) The test also gave us an opportunity to look at our internal plan and to test our responses from within the Department. (2) Our worst problem was infor=ational flow or total lack of information to the Response Tea =s and to our co= mand post. (3) The drill began for us when the response team was notified of the problem at Three Mile Island. Shortly af ter 9 :00 A.M. they called the information to my of fice, and I infor=ed Dr. Muller tha: 5 mr/hr were escaping.~

hat point, we A:

began calling personnel utilizing our alert /augmen:ation rester in the Radiation Ecergency Response ?lan. Dr. Muller se=moned his s taff and o ther key persons who have direc: responsibilities during a disaster situation. (4) A f ew minutes la:er we received a call from :he response team asking if we would recoc=end Potassium Iodide (KI) distribution as suggested by the Sureau of Radia:icn Protection. This was discussed with Dr. Muller and the answer was negative. A: :ha: time we wondered why we should be considering distributing Potassium lodide when the radiation levels were so low, so I called the Bureau of Radiation Pro: action at 9:34 A.M. and was :ald " Things are getting cut of skelter. There is a fuel failure and the core is dry". (5) At that point, we began to institute the first level of our Potassium Iodida distribution plan. There are f oar specific situations, each calling for progressive levels of action by the Depart =en: to meet :he contingencies of various states of energency. They are: (a) ?reli=inar. - to be implemented when there is even a recote potential of radioac:ive danger. This alerts the par:icipants :o " standby" for further directions. (b) Alert - :o be set in motion as preparatory machinery for (c) and (d). (c) Precautionary - to be implemented when there is a decided threa: of har ful levels of radisticn. (d) Emerzency - :o be i=plemen:ed in the fac: of actual high-level radioactivo fallout. (6) Sy this :ize, six regi nal energency nedical services programs had placed 25.'; of ambulances' in each area on standby. Staging area information was obtained frcs the county. And then we wai:ed--and wai:ed: The ::cmand post had been set up in the Secre:ary's of fice. _

  • am

(7) At 10:30 A.M. we received a call from the response team concerning ru= ors that were circulating regarding an increase of radiation in the at=osphere, an evasuation and plans for distribution of potassium iodide. At this point we placed a call to the Sureau of Radiation Protection. The information they were receiving was conflicting, and we were told to stand by. (S) Rather than waste cine and do nothing as we were asse= bled, Dr. Muller suggested having a hypothetical situation within our Department. He gave us ,ble=s to solve, and we discussed them among ourselvue and determined the best way to accomplish them. Still we heard nothing from the drill that was actually taking place. (9) We decided at lunch time to visit PEMA. Cur curiosity had peaked at that point, and we were vondering if, indeed, Hea,lth had been included in the drill. We found things were progressing and our response team was frustrated with too little knowledge about :he cessage for:s. First, they were not receiving informa: ion via situation reports, and secondly, they were not sure wha: to do with the reports. We returned to the Health Depart =ent af ter discussing some of our con-cerns with Col. Henderson, who was helpful and relieved some of our anxieties. (10) At 1:15 P.M., Dr. Muller instructed the s:sff that had gathered a: the Co==and ?ost (his office) to disperse and return to their normal duties as we were not getting any messages. (11) At 1:53 P.M., I received a call from the physician at our response desk. He needed infor:ation regarding distribution of Potassium Iodide along the evacuation routes. We had not been told of an evacuatica, so our ?otassium Iodide distri-bution plan had no t been i=plemented. They wanted an i==edi-ate reply. I cid Dr. Muller and called the 3ureau cf Radiation Protection to find out what was happening. We were no: :old anything abou: radiation levels since 9 : 30 A.M., and it was now 2:00 ?.M. Mr. Gerusky told =e there was a problem. The Governor was on the radio ordering an evacuation. The problem was cu: to "O niles downuind. The present readinrs were in the R/hr range, and i: would be two to three hours before the child thyroid would be exposed Oc five rems one sile from :he plant. We were instructed to give ?ctassius Iodide to everyone being evacuated eas: o f the river. Je to the imple=enta:ica part of our ?otassius Iodida plan. wen: (12) Potassiun Iodide distribu: ion :o the population under favor-able conditions is difficult. Under these condi:1ons, i: is confusing and extre=ely difficult. There is no easy solution to the problem. We have thoroughly researched it and have reco== ended several options to the Governor. Ideally, pre-distribution :o homes and places of employment is desired. However, this decision is a difficult one and involved a fair amount of expense. Fredis:ribu:ica would also negate a panic si:ua: ion. Should the problem be solved in this esnner, distribution 2: :he time of an incident would no: be a problea. At 2:10 P.M. I told the response team we were not going to distribute Potassium Iodide en route because of the antici-paced traffic problems and our primary concern of evacuating people. (13) At 2:10PM Dr. Muller assembled his staf f again. We called the (a) Hospital Association of Pennsylvania to hetify hospitals, (b) Long Term Care Division to notify nursing homes, (c) Pennsylvania State Police to pick thei Potassium Iodide up at the Depart =ent of Health. I called the response team to contact Military Af fairs to make arrangenents for transferring it from the plant. Their response--Military Affairs left. The drill is over' (14) The =ajor proble=s were: (a) Infor=ation flow or lack of coc=unication to :he response teams and :he command pos t. (b) No advance notice to begin the first step of Potassic = Iodide distribution plan. (c) We were asked to go from A to Z without anything in between. (d) Need for a better systen of gaining information regarding radiation levels. (e) Our response teams need additional training with forms, etc. The drill enabled us to take a closer look at ourselves. It was helpful in many respects. I believe I can say emphatically and unequivocally that the Department of Health is f ar better prepared for a radiation disaster today than we were at the cine of the Three Mile Island occurrence. 9. Labor and Industrv a. Observer debriefing indica:ed that they overlap the respon-sibilities of Community Af f airs. Manpower and building saf ety are their major responsibilities. They have contracted with I3M Corporation Oc move their cocputer base in the event of an evacuation rather than relying on Mill:ary Af f airs for trans-portation. The Response Taas was bet:er prepared and eculpped than :he last exercisa. Scecific co==en:s are contained in the following written report. b. The wri::en report stated: (1) 3ct er way to identify ?EMA s:sf f and various agencies' staff. (2) Should be a designa:ed ?EMA person on :he floor for each agency :o go :o with problems, questions of procedures, etc. (3) Need clarificatica of both internal (i.e. ECC) and external ec==unica:ica procedures. 15 staf f was under :he impres-sion, for instance. :ha: all messages in:ernally shou'd go through message center for reasons of control. 2nd so : hat ?EMA knows wha: is happening between agencies 2: arv one point in time, , g,

(4) We found =aterial missing from the LSI per=anent file kept here at ?EF.A that had previously been submit:ed. (5) LSI staff felt that we were not kept current of what was happening hour by hour in order to make proper responses effecting our agency and its abili:y to function in an emergency mcde.

10. Military Affairs Observer report and debriefing indicated that the Response Team a.

felt the National Guard should have been placed on Sta e Active Duty at the start of the exercise in order to get more inter-agency exercise play. They could have been more responsive to several sessages earlier. Specific ces=ents were:

read (1) Some messages written in longhand were difficul:

and also-left out some vital infor=ation. (2) DMA-?NG E=argency Operations ?lan should include :he use of C'd 54 - sky cranes - helicopter for possible use during evacuation. (3) Checklist should include decontamination procedures for the National Guard. (4) The National Guard was never activated. Consequen:ly, the evaluation of precedures and response of the guard could not be observed. (5) Distribution of the Mili:ary Af fairs E=ergency operations Plan is expec:ed to be c =pleted in the near fu:ure. (6) The rescurce listing was available at the Heade.uar:ers, yor: Indian::wn Cap but not at the State ICC.

11. Public Utility Cc==ission Observer report and debriefing indica:ed that the involve:en: of a.

the Cc=nission in the exercise was semewhat limited. More rep-resentatives of the Ccesission should be involved in these exercises and beceme fan 111ar wi:h the procedures. The bigges: problem wculd be :he shu drwn of electric pcuer plants in the risk area. They would also be concerned abcut :he problem of record reloca:icn. The Rasponse Tean considered :he exercise very interesting and :ha: they learned a lot.

12. ?ublic Welfare a.

Observer report and debriefing indicated tha: this Response Team was an old hand a: this and had their hcuse well in Order. They knew all the answers. The big probles is the reloca:icn of their Middletown rescur:es: cash grant, food stamps anf medical assist-They have made arrangements to relocate c=pu:er : apes if ance. time perni:s. Public Welfare has an evacua:icn plan :o reloca:e the Execu:ive Jepartment :o Selinsgreve and has plans on file with counties, ins titutions and ins ti:utienal =anagement. Specific ccmcen:s are listed in the following tri::e." rapert. b. The wri:cen report stated that al: hough the large por:1on of the Department's work is during the recovery process, this exercise brought into play some of Welf are's key operations 1 functions during the emergency. They have found through experience with actual emergencies and si=ulated exercises such as this one, that an important f actor toward =aintaining a s=ooth and efficient operation has been the assignmen: of per=anent members to the Response Tea =. Some of the key functions and requirements are: (1) Relocating and placing of long-term care patien:s. (2) Evacuation of Welfare Facilities. (3) Providing crisis counseling. (4) ?lanning for the needs of displaced victi=s. (5) Relocating key Welf are functions that =use re=ain ongoing such as: (a) Relocation of the compu:er facili:y housed at Middlet:wn. (h) Relocation of County Assistance Offices. (c) Relocation of the Depart =ent of Welf are Executive Office.

13. Red Cross a.

Observer report and debriefing indicated tha: the Response Teca was very professional and had their resources available. E/ery-thing was okay and the Observer expressed "nothing but praise for them". Specific cc==ents by the Response Team were: (1) Need for clearly written =essages. (2) Need scre Risk County plans available. (3) Need more axtensive ecm=unication on upda:es a: the plant a:id with the counties. (4) More realisti: pressure shculd be added :: response agencies via more proole s. (5) Cc==unications wi:h other agencies improved greatly over the las t six months. (6) ? ssibili:7 of having runners and/or cul:1ple nessage sheets

o save xerex time and submission :ine for =essages :o

=essage center. b. The writ:en repor: states that message ce==unication, as previously noted was sicv. Perhaps one neans of previding si:uation reports could be a clipbcard available to everycne, whi:h :could have the pertinent fac:s. Specific consen:s were: (1) A list of >hss Care Facili:1es needs :o be shared with :he Red Crcss Liaison at :he Cen:ra; Area Head:uarterc. Selinsgrcve..

(2) The listing of Mass Care facilities needs to be refined and assigned priorities. (3) There is still no equitable solution for the care of pets during a potencial long-term evacuation. (4) Com=unication between the response agencies and the knowledge of appropriate roles was well defined and kncun by the participants. 14. State Police

a. Observer report and debriefing indicated that the Response Team was impressive, sincere and ref erred to docu=entation. They did not know the location of the recaption center for the Dauphin County evacuation.

They had good ce==unication, some interface capability and also airborne con =unications. Specific cet=ents by the Response Teas were: (1) State Police should be notified more quickly and be saved up on the initial notifica:ica list. (2) A direct telephone line should be ins:alled between IMI and the Troop "H" Headquarters Cc==unication Unit. (3) News media and public were notified of on-going situations before the State ?olice. - This could be corrected by better cec =unications a: the State EOC. (4) Yellcw paper correspondence should be copied on yellow paper - not on whi:e paper.

b. The written report s:ated tha: as the result of the State Police involvement in the exercise, the following poin:s should be dis-cussed at the Formal Cri:ique:

(1) Due to :he fac: tha : :he S: ate Police is one of :he few State Agencies available on a 24-hour basis, i: is suggested that the Sta:e Police be moved up on the PEMA notification lis: to permi: quicker response. This is necessary due to the fact tha: evacuation plans involve State Police personnel from as f ar as Erie, Pennsylvania. (2) It is strongly reccc= ended that a direct telephone line be established be:veen :he nuclear plants, namely: Three Mile Island and ?aach 3o:::m, the Pennsylvania S ta:e ?: lice, Depart =en:al Headquar:ers, and :he Troop "H" C =munications Center. (3) Any announce:ent fr = ?EMA :o the news media and/cr the public shculd first be brought to the attentien of :he response teams assigned :: :he ?EMA Headquar:ers. During the exercise, the press and public were given informa:ica which was not received by the response agencies until nearly one hour later. This si:uation presents a problem whereby

he public is contacting :he State ? lice ins:allations reques ting informa:icn :ha: : hey heard on the radio or cele-vision when State Police personnel were n:: informed as ::

what was given to the public. -

(4) It is recommended that outgoing =essages xeroxed at PEMA Headquarters be on :he same colored paper as the original message. This could solve the problem of misunderstanding on the type of =essage which has been dispatched. 15. Transoortation a. Observer repor: and debriefing indicated that the Response Team was alert to the play of the exercise. Their resource list was not available in the State ICC, but was on hand in their Trans-portation office upstairs. They do not have the capability to mark evacuation routes as indicated in the plan. Adminis tra tive procedures seemed to cause some delays initially, but as :he exercise progressed, the Team got into the flow of response. Specific co==ents are lis:ed in the following written report. b. The wri::en report stated that the staf f of the 3ureau of Highway Maintenance has the following co==ents to of f er: (1) In considering the nu=ber of nessages that were generated, the exercise could have been accomplished in half a day. (2) The flow of =essages to the Action Agency was slow. (3) There was insufficient inter-co==unication a=ong the agencies. (4) In tmergency conditions, such as this exercise, the Department of Transpor:a: ion is an Agency prepared :o respond i=nedia:ely. Care sust be taken not to spread our resources too thin while wai:ing for the National Guard to be activated. (5) For the sake of the exercise the National Guard should have been activated sooner, as they apparen:ly served no purpose to the exercise until they were activated. 16. Dauchin County a. Observer repor: and debriefing indicated that the Dauphin County E=ergency Manage =en: Agency had an excellent exercise and no unresolved problems or weaknesses were identified. Specific cc::en:s were: (1) Initial no:ification (15 minutes) was timely. (2) They had a good syste= to update : heir officials. The Ccunty Cc=missioners were involved in the exercise. (3) Warning plan appears to be eff ec:1-ee and timely (2-3 hcurs or less). Responsibilities and procedures are assi;ned. (4) Ccaplete resource lists were available in the Ccunty ECC. (5) Ccunty plan and evacua:icn plan were on hand and usefu'. in the exercise. (6) Security of the Coun:y ICC was main:2ined by ID card and physical check f:: entry (7) Response Tea = consis ted of 10 personnel who participated well and were =os t responsive in their actions to the exercise proble=s. 17. Cumberland County a. Observer report and debriefing indicated : hat the County ECC was =anned by the Coordinator, a staff of 12 persons, 2 sec-retaries and 2 =essengers. The people knew their jobs, and the County appeared :o be pretty well prepared. There was one County Co==issioner present. Specific ce==ents were: (1) All ite=a oa the Notification and Warning Checklist were checked in the affirmative. With 34 political subdivisions in the County and the type telephone syste= in place, it should not :ake over 30 =inutes to notify one official and the local coordinator in each subdvisions. (2) Evacuatica plans and resource lists were availabla. (3) Their kncwledge of the require =en:s was i=pressive, and there was good tea = ork. (4) There was not enough =essage traffic fro: ?EMA. (5) Observer was i= pressed with the total opera:icn and believes the County is well prepared to cope with a TMI accident. 18. Lancaster Coun:v Observer report and debriefing indica:ed that the County ECC a. was =anned by S-10 s taf f =e=bers mos t of the time. Exercise started very sicw. Due to personal work cc==1:=ents, the participants rota:ed or varied during the course of the exercise. No ce=nissioners were presen:. Specific cc==en:s were: (1) There was concern over the lack of ?EMA message traffic, and the Coordinator was afraid to interjec: his evn proble=s because 1: =ight foul up any scheduled ?EMA input. (2) E=ergency public information has not been for ally coordi-naced wi:h o ther c:unty depart =ents which have a public infor=a: ion capability. (3) Coun:y rescur:e list dees nc: include a list of industrial sirens or c:==ercial vehicles vi:5 a public address (bull horn) capabili:y. (4) Generally, the exercise wen: well. Recc==end future exercises have sc=e c:ntrolled messages inserted at the county or local level so tha: county s:aff has sc=e activity early in :he exercise and to tes processing inf or ation frc= ::unty to the State. 19. Lebanon County Observer report and debriefing indicated tha: the exercise a. was initiated with the first notification of the Coordinator at home at 6:35 A.M. concerning the IMI incident. County ECC was activated at 7:40 A.M. with a direct line to PEMA. During the exercise, 23 proble=s or =essages (17 from ?EMA and 11 generated by Lebanon) were played by the staf f. The local coordinator of the Risk Municipality (South Londonderry Township) reported to the County ECC for the cxercise. The County Coordi-nator participated with ?EMA on the basis of the Risk Area radius (10 miles), but prepared plans for a 20 mile radius action. Specific comments were: (1) The County Resource Plan and Radiation Incident Plan were utilized during the Exercis-e. The answers to all ques tions (12) on the Checklist were affir=ative. Officials and popu-lation can be warned or infoc=ed within a 30 to 45 minute period on a 24-hour basis. (2) Responsibilities were assigned and staf f personnel functioned in an efficient and appropria:e sanner. (3) During the exercise, the Coordinator and staff were inter-viewed by :he press and media. Releases were prepared and approved by :he Coordinator for oublication. (4) In planning and preparation for evacuatica of the Risk Area, Lebanon is its own ' dos: Coun ty. No problems were encountered for mass care or traffic control. (5) The Coordinator and his s:sf f constantly referred to his Emergency Operations Plan for Radiation Incidents. Each participant, full:i=e or volunteer, was f amiliar vith its content and annexas. Although problems were solved "on the spo t", they ref erred :o the Plan for accuracy of their decision or judg=en:. (6) The Emergency Plan for Radiation Incidents has been approved by the President of :he Board of Co==issioners and ?EMA as ' art of their 3asi: Pla:. (7) The County 3asic Plan has not been subtit:ed to ?EMA for approval. I: requires review and updating prior to its submission approxi=ately Oct:ber 1. 1930. (3) In the observer's opini:n, the Coordinator and his staf f are to be cc= mended on : heir performance in solving exercise problems. 20. York Coun:v a. Observer repor: and debriefing indicated tha: the exercise had a great potential as a learnin; col for ::unty operations. The The Coordina:or and obserrer ;ere op:inis:ic as the exer:13e started with messages pr:vidi:g infor ::icn, guidance and pr:blems requiring decision-caking responses by the Coordina:::. As the morning vore on, :he nessages decreased with finally no messages at all. This was the big weakness of the exar:ise because Of the -3;-

lack of play for York County. All requests by the County for information and equipment from PESA were ignored or not answered. This may cause some proble=s because the Co=sissioners observed the exercise. Specific comments were: (1) York County played the exercise in a low key =anner. The staf f was not mobilized nor did the Coordinator call the affected municipalities. Observer questions :he validity of some responses and especially the time estimates. (2) Coordinator tried to simulate staff =obilization, but the Observer questions his organization. The Public Infor=ation Officer and RADEF Officer did stop in and were brie?ed by the Coordinator. (3) Observer f eels exercise was valuable to the County in tha: the. new Coordinator got a feel of how to respond and what kind of infor=ation comes down to the County from ?IMA. (4). Recon =end PEXA :ske a look at its infor=ation flow to counties including the status of the e=ergency on a regular basis even if there is no change. b. The written report stated that York's involvement was limited to the County EMA office. Specific cc==ents were: (1) York County reviewed the adequacy of its draf: TMI Protection Action Plan during the exercise and will adjust i: to correct problems highlighted during th e play. (2) Upon notification of any seasurable radiation off-si:e release, they will now reco= mend a TAKE S'dELTER/TAKE CCVER advisory regardless of the incident classification level. This pre-cautionary =easure (simulated by York in the exercise) mi:igated a two-hour delay in the no t'ificatica of a declara: ion of a General Esergency from ?D!A. (3) A rei:eration of the Observer's co=nents regarding informa: ion flow from PEMA to Coun:y. (4) York County Co=missioners strongly reco==end permanent retention of the "ho tline" installed for :he exercise. The tine fac:or involved in reinstallation of :he device could be cri:ical in certain emergency situations. Cos: effectiveness could be additionally jus tified by the enhanced public credibility ob tained from having direc co==unications between the S tate and county agencies. (5) Need to clarify a 10 zile or 20 =ile radius as the definitive =argin of safety for protective action plans for fixed nuclear facilities. (6) Overall, the exercise was deemed worthwhile as i: did provide some valuable insight in:o :he myriad of ac: ions required :o implement cur protective action plans. 21. Middletown 3creuth a. Observer repor: and debriefing indica:ed tha-Middle::wn lorough had a very impressive opera: ion. The Mayor was on hand and extremely 9 e satisfied with the exercise. E=ergency plans were available and utilized. The resource listing was complete. They have an excellen: list of bedridden people which is updated continuously. For the next exercise, the Mayor suggests playing evacuation for 30 =inutes. 22. Highsoire Borough Observer report and debriefing indicated that Highspire 3orough a. had adequate facilities for ce==and and coatrol. The Borough had good co==unications, very ec=plete call list, and a well documented resource manual. The TMI Plan was complete, and they were well equipped with maps divided into fire sectors. Highspire had 13 fire department vehicles equipped with loud speakers and could notify the entire =unicipality in 10 minutes. One weakness was a shortf all in that no personnel have received any RADEF training. A fact sheet with e=ergency information about TMI had been distributed with the tax notices. Overall, the exercise was very impressive. 23. Cc== unity General Ostecoathic Hosoital Observer report and debriefing indicated that the Hospital a. received the ini:ial notification of :he TMI incident at 6:40 A.M. Key personnel were asse= bled and briefed by the Administrator a: 7:40 A.M. A: 3:30 A.M., : hey received notification of a possible evacuation from Dauphin County EMA. It required 41 =inutes for the Ecspi:al to ob:ain a head count. The Coun:y requires 21/2 hours to provide a=bulance :: anspor:a: ion requirements. The Hospi:al was well prepared and had a well written plan. It is administered by Medical Service Personnel, not doctors, and it has five Directors available on call and well prepared. Specific ce==ents were: (1) Evacuation route is unkncwn :s the Hospital, bu: : hey expec: this information frc= the Coun:y. (2) Need a checklist of equipmen: to be moved. (3) Need to know which a=bulances have life sus taining equipmen:. (4) They have no f allout shel:er capability or any kncwledge of shelters. (5) 3eds for bed patients will not fi into their elevators, and this is an unsolved evacua: ion proble=. (5) Hospi:al had good plans and call lis:s, and each depar:=en: had a portion of the plan. 24. Harrisburr Ecsoital a. Observer report and debriefing indicated _..at the Hospi:al was exceptionally well prepared and had a "Model Flan" in the words of the obse:ver. Air Medivac had been established, and they had planned f or the ese of ?otassiu= I:dide (KI). They have identi-fied : heir un=2: needs and are prepared to evacua:e patien:3. They maintain liaison wi:h c:her ac:ivi:ies and their personnel arc well oriented. Specifi: Oc==en:s were:.

(1) They have excellent supply inventories. (2) They were not familiar with package disaster hospitals. (3) They were :oncerned over the require =ent to notify the Pennsylvania E=ergency Health Services Council. 25. Pennsvlvania Emergency Management Arency a. The following ce= men:s are s"- arized fr== the Speaker's remarks (Director and Operations Officer) delivered at the For=al Critique: (1) The enthusiass of the players and support of the State Response Teams in the exercise was =os: gratifying. (2) Participation by the Municipalities of Righspire and Middletown plus one in Lebanon County deconstrated : hat their plans were sound, but require final tuning. We. =ust continue the effort

o improve the capability :o notify :he public and assure the flow of essential traffic bo:h up and down the line. We have to develop refined resource inventories and provide for un=et needs. We =us: also look a: the co=munications systems versus the organization for rapid dissemination of data.

(3) The Hospitals wera well prepared for the exercise, especially Harrisburg. We will continue to work with special care organ-1:ations to :efine their plans, assure : hey have the basic essentials to do the job including caps and give priority of =ovement to special conveyances. (4) Counties =ust close the loop on use of school buses and provide for unset needs. They have :o take :i=e to conduct an in-depch review of activi:7 and prcep:1, while fresh in sind, resolve 7 probles areas. (5) ?EMA will revis e the exercise. In the overall analysis, :he exercise was a success, plans are sound, and :he mission can be accomplished. I want to express my appreciation to all parricipants. (Conclusion of Director's remarks.) (6) The introductory remarks of :he Opera: ions Of ficer poin:ed ou:

hat:

(a) The exercise just comple:ed was designed in such a manner tha: the cos: significan: responsibilities and tasks assigned to organizatiens and agencies to assure an effec:ive evacua: ion were highlighted. (b) The scenario was delibera:ely designed in such a fashion to cause taese key respcnsibilities and : asks to occur. Then through observer personnel, cri:ically examine the effective-ness of :he actions taken. (c) The exercise was triggered when the Shif t Supervisor of !M: Uni: I notified :he ?EMA Cuty Person that there was an unusual event in Uni: I. This resul:ed in :he impletenca:ica of the ini:ial notifica:icn pr:cedures. Thereafter, fic-ti:iously, a: the sake of realism, the facili:y suffered a controlled degradation. The facili:y was ac:ing purely as the vehicle to drive an escala: ion to emergency respcase activities. The basic purpose for conducting the exercise was to: test and evaluate State, State Agency, County and local plans in support of a fixed nuclear facility incident. The purpose was considered fulfilled as the exercise :armi-nated at 2:00 P.M. (d) The purpose of the critique is to reflec: not only how well we perfor=ed, but :o bring forth the areas we need to improve, to review the senangths and weaknesses derived from self-analysis of responsibilities and tasks to be fulfilled during provision of actions to protec: the public in the event of an incident at a fixed nuclear facility. (e) Each State Agency, County and Federal representative who participated in the exercise will be called in turn for their presentation. It is not a ti=e for discussion or questioning or airing grievances. Written co==ents and recommended actions :o probles areas will be provided in the After Action Report to be prepared by August 1. (f) Exercise play is provided through a hypothetical si:uation si=ulating a perceived event geared to reveal actions which will attain prescribed objectives. It is the ac: ions and tasks performed that are important, not the vehicle that is administered to assure :hese things occur. (g) There were 16 observers from the Sta:e and 14 observers from National including the Nuclear Regulatory Cccaission. There were 13 State Agencies represen:ed wi:h a total of 81 members. ?EMA had 37 participants. (h) Players showed enchesissa, were professional and knowledge-able. (i) There is a need to davelop or refine plans for the provision of kncwn resources :o readily neet e=ergency needs and follow up on actions to assure compliance. (j) It is essential to beco=e fasiliar with ICC procedures. There should be meetings wi:5 Team Leaders. (k) During the exar:ise ?EMA logged 196 messages ir the 5-hour period. During the accident on March 23, 1979, ?EMA loggec 90 =essages in a 24 hour period. We will review and revise procedures for ::affic flow. IV, Federal Evaluation Federal Imergency Manage =ent Agency, Region III (?hiladelphia, Pa.) lat:er (less a::achmen:s) of July 25,19c0 is quoted below: " Colonel Oran K. Henderson Director, Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency Transportation and Safety Building Room 3-151 Harrisburg, PA 17120

Dear Ken:

As you requested, enclosed are copies of the evaluations of the Federal observers of the State RE? exercise held in Harrisburg on July 16, 1980. You will find the =ajority of the evaluations f avorable and the criticism cons tructive. The assessments of my own staff and of reit of the RAC me=bers were tha: the exercise was ex:remely beneficial to the State and the participating locali:ies. I recognize the fine preparatory and execution ef forts expended by you and your staff and congratulate you. As with the purpose of any exercise of this type, certain areas of deficiency were identified where improvecents should be implemented. For example: 1. Poor information flow between the PD'A ICC and the county ICCs which are responsible for implementation of protective actions. In several instances counties were no t informed of decisions made at the State level for up to 21/2 hours. Additionally, disse =iaation of critical data from the State ICC to appropria:e State agencies lagged. 2. Inadequate understanding of authorities and responsibilities for State agencias cperating on-scene or in Sta:e or county ICCs. This perhaps stems from a poorly defined organi:stional concept of operations and/or relationships of State agencies to each or'.er. 3. Dif fusion of decision-makers ha=pered a more ef f ective response. The PEMA Direc:or, DER Director, State Secretary of Health and cther agency or department heads all should be headquartered in the State ECC :o assure a rapid and accurate information flow and coordina:ed response opera:1cn. My staf f will re=ain available to assist you in further refinement of the Sta:e Plan based on :he lessons learned in this exercise. Again ny congratulatiens to you and your hard-working and prof essional staf f. Sincerely yours, ~ Charles T.

  • chnson Regional Director At:achments 7.

Conclusions A. The pace of the exercise was too fast, and thus did no t pe rni tira to analy:e problems and take corrective action. 3. There =ust be a player understanding of simulations. Everyone did not have a clear picture of exactly what was being si=ulated. C. For exercise ad=inistration, ?EMA Opera: ions was both a player and exercise controller which resulted in too heavy a workload. D. Exercise was too broad. It should have been li=ited to an evaluation of only =ajor planning ele =ents. E. All agencies should be thoroughly fa=iliar with their assigned respon-sibilities in Annex E, Co==onwealth of Pennsylvania Disaster Operations Plan. VI. Reco==endations A. Review State ICC procedures with a view toward accelerating the exchange of infor=ation between ?D!A and agencies. 4 3. Conduct a study on the advisability of the installation of a public address syste= in the State ECC for the purpose of saking ti=ely general e=ergency announce=ents to all ECC e=ergency forces. C. Require each State agency to conduct cuar:erly training on Standard Operating ?:ocedure for the State E=ergency Operations Center. D. Require each -State agency to =aintain an Of ficial Action Log during the State EOC Ac:ivation Period. E. Use si=ulators w1:h prepackaged approved =aterial fro: each participating agency in :he nex: exercise to speed up input and decent:alize the ad=inistrative burden of the Message Center. F. Maintain a Si:uacion Analysis Status Board in the Conference Roo= which is continuously posted with current infor=ation on the si:uation at the nuclear facility, protective actions, major proble=s and responses. G. Review the Federal reco==endation that "the PEMA Director, DER Director, State Secretary of Health and other agency or department heads all should be headquartered in the State ICC to assure a rapid and accurate inforr tcion flow and coordinated response operation." August 3, 1980 en ) I ! ?.!!' !81'jl I^ll. EA'lli llT. } X[pg['.4 lithI t; Hil.E l'il AN18 tiill'l I AN l'IUt M STATloti l'k F-t X FisC I Sl: IdlTY Pt il?;tsH g l'kJ 1A-U -ID-1 'j, gy g g,

  • g9gg g

3 DATE I' AGE OIP l'AGili ACTl618 100 g INFO'ittAT10!!/ 33o33.pt g ( t!unnt y-bubt i vi a. ion) AC'llbil AGk2lCY(S) COOltD1H ATION COFiltL*rkt. ACTIOla -.99_, .y g i n.: ..iiave.1 f G _ g.P d'd _'ja; W itiv D L.l E.to ol.ctxc. 1 OclS u t i l s.n ...n. ___ To L. Las t w ise.. _ __ / OW' 'uu i e e _.!kLsa _ik t a a i 6 J _ LUC l u t_ lt11adel plain L _._"L0(J _ !!u!Y_ '.!L11CL1_ WilcL__Illi Call c d.d t O lH - 'llll_l!ML_' erldIEd ._1l11112'S:1u11 J nunsua l _tt nLgL"D& __99_It!rane 'n " '* ' b l l" ' e - bitn888"n _ _m3y _ w.si c.co. C.niu t I c 4. int ItkP 1. ave I.ecn notiIfed. Ikatified alie fulluwing of situation 4 61/00 s 'v i n..k y,, itgP, e a l l e.1 to reg n r me.u.a ge isom fl6kr 4:oue lo, 1MI PIM ot.s Wille..=.on .i t 1MI: 010% - p.iuplein Count y as I)(.S I. Ifnu ual event. 1.ne.m o f a f t a l t e (.ow e s. l.=* s es t 0706 - Sen. GAan calle.1 lann c.ar raJao losce.1 cleanlatton - In na t u r.s l c i r 4 ula t toin m...l e. One d i e:.c l 0708 - Cumheileni Co. Di s p.s t i li 0710 - York County - Curay 4..u l u[.. I:ontain= cut 4.uildsng l uo l a t e.l. 1lant 0712 - 1.cl. non Co - tiiller _ pence..sor - no 0714 - I.an aster Co. - lecac in nosmal utntdown mode. Wi nd 1 H0' 6' / n.i la. h er.si t ous u l t ia.it ion. I k A l'. It s.aih taaven. notifle.1 at Ofe')(. S O/40 alHP - 'lill dec t.a ed.: =6sc wmc a r.cenc y.e t O/ 35. Lost all mooisitos ina MMA Ops Williamson Called Ll:e following: D.iLi.la sTro. - 07W- --- - Yosk Co. - 0744 Mon t a us i nc, t rama ell sp.at t'lic l - wi nd 2 /0*.it i mple. CJm6'ErT4:GI Co. - 0 74's - - - - - -pump:.. I.cle.snon Co. 014 t> .g. g b'> fIs Al I At lills til' 16 6 l . - - _. -. ~.. -.,mm. amu _, 2m .*g g _, _a.. _, e nu. _m j. AJ L Ls W.'

e w t i 4 a 1 e' l i i a s a v. ? 2 ai a 4 4 d .s. 5 5 C D = = I n = = 3 3 e a C 3 0 w a m c s a S. a-s 2 l A. b .c. =, c'- 1 w n = a. 3 2 Q e D h i o o a m a a w a a, p g w o a = a .a =s m u ~ l O J-2 9 3 .i l v d f J 3 o 3 w w w c a n, = c4 v a o -s u u a c r.: a s = =,

2 e

c :l . s. w = c., W kt n. e = 2 A 3 w !! u vi 3 1 I l g sm 4 zo o~ - e-4 i- < e

s. m

= n 2 S- ); c = =, .a .a. i s 1 l u5 e e.- -o i i l 9 t l i -as 5 1: . i, u, I 2.E. 4 44 = = Q

  • C I

C .s 2 2 4

4 1

I j I. I .c = 3 1' 4 -1 1 W i I W e -M A g l. 4 ,'t - l .3 i. = 5 C m n n t w a C-3 = u ] u = u ,n a r a i 2 a .~ l u i 1 w 3 -2 1 w 0 J 3 J ,= b w es

== s e g .a o = a 4 = 4 = i 4 u .c n w = l,: q -.a. n a = s .a. a a 3. u 2 l g= g> a 4 a u .= = a-I a. a w a n a; m = I. l *s -e a a n. i - = = 'u l a 2 s -w 2 w W 4 i 2 g u s i j = w,i u a a v 4 l 3 1 l -l -J J. = i 1- -elm lr =. - 3 5 o= = .i J = 7 a l 8 v nI a, I 8 2 s-s .. ~ -0', - l - = =4 s, s

- lo

- l. l :. = a t,,: w . e i a u 3, ,i 2 .=. 1- ) ai .: i a1 3 = =- i; .i .c l si, i n, -l .l - i s' i a a = =,-- ,e>-

i j -

u -l .-2 = -s, 3 a .v 11 al - w si-w l 4, l a a s, w 2, 6 = = x e i 9 1 ., aa a,. a,, - i. 1 a i. -l,!,! 2 l. nl e, ui ai a = - l u 'l. ula ui u.

i : i w

a ..: i v e c a ; =, - . 1.,

  • d

.-i -:, yi

9. i :. :
2.., -
0. i,:

i m 3 2.:. i,uIu,l *l4 u, =lu a; : 1 a a xi a, g* a u I. I. i e i i c e; i ,i { l 1 i i I I el l i e j i 1 i i l e i - l. 2 a ei i c i .1 3 i ..G 2:-. i i i e i i l E J, l A 't I j i. d

~6 C I k !.U" A l .a 1

o i

~ ' l2 I i. e = e n lh w la as =

'%=

0 1

.=:

i >'s1-9

  • 3

. Q L e V l.3 ei e w 43 7 5 ] - l= 1 * "5 4 a,a w l u, 9 w i Q 3 wL = a, I's k'. =,v. [3 3 l

I3 4 i:
  • O E

= f.=3y=J l g W 1 y. $, 3 -.

  • i s - 2

'd

8 I

8 en f* ,3 -l- . i= ) -4 e t,, 3 d,t o 3 ?,- ml 1 = la.o. n

.a

= we==i> l e w 'o y "l3 w eg 'J A p A W 1 aC

  • Z M be A

3 ,,J a6 1N 8 W 3 3 hi. y . =

u. m -s, ,a o U

a>

'J a. = 3 hs . 11 ' : S' 31 A 'w 7-7

== l A Q "k es3'A M 3 A A 3 %,1 2 f me J a. =e -W & t.d = lC

  • J h.

7'I s "a - .J E "3 J w f V & A 3 ese -

== to h.x. l v = a = = M

==v W 3 3 3

=

g c ] sa3 me w A ,.is - C &a u s1 A - %,md= = '. = = J 3 2 4 we 3 ,3. v J U

== 1 1J== 0 w y '.=:

  • p: -$ p:

a a 'h'3 = 's o=

  • C

-A

  • J J 1' v

v V u -.m w et e l h* %. z j,. nc O- . j

    • s*

E= *C $ 21 J1 67 2 3 ~ i 5 s 5 6 aEl 32 B

n A

.m E E x6 E E 'w 1 1 ~4 1 I eum5 4 l e 1 "2" ".,w, t*'

  • 1 p.

U. s d -3 K ~ 4 l ? ,1 = !g* a. l 4

  1. 9 e s g

4 ) w g a 'l 3 3 3 3 9 'em en

==- e i 1J 'I aV

== 1 A S l

  • 1

= = v I,

== 1 S== w O 6 1 0 i k A A =

== 7 C 1 4 'J 3 e '2 s 3 w D 3 1 1, = = t 6 i z = -b v 3 1 y Is a E j 3 = A w E b t I i u o w I

== 1 I 0 N a 1 = 3 I) O w u V 2 = e 4l -2 = A 1 m A

== a 2 2= c = 9 .1 e

  • J O.

-1C J "3 N 0 3 e 3 J' 1 A em J 2 = ( 1'

  • J 8

K.>. la A d't S i o m 1,, 22.7 4 .s -L 1 5 E t w

=

3 r g 2 81 v I J 3 3 Q k a h E f 4 K l =0-O t w A 9 L y w U 4, w Q 1 e a ,l 1 Te U r= mu w w m u &l 3 4 3 1 1 E S f ' .Oi 4 s J l A 9 u

  • J L

1 3

i. -

w i V w m = 2 I ** -a 5 - -'A 'a ee q n A'a = I A = O 1 4 l O l 1 1 g'J I l G b 9 2 = 1. s Z K 1 4, g 4, al = .'t = i 3 a = =l .h.j-l fh ! O I w = 7 [ 8 'w = x 1 2 i .' l f' 1 l J,I J s u -a!-j I Q A 7 i .1 } j 'l. - t, 1' u j i a' =- l

m. l m

i l l -lx, = u x 2 1 , =, i f j l i =, 2 . =., ~ { i i i i j I a

r! J 2

z, l. - E,l 'l -l I . ra _ * .i. x. j I 2 l l l l i E '.. I j e; ; { w i, 7 06 i si i I e i e e . J 5 l i i j l 'l - - i 1 i 1 l -s = i - 1 ..', C t, 6 m e i l + i i s I a .i

6 e 1 8 l. o"- J e' ? ? .O 4 l l-J L I I 4 w l g .e I P h s b 1 I O g r E i a i i i g I k q e w O f N P e7 l ~ ~O I I sa 25 O O.= a 4 f b i1 1 6* d 1 .6 g 3e e A O 8 38o '3 30 d r, =5 e l a .Z O Z .a. h l = E 3 s 9 w p. 'd .h, t' 2 .h 6 O '1 = -2 s .=. d + = x s. =4 l C I f, b di O i. i 4 i 4 I d !eI e I .= Z! I Cl -6 d = 1 b Nl 4 JJ e

6. a 1B

.a. s11 .11 -l t E4 J "J bl= = = M.f M ^* a .x..- Ql 1 M t., ga = i M M 2 Le m i n b.5 .C l l M l a u sa - Mi O g ) W .. i -

J z

.a.l l S .a 0 tt -6 '- 3l .s I 2 ,j 1 Oi - m 1 M <j Z1 L. 2 g x.

Oi i

A 1 ll e x {. l <; i = a = = M Y< '. % %, =. O N I i O V x x a g <.* ?. 2; zi -l 0 ' .3 I -hj ";, ] T d E T T J = = = I 5 -I Al Q: b M. 9 l = 6 x I Oi ->

5. 3

-=.

== 1 l _a = 2 a a s i .a-s k 1 1 = .i .1 1 3 I' 2 y =.* = = 4 7 A i-2 h M' O f 6 .b l s a T -t =

c. a,,e l De

= a 3l 1 u I

4

c, u a i a m 0 - l =f .u -= i e- =. t i i a , %.,I 3 q g g

  1. d v Z

Xe s x.

    • 8 Y

i wt Eg g r J 51 ~g M, M j .E. 1 L ~.i ~ ^ gl ~ l j 6 m. al - = 1 A 3 l 4 d a s s I ). >$==. l I I r c . = s -=- =l = .a I i h a g a L -*j "" 'dI 3 4 g O W W { j. .3 3 e s I-e 1 l : C S 6 1 4.= s W -I J l 4 g [ i - [ L w , -i, :i >t x x i. _. i -: - 6 -1

1

-l .a l s -a, -, s w e w, .s l, j -, a L di 0, 0 d d -i - -l ,l i -l I -> I ~ ~

  • v s

>l w, .lJ{ 4 E = i a i -i l 1 -l

e H,

d v 9 O l 'J J. - ij f -}- vl uj wi e i 2 1 mi g r. -a ; w a v i ,e,. -j l I , e, ='i . e I,l. h O =; O. 3,i =. O,I

i i

4 4 .- ; -i =.. : = -ni =l zi =i 3 n 3 i e, e-r. r. O. =. : -. ) n -i Oi O, O! O, O-O, O. .y O1 Of i l 1 t i i .., _i

  • eI
    • )

4' 4' N ' <{ ! C ', ?, OI -,I ) i i i -i i l a y u I i .t \\

s. i v I I 4 =v l = j 4

  • l u

a 0 0 = m.= a. I s c., ei d. l -a J .e u = p 4 q 1 A w Q .U, 2 E -r 3 3 1 e .e C Q ee wt 1 m

  • 3

== "3 3 w k M =. 'J = g Q

== 1 h .c J. .M. g 2 f U EO .O. w.e E 9 ii g b4 4, 5* d 3', e. 2 $W Q5 I e -c 4. l i 1 1, i 3 a i l 5 w sq w W 3 U

  • 1 9

)*. ol "e e' a. 4 X z l =: + 1 = r.c

s b

a I Q O _3 1 w4 1 1 A A .s I e a .c. a w "J. lI A = 1 .= .2 3 3 3 1 a C w =. w 'a O y s T 4 .e 1 = M 1 3 W O

== A g t =J w 1 l g w

  • J A

a = M ^. a 9 w 2 1 l 2 5 i l 2 = A 2 a m }, n g a a = = O = a 1 .u .=. y ,d s A w j A u m n .C .= .=. 1 3 =. A d G .u. = as n. y y f1 a 4 '1 s .1 3 a 0 =.* 4 a. I .1 a = .C 3 3 9 7= =8 0 3 E 8 g I = 1 1 1* Q A 7 e d y w W 3 3 w a i e a j V 9 e

== w a A W K l i 1 j 1 "3 h j to b c 1 = 1 V 3 N 3. 3 2 u 2 1 3 3 w

== 3 { es 2 3 C 3 =s w W b e c w y h .c 4 w a.1 to

  • J 3

= t., y I a = = b h N A L w Q A b w .K. '3" **". 1 ~ ~ f 4 -g 2 s O 2 p 1 1.

  • 3 1

=8 ? A

  • C
  • .=.

n a .h.a 'O'J 'l 4 3 ai, J! f 3 J. = .k M 3 W D J 1 4 w I .a. 0".J 3 J I 2 4 u 4 l = a g. 4 s i e a: 6 s A 1 l z, 2. e 2 's ) *l l wl X ? w y a- % I 1 g - s

  • = = =,

8 O l i

  • e we 3

A =, - = - l

==- "3 3 e .e = .e s s 3 a 1 .e a w =. i - x 2 3 = 5 > l M l 3 a s 2, 1 9 e l m A = 3' s s k = 4 ~ 4 T = 0, -b b' 'l l0 3 =

  • l

.s t i i a i ! > 3 w0 M A, ".4 l M; - sl = i -ei i 2 s i, 4

I 1

w e w A 3 M M = M 0! .L. l l 2'

'=

=l 3 > 'l -; I h 8

  • l 2l Z

ll .i e 1 z w I 3 3 .1 - 0 M i 1 s S' 3 2 .s ! 1 'I s' I M M( ! M ! - i W l. M

" ! M!

-l -A l =*l !l :,' 1 e -I l ri i 4 i j -, - ;w. w ..t, .'t !, 2. w ] 4..:, .i a - 1 w 6 i { 1 l I i M e i ', -i. } i, e,, ! 8 ,A E,. o. j ,6 _t ... e,o. l.* i 4 i ,- 3 4 s ~ r' _,'i 1 i O D,. D Dl D' D! D{ D!D D, D D. g i e i i k f = i e, l j p I I N, 2 [ j.* ; 4 c* - l c _l 4 2 i i ~ - ~. .i 1 i m es. b k {)

9 his

  • J

= l' 3 0 1 1 g F i y = w en he V ,A i 1

  • }

A 'S }- t 1 .1 b es -97 e 2 O Igb I g

== 5 j g = = 'g -i O h .g d s j 1 .k .4-w 3 -

  • =

i i=

  • t I

a I I. 9 M I p w u t. 4 g.s l. .s l a e se 14 i

a l.1 h.

J l = s s Q N =-a=r* =n=o

== a 5, et 'e *G < 6C = '1 4 ,4 A.- d nL

  • 89 C 1?

l A e 4 wi 4 e4 m c'* WI 4 : 0 b3 CC O.= : C U== == e== t

3=

r: w it

==== CP est 3 # ( ~ w >w a -w g @ w 4 l % o,,; j o we

  • ==

4 em at em ' eue 0 e i en i M3 O ** n - t* i1 E= =C Q -$ 2 1 t.. c. 4 me Q.ha

== ^* A 1, as em CJ 4 ""N = \\ N A 1 3 s R a riN 4 j1 u~ = 2 L1 a

s3 as eg A

T i- .a A a i 3 0 w a.1 C-j' E D 3 L W 1 ed - S "k UR 4 1 e M i4 \\ 4 l k h i] l _j d. i a = 2 =e =0

==8

  1. 1

=2 ee w J anJ w =.1 R",- d y = 'y A ) es .a M me J

4 y

w y 1 I 3 1 y ~ =l 4 }l 3 1 t 3 -1 d .1 et V

  • 3 f'

l -1 ""] 2 3 a li, s a s i "3 ; I 4

== = tC 3 l =, w a

)

A a N El it. 's A

== 3 1 s a 3 =a .e 4 S -:l

==u a t 1g 8 6 1 u d 2 l -= A .a s a

==t x a a y.

  • y

-, -i 5 ".'I e. 2[ si s. t -s -s ..j ""1 a a .be n T ~ l 3 -A 3= s a 0

== K> .x 5 le 1 1 s =l s u u ."} A A 'e= 6 0 w 4.*j 2 -j 48 = 9

== .a J e .'3 a 0 ee x a a y I g "=1 3 ' H J 9 31 1 Ll e. r f Q w a' a i

== l .:l .m l .i _i -l . e, -l, .a = s i el l x! q 3 = 1, 1 O, e, 3 'l LI e a M

  • 3 e l
  • E!

2

  • l i

1l 4i

== = t i = 2

  • n m
  • f.

L. -.s l g g w 3 1 = i e g I' O 4 E w. i-, g 2 s 9l

i. -J o

. 4{ e = I s -d a L,l 4 w -3 a M s E i i. = -a, 3. s,i = , = s. , =, s =' m==

  • I

>e

l M

I 2 D= = 4 1 3 a. -i. i Ml 2 eI ~} i s -:1 ig - I i. ,j al 2l -3 s el E! L i b .l J . i. V l = [ 3 a

s t'

9" j r

: i.

4 i 1 aj I -l it .a, ~, ; i a , a ,s \\ a t. -e -t i a 4 i lt i l i .: l } 1, m.t, i i 1 i e> eg.- e, ,J .2 3, 2 O., ~l -t e, i i 3' r: t i O O, OY l O, L l Oo 8 O< O1 O, ,Y s I j i e 1 2 o I =. ;

e. i t ei

.; e. s., i k l 9t i

6 he I i .m l J-- s I O 2 i i 3, a l 3 0 0 h 8, t 5 ) S b e u l a 6 3 O l 4 o 0 -s v = S -r .e lm3 U 1 g ep W

  • C k

5 z4 ' O l 3 i t i I

  • = 2 3

M 3 - s'*. .d e O* u 6* *C 3 b X ei

9. =

3 2 pJ U i ^ 9( -s i a a X .h. 4 t f I 1 2 m. p N" = 1 u a J 2 m Q w A w e 1 9 h ^ 3 ag

=

= 1 'J .2 s a g F i E d I .I i f4 em w + 3 4

  • h

= n 7 M M V = h h 0

==..

.

2 ) w = h D S i 7 )

== A = ] J 2 'f. i i 2 a e u .s a -m 0 1 =14 2 L w W 1 1 I l a 3 a l

  • i e.

2 m 1 .w s 3 3 L 3 s ' 2 ' n 1 a s a S i l -.h d 6 w II m 3 m I 3 d i 1 i i 2 l 1 I .a. n .= s i I - s 1 s u -*I l.

  1. ' J, I

3 W 3 a =, n{ .a 4 I .1 3 i =, 3 U 4 = 3 3 u u a l w '= - S = a s a n> = =- S .e 4 s e ~ 3 .1 s a 5, 4 E 3 2

  • 4

== 4

== iq D

I X

u

== J-A A ,= a 2 aC W

== w 3 9 7 v = A 0 a. .s. = g 4 = .o ir i a g g ~ X 4 I a = 1 O sJ i W D = I ;3 = d 1 8 "J -b wI O a bl h -J A h L I D e, 2 a. 3 V 3 j .s. j i <j, A i M 9

  • l l

=se J *- =a l' i O { -4

.1 s

w 9 e <t i a i 3 1 , 42

l J i =

-a, 1 a = a 1 j l j

e:.

4 8 L 4 1 m ^ . j ~

  • I H

^ L i 2l 3 I' ,

  • J t

"2 i t 0I -2 a, 6 =I .1 8 3 1

i

'u . i i .I I .. J, a

== =l -Ot a 4 t f = a

2. 6
a. 3 i

L, + i. a = ,i l , t l e 2 _I I A =. V '.1 e i :. a i = 0 ..l 0' , '( I O 1 a*.

i

.a <l at s - S -l si r a e = 1' l :a 0 .s i e : i i l = i a i = i 3 wl 1 = A .c o- -=P 3 1 : i j -f 3 e _ i.; s - ..: - u i -; i : .a l .= ..,.,.= o. i ,9 g 3 .=. T.. ) S 4 .I g; 3-s, i -)

i -

.f M; J Mi V Oi Ml:

.3 3l 9

-a, 1 i Mi 8 M i : t, ' l, j, 2. '. i = l :,.

.' -:- l.6 l -; O <,.1 l

i x

i. f'

-'n i s A l. 5 O j - l-O a. l h i i s, o n = ~, et a w v. i -g =, e : i t ) I - { -t -g I. - { i 0 1 : i I_, - i g + i 3 2 ...i j m *. p-1 - -' r +. a d a: - ; 1 t i o i i n. J t<& t _b

b e 8 a l I 4 I 9 l I .e i

  • i ^

I l t J i a l l [ E d 0 = 4 b t. 1 .U h 6 i I - l I Q a sit o O

u a

C 9 '8 4 ~ p f l 1 t ~- =0

  • g 0 =.

m6 f= 4 d I 3 4 e Ma a e pa Q e. l l I 1 $ I l k l e i a i - s.

  • a T

M 1 M a Q-N I t n

rs 4

I 4 2. 1 s e-O s a O 3 4 4 Z L L r. A N O O C )* = = a = t a 4 e j 2 l * .u. 6 t ll T f M e b 1 l e. A =. 4 ^ g j i 3 f t' l a. 1 s li 4 l 4 'B j' E g - = I I i h ~4 s s f 1 6 W -= 1 3 0 -f k I q l l .a a -.a. =. ,',i x a e z . 3 I. y w a t =,, .b o I 'a a u a w ^ .o a r g a -: = 4 J i. w 3 = ed -s !i ,i j 2. 4

  • 3 I

4. 1 r-U 2 0 j J X a =< > i 4 o + ,2> i, o a h A 1 .g a

l 2

2 l.. a >I.'u =.5 a .u. t =. 3 51 4 i - i 2 l a-I* f-- z g .r.: =s =*4 1 a t J y. 8 m y = A

3 a s a y l .a k 'J, a I X .s I ' a* 3-8 t f t s. i i -l ,1 :

i

=. . j -. . i L s '- - =1 =3 a s 8 d s.l g - {3 '[ l = Jj . ai

  • I wl k

"s -0, l A [ 'J = 2 ; - i

l. = +

l - .a i =., -4 . l= = = = 2 _i : s.3 i s u I ,, si - : s' i : >l q l A q s' 3 ' s s 2 4 >l

  • al W

u 1 +- = - l - J 1 y a i !O l ?

  • l I

-Ji , b,; - b l .a 1 e 1 I l } h 1 A I ! l I 5 t 1 -t i -t

t - i i - j -

i g a v' = s ', e s . e} s i, >I l e -1 1, 4 i : = 0 !, st I s 1 = .k, . =, -s!s ai 4,. -.. . 3 - t s'

t. g; e.

c -l -s' 9 i -w -s s - 3 )! - ?s _2 2 s, - 2l ?. I I. 1 l, I, ? s, E, js ~ '. 5. I. \\ y k: ! b

I i

s_!. c. ~l =i m.., e. .i n s, . i s =l = = , - { = = , -;-j r 'i 5., --8, t 3 - d 8 fh, -1 ' d; - ' ~'== 4 ' e

l

= ', 4 4 ' 4 4 1 i e i' 44t: .'ti.

e I9 6 OF l.' AGE 3 1 tJ1A O-ID-T ACT!hN Ihi DA't.g .lu l y 16 1950 pggg s.' ltitDHr1ATION/ 4 l'holit.tM (Cuna.t y-thelat i vi nilt.n) ACTIOld AGkMCI(u) CoutilllN ATION CtJ04f 1.ETkl. UNION

gen, p

.pi tlF O!!) I u 17 noin t hic - t. Vlu. !!11.La.L.us!..un - S1Litat.ta ut_1000 Jiuuta ao I.. TI.os j e, F..s c s t a y, t.a ct.,e t c evasieetion **f l'oa c s t a y Ss Itall thangol,ig - sit ivice


I. t.

In Me.tJletnwn. g-- Fon et.t l'.u. t of honca for arcJ a.cl a v asi=. Ar sin to 3"tita up:. - k cuy u..e to Mei. sage ?st - a s....,. to olu. 54 IH l4 a en 6... e a e i r...c.. .- - -.- --...A_gstrultinac - lodlue detecitun vast of THl. Agalcultute 1.cvin to . - l l. - _ po.t y.o l e..g - tu S ', 's t. t u lit

. a c t u s.. k, l. l. n..n uc.e l s h inegat.. to l' t tt A - u. cil. moeilic i ne l' u r Itca t ti.

Causana t multely - why not.avallat le lutally. t h y s.i t J p a t t o u s te. Cua J c s I moJ Co.

  • j /

l 0 l's u.eay.oiug - l'1 IIA opa ao Cui l.c I and Connt y - u 4 ud a e tan a Sts l u s') that gning - ist u a u tsik keglunal Ollice - alent k.adiola.gical Staff lat* In kegi..nal Ol's16. t o tts i. ln - Aglaig - tip St at e all t ta s atests.1 to ops YA 104t lu.. g.oc...-_.._-_...g._., _ _ _ _ _ _. pa ov A.lc.aat.4 tan c. e,o th44 feb.ui.u County to l'I rlA - He.guch t a.lvice t o w.iencu.and s h il d s eat. tie di t h a.1 l u4 's nuaguing 8.evin, Bel H tu lamia.un - Cuncial f aiss a gency Jc l aa :J at opas i Tit 4. o*ig% .-..u -~^ --.----m_:...-_-.___- g w. u 2 m __ a. a-.._..

8 e 1 L r i F I l l 1 1. I 9 } I e.- 1 A l 4 8 1 a

s 1
  • t S

f* l x 1

,.a.,

e P{ s i

s=

3 i 1 Q L E I G 1 e W rn 4 e V a. I l I e I I l l A. %3 M. =0 -y q O= (= at at Z b 11 h 'n x. o' 4 .^3 a

<l

? = px 2 l a s i o .e 'l P =3 s -c l 4-l l 1 i a l l. A l I h

  • 1 21 I

' i, 'd -i s i 6 'J ht h 2 ) L Q 2 r:t 1 8 4 a 06 d a i

/

p A l=w .s 4 as: 2 .s t= L b= =+1 4 L C. _0 4,i i= 0 Q2M ~ O m M

  1. ,l

{ C== A P t$ U 1 c"4

6 ia :

9 t <c % %Z 4= 4 l I f 8

  • *4 i

i f 3 e 4 y ' g i A 1 1 A w k 3 u I -a e A l = aI l 'i A l I 7 M - e v i x. 3 .s-1 t C. a a. s

=:, i -

A -i = Vl j J i W .i .d. J 3 si I - - =,. l L M i I a ,l a; .3 l a = 3 j Ll p 2 -1 A J 1 w' a y - a = x = = i a . i a l -, a z = = = b =,, - .) V e =. =

== 1 '= 2

  • 2 2

t l

  • 4 3g L !' -

A = s 5 g a. - l . I 4 1 = W- "] al A A I = s x> ) d g a = v 3 -l 1 r* 1

  • C j

=l A

4
-.

=l 3 -A i .= i w 3 w l 2.: 1 ^A w -A w = l k =- } - '. a 1 x L,, II a A L.c,j k s 3. = a+ .t .i 2 =l Z i =.3 l. ' I. ,i "a 6 i -l

  • l I

9 xi sj I :. i -s1x ~ e l 1 j -l 5; .: n a

1 i

i

]

-e i u. z: T * -, -",i ~. .a t t.l

l

.1 .i e ? . m i 6 5 .j .,g . i. 7 l a -t 1 r, [ : 1 d: ,t sl 1

.1 l <
. 6 i

.1 - =i !, - I., => ! - !. < l, -j a l =- = ~

t a

ut 2, x >. =, x 2 i - _. l -4 a 2 <j ~ I - .1' 1 = a,i - i 1

i :.,,

i a u f ,, 2. 1 - i d i I =- ,e

t f

s f ." l. I i 8 u A I +

t t

I f i J l : Cf 2, _l -i y I .i i ,- l ; - -i s . l' 4 ., g; 3' g,' , 3l MI =l il,

-i,

.L* l, El E6 --- I. 1 - _ 2 b ,l -:.3 I i -. si j.i >i

1..,,

. 1 -_;: 3l

l. i lj

.I 1..: t 'I 'g l l i t 6 t o' .c i i i _ I =. - 4 2.* 1 i e s. = O t Oi - t - 3 0t .O < 0' O. e; 2

  • .', a;

.? .O. 4 O, i w i i r 5 ..-}i: u 4, =l 3! O '. -. l ?. a, . I.,...

  • e w

i 6 i >5 3

8 or 19 3.Augs l111A O ID-T ggyg July 16 1980

g. gag litFO!$1ATIOtif gggg,gy AC*a' lote AGil40Y(3)

OtXJhblMATibN CtMl'Ifrk1.. s.CTIOl4 (s'..us.t y nist=t i v i sil.,n) ...i p' .g b" Y 'I" #d *

  • l '8 IIH4 i h' tE" B ut._l'ill.iti ldil Y.l!dl e r - s kuuu lut a tu.a. un d!'i. a,.wLu.a tlun _

_* r p t r ! N.. ___ _ _ ___ -. __ /4 l l u's to k6ak I'.ount8r= - k c a poua.e to Hesa.ogt--f *a4 - t e.pse:.1 T'I T-N i a.k d.oh.-_._ Agdug t e..a ges t on__- Op:, to suuntaca, catablish list of lion c s f e.s aged an.1 t aanapos t at ion. / 's l l o') outgoing - E.I.ic a t l on to l'th4 Opm. - re 1=>nse tas Mena.ege 25 - Opm availability of taanapostatine. 16 1810 1.. l...non Co. so PiltA leo a: 5.!v a t y tu 10 mile s ad lua. Aglug g gg _gjyg g // Illh I uua.tes a.. Pl HA op. - kcalucut i ur c a.Il u s toen.te t c. t a..n a spr./ SL P instrus.cuta a v al lata l e, i n:. t r us n I a. /u 11/o shoo goi ng - ite.il t h e n riltA lt i unita avallat.le f..i.f i 3 s il.ut e us opa pointa. l's 1822 rennliert t o ops. Ol t ie r s - will contact rounties to supply gam Opm tourks t o lics :.t.cy anal Ci t y Island - wh.. to s ea selve fuel? 80 lih tsr to up:. - Hea p.or e to Mc:.. age 2tl - Ev.t. asalutante 1.sovided. Opa i r:,ous a ( = nu el. I i i z e.l. HI left s ewe go l og - it..e l a te to 8. li.aoun County - eua s e...emerskt.a t t osia telativu 1.chanon County e__-_____.-._.. z... _ _ Wili i _ _,,, 3, 3,_ - ~ - ~&, __... ;~---- ~ .n_ ws- - -m- ' s um a stamaa, a y - M - e.a s. _w--~

9 e 'l .?. I .s f E O l O

)

= N i v .O I .= 1 i o j 4 a M b g .s ph l N 6 -l [ = 0 i l 4 D 4 W g b a 1 C 4-I. C 3 =

  • 5 w

gm 6, 3 N -= b1 w t. y C = M.=.i. =L i. at a, l n. l 1 \\ ~< 2

4
Cog V

r-I o .F. 6 a "8 4 IC a 8 g 4 cm ?. = a u A sc A 2 2 ~ px 3' .:~ 7 2 ~ ~ ~Q s 4* e." =E' 2 a eu .= g eC a 6 i l a q j .=. h. 2 g w ij 7" l I d 5 1 .I

.3

=~C N 5 l = 3 Al A. b 04 'A

  • E i

t e e b 4 l =l l 9 9

i. 4 l

3 -A s g 1 A 4

  • =

.g 9 .=. .A w h a 3 3 I em E s a = = a v 1 w m n j

  • J

== 1 = 0

== i V 5 1 a M 7 I =*J- 'd =

==I 1 Q IA A = = 9 aC l. = = = .a 4 1! J f' 0 r =.=. 2 M( 1 : a = = = .s t 3 1 l l,' = 7, l =_. 3 2 =e 2 v, u el e s 1 - { u. 1 W. t .a 'a n i. =t 4 w-a . 1 :., a s

  • =.

V V L = .=. A = A 3 = 1 = E m b G 2 A = 3 U 7! t u .l -.A i a i o =. = g = =, x a = ( , = > .6 v = 7

== I = = = b =j 3 3 a y r = 2 I. 5 2 - 5 E C j ~= 1 i n L A = .n, e a n u i i u 1 g '=1

  • C 1

= =l 'I

  • ." 6

== k1 -A g w 2 3 8= p L = = X V T'

  • 1 J

w

l.

k =. .-e. A i 4, hi =, s"si I 3 i -A =. ' ',1 i we Lj =

;

i 2 a 0',l 1 = = = a a 9 - I 8 = ,j f -l A Z l q wi 3 =, 'o l I I -r -. 3 w . I S,, I ?. = t ~ e : } - { l .,i i sj i - si _ 31, e . = -l a; s -=. -, : ' - i A 4 = l. u -;O.; z . = .I = 2 - =. ;, -.' O d' k L I - = a 1 1 3 } .c .Z I i, c u -6a

J l

= 4 l < 1 i, xj i v> i 3 1 w i

3. I M

M . m -l ga c, 2 -6 = = M 1 el Mg l - 0. -:l n. 1 2j E b a a = l e: s,

l

-l i 3, -j 2 =, t 1, .: :, e v.' .i : ' 3l :l f a, 2

J

, =. := l =?I ~ 4 ,j = f, 2 ;. i, -l.' . M 4 E

  • i EI T,
  • i :
  • j f

T Tf .-i* et 2.

.; i aI

=t a_ t e, r. .i . t. i i i i } l k I l I e g I g -A ti 1 -i e _i t e. e, ' -I .,i i .l .r -r 1 l ._, f -l f ~!i- -[ e r i l .e ] I i i g - l< 8 .{ s 'i q .I 6 n = m = Ei = m: E: Fl ~ 2 5, r i l ~ l s y ) I ~

s n g i l \\ o I. s . a p t M, 3 l E. U l 6. a 9 t ,l y 7 a g a g O St l

  • c

.e ras O i 4 i l 1z ( M h3 s a u o t p I.*

  • J

=* i g .c $3 3 4 $E lu x yT c a( 4 ,m p s. a n ..e J e L x r.) 1 s vx s a a 4 1 a a .z. y -I a u -1 9 9 Oi ' AC E 5 3 E 4 a 1 2 w r pu ? li A ~5 1 A u- = a. + t.g-z. = -a c l 4-U 3 s -I a b.c 1 1 I 1 l i 's .=. a j -a g m l-2 l, b Y 1 2 J d ~ u a u l ^a g C g 5 y n s u l. u = a u a 3 d U l ; i J ii t 6 n = .e a: a u a = 7 a i a j .u i s i 4 a e I = A -l u ? i f. e 2 g u O - n ("* 88 a -1 ll U 1 M. ~ l ?a Y. I ,k ~, F G a a o A T '1 L J 'J U e.m =1 g l w> O .::.3 _ 6 ^6

== ="J l w Q 2 a. 1 3 C- .2 "a O N 2 2 Z G

== U =. i i s. = =, u t '.1 J I D i i, 3 rg 3 M' 'A .1 ,3 L .h. e u .i =l --3, --s --E 2, r u .J.e i. m, it = -i -' E -i .{ ao 3i C 2 >J l f L~i '2 d -e f. i i u a a ai i i l l i g

== I h i,

l

= E = d' .a = I Og O <j 2 1 y d, Og a 4-z -- V W_ _i

W r.

t. 'l r i S. i K g .4, .r. e u f.

  • l
I -: x i

i i i i i+ i -g 2 Le, e T' T "I = >g -t 2, 2 2 -a ' -a

i :.

= 9 a u 3'! .. I 3 ~ I 'T I, If I 26 1 i 5 I 4 d i.] .f. E -l O Ej kj I.: 2 ([ .a T f O T.

i.

? ?' i .: t' -t I' T' x, z. p. I >+ <..i -, - a x . =. i 9 -t i I Q =. ei

  1. t as El O'

e I' I i i i i I l ?f t M* -l i . Of -l ?8 e, p 6 4;

  1. 4
  2. 1 r!

.# li

  • I Ai A

e, o_e j -t r, .P. l e, _ l, { . -i -4 , -, -i i p, = , -i S i i i .e i I + 1 i a '! t 2 .} =i i ei e %( ra r; O,. -t 4 e '. : el pi r, r, ei r, y r, r -:. :r e,. :; c - 2 il,' 4n

0 e t p ( i Y c i, i 1 2 I S, 3 D s a )..'. _a q .S= Jie f g p 4 fan a i O aI C i 1 W i o 1' 4A 1, i a W a z u. M3 1 y g e

c..

g. HC 3 Y w 4* n 1: a g kw .u t 2 a I

r.: G

? 1y Qc. 2" 1 C I e z l v e B Ol 4 -l ~v 4 m 1 c 61 =,. l s -b N e e w e

8ra, n

.t 6 .a q i = I 3 3 SI k g a j 2-l< 1 u g w

9 b

u E 3d t1 4 W N 9 V i .=. a= m. J 1 .q J = . l 's l w s .= g 1 -?. ~ J ? i 1 4 3, 't = 3 2 =. I a "3 w = = J i a 1 J m D, 1 w I 1 O 9 J [ W j L 4 ', T E ~

  • 1, l

) 4 e a- ~= 2 2 =. 1 0 l s 21 1 = 3 w =, w =. ' =g h A, q

  • I g

A, ti3 e = -A 1 1 3 f - 3 g a N g J = 3 2 L 1 W 7 ~3 I, ~ I 2 d ~ .1 = a, a 2 3 1 J s 0 N 1 -a 1 -r2.> i .J = -1, .s 7 t. e J 8 = !,l ll2 M A 4 38 a e 0 "1 3 J 1 8 y g y m 4 -s 3 :=.: ' ij b ai ? ? ? 'T ~* + d O s 3 l s. = 4 = 6 aI 3 w 1 8 ,d x ? .l i 41 3, e i i I = .: E I ~1 5,. C' I -A <l L' 4 y' f "i,- ._3 ' J' 5l 1 I .J N g-2- 1 5 M 1 a a

  • i _

2 .d w " ~ U t 3 I. ' 'l I .d .-2 ' ** M

=i 5 i

.'4

.7
-?

2 ', - ' r - l -s _ I 4 : x s = 'a x y* 4 a u ik = i I, [ I e f, a 1 3 3 s.' d' y., 3' 9 d ?; - y, - -? 2,; 1 si si i a_ l <i, - i l. x, -l , - i **,

i 2.

I i i * .,t 21 .M g .M '.,i Mi -t =M g M. T-

  • t e*

?. M 4 I J. l -e i, y 2! 2I - - ; -, 4f 's f A.' k I 'l 2. 2 I,

5.,

5 2_3 T. i, ."a { i i l I i "* i i s. l d1 -l -l =,? l l 4 I Vl j O7 j 1 i

5:

5 =; =. 1 - =, i ~ i u, e -, 1 ~ Y -f. '.h ' U ,7 l q .. E [ E* E ', 1

    • l l

8'" 1 I. em g i I e. .e + -= .s 4-4 e ) i i r, E 1

e s k 4 6 ? s l i b. l l i i i .3 5 l 0.c g i a. a g ..-6_%._ s 4 l r-e l 5 ~ 0 l m. c e uc< a ok i f l I ) I er sz l lg =co. w s< = .f o

$ z 2

-l = a = =

7. =

-3 pa d: 3 i 9 4 5 x 3 m 2. 0 .A .e. M ? .a. 4 .e .M. l -.J l = m -n I)l, w e l >.9.:o

r2 H

.= 8 3 ~ <z -V e 2 i j I t t l 4 T. (' v s f* w -s _a = m = = = a =. = = 5- ..4 = m u i ii J -7 w 4 = ri a z} -s a S = i al a u

i a

w w = 3 7 l a = ~ j D J ) I8 0 3 I C i J ~ ~ I _1 a s g = = a i a a v I ? 3 i 7 J 8 l i, a u. =., ,~ a-l = a s = 5 = n n a a a = a f a j o .= 1 .1 g a q -a

. -.

si a u a s a a a = 3

s;. >.

a.] =- a a w l 6-I, =- i i s 9 a = z .=.;. i r-9 s w = e w s u c i w n . i u g= i = = =

i 1-w u
a i

,= a- = m .= L a. I. a m = s - a a = a a x e 1 s s =

n E.

al !,] a i = q a - w = x .a t I 5 s u = a = ? E u i De .l l } , u wi 1

(

x = >.1 5 <. _ < l _a l i .= ai i - I z, - i s. i => = = = u m I,.=- -l 1 t.9 s = e = e -. r 3 y- .= 3 2 2 = , iie ,h i w = 5 3 =1 s = 1 l.a =l t - m t s ' n

=,

4 = s 2 i. .e. - -, = - vi s .e, .a u, - i, q=, 1l i, .= i ,I = r : =, = a .l -s

.2 4I 2

-x,. -lW

I i

, = ^.i - i..:,

l

-di -E'a t 1 i 3 i e -l 1,, 0 2 16 -:c 1 i : ?. { t j-i i .e 1: - *-

  • f u lt 2l -, = f 1 1

-l 2 -4 a 6 j ti w _ i. - ag l i j i 1..

-.*.6

~ i.

  • l I

I 1 e 5= I -l ! _., *I ol -l i l i 6 ? Q -r., .2 a-i s s s ..4 -e 1, ,i - l -l l h N,,. l -. l ~. l, s l p, o s, r, _n ! j _; - t - i - I i ~., y i i I V

y. 4

I9 l AGili -Aaviota IJM,. g.g.g .he l y it, 19t:0

g. AGE II OF - - - -t.;

l'i m 0-ID-T IliN!tMATION/ titout.tM ( Coan.t y -:,utal l v i a. t usi) ACYit,13 AGkJ14(3) CoohblNATION CtMl'LETkE JCTIOld g ;,,, ms. Tlfit; 1 24. 1210 (Ju n gu ing - be a t r a sa l'A t ilhF t t visi lic.t! t ti - tent amic a a.sa;u te.imbulanso lle.a l t h st pluyecut. licanI tia I2/ 11 li Oiaagoing - S. AIIi glie nelc.4 FilS i com lic.a t ale - a ca. I si.c=>.agu s e 'I .es.l.o 1.e ut u de pl oymcut. 12d 12 '.l _l oua goin;; - Ilcal th su laine Cs_e_ lam.au - Ca s olina Ts'us k ing Campany - immediately avallatali. s e.3uc.as. s _a _at..a us t o s t i.c_e _a, Immed ia t ely av.sil.nble. l."s 1 J__I4_ _uutgoing - Inc..Ith to koadu.ay Tsu6 king - actue t trucks. 1 30 121'2 oua no eing - lic.al th s o I).auphin Count y - a c.gue s t =t ag t aig as e.sa. Dauphin Stagins eleds P8"Vid'd. I 11 12 m lie,e t ti. t s om St bA-Cos;, l.tw i s.t.u r g - ambu l.suc es, available tsom ti.:a l tla kst,fous, 1 12 12'lH ' late paaks to DtX - status <>f campsites muJ cabina i n 8.oi. t rounss w. I11 1242 Outguing - Dtu tu l'attA Couw-il - e.t.a tum o r c ampa t i s m.au.t cab l ua ,l'ntA Council l u hu:.t (ountics. Dtk l 1241 Cerusky tu 1.wv i n, plR - k.aJf.etion acadout -. _'l4 E D k i. k.h h k h k - - ~ ~

  • l' DtA psov l.h J II uiphin gisi.1 Comise n laind 4:uusst y.

(>Mla

2. 2 n y49: W '-- - -

+.,. -s _ . w s~.- m.

li s W f8 l i I O C f C i e i, t j A f i - f ( 'l tl s og t e I FT

  • E l

t O ilh t l'* C E GA I' / ld u NO e OI l TA n a I T sc AN e MI g n !iW A i 8" O! A i. A A l M l m 9 F o 4 t A t } I No H f Hl t t h l u Og P I'* I C } i 1 4 t e f_ 1 A f I F )_ 3" ( I S Cl Y a G A h / o L A T C

== A N i t C, t l b S l J t R l 'c6 a A I A l --m +i n s i e l on r o r a i n t m Ji n a t s o a c o i s c t o u y t e U l a a e a. i h r t o. l c t d r c i i s 2 u a f l l a lp u r i a d U t a r e i c lp l f e e f a a t a a l' i o t se t u l t p y 'L s a n s l v-i W l c .= a. i. e s A t u e a t. l d. i c a e { S o a n s ~ n i c a. u t ~ a u y e n ~ s a a t a t t i ~ n u m ) p I. n e t a ic r. s o a u t g n n n g-e: l J s s. u c P i o i i n g t s t t T u U 4 i S-s 1 o u e i a C s s o O 4 u m m v r A 1 c m e t o 2 i 6 l e M m t 1 c l i r t s e. .n h p 4 N IDb 1 e l i p p i -i ~ n i y 4 ) u a e e u. 4 a W l' p u u s i i 8 s 1 O t n l. l o o s H A s i is I u 't I y 6 e 8 o n i t t 6h p A t A p s M .n / p m l4 i u I O t l o C u I t r u iu l' A t ia t l C t1 I

S C

o H it a t e. t ( o t t . u l I H a 1 I 4 a i e 4 t l' s i A sp e e t = i. b y o g a o I o s n l. l s t a e s n t t f i a s t n i C u C I v p c 1 a u l a v V s n. S s. R K t e. O u g C l' 1 I A t A U I At _ i

  • H n

n I l e o d_ i g a t m li-s_ ss t_ g g ec g s g t l l ln _.a_ t g D g- .. i a _ n l a i a ss y l ._ m$ m p a i. a o n n c i a o i. o o u i t u to_ s o l s e. o-a n_ e t _ tg tg p tg p t r H. n tg l a__ tg ss m p . A a i l. tg-a s l A t = h e. u i. i u i u L. BL C s_ _ O O l. O h O dc. o e. s D. is I D i_ t t _ C O-J . 4 S ~ 4 ') v 2 1 y f t.. 1 0 i S 5 >_ ni I 'l 9 l b p . 4._ 1 p 4_ 1 1 4 1 2 1 '2 k 1 1 g. 2_ J. 1 8 1. I l' 1 1 1 .- i 1 u. 8_ A t, 11 S = i 9 0 1 2 6 4 s O 4 s / t i_ t '8 4. 4 4 4 4 v. [6 t1 1 i 1 _ I I 1. 1 1 1 1 I 1 h ' m ^ sa b. t

e "IY ACTI6li Ifr, DATE I' AGE Olr l'AG t; 1NFORMATION/ l'id>lt!.tM COMithT. kE. ACTioW g.' ( Cousit y. Gaalmi t v i sion) ACTION AGkEY(:3) fd>ld#1 NATION . p 3.,. y g ggp; 146 1 11 % is.au pla i n to _l'_ illa ga. - confism.ation of enemet s e:.ous c ra coord i n.s t los Pitt A i l'F it __.')_. I.l.i t.e._ --_s n:._ky t ee.i.ev ig lat it - *il t s ep,reencea ni sappuwes. I f. Ge - l'PMA 0p:.. - Cunel,e r l.sud (*ount y Am. leu l a sm e ISO l 'il l Outguleag - llea t t le t ie a.atiksicJ - C.apital City H.all staging ate.a. ISI a ll-) Oul t.oing - tie.a l tle to I.cl.. anon Ci t y llca t ti. - If a scleame of kl ~ Eltl W17dUy ll ~ diatell.uted lei 10 male r.ed ius. liedl t le I ',1 l 's ? i ills of Hl' PA to llca t t le - s er.ponse t o aml sel.ince s e tuest. _ _ _..nuagoing - l-anc.anter County t o llcat tle - capsul cm av.a llat.le. lic.al t le i l' l I ll s AE~rT-~%i.aTtTi 1)CA l '.4 1 824 outgoing - Pl HA to Agal., llc al lie, 1)C A, lit H, PUC, liOT - request Dlk. I' llc. lisif AkC aastuument in accos.l.anace with Annen la - Opa. Plan. PtMA ISS I ths 1.tl.aamen County to PillA - m it rep -.~._ y g 8% 1 81') Yuak County to PlHA - requent status of V-135 Jos teet e r tur use/ lat:N Pl}lA liep. Dir. ^ 1:.aue Count y wut kc a s. llLH IS/ I lli Gesuuky to I.ev t in, l>LR 'INI m i t s ep, I l ',41 i ll? Outg.. lug - Pilla t o I.a na.e :.t e s - r eal%m.se to Hebuage // ru r.sJ ia t ion .lc a. t t on c pa l geien t. g.g__...._

1 1

GYIk _"M C ^'^ ^ ^ h-- L _' 1 _,g g. A ha. a m - g a ,g ,, _ _ m., ht~ s

e s., 0 l l i f i I l l I !e 5 O e ] l l 2 .3 3 i I E ] I N. 3 e, a U .= ._... -1. e y .e. g d i P t-1 ~~ m aa i. A d, Q a a 4 s' 4 J A^ \\ 1 M 3 0 -a 1 4 E 1O s h II j f. g I U 2 AA %E =0 J o e-o C = -p 5 b# h A = Ng L 5, A d. l e -= a .e .k k_ 5 0 2. g i. ,l .1 = } 2 = ,c 1 .c l a a, W) l l l l

  1. -l

'i i i I C = = ) M" q y esd W q w A g i. l, 8 l = k j c O I l F J a f 5 d

d At lU 5l E

i I + 1 i ff 9 4 e 3 I 4 J U 1 s 3 e II 3 w -w 3 2 1 8 l 4 A O 1 1 3

== j l 1 j s a w u A l' =.s 1 4 I. I = u I i l 3 =- a A M \\ y a a = s 1 1 .4 9 4 -O i -O 5 l 8 {

l tc

= f w ~ f.,

  • N

'I .I 3 ,5 5 l I I <E 3 i sa i A .O.. a A O 2 A u A e. m f 8 f e L gt .-O y n 2 l Si l yt u V. = w e A 7

  • il lj

-1 2 1 l -24 !) a w ., s

1

.c A a i 1 e-1 2 l 2 1 1e y g A .i 4

  • 4
J

^ e g A b

== .e f aus .: I M WI

== O O A 1 -4

==3 I

==t 4C 4 =ra' :.y O 9 2

-i

~' 8 a i 1 3 1 3' 3 i < A 2) .2*- L l' l

== I m* i 4 .~.= 0 e 6 l ~l 2 Y. a O 2! u s. = = 4

    • l a.

O L 3. =l E 4i St l A 8-P g e j -

  • }

5 O h I! E. ,,,l, 1 _n l i i O, 3 A i ~l T. t a" ! ] =*l l -L i. 1 <t 1 Is t 8 e i .s .C ,l .,; l 1 }* 5 . O l .V 1 l EOl --:i A l 5 ". I l 1 4 .e -2 .c l : = i - 1 i 2; i. f 3 'i 2i<, S I! 8 2 if 1 f

2 af 8

A 1 M 9 >I Z 16 Di I wt I I' K. 3 u

I a

-t e q .. i .l 0,, yl"l -2 6 --3 l At ~ {

  • E l

^ s 6 6 74 -1 4 i e 2 1 I s 1 II t i ' ul 143

c

- e we s i 3 M .-4 M J 3-2 h k{ k l b lO - .a 5

I.i :.

i : i

-i :

l

i is 24

- _= _a l _i .o f. _- 1 l _-E 4 e y . =i x i yI =- t ] =4 O' J

.J I

-4

  • f bl O

bl -[ .I Oj <l Of O Al -l i 6 l 6 i i k i e, f .r tci N,.f p8 .O- .4 d, f" !.** 4 2:.I - 0l l 1 i i .e j -j 1 l - j e. 1 i s. e i l l I - i - j 9 b"" ' i S -a,' -. c. e- ~ 1, g i -et 4, .a , ei i i - i t I J t ) i i h r 4g. A

W i i i f* 1 l 1 . Q 3 I l Q .C. I 94- ). e 1 P g. p t l q -y G I. c. t c. r I 6 o aC G. l h i i s. -o O== t

= E

k= aC E a t. $ *3 ? u -y .u. g t m f, d -9 s .e x l a g y -L + l a. A, i r 2 e --bl i l 2 rA 'I k. w >= i M J 1 A 3 1 n$ s = j ' m. ~ l' Y 1 m 3 = ye

== v A

  • .i T_

I. 3 ,4 a

s l

o

  • ,e.- (

Q 4 E h 4 < \\ f l l , i I l

  • J

.J

== =

==a Y i =3 2C l "3" = w 1 3 1 = .-= b 4 'T 4 b w v a 5 Ol s .a s -a = 0 I g 1 -e 3 j

  • T 1

2 8 2.

  • -E 7

a -l g 1 2 l t -e

  • i 7

W 8 i 1 a, 's 'i 3 O, b 3 T., .i 4 4 s O =. 6 v i a 1 1 = s O h l M U , = 2

I A

a

q -

- l .s= [ f 1 m 'I A in s 1 A - l A. i 1 i i => u A 8 4 n 's me g 1 e 1 A 2 A! 4 D T f. = 2 M O -4 A

n T

h h 1 1 3 s u 3 = 0 = = 4 3 m as j 3 >e 3 be il 3 b J 1 1 = w 3 'm .0 3 n =* w L .e u MI -- i w 2 a j =. s. =- 1 a e i ,i =s ,A .,e i r i,e t --i J. a

=

m r 'l i i 2 i 1 .a 4.

I = l l

O d M 6 2 I la n h N 8 i a =I Z 3 I 1 .d .- 1 1 E g 4l - 7 4; g .s s i x-z, 'I x =,

a..

a,, a v' ~. 4 O. s. t t n ) .4 . Og i b ~x g 1 l s l .= s =

3 s

- =. i : x! a, ,i i m r

I :

i 1 . a ri x; x. E8 3 l' s t 2 a 28

  • i '

=, i -.13 j O1 -t O = =, 8 3' 1 s, .a 'l i

' ~
  • i i !'

- l, i. ci i = , i 4. i I w =. 2, 2, 2, x; -2 5 i g -- = , m : -. - >, -i - t i u. 2 .a t i -l

  • i i

!l T1 '"> l, ^ A : 1 y :. : 2 2 i - : =i :... a si a m _l m u -i _. T' f; W T' ?' '

i. s
  • I T.

I Tl as s a A. a .-6 z 'I gj .a l a. .e w -) w a 2. a -1 I w. wI .I I ] I t N l * ' k ei l e. %eg 20 S,

  • 54 i : l 1

et e -~ .z.j ei c, j l ~-. e l - -l -i, e, e .t. 5 I 1 9

4 s.

s. -i -t

ej ~ i.

2 ~ ~ ~ ~'

2 as t

-I

  • s 5

mm g g -g am d. s.*, L ii. s i .gN kI

4 I a i f f i. O" i i J 8 I I I d 5-1 I i ~ i &e - U 4 1 0 l 'l S Q ,h b i e t i i 6 E e j 1 0 l = 4 M i O i "E l l 8 r g'i I ~z 2O j .O*.*. l b4 "3 JI 2 S U l y e = 4 as d 3 l - Q ~ Sg 4 =. f d., S q l 2 m t + n u -4 6 s-a. m a l a a. s u 1 I J 0 l 4 ~ m l l } I 1 -m

1 i

.d, I ^ b i r M 4 y 5= N E .1 C 4 = m

9 r

.r. ,w l

  1. 1 t

l'g i l ll m .y 4$. l - -1 e. 1 3 3 = .8' = 1 J4 4 L 1 b fl ^4 = a 4 I 1[ =a 1 l L = 2 L$ I -l a. 1 .a. a 1 n , z = i. 2 i -Ol -:I

== a a l5 s 3 I

J $

l g = U l s >s l 5 i .a n. n = u = I l ^ 4 = L l e ', i -u a a1 1 .= e. J w l 3 i 8 2 I L b W

== = a

n e

s a.i a' .== 1 A S

=

L 3 ) 4 a 'n B

== 2 g - d l ". A Z t =. ! ) 3 I : A = A - .d 2 a = = I m a -4 = .A 1 y-4 7 44 i = 01 ll

  • C

=>. u i f w = 2 3l 2 3 L 3 1 I t 0 4 Le I

  • J O O

.r a l u A 4. 2 a u t;-i, = c. i s e s =j l Z- -' 8 1 l, l l 4' U

  • s t
s.,

8 -I' x >i i ej L e! -l 3 l. 1 = s 4 t e i b 3. l .:l i, 1 i i w 1. i 1 i s, J_ l

  • l :

. i M. l. '== [ O! g v i m. l X el J L ]i l - g,' m' U s i : i s. I

t slg*

s = , = i' - = 0 4 e .a si _z l l O j 2 ai - t,! i :. o.' al it a = = . - a i. i t : e Ml El 2{ 2l z l'

  • 2 l

==l w ' s i 4L i E, sq il

  • "1, c,

-l -l 9 1 e' =9 >I 0 al xl l -1 I

I

-sI

, e -

,=r,! -l A -l 3l . a ' : = s, a, s u3 x I; -a u! 2:

1. I *

.1 2, r, g : -- : i.; i w ') m 1

  • e as

~s

s. 1 =

A s, s. 2 A i l i., g ) -l t i i

  • I O

f .? ' 9 * % j "a' Jl 8.m ' f

  • O fr

,=r ,e ,O l - ,r ^8 N I ~r' O -*i -r g .r Q ej ...p. -1 rl -- ,r - -i -i 2 6 I b,, e. p: q

'

1

==#

2,

=- =. mi =- c o "=- a -l - i. i s 1 i [ k a Y w

a I9 i l.llA O-lh I gg.g.g .loly 16 19t10 l' AGE 0F 19 l'AGlii f t'TIOff II6 I INW)!EATION/ I'!cLJLI,tM ( Cousal.y-Sulat ivi s f ou) At'i'lON AGL24CY(G) COOlWidtATION CLA41tETtt. ACTibil gg,g, . gg,, yggg . _. _/_/_.__ _atgo_ing - ANC --PIMA - Pul.lic l uf os mat i..u as I put.l d c n el a.ame. PlHA 14 O. so I tt / pets not le6 blieli cs. PlNA S titt 14218 th.L gie l seg - lat H 8 4e PillA - Fl.s:.m C.n s e Cens t va ns to sereiwe ev.a asces at I 4 10 . # 30 Ill.N lit 9 1412 t'/A to Dt.K - lla a ease ccuteau tr4Jy tu setelve evanaced at ._____--____'lMA-acquc>t 149 snar.km an.1 judfue tiltess. PtllA u.stgolug - PS P t., I 19tl 1415 191 14M thatgueng - lican t ie tu k..a!way and Casulina Tau.L - n. gisc h t s c le.ame .it 21 tsactor tsailsas to ev.a. u.a t i..n cen t e s s, 191 1414 4 ee t a,o t ang - lle.s l ile tu 1J. S. $(1.001 tilmtsii8 - sequent selv.ase of l ui t..o l L u:.c. t o ev.a..ua t t oon s.cu t e r. 198 14 1% thit ro a ng - I'lilA l'id t o P11t% Ops. - Pa ram actsaue - ev ru.a t ione PDit Opb/ TTY ales e. 4 l 194 14 6t. t ou t gu t ug Blealt h t o PS P - kl s ea.ly t.. netcase t.. y.us petuouact PSP I_____ 19% 14 Ili t heit go i ng Ltcal 6 66 tu l'!}lA - !! cat tle liept. t o eu..li c put. l l e Pl}tA 4 unouncemcut wlrse El obtaine.l. li 19h 14 19 t hit g.. a sig - t*SP t o l'l tl A - ca. int er t e 1 Ilea t tle - will tiltk up El lur PDtA l'SP pensounct. 6Flli - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ - ----- .aa a.-- _-. __ ;,1 _ % .',y_--.-.... y,.

.n, UTTIED STnIES CF RECA IMR REGULAICRY OtHSSION EERBE 'DE /dGEC SAFErl AfD LICE!3ING ECARD In the Matter of ) ) IEIFDPOLITRI EDISON OPMTI, ) (,[ ) Docket No. 50-289 (Three Mile Island Nuclear ) (Pastart) Station, Unit No.1) ) Lc.tulnCATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the attached letter to its. Aa::rdt from counsel for the Cccmctraalth, the " Exercise Scenario" and "After-Acticn Report and Evaluation" are miled, postage prepaid, this 22nd day of August, 1980, to the persons en the attacFad service list. d b.,c ['I bl s nam w. CAas Assistant Attorney Ceneral Dated: August 22, 1980

CTITED STRIES CF Al4ER.ICA NUCLEAR REGULAICRY CCMESSICN EEPCRE THE A~UEC SAEI'l AMD LICD:SI'E ECARD In the Matter of ) ) FEIRCPCLITRI FDISCM CI4?MTi, ) ) Decket No. 30-239 (Three Mile Island Nuclear ) (Restart) Staticn, Unit !b.1) ) SERVICE LIST George F, Tr~otridge, Esgaire Theodore A. Adler, Esquire Shaw, Pittran, Potts & Trewerifge Widoff, Reager, Selkcwi:c & Adler 18C0 M Street, N.W. ?. C. Ecx 1547 Washingten, D.C. 2CCC6 Harris'curg, Femsylvmia 17105 Ms. Marjorie M. Amnode Ivan W. Scich, Escuire R.D. #3 CN 4-- an Ccatesville, Pe=syhan:.219320 Accclic Safetf and Licensing Ecar" '=-=1 U.S. Nuclear Regula c:f Cccrissicn Ms. *bily S. Keck, Leg. CN#-- an Washington, D.C. 20535 An:1-Nuclear Grouc Representing Ycrk (RL'?Y) Dr. Walter H. Jordan 265 W. Philadelphia Street At=le Safety r.d Licensing 3 card Panel York, Pe=sylvania 176C4 381 West Cuter Drive Oak Ridge, Te=essee 37330 Ms. Frieda Eerr-faill, C2 ire. Ceali:icn for Nuclear Pcwer Dr. Linda W. Little Plant Post enement Accric Safety and Licensing 3 card Fr.el 2610 Grenden Drive 3CCO He ritage Drive Wih ingecn, Delaware 198C8 F21eigh, Scr h Carclina 27612

v..,

. =c. e-. o.. e,1.,_.=._.; Do ck. e H__~..', =.d c, " a.e. _. .c __d.~.. w e

c o vc n _ e l _< e._.

c,.. C:_ _2_c o_ e,:..e eec_e.a. U.S. Nuclear Repdaccr' Eali rcre, Marf r.d 21213 i Cecrission .esn:.ngten, D.C.,nac_e_/ . 3 :er..w. Cc.cen, :.sga_,re .sa. Ccnst.rer Ad.tcace Elljn R. Weiss ,., par-ent c:.ust:.ce tce, cen, ..a_ rn, ec:.scr. a.se.ss e ccr.rerry :cuare, lich Flect 1725 I St ee:, N.W.

2rr.sceg, remsy, van: 1 _ /,__, _/

cu:.:e et,e 3 u Washi-.gten, D.C. 2CCC6 Dr. Catncey Fapford Judi d H. Jct:'.srud Farin ? Icelden, Esq. (PANE) .cn en.uc3 ear

cencen, :2r en. rc:.s an s.se:.ss
nv:._a.c :a, Cea.,.,.

s. ,cwer u c u et est,

c:.te :Lo

..o. I-33 Ctlando Avenue Washi.g:cn, D.C. 2CCC6 State College, Fe=sylvania 16501 Ja es A. Tour:elict:e,.scf ire Mr. Steven C. ShcIly Office of de Execu:ive legal _Ci .ect..., u-e e_m eot m Mechanics ~ctrg, Fe.sylvania 17055 U.S. Nuc'a=- 02gia----i Cecrissicn Washi.g*~cn, D.C. 20333

John A. lavin, Esquire Jordan D. Cumird.am Attorney for Hed e r v, Esquire Assistant Cet:nsel Ec.,nshio Femsylvania Public Utilit7 T.M.I. Steering C M ::ee ' Cent:issica 2320 !br h Seccnd Stree: P.O. Box 3265 F.a=ishtrg, Pe=sylvr.ia 17110 F.arrisbtzg, Fernsylvania 17120 Marvin I. Lewis Robert L. Knurp, Esquire 6504 Bradford Terrace Assistant Solicitor Philadelphia, Pe=sylvr.ia 19149 Cctney of Cat:phin P.O. Box ? Jane Lae 407 lbrth Front Street R.D. 3, Ecx 3521 FA % burg, PA 17108 =.rs, Pe=sylvania 17319 Jc'en E. Mi;nich Chairrun, Dat=hin Cctnty 2 card of Cctr.issicners Dat=hin Cctn y Ccur:%use Frcnt and Market Streets Fadbtzg, Pemsylvania 17101}}