ML19281A118
| ML19281A118 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Marble Hill |
| Issue date: | 12/28/1978 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17195A459 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-546-78-08, 50-546-78-8, 50-547-78-08, 50-547-78-8, NUDOCS 7903060577 | |
| Download: ML19281A118 (2) | |
Text
o Appendix A NOTICE OF VIOLATIO:s Public Service of Indiana Docket No. 50-546 Docket No. 50-547 Based on the results of an NRC inspection conducted on November 6-9, 1978, it appears that certain of your activities were not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements as noted below.
These items are infractions.
1.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V requires in part that, activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings and that these instructions, procedures, or drawings shall include appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria for determining that important activities hav2 been satisfactorily accomplished.
The Marble Hill PSAR, Sectior.17.1.5 states in part, that, " PSI requires each contracting ort;anization to develop and implement written instructions, procedures, or drawings for performance of all quality-related activities.
Inclusion of appropriate acceptance criteria..all be assured during review and approval of instructions, procedures, or drawings".
The Marble Hill PSAR, Sectior 1.7 commits to Regulatory Guide 1.38.
Contrary to the above:
a.
The hoisting equipment used to lift two of the stear generators was not propetly rerated for this special lift as required by ANSI N'45.2. 2 as endorsed by Regulater.
Guide 1.38.
b.
The site surveillance check list used for material handling (special lifts) Paragraph 5 did not require that the rerated piece of equipment be given a dynamic load test at least equal to 110% of the lift weight as required by Regulatory Guide 1.38.
c.
In addition, the site surveillance reporf:fsr the load testing of the jack tower, site surveillance check list, contained several documentation errors.
790306057 7
Appendix A r 2.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion X requires, in part, that a program for inspection activities shall be established and executed to verify conformance with the specification requirements.
The Marble Hill PSAR, Sectica 17.1.10 states, " Inspection programs shall be established and implemented by our contractors performing activities affecting quality of safety-related products and materials".
The U.S. Testing Quality control procedure QCP-11, Revision 1, Division III, Section 2.4, Visual Examination of Cadwelds, re-quires the inspec or to calculate the void area in the filler uetal of the cadweld sleeve and document this information on form QCP 11.3.
Furthermore, S&L specification BY/BR/MCS, Revision 7, Section 5.3 requires a visual examination and compu-tation of void area of the filler metal around the cadweld sleeve.
Contrary to the above:
The inspection performed by U.S. Testing on the "B"
type a.
vertical cadwelds for the Unit 1 Containment Secondary Shield Wall at elevation 377 was inadequate, in that, two of four completed and accepted cadwelds (F693-3 and F685-11) that were reinspected at the request of the NRC resulted in a failure to satisfy the allowable void area permitted by specification requirements.
b.
The QC inspectors performance of the computation of the void area was incorrect and not according to the QCP-11 procedure.
c.
The QCP Form 11.3 did not include an inspection checkpoint relative to porosity in the filler metal at the ends of the sleeve and top hole as required by the S&L specification EY/ER/MCS, nor were the QC inspectors aware of the requirement.
l
-