ML19276H398
| ML19276H398 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 01/10/1975 |
| From: | Jaffe D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7910160735 | |
| Download: ML19276H398 (4) | |
Text
,
DOCGT :O: 50-239 LICE';SEE: :btropolitan Edisen Cc=:any C-bt. Ed)
Facility: Taree Mile Island Unit I SG!!\\RY OF T:E MEdTING HELD IN BE21SD.\\, ON TIE PREPAR\\ TION OF LA2 COCK MO WI1COX (BFJI) STNG\\RD TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION FOR THREE MILE ISL\\.'O U'iIT I On Dececber 11, 1974, representatives frc:a the AEC, >bt. Ed, and BGi met at the Phillips Building, Bethesda,hbryland. A list of attendees is enclosed.
he purpose of the meeting was to discuss the following topics with representatives from 3bt. Ed and BGW:
1.
Re advantages of adopting the B5W Standard Technical Specifications (STS).
2.
A schedule for !bt. Ed to provide the Co=nission with its coments en the B5W STS.
3.
Procedures for coordinating the review a cng the technical staffs of hbt.Ed, B4W, and the Comission.
Following opening co ments by George Lear and a presentation by David Jaffe, the :::ceting was opened for questions. A detailed account of the meeting and its conclusions is presented in Enclosure 2.
D. Jaffe Operating Reactors Branch !3 Directorate of Licensing
Enclosures:
1.
List of Attendees 2.
Details of.'beting f
p' ~
7910160 %
ORB #3
_.._...RRB.i.3...
,e.
LIIaffek... 'GLear 6 C 1f j 1/ \\Q 75
-_1/_..'.3 75 p l _.
.m m.m
...,n - m m....................................
ENCLOSU!G 1 LIST OF ATIEIEES AEC D. Jaffe R. Bottomore J. Pdlillen R. Schemel J. McGough G. Lear A. Schwencer D. Bridges Met. Ed.
R. Arnold L. Lawyer BEdl R. Shaftstall R. Willi = son General Public Utilities Service Con; oration T. Crimuis 1414 356
ENCIDSURE 2 DETAILS OF EE MEETING 1.
Meted expressed a desire to divorce the question of implementing the Babcock 6 Wilcox (B6W) Standard Technical Specifications (STS) for Three Mile Island (III) Unit 1 from their participation in the review of the generic B5W STS. This point was agreed to.
It was further agreed that their input would represent their experience with the design of T!I Units 1 and 2 which may have certain unique features not applicable to the generic B6W STS.
2.
Meted inquired as to how the B5W STS compared with the present B1I Unit 1 Technical Specifications.
It was indicated that, although advantages existed in wording and fomat, a careful comparison indi-cated that the new STS exhibit an overall trend toward increased surveillance and more conservative operating requirements.
3.
Meted expressed concern that they would be previding the only input to the B5W STS.
It was indicated that Flc rida Power, Toledo Edison and BGW would also provide input.
4.
'Ihe role of BSW, in the development of the BSW STS, was questioned.
It was agrecd that BGN had already pledged cooperation in this area.
Tne exact nature and scale of the B6N commitment was not clear and it was concluded that this area should bc resolved.
B5W has had the STS since October 1974. Representatives from B6h have met with Mr. Botomore of the Comission.
5.
It was indicated that preparation of the B6W STS for Three Mile Island Unit 1 would be a considerable effort. The AEC stated that it would cari; out all tasks required to actually prepare the STS (final pre-paration, typing, editing,etc.).
6.
Meted requested an explanation of how the development of the D1I Unit 1 STS was related to the developant of the generic B6W STS.
It was explained to Meted that, following review and issuance of the B5W STS, Meted and the AEC would tailor the STS for DlI Unit 1.
7.
Meted expressed concern that those at the Commission, involved in the STS review, would not be operationally oriented.
It was stated that those involved in the STS review have considerable operational experience.
1414 % 7
8.
The AEC comitted to update the current BSh STS based on input from and review of the riestinghcuse and CE-STS and to issue the updated BGw STS to Meted, Florida Power, Toledo Edison, and BSN in early January 1975 for review and ce=ent. Meetings with the reviewers will be scheduled toward obtaining a revised BSW STS by August 1975.
In this regard, the AEC representatives expressed their intent to review all coments with an open mind, to shun arbitrary decision and to provide appeal routes that are always open to the utility.
At the conclusion of the recting, "etEd indicated their willingness to cooperate in the development of BSN STS for D!I Unit 1.
They requested a letter inviting their input to this effort.
)h\\h O
+.