ML19276G199
| ML19276G199 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/14/1979 |
| From: | Hunnicutt D, Roberds H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19276G198 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900077 NUDOCS 7905150797 | |
| Download: ML19276G199 (5) | |
Text
-
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION IV Report No. 99900077/79-01 Program No. 44020 Company:
Pullman Power Products 14507 South Paramount Boulevard Paramount, California 90723 Inspection at:
Paramount, California Inspection Conducted:
February 26 - March 1, 1979 Inspector:
//d'.4n/h J 4//f
'H. W. Roterds, Contractor Inspector, Vendor
/ Date Inspection Branch Approved by:
h)f )
wk,f 3//9/79 D. M. Hunnicutt, Chief, ComponentsSection II,
/ Date Vendor Inspection Branch Summary Inspection on February 26 - March 1, 1979 Areas Insoected:
Implementation of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, criteria and applicable Codes and standards; including actions on previous inspection findings; procedure, document and drawing control; control of nonconform-ances and corrective action.
The inspection involved twenty-eight (28) inspector hours on site by one (1) NRC inspector.
Resul ts:
In four (4) areas inspected, no apparent deviations or unresolved items were identified.
7905150 7N
e Detail Section (Prepared by H. W. Roberds)
A.
Persons Contacted S. L. Engeler, Manager, Quality Assurance E. Perry, Layout Foreman R. Shields, Process Sheet Writer L. Porter, Senior Draftsman H. Owen, Plant Superintendent R. Foley, Project Engineer E. Silveria, Project Engineer M. Ryan, Project Engineer B.
Actions on Previous Inspection Findings 1.
(Closed) Deviation (Inspection Report No. 78-01, Item A of Enclosure):
It could not be ascertained that a grinding wheel being used on stainless steel had not been previously used on carbon steel.
The inspector verified that shop procedures Nos. VII-12 and VII-13 had been revised to include the requirement for control of grinding materials to be used on stainless stec-1 niaterials.
Observations of grinding materials that were being used in shop production indicated that they were identified in accord-ance with the applicable procedure.
2.
(Closed) Deviation (Inspection Report No. 78-01, Item B of Enclosure): A penetrant inspection identified as ' hold for co. inspectien' had not been performed and the work had proceeded beyond the identified hold point.
The inspector verified that a nonconformance report had been issued and that a shop procedure had been issued for the sequencing of process sheets and a review of eight (8) process sheets did not reveal a similar discrepancy.
3.
(Closed) Deviation (Inspection Report No. 78-01, Item C of Enclosure): The final inspector had not signed off the process sheet for ID&OD weld inspection.
The inspector verified that a shop procedure had been initiated requiring all operations to be sequenced and a review of six (6) process sheets did not reveal a similar discrepancy.
. 4.
(Closed) Deviation (Inspection Report No. 78-01, Item E of Enclosure): A Beckman conductivity meter was not calibrated as required.
The inspector verified that the Beckman conductivity meter has been included in the calibration program and that the calibration status is current.
5.
(Closed) Deviation (Inspection Report No. 78-01, Item F of Enclosure): The fabrication drawing did not specify a preheat or post weld heat treatment for a carbon steel piping sub-assembly with a carbon content greater than 0.30 percent, as required.
The inspector verified that a corrected check analysis which specified a carbon content of 0.28 percent had been received for the item in question and that a shop procedure had been issued requiring a 200 degree preheat on carbon steel material over 3/4 inch thick.
6.
Unresolved Item (Inspection Report No. 78-01, Item D of Enciosure): This item remains unresolved pending the final ASME Subcommittee III Decision.
C.
Procedure, Document, and Drawina Control 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that measures are established to control documents, such as instructions, procedures and drawings, including changes thereto, in accordance with the QA bbnual and applicable regulatory, Code and contract requirements.
2.
Method of Accomolishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by:
a.
Review of Sections III, V, and VI of this QA Manual, b.
Review of Project Procedure Index, Revision 4 of November 9, 1978.
c.
Review of Project Procedure Manuals maintained in Engineering, Production, Layout Foreman Office and Process Sheet Writer Office for the approved revisions of ten (10) procedures for the Palo Verde and San Onofre projects.
a-w-
. d.
Review of six (6) Shop Sketches for revisions issued by Engineering at various stages of fabrication.
e.
Interviews with cognizant personnel.
3.
Findings In this area of the inspection, no deviations from commitments or unresolved items were identified.
D.
Control of Nanconformances 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that Pullman Power Products had implemented the requirements for the control of nonconforming items in accordance with the QA Manual and applicable NRC and ASME Code requirements.
2.
Method of Accomplishment a.
Review of Section XV of the QA Manual, Nonconforming Materials, Parts, and Components.
i b.
Review of the nonconformance report file and selected six (6) nonconformance reports issued during the past three (3) months.
c.
Raview of the applicable process sheets corresponding to the nonconformance report.
d.
Observation of items identified as being on a hold status to assure that items are segregated or properly identified as nonconforming.
3.
Findings In this area of the inspection, no deviations from comnitments or unresolved items were identified.
E.
Corrective Action 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that Pullman Power Products had implemented the requirements
, for correcting conditions adverse to quality as defined in the QA Manual and in accordance with applicable NRC and ASME Code requirements.
2.
Method of Accomolishment a.
Review of Section XVI of the QA Manual, Corrective Action.
b.
Review of nonconformance and corrective action file, c.
Review of Section XV of the QA Manual, Nonconforming Materials, Parts, or Components.
d.
Interviews with cognizant personnel.
3.
Findings In this area of the inspection, no deviations from commitments or unresolved items were identified.
F.
Exit Meeting A post inspection meeting was held on March 1, 1979, with the following management representatives present:
E. B. Curcio, Commercial Vice President H. W. Owen, Shop Superintendent B. S. Saggu, Staff Engineer S. L. Engler, Manager, Quality Assurance The inspector sumnarized the scope of the inspection and informed management that there were no adverse findings.
Management had no comments.
we w-www w e sum
- ===*~~-*mee g-.
e+e e--===w
-a