ML19276C789

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-255/84-09.Corrective Actions:Procedural Controls Instituted to Ensure Amends to Tech Specs Implemented in Timely manner.Q-list Specs for Certain Parts Updated
ML19276C789
Person / Time
Site: Palisades 
Issue date: 09/24/1984
From: Vandewalle D
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To: James Keppler
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML19276C786 List:
References
NUDOCS 8410100078
Download: ML19276C789 (4)


Text

-

4 4

Ol Consumers David J VandeWelle Di.tcrur of Nuclear Luerumg General offees: 1945 West Pamall Road. Jackson. MI 49201. (517) 789 1636 September 24, 1984 James G Keppler, Administrator Region III US Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 DOCKET 50-255 - LICENSE DPR -

PALISADES PIJET - SUPPLEMENTA1 RESPONSE TO IE INSPECTION REPORT 84-09 Three items of noncompliance were identified in IE Inspection Report 50-255/

84-09 dated June 29, 1984. Cont.urers Power Company letter of July 27, 1984 requested an extension and committed to providing the response to this inspec-tion report by August 10, 1984. Consumers Power Company letter of August 10, 1984 provided the response. NRC letter of August 24, 1984 acknowledged receipt of our response and requested a supplemental response for two items.

%is is our supplemental response to these items, which has been agreed upon by members of our respective staffs.

Noncompliance (50-255/84-09-01A) 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, as implemented by the Quality Assurance Program (CPC-2A) which includes a commitment to ANSI N18.7-1976, requires that activities affecting quality be prescribed by documented instructions and procedures which include appropriate qualitative and quantitative acceptance criteria and be accomplished in accordance with those instructions and pretedures.

Contrary to the above, the following examples of failure to have or follow appropriate procedures were identified:

a.

No acceptance criteria, as required by ANSI N18.7-1976, paragraph 5.3, were specified in either surveillance procedure RM-45 or k'yle test procedure No 6108-545 for surveillance activities of mechanical snubber operability.

8410100078 841005 N

$DRADOCK 05000255 PDR OC0984-0007E-NI.02

4 JGKeppler, Administrator 2

Palisades Flant SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO lEIR 84-09 Septa;mber 24, 1984 Corre :ive Action Taken and Reruits Achieved:

The 1 k of an adequate snubber surveillance procedure resulted from a failure to fu' r implement Amendmtat 69 (March 12, 1982) to the Palisades Technical Speci cations. A complete review of Amendment 69 has been conducted, and the proc < sural changes necessary for full implementation of the amendment have been made. Since the issuance of Amendment 69, procedural controls have been instituted to ensure amendments to TecP/ical Specifications are fully imple-mented in a timely manner (reference i S3-070).

While the required acceptance critella were not included in the hydraulic snubber surveillance procedure, RM-45, the necessary data was collected during the testing performed for the 1983-84 refueling outage. A set of ecceptance criteria was subsequently developed and ecmpared to the test data. All of the hydraulic snubbers, with the exception of two, met the established acceptance criteria. While data from two of the hydraulie snubbers wcs slightly outside the acceptance range, a subsequent engineering analysis determined the snubbers are acceptable.

Corrective Action to be Taken to Avoid Further Noncompliance:

Technical Specification 4.16.1.c requires functional testing of a representa-tive sample (10% of the total safety-related snubbers) once per refueling cycle. At Palisades, a representative sample would include, on average, one mechanical snubber each refueling cycle. While one mechanical snubber was tested during the 1983-84 refueling outage, the testing was not in accordance with Specification 4.16.1.e.

Accordingly, a new mechanical snubber surveil-lance procedure RM-89, incorporating Specification 4.16.1.e has been developed and approved. A mechanical snubber has been removed from service and sent to Wyle Laboratories for testing, in accordance with the new procedure. The testing and reinstallation of the snubber will be completed prior to startup from the current maintenance outage.

Date When Full Compliance Will be Achieved:

Full compliance will be achieved prior to startup from the current maintenance outage.

Koncompliance (50-255/84-09-10) 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion IV, as implemented by Section 4 of Consumers Power Quality Assurance Program Description for Operational Nuclear Power Plant (CPC-2A), requires measures to be established to assure that applicable regulatory requirements, design bases, and other requirements which are necessary to assure adequate quality are suitably included or referenced in documents for procurement.

OC0984-0007B-KLO2

JGKeppler, Administrator 3

Palisades Plant SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO lEIR S4-09 Septumaer 24, 1984 Contrary to the above, purchase order 2004-3428-CQ, for the spare boric acid pump motor, did not specify adequate technical and quality requirements. Also include in your response to this frem the procurement of safety-related items from suppliers not on the Nuclear Operations Department Approved Suppliers List.

Explanation:

The Palisades Plant Administrative Procedures allow the procurement of certain commercial quality items for'use in safety related systems and components.

Such procurements are know as "CQ" procurements. The CQ designation identi-fits the item as being 1) safety related, and 2) commercial grade. A safety related item may be procured as CQ if it meets all three of the following criteria:

I

~

a.

The item de not subject to design or specification reopirements that

'are urdque to nuclear power f acilities and activities, b.

The item is used in applications other than nuclear power facilities and uctivities, and c.

the iten is to be ordered from the manufacturer / supplier on the basis of' specific.ations set forth in the manufacturer's published descrip-tion <(eg..a catalog, a vendor manual).

Once the determic.ation has been made that an item is CQ, the item may be procured from the supplier who has not been evaluated and placed on the Nuclear Operations Departzent Approved Suppliers List (FDDASL), if all the following are true:

a.

The item.is relatively simple and standard in design, manufacture and test ability, b.

The item is adaptable to standard or autonated inspections or tests of the.end product to verify quality characteristics a.*ter delivery, and c.

Receiving inspection of the item does not taqsire operations that could adversely affect the integrity, function or cleanliness of the item.

When a CQ item is procured from a supplier who is not on the NODASL, source verification and/or receipt inspection activities provide the necessary controls.

The Palicades Q-List identifies both the boric acid pump and the pump motor as being safety related. The Q-List specifically denignates the pump as being safety related for seismic reasons. The listing for. the pump notor, however, does not contain any.information'that the motor wust also meet seismic OC0984-0007B-NLO2 t

\\

JGKeppler, Administrator 4

Palisades Plant SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO IEIR 84-09 September 24, 1984 criteria. Therefore, the inadequate classification of the pump motor in the Q-List allowed the motor to be purchased as a Cr. procurement, rather than appropriately as a Q procuremert.

Subsequently, the vendor could not supply the exact motor which was specified and a replacement motor was substituted. Daring receipt inspection, a Noncon-forming Material Report (NMR) was issued to address the motor substitution.

The NMR required that the motor not be released for installation until appropri-ate documentation to address the change in design specificatien had been completed.

Palisades Plant Administrative Procedure 9.04 requires that changes in design specification be documented via a Specification Change (SC). The preparation of a SC requires that applicable codes, technical documents and design reference documents be researched to ensure that the design change is technical-ly acceptable. Additionally, the SC includes a safety evaluation which addresres 10CFR50.59 considerations and receives technical, quality assurance and Pir.nt Review Committee (PRC) approval. Therefore, adequate controls are in place to address all technical and quality concerns prior to installation of the motor, despite the lack of certain specific requirements on the purchase order itself.

Corrective Action Taken and Results Achieved:

A hold tag has been placed on the spare boric acid pomp motor.

Corrective Action Taken to Avoid Further Noncompliance:

The Palisades Q-List will be corrected to indicate that the boric acid pump and motor are seismically qualified as a unit. This information vill facili-

. tate the incorporation of seismic requirements into future purchase orders.

Dste When Full Co=pliance Will be Achieved:

Pull compliance vill be achieved by October 1, 1984.

AY David VandeWalle Director, Nuclear Licensing CC Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor ReEulatioi Directo:

'ffice of Inspection and Enforcement NRC Eesident inspector - Palisades OC0984-0007B-NLO2