ML19275A410
| ML19275A410 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 09/14/1979 |
| From: | Davidson D CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. |
| To: | Fiorelli G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19275A403 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7910040359 | |
| Download: ML19275A410 (5) | |
Text
J 9
Yj*
g-l [ t. r e
- g
- f. ]a [ j
,r-( [ t a p ts i. c.
- a l6 e L. l.; !.
s l 1. t I..
O t.
t i.
I-(. L i
1 i
. i*
s-s s I
i r, h !
a ILLUMINATING BLDG. e PUBUC SQUARE e CLEVELAND. oHlo 44101 m TELEPHONE (216) 6231350 m MAIL ADDRESS: P. o. BOX 5000 Dalwyn R. Davidson VICE PRESIDENT SYSTEM ENGF4EERING AND CONSTRUCTION Mr. Gaston Fiorelli Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137
Dear Mr. Fiorelli:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your Inspection Report number 50-440/79-03; 50-441/79-03 attached to your letter dated August 1, 1979, which I received on August 3, 1979. This report identifies areas ex-amined by Messrs. J. Hughes, H. H. Livermore, G. F. Maxwell and E. W. K.
Lee during the inspection conducted at Perry Nuclear Pever Plant from July 10 through 12, 1979. By agreement between J. E. Konklin and W. J.
Kacer reached during a telephone call on September 4,1979, this response has been delayed from the original due date of September 4,1979.
Attached to this letter is our response to the two Items of Noncom-pliance described in Appendix A, Notice of Violation, of the above referenced I. E. Report.
This response is in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice", Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations.
Please do not hesitate to call if I may be of further assistance.
Very truly ours,
/
I
/
D. R. Davidson Vice President System Engineering and Construction ksz 1095 " 2 7'9l00 4 3S Btp20 18m
e RESPONSE TO ENFORCEMENT ITEMS Listed below are the responses to the noncompliances identified in Appendix A, Notice of Violation, of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1. E. Report No. 50-440/79-03; 50-441/79-03.
I. A. Infraction 10CFR50, Appendix B, Criterion X, requires that a program for inspection of activities affecting quality shall be established and executed by or for the organization performing the activity to verify conformance with the documented instructions, procedures, and drawings for ::complishing the activity.
The PNPP PSAR Chapter 17, Section 17.1.10 states in part that,
" Quality will be r.ontrolled by inspection... Appropriate mandatory hold points..shall be identified...and activity may not proceed beyond... Records shall be maintained describing results...and verifying that inspections were performed..."
The Newport News Industrial ASME Nuclear QA Manual, Rev. C, dated October 10, 1978, Sectica 10.1500 states, in part, that "Each step of the Manufacturing Installation Instruction (MII) will receive a verification signature and date on completion, including all...QA hold points. The...Superintendeut will sign off...in-sta11ation steps."
Contrary to the above, the NRC inspector observed numerous instances in which contractor personnel failed to execute the program for inspection by f ailing to verify conformance per documented instruc-tions and procedures.
The inspector reviewed four contractor MII's used for the installation of some ten pieces of safety-related components such as: Reactor Vessel (Unit 1), RHR and LPCI discharge heads and suction barrels, RCIC pump and turbine, Reactor Vessel anchor stud installation, and Control Complex Chiller baseplate modification. The inspector noted numerous and widespread examples of the following in 3 of 4 procedures:
- a. Both QC and Trade signatures were missing for work completed.
(Some 12 steps of the Reactor Vessel Alignment procedure during Unit 1 Insta11atic,.
One complete operation of the Vessel anchor stud installation - Step 600.)
- b. QC and Trade signatures out of sequence.
(Some seven steps of Unit 1 LPCI grouting operation were signed by QC 15 days prior to trade signoff.
One operation step of the Chiller baseplate modification was signed by QC three days prior to Trade signoff.)
1095
?
Response to Enforcement Items Page 2 Infraction (Cont'd.)
No trade
- c. QC signatures by themselves for work completed.
(Two extensive operational steps of Reactor Vessel signoffs.
Seven-preps for installation and alignment and lubrication.
te n steps for the location and alignment of LPCI discharge head and suction barrel.)
QC required.
On the grouting operation of seven pieces of safety-related 1.
components, 37 steps completed with no QC signoff.
On the alignment of safety-related suction head and barrel 2.
of (B) RHR, three steps with no QC signoff.
One operational step for each of five safety-related 3.
suction head to barrel installations with no QC signoffs.
These examples indicate a breakdown in the inspection verification Completed work verification cannot be confirmed.
system.
B. Response
- 1. A detailed review of all completed and in process MII's will Verifi-be conducted to identify and correct discrepancies.
cation will be accomplished by review of associated records such as inspection reports, production reports, or veld history records.
Operations that cannot be verified by reference to asaociated records will be reworked.
Operations which cannot be verified or reworked will be identified as nonconforming for Engineering resolution.
- 2. A Stop Work has been placed on all NNIC operations associated A
with the installation of safety-related NSSS equipment.
specific NNIC instruction will be prepared for the preparation, review, approval, implementation and completion of MII's.
Training sessions will be given to all NNIC personnel responsible for the preparation or use of MII's prior to permitting any further installation of safety-related NSSS equipment.
- 3. Full compliance will be achieved by November 1, 1979.
II. A. Infraction that " Measures 10CFR50, Appendix B, Criterion XIII, states, in part, shall be established to control the handling, storage, shipping, cleaning and preservation of material and equipment in accordance with work and inspection instructions to prevent damage or deter-ioration."
i095 :
Response to Enforcement Items Page 3 Infraction (Cont'd.)
The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (CEI) Corporate QA Manual - Introduction Section and Section 1300 states, in part, "This manual...provides a QA program which complies with the regulatory requirements of 10CFR50, Appendix B, ANSI N45.2.2 CEI Contract Specification and those regulatory guides..."
Paragraph 5:06.2.c commits SP-38-4549-00, dated July 16, 1976,
)
the Installation Cotnractor, Newport News Industrial (NNI, to the requirements of ANSI N45.2.2, Handling and Storage of Items of a Nuclear Plant.
ANSI N45.2.2, Section 3.5.1, states, in part, " Caps and plugs" shall be used...to protect threads and weld end preparations." Covers removed Section 6.4.0 of ANSI N45.2.2 states, in part, for internal access at any time for any reason
" Cleanliness and Section 6.2.2 of ANSI N45.2.2 states, in part, good housekeeping practices shall be enforced at all times...
" Items released Section 6.5 of ANSI N45.2.2 states, in part, from storage and placed in their final locations within the power plant shall be inspected and cared for in accordance with AhSI N45.2.2, the requirements of Section 6 of this standard..."
that all openings Section 3.2.3(1), Criteria 7 states, in part, into items shall be capped, plugged, or sealed.
Newport News Industrial Equipment Maintenance Instruction 124 Section 7, commits NNI to the administration and control of a pro-gram of field storage and protection of safety-related equipment.
The reporting system lists items such as:
Corrosion or Rust Visible Equipment Openings Sealed Connecting Flanges Protected Heater in Operation Contrary to the above, on July 10 - 12, the NRC Inspector observed the following:
- a. Unit 1 Safety-Related RHR and LPCI pump discharge heads and suction barrels presented connecting machined surface flanges Visible that were unprotected from possible physical damage.
rust was present on the connecting flange machined surfaces.
Widespread rust was present on the internal surf aces of the Equipment openings were not sealed to the discharge heads.Installation threaded studs were exposed to rusting and unprotected from possible physical damage from environment.
construction activities.
1 L
T Ub 1095
/
Response to Enforcement Page 4 Infractions (Cont'd)
Unit 1 RCIC pump and turbine space heater was not operating b.
as required by NNI Instruction 1240-F-S002. The environmental storage enclosure was open to atmosphere, The NNI Field Maintenance Records of the subject equipment did c.
not report or record the conditions listed on Items 1 and 2.
NNI Surveillance Records were updated one half day prior to the NRC Inspection and did not reflect the conditions. The reporting requirements in regard to corrosion, protective covers, sealed openings, and heaters are listed in NNI Equipment Maintenance Instruction 1240-F-S002, Rev. G, dated May 1, 1979 B.
Ecsponse The storage and maintenance of the equipment installed under 1.
Specifications 38 and 39 is being conducted by the Perry Project Organization. Transfer of long-term responsibility for the storage and maintenance of the subject equipment to tha Perry Project Organization is being evaluated.
The Perry Project Organization will schedule, supervise and 2.
complete the required storage and maintenance operations in accordance with the SAR and CEI quality assurance program.
Additionally, an inspection and documentation review will be conducted to establisn the exact status of all equipment or material and appropriate actions to be taken to reach full compliance by November 1,1979 Full compliance will be achieved by November 1,1979 During 3
the interim period, the Project Organization will schedule and complete the required storage and maintenance actions,
~nn 109q 1
s
.