ML19275A398

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Requested Safety Evaluation for Unit 2,to Supplement 790827 Request for Amend to OL Re Measurement Calculational Uncertainties of 6% & 7%
ML19275A398
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/01/1979
From: Lundvall A
BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To: Reid R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 7910040348
Download: ML19275A398 (2)


Text

~

BALTIMORE GAS AN D ELECTRIC COMPANY GAS AN D ELECTRIC DUILDING BALTIMOR E, M ARYLAN D 21203 October 1, 1979 ARTHUR c. l.U N OVALL, J R.

Vict Pat S'C E=Y Su ppt r Office of Ihtelear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Co= mission Washington, D. C.

20555 Attn:

Mr. Robert W. Reid, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #h Division of Operating Reactors

Subject:

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Uc.its Nos. 1 & 2, Docket Nos. 50-317 & 50-318 Supplement to Request for Amendment to Ooeratine License

Reference:

a) LG&E letter dated 8/27/79 from A. E. Lundvall to H. R. Denton, Request for Amendment to Operating 'icense, b) BG&E letter dated 7/26/78 from A. E. Lundvall to R. W. Reid Request for Amendment to Operating License.

Gentlemen:

Reference (a) requestal modifications to the Cc1 vert Cliffs Unit 2 Technical Specifications to incorporate measurement--calculational uncertainties of 6.0 and 7.0 percent on Fr and F, respectively.

IGC q

Staff noted that Reference (a) did not contain a safety evaluation specific to Unit 2 and requested-that one be provided. The following paragraph provides the requested safety evaluation.

Safety Evaluation The requested uncertainties are larger than those currently in the Technical Specifications and vill, therefore, increase the con-straints on plant operation.

Consequently, implementation of the requested uncertainties vill have no adverse effect on the consequences of the Design Basis Events reported in Unit 2, Cycle 2 License Application (Reference B).

A review of the Unit 2 Technical Specifications has been conducted to ensure that no other technical specifications vould be affectcl by approval and implementation of this request.

1095 m'n 7910040 3 p y

Mr. R. W. Reid October 1, 1979 Fee Determination We consider this letter to constitute supplemental information to our recent request (Reference A) and pursuant to 10 CFR, Part 170 no additional fee is required.

Very truly -

  • s, M

~~

I cc - J. A. Biddison, Esquire G. F. Trowbridge, Esquire Messrs. E. L. Conner, Jr. - NRC P. W. Kruce - CE J. W. Brothers - Bechtel 1095 169