|
---|
Category:Integrated Material Performance Evaluation Program (IMPEP)-Agreement States
MONTHYEARML24022A1512024-02-0505 February 2024 02-02-2024 Letter to T Howard Re Utah Final Impep Report ML24029A1192024-02-0202 February 2024 02-02-2024 Letter to D Pelletier Re Rhode Island Final Impep Report ML23269A0612023-08-23023 August 2023 Ri Heightened Oversight Call Summary 8-23-23 ML22313A1402022-10-31031 October 2022 10-22-2022 Massachusetts Organization Charts ML22179A3362022-10-12012 October 2022 OMB 3150-0183, Draft Impep Supporting Statement and Questionnaire ML21162A0462022-10-0707 October 2022 Draft State Agreement (SA) Procedure 900 Termination of Uranium Milling Licensing in Agreement State ML22258A1032022-08-0808 August 2022 09-06-2022 Email from A. Leek Re Response to Iowa Draft Impep Report ML22214A5202022-08-0202 August 2022 North Carolina Comment Resolution Matrix ML22208A0842022-07-14014 July 2022 Reciprocity Summary 071422 ML22208A1162022-06-17017 June 2022 07-14-2022 Colorado Comments on Draft Impep Response Report ML22140A3962022-06-17017 June 2022 SA-700 Handbook for Processing an Agreement Procedure Final ML22165A0742022-06-0606 June 2022 06-06-2022 Iowa Impep Organization Charts ML22165A0802022-06-0606 June 2022 06-06-2022 Iowa Impep Questionnaire ML22126A1592022-05-12012 May 2022 Mississippi Comment Resolution ML22110A1362022-04-18018 April 2022 04-18-2022 Colorado Impep Temporary Instructions Response ML22080A2182022-04-13013 April 2022 Cy 2021 Annual Report on Agreement States and U.S. NRCs Radioactive Materials Programs ML22075A2522022-02-14014 February 2022 02-14-2022 Texas Impep Questionnaire ML22075A2202022-02-11011 February 2022 02-11-2022 Texas Dshs Impep Questionnaire ML21243A5172021-11-0101 November 2021 State Agreement (SA) Procedure 116, Periodic Meetings Between Integrated Materials Performance Evaluation Program Review (Impep) ML21319A2032021-10-28028 October 2021 10-28-2021 Minnesota Impep Questionnaire ML21279A3112021-10-0404 October 2021 10-04-2021 Rhode Island Impep Organization Charts ML21279A3192021-10-0404 October 2021 10-10-2021 Rhode Island Impep Questionnaire ML21267A4542021-09-19019 September 2021 09-19-2021 Vermont Impep Questionnaire ML21270A0372021-09-19019 September 2021 09-19-2021 Vermont Organization Charts ML21260A1202021-09-10010 September 2021 2021-09-010 RCB-Org-Chart ML21260A1222021-09-10010 September 2021 2017-2021 New Mexico Impep Questionnaire and Inspector Accompanied Inspection ML21286A7782021-08-25025 August 2021 Rhode Island Quarterly Monitoring Call Summary ML21189A2702021-07-0707 July 2021 Maryland Organization Charts ML21173A3312021-06-21021 June 2021 Maryland Impep Questionnaire Response ML21256A2582021-06-14014 June 2021 2021 Oregon Impep Completed Questionnaire 1 (6-14-21) ML21127A1372021-05-0505 May 2021 Illinois Regulations 32-IAC-335 ML21127A1382021-05-0505 May 2021 Illinois Cross Reference 2020-2 ML21127A1432021-05-0505 May 2021 Illinois Cross Reference 2018-1 ML20275A1192020-10-26026 October 2020 Description of Impep for Website ML20324A6222020-10-22022 October 2020 Rhode Island Department of Health Quarterly Monitoring Conference Call ML20295A2472020-10-21021 October 2020 Ismp General Information One-Pager (with Videos) for 2020 Nmu Commission Briefing ML20184A0852020-09-15015 September 2020 State Agreement (SA) Procedure 109, Reviewing the Non-Common Performance Indicator, Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Program ML20183A3272020-09-15015 September 2020 Final SA-107 Tracked Changes ML20188A0442020-09-15015 September 2020 State Agreement (SA) Procedure 102, Reviewing the Common Performance Indicator, Technical Quality of Inspections ML20183A3262020-08-27027 August 2020 Final SA-200 Tracked Changes ML20254A0902020-08-11011 August 2020 Rhode Island Quarterly Monitoring Call Summary ML20113F0172020-05-0101 May 2020 Letter to S. Stack Kentucky Fy 2020 Final Impep Report ML20066H8862020-04-15015 April 2020 Annual Report on Agreement States and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissions Radioactive Materials Programs for Calendar Year 2019 ML20071H4452020-01-16016 January 2020 California MRB Minutes ML20191A0592020-01-0909 January 2020 Comment Resolution Document SA-106 ML20008E1352020-01-0909 January 2020 STC-20-005 Notification of the Issuance, and Opportunity to Comment on the Following Interim Procedures Related to the Integrated Materials Performance Evaluation Program (Impep): SA 105, SA 106, SA 108 and SA 110 ML20258A0632020-01-0707 January 2020 Comment Resolution Document SA-104 ML17293A2012019-12-20020 December 2019 Interim Procedure SA-105, Reviewing the Common Performance Indicator, Technical Quality of Incident and Allegation Activities ML19324D0662019-12-20020 December 2019 Interim Procedure (IP) SA-110, Reviewing the Non-Common Performance Indicator, Uranium Recovery Program. ML19326B4662019-12-20020 December 2019 Interim Procedure SA-106 - the Management Review Board 2024-02-05
[Table view]Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "". Category:Meeting Minutes
MONTHYEARML20071H4452020-01-16016 January 2020 California MRB Minutes ML19304A1172019-11-0505 November 2019 Enclosure 2 - List of Attendees ML19297G9662019-10-10010 October 2019 Minutes: Maine Impep MRB Meeting October 10, 2019 ML19274C5892019-09-24024 September 2019 Minutes: Wisconsin Impep MRB Meeting September 24, 2019 ML19301C1902019-09-0505 September 2019 Minutes: North Dakota Impep MRB Meeting September 5, 2019 ML19301C2332019-08-0808 August 2019 Minutes: Arkansas Follow-Up MRB Meeting August 8, 2019 ML19198A0142019-07-10010 July 2019 Summary of Meeting to Discuss Status of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Security Requirement Rulemaking ML19309F4442019-06-18018 June 2019 Minutes: New Jersey MRB Meeting June 18, 2019 ML19309F3212019-05-16016 May 2019 11/012019 Minutes: Ohio MRB Meeting May 16, 2019 ML19309F6232019-04-0909 April 2019 11/012019 Minutes: Pennsylvania MRB Meeting April 9, 2019 ML20091G7372004-04-20020 April 2004 April 20 2004 - Pilot Project Chairs Meeting 2020-01-16
[Table view]Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "". |
Text
MINUTES: MANAGEMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING OF WISCONSIN SEPTEMBER 24, 2019 THE MANAGEMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING ATTENDEES WERE AS FOLLOWS:
Management Review Board K. Steven West, MRB Chair, OEDO David Lew, Region I John Lubinski, MRB Member, NMSS Earl Fordham, OAS Liaison, WA Mary Spencer, MRB Member, OGC IMPEP Team Stephen Poy, Team Member in Training, NMSS Randy Erickson, Team Leader, Region IV Robert Elliott, Region I Michael Reichard, Region I Darren Piccirillo, Region III Leo Bakersmith, FL State of Wisconsin Paul Schmidt Mark Paulson Joe Elliott Reggie Roberts Megan Shober Mike Stevens Staff Andrea Kock, NMSS/MSST Paul Michalak, NMSS/MSST Lizette Roldan-Otero, NMSS/MSST Robert Johnson, NMSS/MSST Kathy Modes, NMSS/MSST Joe OHara, NMSS/MSST Jazel Parks, NMSS/MSST Dave Pelton, Region III Stephanie Dingbaum, OIG Members of the Public Jennifer Opila, Colorado Angela Leek, Iowa Jeff Dauzat, Louisiana Morgan Bullock, Washington TOPICS DISCUSSED DURING THE MEETING INCLUDED:
- 1. Convention. Mr. Robert Johnson convened the meeting at approximately 1:00 p.m.
(ET). He noted that this Management Review Board (MRB) meeting was open to the public. Introductions of the attendees were conducted.
- 2. Wisconsin IMPEP Review. Mr. Stephen Poy, Team Leader in Training, led the presentation of the Wisconsin Integrated Materials Performance Evaluation Program (IMPEP) review results to the MRB. He summarized the review and the teams findings for the indicators reviewed. The on-site review was conducted by a team composed of technical staff members from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the State of Florida during the period of July 8-12, 2019. A draft report was issued to Wisconsin for factual comment on August 7, 2019. Mr. Poy reported that the team found Wisconsins performance was satisfactory on all indicators reviewed.
Wisconsin MRB Meeting Minutes Page 2
- 3. Performance Indicators.
a) Mr. Darren Piccirillo reviewed and presented the common performance indicator, Technical Staffing and Training. His presentation corresponded to Section 3.1 of the proposed final IMPEP report. The MRB, the team, and Wisconsin representatives briefly discussed the status of the staff hired during the review period and the impact of vacancies on the Agreement State Program.
The team found Wisconsins performance with respect to this indicator to be satisfactory and the MRB agreed.
b) Mr. Stephen Poy reviewed and presented the common performance indicator, Status of Materials Inspection Program. His presentation corresponded to Section 3.2 of the proposed final IMPEP report. The MRB, the team, and Wisconsin representatives briefly discussed inspection findings.
The team found Wisconsins performance with respect to this indicator to be satisfactory and the MRB agreed.
c) Mr. Michael Reichard reviewed and presented the common performance indicator, Technical Quality of Inspections. His presentation corresponded to Section 3.3 of the proposed final IMPEP report. The MRB, the team, and Wisconsin representatives briefly discussed the status of inspection actions.
The team found Wisconsins performance with respect to this indicator to be satisfactory: and the MRB agreed.
d) Robin Elliot reviewed the common performance indicator, Technical Quality of Licensing Actions. Ms. Elliot presented the teams findings. Her presentation corresponded to Section 3.4 of the proposed final IMPEP report. The MRB, the team, and Wisconsins representatives discussed the teams findings, as well as the actions the program had taken to address them.
The team found Wisconsins performance with respect to this indicator to be satisfactory and the MRB agreed. The MRB also agreed with the teams recommendation.
e) Mr. Leo Bakersmith reviewed and presented the common performance indicator, Technical Quality of Incident and Allegation Activities. His presentation corresponded to Section 3.5 of the proposed final IMPEP report. The MRB, the team, and Wisconsin representatives discussed incidents of high risk and protecting allegers identities.
The team found Wisconsins performance with respect to this indicator to be satisfactory and the MRB agreed.
f) Mr. Randy Erickson reviewed and presented the non-common performance indicator, Compatibility Requirements. His presentation corresponded to Section 4.1 of the proposed final IMPEP report. The MRB, the team, and Wisconsin representatives discussed the States overdue regulations, and
Wisconsin MRB Meeting Minutes Page 3 program elements, as well as the actions the program has taken to address them.
The team found Wisconsins performance with respect to this indicator to be satisfactory and the MRB agreed.
- 4. MRB Consultation/Comments on Issuance of Report. The team recommended, and the MRB agreed, that the Wisconsin Agreement State Program be found adequate to protect public health and compatible with the NRC's program. The team recommended that the next IMPEP review take place in approximately 5 years with a periodic meeting in approximately 2.5 years. The final report may be found in the ADAMS using the Accession Number ML.
- 5. Precedents/Lessons Learned. None
- 6. Comments from Members of the Public. None
- 7. Adjournment. The meeting was adjourned at approximately 1:56 p.m. (ET)
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF SEPTEMBER 24, 2019 WISCONSIN MRB MEETING ML19274C589 OFFICE NMSS/SALB MSST/SALB MSST/SALB NAME JParks SPoy RJohnson DATE 10/10/19 10/10/19 10/10/19 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY