ML19273B133
| ML19273B133 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 03035072 |
| Issue date: | 09/19/2019 |
| From: | Deborah Piskura NRC/RGN-III |
| To: | Peters T Mannik & Smith Group |
| References | |
| IR 2019001 | |
| Download: ML19273B133 (2) | |
See also: IR 07200201/1990001
Text
NRC FORM 591M PART 1 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
(07-2012)
1ocFR2.201 SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT AND COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
1. LICENSEE/LOCATION INSPECTED: 2. NRC/REGIONAL OFFICE
The Mannik & Smith Group, Inc. Region III
1800 Indian Wood Circle U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Maumee, OH 43537 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210
Lisle, IL 60532-4352
REPORT NUMBER(S) 2019001
3. DOCKET NUMBER(S) 4. LICENSE NUMBER(S) 5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION
030-35072 34-26110-02 Sept. I q , 2019
LICENSEE:
The inspection was an examination of the activities conducted under your license as they relate to radiation safety and to compliance with the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) rules and regulations and the conditions of your license. The inspection consisted of selective examinations of
procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector. The inspection findings are as follows:
~ Based on the inspection findings, no violations were identified.
b 2: Previous violation(s) closed.
D 3. The violations(s), specifically described to you by the inspector as non-cited violations. are not being cited because they were self-identified,
non-repetitive, and corrective action was or is being taken, and the remaining criteria in the NRC Enforcement Policy, to exercise
discretion, were satisfied.
Non-cited violation(s) were discussed involving the following requirement(s):
D 4. During this inspection, certain of your activities. as described below and/or attached, were in violation of NRC requirements and are being
cited in accordance with NRC Enforcement Policy. This form is a NOTICE OF VIOLATION, which may be subject to posting in accordance
with 10 CFR 19.11.
(Violations and Corrective Actions)
Statement of Corrective Actions
I hereby state that, within 30 days, the actions described by me to the Inspector will be taken to correct the violations identified. This statement of
corrective actions is made in accordance with the requirements of 1O CFR 2.201 (corrective steps already taken, corrective steps which will be taken,
date when full compliance will be achieved). I understand that no further written response to NRC will be required, unless specifically requested.
TITLE PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE DATE
LICENSEE'S
REPRESENTATIVE
NRC INSPECTOR Deborah A. Piskura, Senior Health Physicist
BRANCH CHIEF Aaron T. McCraw, Chief, MIB
NRC FORM 591M PART 1 (07-2012) I
NRC FORM 591M PART 3 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
(07-2012)
10 CFR2.201 Docket File Information
SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT AND COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
1. LICENSEE/LOCATION INSPECTED: 2. NRG/REGIONAL OFFICE
The Mannik & Smith Group, Inc. Region III
1800 Indian Wood Circle U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Maumee, OH 43537 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210
Lisle, IL 60532-4352
REPORT NUMBER(S) 2019001
3. DOCKET NUMBER(S) 4. LICENSE NUMBER(S) 5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION
030-35072 34-26110-02 Sept. 19, 2019
6. INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED 7. INSPECTION FOCUS AREAS
87124 03.01 - 03.07
SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
1. PROGRAM CODE(S) 2. PRIORITY 3. LICENSEE CONTACT 4. TELEPHONE NUMBER
03121 5 Thomas Peters, RSO (734) 397-3100
D Main Office Inspection Next Inspection Date: Sept. 19, 2024
[l] Field Office Inspection Canton and Monroe, Michigan field offices
[l] Temporary Job Site Inspection sidewalk & road replacement, Monroe, Michigan
PROGRAM SCOPE
This was a routine inspection of a large private engineering and consulting firm based in suburban Toledo, Ohio. The
company was authorized to operate four field offices located in Michigan; at the time of this inspection, two of these
four locations possessed portable gauges. The licensee owned numerous moisture/density gauges which were used
frequently for DOT road projects and other construction projects during the construction season. These gauge units
were primarily stored at the Monroe and Canton field offices and dispatched to field job sites as needed to support the
local construction project. Forty-five individuals were authorized to use the gauges. Gauge users must attend an 8-
hour training course conducted by the Michigan DOT, a service provider, or the device manufacturer. The licensee
maintained copies of all gauge user's training certificates and a list of approved gauge users on file. The licensee did
not perform any service or maintenance on its gauges; these services were performed by a service the device
manufacturer.
During this inspection, the inspector toured the gauge storage areas and noted the controls used by the licensee to
comply with the security requirements in 10 CFR 30.34(i); performed radiation surveys around the devices; reviewed
selected records; and interviewed selected licensee personnel. The inspector conducted a field inspection of an
authorized gauge user at Front Street sidewalk replacement and road resurfacing project in Monroe, Michigan. The
gauge user demonstrated that the shipping papers were visible and within reach during transport. The gauge user
demonstrated how the device was secured with two independent physical controls (10 CFR 30.34(i)). The gauge user
confirmed that the transport case was blocked and braced in the rear of the vehicle and confirmed that the devices were
not transported within the passenger compartment. The gauge was not in use at the time of the field inspection,
No violations ofNRC requirements were identified during this inspection.
NRC FORM 591 M PART 3 (07-2012)