ML19271A824
| ML19271A824 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick, Bailly  |
| Issue date: | 06/30/1980 |
| From: | Chilk S NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| To: | Dircks W NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19271A825 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8008080585 | |
| Download: ML19271A824 (2) | |
Text
.,
W I.I.
si. 1.
,,,,.,3,,
,-y i.
o
(
5 y
p.-
'o,,
y, l f.0
/
- i,im u.c
. a.a.u v
,(-
V
""'c "hu: 1 UR:
'lilliam J. Dircks, Ac ting Executive Director for 0; rations 110.':
Snuel J. Chilh, S i et.u /I b
r Sl!BJE CT:
' D'JTX1 ':O i bP OF lt0POSLD RULLIGKlf;G ON REACIOR S1Ili:G (I 0 :ti.i.. L A1 I I PAR ll EM)-
In association with the advance notice of propo.ed rulinaking on reactor siting, and in recognition of the ac tion of the Congr ess in the FY 80 j
Authorization Conference, it is necessary for the I;RC to develop a transition policy to move from the old to the new siting criteria and a inethod of focusing a
l on existing sites.
Therefore, the staff is requested to do the following:
i j
(1)(a) For plants with applications for CP filed before October 1 1979, but that do not ! ave an IWA or a CP or for LWA plants I
with little. anstruction t o plet ed, the stoi f is directed to j
det ermine foi the purpose of this transitionary effort which of j
these would not be exp>< t ed to i.. et the rm o.:nandations of the Siting Policy Task Force, t.5a r. a /5, as r,,dified by OPE and l
ALRS co;
- nts as discussed with t he re: oi: sion.
This compariton, together v.ith the othar. spects of the saf: ty evaluation, will be used to detennine if any additional i.:'.isures in plant design or operation should be reco-cnded.
(b)
The staff discussion of siting r.atters shauld be placed in the staf f Safety Evaluation P.epor* or should be in the form of an addendum to the SEP.,
The Ce: ni sien will 'hcn review these 1
matters when the LWA or Cr cases reach us.
1 (2)(a) For plants with CP applicetions filed l'efore October 1,1979 and:
I l
i.
with an 01, or, i
11.
viithout an OL but with a CP, or; h
iii.
without a CP but with an IWA..nd wre than a little construction (empleied; the staff is recuested te continue to dcrclep a priority list of those i
plants in the highest population are.:s fer ac,iitional safety evaluation.
As the preposed siting criteria are iveic; d, the staff should determin how far t o extend t.he list L:tw.i on t he.e pl. ot s which might f ail some
~
significant aspect of the new ciitcria.
3.
i8.0 0 8 0 8 o S T S
~
,,,.9 POOR QUAUTY PAGES u i
/
/
as
/.
2 (b)
Following completion of those analyses currently underway, i.e.,
Indian Point, Zion, etc., the staff should continue safety review for the next plants on the list and recom:dend what if any additior measures are indicated.
(c)
These staff reviews should be in the fann of SEC,Y papers that are presented first to the ACRS and then, after appropriate revision, to the Commission.
Cated on the early reviews, the Com:nission may either truncate or require extension of the original candidate list.
l cc:
Chairman Ahearne Comissioner Gilinsky Co:iaiissioner Kennedy Comnissioner Hendrie Commissioner Bradford Com.nission Staff Offices It
~
I e
t I
Ii
.