ML19270H189
| ML19270H189 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000452, 05000453 |
| Issue date: | 05/23/1979 |
| From: | Ballard R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | MICHIGAN, STATE OF |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7906250177 | |
| Download: ML19270H189 (4) | |
Text
TEMR DISTRIBUTION:
l Dockets (ENVIRON)
TERAT /
NRC PDR MAY 2 31979 LPDR j
i BYoungblood SSohinki l
Docket Nos. 50-452 i
and 50-453 MNovick, ANL RBallard/PCota LEngle NRR Reading Chairman 4
EP-1 Reading Michigan Public Service MSlater l
Cocraission Law Building l
Lansing, Michigan 48093
Dear Sir:
I i
The Detroit Edison Compcny has submitted Supplement 5 to their Environmental Report for Greenwood Energy Center Unit Nos. 2 and 3, and we have reactivated i
our environmental review of Detroit Edison's application for construction i
permits for the units.
f As part of our review, we evaluate the need for the proposed generating units.
Enclosed is the proposed outline for the "Need for the Plant" section of our supplement to the Final Environmental Statement (FES supplement) that will be produced in conjunction with our review.
(The Final Environmental Statement I
was issued in Hovember 1974.) We would appreciate any comments you may have on this outline.
I We will be meeting with Detroit Edison in the near future to discuss, among i
other topics, Section 1 of the Environmental Report, dealing with the need i
for the plant.
You will receive a meeting notice in advance of this meeting, t
and are invited to attend.
l Before we publish (for public comment) the draft of the FES supplement, we intend to send you the preliminary draft for your review.
i 1
If you have any questions on this matter, please contact Dr. Phillip C. Cota (Phone # 301-492-8432), our Environmental Project Manager for this review.
I.
f Sincerely, 223[ jl3 Criginal signed by Ronald L Ballard Ronald L. Ballard, Chief Environmental Projects Branch 1 Division of Site Safety and Environmental Analysis e m._ _.~._.
.n,.lg stat.ed...........D.. S. E...:.E_P. 1.....
. D..S : E.W..........
= = tt:..see..next.. pag.f.9.t ia40G RBa
. 5../. 21../. 7. 9...c
- 5../../../../. 7 9......
..................r.... *.r&O'G E"/ 7" 7"""g.",",
- - - ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
"-a j
~
pef. POE24 HS (9-76) NECW 0140 8 v.s. eavsaansear raearias e,rics s a ve. ns,. ve s
t i
Michigan Public Service Couaission !
cc:
Chris Shafer Coastal Zone Management Progran
}
Dept. of flatural Resources Stephen T. Mason Building i
Lansing, Michigan 48926 i
i Executive Secretary l
Water Resources Commission
}
P. O. Box 30028 Lansing, Michigan 48909 Dennis Tierny Environmental Enforcement Division Dept. of Natural Resources Stephen T. !!ason Building Lansing, !!ichigan 48926 Chief, Wildlife Division l
Dept. of Natural Resources
[
Box 30028 l
Lansing,111chigan 48909 Chief, Fisheries Division l
Dept. of flatural Resources Box 30028 j
Lansing, !!!chigan 46909 t
Director Michigan History Division i
l Dept. of State g
Lansing, Michigan 48918 Jonathan Cain}J jj4 Special Assistant to the Governor Capitol Building, Room 1 Lansing, Michigan 48909 f I 1 I I f wm> l, SATE M ....................>.1........... 4.......... ,a,...,.,o
P".0?CSED OmIN3 FOR 'DC C11 APTER E'i?ITLED "rdt ::EZD FOR PC'RR" Detroit Edinon's prcsantation of the need for p scr in the Environmental Statement for Gro mt, cod Energy Canter (GCC) Units 2 and 3 generally is cicar and internally cor.sistect. Booz, Allen proposes to preserva the basic st~+" o, although ninor changes are required. We fill firn up the fics of logic, add Occtions on scanitivity analysis of risk, and make codifications to reflect Edison's responses to the quant 2.ona (attached). The chapter will be intrcduced with a strnary of t'le logic of the arge=ent. The prcposed intrcducticti and out1.ine follo.is below. Detroit Edison has been responsive to :.,ceting the require ents of its custcmars for electric energy. Description of service area Eintorical demands a:fd capacity Regional interconnection 3 with Conmraers Power, ECAR, etc. Desud for electric energy is expected to increase due to grcwth in the nurber of custcrara, increasca per capita consu=otier, of electricity, pollution control raasures and regulatory changes. Gree.nacod Energy Centar Unita 2 and 3 are required to caet projected demnd on Detroit Edison in the 1990's. Energy der,and is projected to grew Current capacity is not sufficient to serve the load Additional capacity is needed in the late 1980's. 1. GEGWTH IN Ehm SALES AND PEAX LOAD 1.1 Summary of Energy Sales and Peak Lead. Projections 1.2 Cc=parison with Past Grevth Rates 1.3 Overview of Forecasting Approach 1.4 Impact of Conservation and Load tanacement 1.5 Sensitivity of Load Grcwth to Critical variables - Rick Assessment I }[ j O a a{
2. PROJECTION OF CAPACI7f IEQUIFE'40;'Q 2.1 Installed Capacity, Purchaced Pc'#er and Planned P.e tirer entn 2.2 Rcquired P.aserie Margin 2.3 Capacity Ad:iitions F.aquired to ; fact Lcad 2.4 Generation Mix u. 2237 316 d D m~ (. o = 1% e 7}}