ML19270F586

Ack Receipt of ASLB Initial Decision.Requests Detailed Studies Used as Basis for Decision on once-through Cooling Sys

ML19270F586
Person / Time
Site:	05000516, 05000517
Issue date:	01/12/1979
From:	Hochbruecker G NEW YORK, STATE OF
To:	Boyd R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML19270F584	List: ML19270F583 ML19270F586
References
NUDOCS 7902150474
Download: ML19270F586 (1)

Text

-

g.

$, g );g; x.3 Ah T H E A S S E M B LY

f.

STATE O F N EW YO R K LenL 4 -CA> >

ALBANY CO M M ITT E E S GEORG E J. HOCH ORUECKN ER E DUCA TIO N AS S E M B LY M AN 2 *D DISTRICT RE AL PROPERTY T AX ATIC N SUFFOLK COUNTY CO RPO R ATION S. AUT =40 RI't E S HU B OFFICE BUILDING

& COMM'SSION S ENVIRON M ENTAL CON S ERVATIC N ROUTE 112 PO-BOXT PO RT J E FFE RSON STATION, N. Y.11776 CH AIRM AN - SU BCOM MITTEE ON TE L. $s6 929-778B EOVAUZATIC N & AS SESS M ENT CH AIRM AN -SUBCOMMITTEE ON RESOURCE RECOVERY AS SIST ANT M AJ O RITY WHIP January 12, 1979 Roger S.

Boyd, Director Division of Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Nuclear Regulatory Commission Bethesda, Maryland

Dear Mr. Boyd:

I am in receipt of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's Initial r7 cision on the Jamesport Nuclear Power Stations, Docket Nos. 50-516-CP and 50-517-CP, dated December 26, 1978.

On page 41 of that Decision,Section IV, Cost-Benefit Bal-ance, states that, "... we explored in depth alternative means of unusable heat disposal and found the proposed once-through cooling cycle to be preferable (Fdg. 264, PID). "

I am very interested in this particular aspect of the situa-tion and would very much appreciate receiving the detailed studies and findings which led to this statement.

Sincerely,

!/

i

$h 6:9c ?{CMU 't"' b';' '

George J.'Hochbrueckner

' Chairman, Committee on Real Property Taxation ej 796AISO 4 7Y