ML19269F457
| ML19269F457 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000083 |
| Issue date: | 11/30/1979 |
| From: | Diaz N FLORIDA, UNIV. OF, GAINESVILLE, FL |
| To: | Robert Lewis NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19269F453 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7912210058 | |
| Download: ML19269F457 (2) | |
Text
.
NUCLEAR FACILITIES DIVISION COLLEGE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA j
OF DEPARTMENT OF NUCLEAR ENGINEERING SCIENCES 102 NUCLEAR REACTOR BUILDING ENGINEERING GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA 32611 AREA CODE 904 PHONE 3921429 November 30, 1979 Mr. R.C. Lewis Reactor Operations and Support Branch U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Region II 101 Marietta Street, Northwest Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 RE: RII: CJ, 50-83/79-02 Gentlemen:
In compliance aith 10 CFR 2.201, the following statements are submitted in reference to the apparent items of non-compliance described in your letter of November 20, 1979, and associated documents.
ITEM A.
"No records were found of Subcommittee meetings held between April 4,1978 and August 8,1978."
1.
This is a requirement by Technical Specification IX.H.
2.
We concur that the hand-written notes of the meetings do not suffice as good, permanent records.
3.
Corrective Steps Taken: Starting with the Subcommittee meeting held on November 29, 1979, we have started a meeting agenda, with the first item of business being the review and approval of the minutes of the previous meeting.
4.
Corrective Steps Which Will Be Taken to Avoid Further Non-compliance:
All Subcommittee meetings will be started with a review and approval of the minutes of the previous meeting. Since we consistently hold meetings
, much more frequently than required by TS, no further non-compliance should occur.
5.
Full Compliance will be achieved by January 1,1980.
2}66 243 I M 2 2.L 6 0 Sf NILS J. DIAZ, DIRECTOR (904)392 1406 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOY R
November 30, 1979 letter to R.C. Lewis RE: RII: CJ, 50-83/79-02 page two ITEM B.
"No in-depth review of the facility operations during 1977 was performed."
1.
This is a requirement of Technical Specification IX.I.3.
2.
Although a review of the facility operations for 1977 was conducted, it was not performed on a timely basis and was not formally closed.
3.
Corrective Steps Taken_:
For the facility operations during 1978, the in-depth review was performed in a timely manner and was formally closed.
It was done by requiring strict compliance with the assignments on a scheduled basis.
4.
Corrective Steps Which Will Be Taken to Avoid Further Noncompliance:
The following procedure and schedule for the annual-in-depth review will be followed:
a.
Assignment of components of the review of operations will be made by the Subcommittee Chairman before December 31st of the year to be audited.
b.
All assignments will be required to be completed by January 31st of the following year, i.e., within one month of the end of operations for the year in question.
c.
The Facility Administration will respond to the recommendations from the review within 30 days of the formal submittal of the Subcommittee recommendations.
d.
The in-depth review will be formally closed by Subcommittee actions by March 31st of the year following the one being audited.
5.
Full compliance will be achieved by January 1st,1980.
Please let me know if further information is required.
Sincerely yours,
)
L Nils J5Diaz Professor and Directo.' of Nuclear Facilities c it.
E.E. Carroll G.R. Dal ton 2166 244~