ML19269C543

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards SAND77-1927,Transport of Radionuclides in Urban Environs:Working Draft Assessment & Two Info Repts (SECY-78-311 & SECY-78-311A),which Indicate NRC View of Rept Impact on Regulatory Policy.W/O Encl
ML19269C543
Person / Time
Site: 05000510, 05000511, 07701927
Issue date: 01/08/1979
From: Woodhead C
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
To: Kornblith L, Little L, Mark Miller
NORTH CAROLINA, UNIV. OF, CHAPEL HILL, NC, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
NUDOCS 7902050254
Download: ML19269C543 (2)


Text

ad Prog b

UN11 E D STAT ES k

NUCLEAR RECULATORY COM'.ilsSiOM M@Q g 4

3. I 4,'

J WASHINGTON, D. c. 70%5 4%Yq g.

bRf;

?,,,,,#

January 8, 1979 W PUBLIC D00UMENT ROOM Marshall E. Miller, Esq., Chairman Mr. Lester Kornblith, Jr.

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission U.S. Nuclear Regula;ory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 Washington, D.C.

?]555 Dr. Linda W. Little Dept. of Environmental Sciences 9 I g+g and Engineering g

CA University of North Carolina

<1(

Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514

~

g h]/

2 JAN

, g;7 In the Matter of

/3f y

Gulf States Utilities Company

)

(Blue Hills Station, Units 1 and 2)

,@f Docket Nos. STN 50-510 and STN 50-511

])

Dear Members of the Board:

Enclosed for the information of the parties is a copy of SAND 77-1927 entitled, " Transport of Radionuclides in Urban Environs: Working Drift Assessment" (WDA).

This is a preliminary report in the develop-ment by the NRC of a Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) on transportation of radionuclides in urban environs.

The general objectives of the GEIS are (1) to identify any unacceptable risk or hazard to public health and safety and (2) to identify promising alternatives whereby current levels of safety may be improved further. The study is not intenced, by itself, to support any specific rulemaking action or other regulatory activi ty.

Among the topics discussed in the WDA are:

(1) sabotage of spent fuel casks, discussed in Chapter 6, resulting in severe consequences (thousands of deaths, billions of dollars in damages) and (2) consequences of severe accidents in urban areas resulting in costs exceeding $560 million.

Also enclosed for the information of the parties are copies of Commission Information Reports, SECY-78-311, dated June 14, 1978 and SECY-78-311 A *]

dated November 9, 1978.

These Information Reports indicate to the 3

nly the unclassified portions of SECY-78-311A have been forwarded.

O In addition, SECY-78-311 A has been supplemented by a " Correction Notice" of November 27, 1978. A copy of this notice is also enclosed.

7902050A5L/

t-,.

._ Conmission the Staff's view of the impact of the WDA on current regu-latory policy. As can be seen from these Commission papers, the NRC Staff has recommended that no inmediate regulatory action is necessary

.to protect spent fuel shipment at this time.

Copies of the enclosed documents have been furnished separately to all Licensing and Appeal Board Panel Members for their use.

Sincerely, 7

diw,f Ldd~-

Colleen P. Woodhead Counsel for NRC Staff

Enclosures:

As Stated cc:

(w/ enclosures) cc:

(w/o enclosures)

John L. Hill, Esq.

Atomic Safety and Licensing Stanley Plettman, Esq.

Board Panel Troy B. Conner, Jr., Esq.

Atomic Safety and Licensing Mark J. Wetterhahn, Esq.

Appeal Panel Docketing and Service Section

.