ML19268C310
| ML19268C310 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/24/1978 |
| From: | Snaider R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| REF-GTECI-A-10, REF-GTECI-RV, TASK-A-10, TASK-OR NUDOCS 8001110323 | |
| Download: ML19268C310 (2) | |
Text
g ATTACHMENT 2
/
wtt o naru p'
NLcLtu. Rt out.ATORv c>'essecm 7
?
]
m auw;, vow. D L poem,
/
April 24, 1978
- ...+
Ger.eric Tesl No. A-10 MEM0 FAN 3JM FOR:
D. G. Eiseribut, Assistant Director for Systems
& Frojects, DDR THRU:
D. F. Davis, Chief, Systc<.6 tic Evaluatior. Prograrr Bren:h, DDR F R39.:
R. F. Sr. eider. Tes t Mar.e ger, Ger.eric Te sl No. A-10,
'Ed Feed eter Nor:le and Cor. trol Rod Drive Return Line No::le Cracking
- SUEGECT:
SCHEDULIN*> 0F GENERIC TASK NO. A-10 I re:er,tls had cor..ees6tions mitt E. Sullivan, T. A. tc' O. Knight, ADE/ DSS, cor.: err,in; the status of Ger.eric Test hc. A-14, Flaw Detection *, whict must iriput signific6nt inform 6tior, into Test N. A-10.
I ex;eessed m.v co i err. oser the dire: tion of 1.-14 since the dep6rture of U. Potepovs wh: h6d beer. Test Meneger. Ted irformed me that:
1.
A ne. Ta si Mor.e ger will not be essigned until a rep 16:.ent is s
fosnd for Fotepovs.
2.
Potepovs had indic6ted that a schedule slip of a year may be ne:es sa ry.
This could result in A-14 resolution in 19E1, while 1-10 is scheduled for c:c;1etion in 1979.
As I see it, there are tw: 6ppro6ches which car. be pursued.
These are:
1.
DOE r.tr.6;e.er,t request that A-14 be given sufficient 6ttention su:t that the A-10 no::le issue could be resched on time (input due S/17/79).
2.
A-10 be signific6ntly esponded, under existing ORNL and Sandie contracts, to resc1ve the probler without input fro A-14 I had origir. ally writter. the Test Action Plan to in:lude the use of ORN; and 56ndia or. an *as-needed basis for UT review at operating p16nts, but have deleted their use in my latest revision.
i 8001110 3 M
)
---..~.
)
D. G. Eisenhut 2
April 24,1976 1 prefer thet we utilize optier.1 This will require no additionel expenditure of DM fundi en: will elst result ir: n: Overlappin; ef fort.
H0.ever, it will be ir.;erethe that at least the portion of Test A-14 related to UT dete;tior. of nozzle flavi be giver. priority by DSS.
I en. reeds to discuss this with you et the eerliest possitie opportunity.
d Richard F. Eneider Test Mar.eger cc:
J. Guibert V. Stellt
\\D Q [*jW 95001221
.