ML19263B918

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Rept 50-344/78-26 on 781129-1201.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Event Repts & Response to IE Bulletins & Circulars
ML19263B918
Person / Time
Site: Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png
Issue date: 12/15/1978
From: Horn A, Johnson P, Sternberg D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML19263B913 List:
References
50-344-78-26, NUDOCS 7901250138
Download: ML19263B918 (3)


See also: IR 05000344/1978026

Text

-

.

.

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND EMFORCEMENT

REGION V

Report No.

50-344/78-26

.

50-344

NPF-1

ticense gc,

Safeguards croup

Docket No.

Licensee:

Portland General Electric Company

121 S. W. Salmon Street

Portland, Oregon 97204

Facility Name: Trojan

Inspection at: Rainier, Oregon

November 29 through December 1,1978

Inspection con

te

.

Inspectors:

MLkm

I

/

28

P' H.

bhnson, Reactor Inspector

Date Signed

A.llmm

/2//S/77

A. 6 Horn, Reactor Inspector

Date Signed

..

Da c Signed

Approved By:

M

%

Sl

[

,

D.M. 'Sternberg, Chief,Jeactor Project bect1051

date' signed

.

Reactor Operations and fluclear Support Branch

Summary:

Inspection on flovember 29 - December 1,1978 (Report No. 50-344/78-26)

Areas Inspected:

Routine, unannounced inspection of licensee event

reports and response to IE Bulletins and Circulars; also included in-

dependent inspection effort. The inspection involved 32 inspector-hours

onsite by two f1RC inspectors.

Results:

No deviations or items of noncompl" ace were identified.

7901250I M

.

-

DETAILS

i

1.

Persons Contacted

,

B. Withers, Plant Superintendent

  • F. Lamoureaux, Assistant Plant Superintendent
  • R. Barkhurst, Operations Supervisor
  • W. Orser, Engineering Supervisor
  • J. Perry, Administrative Engineer
  • J. Reid, QA Supervisor
  • R. Schmitt, Chief Nuclear Plant Engineer
  • T. Walt, Radiation Protection Supervisor

The inspectors also interviewed other licensee employees during the

course of the inspection.

These included reactor operators, shif t

supervisors, maintenance personnel, and plant staff engineers.

  • Denotes those attending the exit interview.

2.

IE Bulletins / Circulars

The inspection included followup on licensee actions related to the

following IE Circulars:

IE Circular 78-13, inoperability of Service Water Pumps

(Closed): An internal memorandum discussed the inspection of

the plant's service water intake for silting.

A facility

representative confirmed that a diving contractor had removed

a nominal amount of silt at the intake and that an annual

inspection had been added to the plant's preventive maintenance

program.

IE Circular 78-15, Check Valves in Vertical Position (Closed):

A licensee representative stated that this Circular had been

reviewed and that no tilting disk check valves were installed

in safety applications at Trojan.

-

3.

Licensee Event Report

The inspectors reviewed corrective actions in progress related to

LER 78-20, Grouting of Piping Penetrations.

Revision 2 to LER 78-

20 included a list of 17 penetrations requiring corrective actions.

Previous inspections included review of the licensee's activities

.

'

-2-

.

,

.

.

in surveying and analyzing plant systems to establish this list.

Corrective actions were completed >for at least three of the penetra-

tions and in progress for several others.

A licensee representative

stated that one of the 17 penetrations had been re-evaluated and

would not require corrective actions; another revision to LER 78-20

will document this.

Implementati.on of the corrective actions will

be reviewed further during future inspections.

No deviations or items of noncompliance were identified.

4.

Independent Inspection Effort

The inspectors toured various areas of the plant to observe general

plant conditions. While looking at piping penetrations, the in-

spectors observed that one primary containment penetration (hydrogen

vent exhaust, penetration No. P-72) had wooden wedges inserted in

the annulus between the pipe and the outer wall of the penetration

assembly.

It appeared that the wedges could have been used for

temporary support of the pipe, such as during maintenance on an

adjacent valve.

The licensee stated that no record concerning

installation of the wedges could be found, and that they would be

removed.

No deviations or items of noncompliance were identified.

5.

Exit Interview

The inspectors met with licensee representatives (denoted in Para-

graph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on December 1,1978.

During the exit interview, the inspectors summarized the scope and

findings of the inspection as set forth in Paragraphs 2 through 4.

'a