ML19262D232

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Review of Ofc of Mgt & Program Analysis Comments on Commission Paper Re Enforcement Program by 800318.Info Should Include Estimated Impacts of Sanctions,Addl Resources Needed & Ability to Delegate Enforcement to Regions
ML19262D232
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/14/1980
From: Dircks W
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To: Stello V
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
Shared Package
ML19262D230 List:
References
FOIA-80-533, REF-SSINS-6020 NUDOCS 8004250144
Download: ML19262D232 (1)


Text

.

. /pa arc q'o o

UNITED STATES

[ '%

,g g

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g

,, g\\j

i. C WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 2NSEQLl;E

' t, s,,,

s 9

, u,-

W R I 4 !960

$(

\\p/

\\

\\q

/

MEMORANDUM FOR: Victor Stello, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement FROM:

William J. Dircks Acting Executive Director for Operations

SUBJECT:

COMMISSION PAPER ON ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM Please ensure that you address the conments provided by MPA on your enforcement paper before next week's Commission briefing. As a minimum, I want a written response by March 18 to the following questions: What numbers, types, and estimated impacts (e.g. costs and benefits) of sanctions would have been imposed had this enforcement concept existed in the past? What additional resources might be needed to process more rapidly the enforcement caseload arising from this concept? What will be the ability to delegate enforcement to the Regions under this concept?

I recognize that only qualitative analysis will likel, ~ e possible in o

the short time. Please include in your March 18 response an estimate of the time needed to analyze fully the above questions.

N

~-

William J. Dircks Acting Executive Director fo. sperations 8004250 / [ '