ML19262A954
| ML19262A954 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 12/05/1979 |
| From: | DUQUESNE LIGHT CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19262A955 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7912110353 | |
| Download: ML19262A954 (3) | |
Text
'
,a b /ms
'Af Ni6 b a m ce4cco as s..u..~
omne. e..
December 5, 1979
' 52" United States Regulatory Commission Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 ATTENTION:
MR. BOYCE H. GRIER, DIRECTOR SUBJECT :
Beaver Valley Power Station - Unit Nc. 2 Crane Wall Reinforcing Bars Docket No. 50-412 Significant Deficiency Report No. 79-03 Gentlemen:
During construction of the reactor containment crane wall, 28 No. 11 reinforcing bars and 78 No. 4 reinforcing bars were omitted from a concrete placement.
The problem was reported to Mr. L.
Narrow of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region I, on November 2, 1979.
Pursuant to the requirements of 10CFR50. 55 (e), the final report on this problem is attached for your review.
The concrete in the area ou the crane wall where reinforcing was omitted has been removed as necessary and is currently being rebuilt.
If you have any questions concerning this report, we are available to meet with Nuclear Regulatory Commission personnel at their convenience.
DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY g
By n.,,
(/ J. Woolever
~
Vice President Enclosure cc:
Dr.
E.
Volgenau (15)
Mr. William G. Mcdonald 152B 215 7912110 3 47 5
FINAL REPORT El CRANE WALL REINFCRCING BARS A_T BEAVER VALLEY PCWER STATICN - UNIT NO. 2 1.0
SUMMARY
During the construct 1:.1 of the reactor containment crane wall, twenty-eight No. 11 reinforcing bars and seventy-eight No. 4 rein-forcing bars, as shown on the Engineers' drawings, were omitted froa a concrete placement.
2.0 IMMEDIATE ACTICN TAKE!
A Nonconformance and Disposition Report was initiated and all construction work in the vicinity of the affected area was stopped.
The Nuclear Regulatory Cc= mission was informed of the deficiency by telephone on Novehber 2, 1979.
3.0 DEFICICICY The reactor containment crane wal.1 is a reinforced concrete c.
indrical wall,106 f t. outside diameter, extending from the fourteta columns which support it at Elev. 714 ft.-0 in. to top of wall at Elev.
815 f t-5 in. Its major functions are (1) to provide a support for the polar crane (2) to enclose one side of the th;ee steam generator cubicles and the pressurizer cubicle (3) to provide radiation shielding for the annular area between it and the reactor containment exterior wall and (4) to support various piping, instrument, and electrical components. Its thickness varies from 2f t.-0 in, to 2 f t.-
9 in. with local areas further thickened in the vici:.ity of major pipe restraints.
There are various doorways and openings through the crane wall and integral beams within the wall where required. Full or partial floor slabs frame into and are supported by the crane wall at elevations 718 f t.-6 in, 738 f t.-10 in. and 767 f t-10. in. Cubicle walls oriented approximately radially also frame into the crane wall.
All of the major components in the reactor containment are located inside the crane wall with the annular area outside the wall being used for access and interconnecting these components.
1528 216 7912110 jQ i i
The area of concern is located between horizontal construction joints at Elev. 755ft.-10 in. and Elev. 762 ft.-5 in and between aximuths 970 and 1340 (an arc length of about 34 f t.). During the construction of this section of wall, twenty-eight No. 11 vertical bars, approx-imstely 20 ft. Long, and seventy-eight No. 4 shear bars, approx-imately 4 ft. long were omitted.
The omission was discovered while preplanning placement of reinforcement for the area immediately above Elev. 762 ft.-5 in.
4.0 ANALYSIS OF SAFETY IMPLICATIONS A review of the design in the area of the nonconformance was performed. The crane wall section that includes the area where the reinforcing was omitted has been analyzed twice, once assuming the reinforcing as shown on the Engineers' drawings and once assuming the absence of the omitted bars. This wall was analyzed as a part of the elastic analysis of the pressurizer cubicle using the computer program STRUDL. The capacity of the wall for each case was determined in accordance with PSAR requirements.
The results of these analyses indicate that, with the absence of the omitted bars, the remaining reinforcing in this local area would be subject to design stress levels in excess of yield if subjected to one or more of the required loading combinations.
Also, the design allowable shear stress carried by the concrete would be exceeded.
With all reinforcing in place as shown on the Engineers' drawings, the design stresses remain with?n allowable limits under the applicable loads and required loading combinations.
A failure analysis was not perfermed.
However, it was assumed that some degree of structural failure might occur under certain accident conditions if the omitted reinforcing were not in place.
5.0 CORRECTIVE ACTICN TO REMEDY DEFICIENCY The concrete in the area of the crane wall where reinforcing was omitted will be removed and rebuilt as necessary, incorporating reinforcement equivalent to that originally shown on the Engineers' drawings.
Detailed procedures were developed and/or revised as necessary to implement performance, inspection and documentation requirements relative to removal operations, replacement of reinforcement and concrete placement.
1528 217