ML19262A752

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Response in Opposition to Applicant 791109 Motion to Dismiss Ba Mccorkle & C Hinderstein as Parties for Failure to Respond to Interrogatories.Untimeliness of Mccorkle Filing Has Not Prejudiced Applicant.Supports Hinderstein Dismissal
ML19262A752
Person / Time
Site: Allens Creek File:Houston Lighting and Power Company icon.png
Issue date: 11/29/1979
From: Sohinki S
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML19262A753 List:
References
NUDOCS 7912100479
Download: ML19262A752 (1)


Text

.

d 11/29/79 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of HOUSTON LIGHTING & P9WER COMPANY Docket No. 50-466 (Allens Creek Nuclear Generating

)

Station, Unit 1)

)

NRC STAFF'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS MCCORKLE AND HINDERSTEIN AS PARTIES TO THIS PROCEEDING On November 9,1979, the Applicant 'n the captioned proceeding filed a motion to dismiss Brenda A. McCorkle and Carro Hinderstein as parties to the proceeding for failure to respond to the Applicant's interrogatories despite Board orders to do so. Ms. McCorkle has responded to the questions propounded to her in a pleading dated November 13, 1979. While her responses are late, we do not believe that the untimeliness has prejudiced the Applicant in any significant way. Therefore, the Staff opposes the motion to dismiss insofar as it relates to Ms. McCorkle.

With regard to Ms. Hinderstein, it appears that she has still not responded to the interrogatories in question.

Therefore, for the reasons stated in the Applicant's motion, the Staff believe that the Board should dis'iss her as a party, unless within ten days of the Board's order ruling on the instant motion she files complete responses to the Applicant's interrogatories.

Respectfully submitted, j

Stephen M. Schinki Counsel for NRC Staff 1527 019 Dated at Bethesda, Maryland, this 29th day of November, 1979.

Lc 7912100