ML19261E832
| ML19261E832 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane |
| Issue date: | 07/22/1970 |
| From: | Howe P US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Long C US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7910170872 | |
| Download: ML19261E832 (4) | |
Text
A s.s qs
- a
, 3,C N '
- UNITED STATES o
... C N's\\
I' i'i ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION i.';
a
.i
- , /
W ASHINGTON. D.C.
20545
~"
~
-'QQ, f
,5 e uly 22, 1970 d
J1 Charles G. Lcng, Chief, P?IR 2, Divisicn of Re cter Licensing QlOST:C:iS C'! tl',CU MIL 2. ISLtND ?:','CLC.in Pc'..IR PLtNT -
so.c y0. 20 J,
Att ch:2 :
cuestions on th: ~~. rec :'il Isi:nd..::100:
P ::: ?l:nt 2:0kat NO. 50-2S9. ndditicn:1 cuestion n:.y
- isa as :: i.: p:0g:c:scs.
P. W. Mc c, Chief Site, Envi cnn:nt:1 5 R dir. ica Safety Grenp Divisica of R : to: Licensin-in ::::a:
. :::a. 1 Island Qu:::i :s
- n/e..' csu.::
A...ris
- 2. C:.'.':;;.5 D. R:::
148229i 791 0170
g a
e e
e ) ).',
- O, :) U. p ta;.iu p):]4.\\.3 e.
t
(.
[
.[r
- . (
b;c. p l'
- )1 If
,j1 t
<_r 0O* )uOBa>3 g t ( p(
))).j*
3yg & ~(I(-Z P' (C
[
r@p'(6_
c-'-,
)s 1
' E y' h-
'r 3
l1 j
t D
>e. ltgn0g 4 om g*O::e (Ole s.
1:
4e i
- 8 4
- ie:<
[0 3 M :.,s O(: l c n si 4 u)ir e 8 Otc g t C. :s O el(G O'OOO
-)*
e:Oe:%e1)O t41f e3 8
4:
)}8Te4(*(t Ofi Ie >O f 4
e e.
ate 4
t e
e4 e
4e i)
- t ee *a c
e O e l4f O". J e.
e uOotI):eg4o 3) 4n >Oe t oOf O.
u,*0 pfOblt( :Ol L,*tOO,**te'O
- el 1t e e
,e i
i s 4
c ef t
e a
- o 4 e le*
):e8 e
4 * :
e e:o vs.')T*
fe
(
c er isn ce I.
e e:
4 i
tcf (r
8t tt;t ct Q0 leo 8 O*
nOe143m*
%4O31O dse1)j1o n,o4rO e)O*
e-e a
o) l'1 e
4) 3 a
4,e e-t V"4 e e OIO::OO e,.
, r':e
(
4,e O s:: O 5f Olile 8
t) 3*
%e ee e
4 e
e i't' 8lfUI0iOI*
( O Ce*t)
- j e so4sO o.:O fO 8O)t lo e O t.eOoe d.t:tO8OI O<>
O)t O?
4,* 0
)e8) a 3i OO43Oel4:O3 e.
4 t
t,.4f 4t 6j I
1" s
i 4
e
- is 3 4 e e
e 3*
/
C
.ON A'
. e i.
(t c
4,*c s0eeO;I fI*
- e e
'*O uo4t oO4aGOsO3 u,:O e 448O
.n.O340 pfo>e sj a
.e 4s)
J:)
e e:.f*
4I e
- e i:
. 9 I -
re:) oO:* fe 8 4 ):fg O
- t'O !!n 1*OO ;jOOu s0 OlsOtofee48O :oIeII:
- win o
ie'.
e 4,.
t l*
1 S
- t*t 7
t
{
- )
4 te tt l' e
e)oO3t0. O e s d% l'40 9r)m O"O4e:.fOO c
- I
- ) )d' 31 e:
ef o*
4 :fO Ot<OJ l.
0
$'l
(
f s
e3 I
es:
e e
.j e
(4 ie4vf 4
8OodN:
l-gJn eM O18 ell 8e:t te a
4
. 4c 4
o a ).f)l'OO o: : O:re) e e(
t
.I4:
e n43O l3O8O0i4l) a' O tr U3e
,?
oe
,dt*)e l s oO l..s e
.
- O: ;OtO I'O 6 O **e O J O 3JN ;r t:d')f rM O)f
(!i et i
(,'
4 4 -
e 4n f r4s fD e
eOO*
s3 j1 r o
eg) e 8f!384
- C q(O sO2>)eOcOhiuot dr ofoO 3Otgeti J
i e
e t 4 ** OO
- fOlt :OfeO k:O [*)tf:e u s))IN
- ef e
4 L
i o.
ati Ot r
2e t =
.%.t<
e*
.e
(*
t e
e,rc e
o 4; *,'
rre t oi;)es3e>j 4n Oo4isl1 e4 o:.f t 4,7O >$*9Oo 4M 4l3eOl eeeO 4tl
(
E
- t J
- 4 4 *e3)O' c
e.
- l' c:r c.
gl*O
.t) e i
e)
)<
t.
ie t
4 Ec ef o*
o3 0fsti <of
.O MNO >se tt 4:
(L.
e 0 - *
- !l8 e
8:
3)a
- 3q eO eev
.q't4 te
>le1OO rOIO e
3 4)
} Oj t'O t eO 4
4< 0 O' f I.'
tq tgee.
f 4
uI
- t losele l'O aO,ep e:
ef e el'o 4 OM Or jlse Of O.
e e
e s
- h J:
i. tO.
oi I*)
- lOt:
1 f- )O I O rlO y:3 e.-
I r
,[:e;te 4ef t
t
(
<e ec O83qwe 44 t 4 sN 44 J*
)e) j
- I )lt 4#
r:>
- )4 4)e e
g.'
t t
- e e
e o I* e Oi.sc!'
..f
, c e se e;)eooeOj 0x (<a] e OO (4
.g O$8OtOl e
a ei)3 s
s e
s a
e)*
o l
1s!e*sIO t~
5 I*:O lt <r
)
it 4
c (4
i s
8 '
8 t
.i / s3* )OO8eOc ea 42osOi 4Jo4 4,
4eOO)% glOsO)f:a4)n iOf I*O g
Gl?8
- eef
%e 4
r 4t h t I' i
e
- ,. ee
,,O e
a
)
8 lO. !' O'O O 4' e f e,s O glO0 JO e O l]l{eiI1 4
tl s.(
gte 4f gOOO3:seN le O;*,e1 )j,oN 4:O VOlfe 4
OOo 3)f
. t4t 4..
e.) n 7e 4)4 s:
)e e
I FY@N NC h
.2-of Engineers. However, no data are included on water surface elevations resulting from the PMF.
Picase provide the Susquehanna River probable maximum flood discharge hydrograph and associated elevations (stage-discharge) at the plant site.
The stage discharge should be based on appropriate step backwater computations for preproject and project conditions. The proposed project conditions will probably result in a higher stage for the same discharges of extreme flood events than would have resulted prior to construction due tu greater restrictions in the flood flow area. The water surface profiles for applicable floods of record including discharges and high water marks, should be verified and presented as a basis for selecting the roughness coefficients ("n" values) for both the channel and over bank flow.
Waste Dispossi 1.
Section 1.3.2.16 refers to a design change providing a separate condenser off-gas vent pipe. This will apparently be monitored by. subsystem RM-A4 described in Section 11 (page 11-19). What are the criteria for selection of monitor sensitivity and alarm set point? If leakage occurs between primary and secondarv systems, how will the monitor detect and control possible iodine releases via this route?
2.
Based en estimated volumes, contained radioactivity, flow rates, and discharge ti=es for short ter= releases, provide an analysis of the concentration of radioactivity a a function of distance downstream of the plant for various river flow conditions.
1482 300
.f 3-3.
Please discuss your criteria for maintaining radioactive effluent releases to values as low as practicable.
Include information on anticipated minimum holdup times for liquid and gaseous wastes, and your criteria for minimum processing requirements.
4 Table 11-4 indicates that a number of waste processing system components are vented to the atmosphere.
P. :,ase discuss the possibility and relative magnitude of radioactive effluent releases via this ror.te.
5 Estimates of the annual discharge of nonfission oroduct radionuclides. Please include a tabulation similar to Tables 11-6 and 11-7 which relate to fission product radionuclides and your method of estimating quantities.
/
.