ML19261D825

Forwards Addl Info Re Seismic Qualification Data Package in Response to 790425 Telcon Request

ML19261D825
Person / Time
Site:	Sequoyah
Issue date:	06/22/1979
From:	Gilleland J TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To:	Varga S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 7906260463
Download: ML19261D825 (72)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:%< i.: _ 500C Chestnut Street Tower II Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. S. A. Varga, Chief-Light Water Reactors Branch No. 4 Division of Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Dear Mr. Varga:

In the Matter of the Application of ) Docket Nos. 50-327 Tennessee Valley Authority ) 50-328 Enclosed is additional detailed information for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant relating to the seismic qualification data package submitted for NRC's Seismic Qualification Review Team (SQRT) by my letter to you dated February 7, 1977. This data is being submitted in response to P. Y. Chen's request, made in a telephone conversation on April 25, 1979, that TVA provide: 1. Applicable seismic floor response spectra for each of the equipment items for which seismic qualification data was provided in the data package. 2. For those items of equipment which were qualified by tests, a demonstration that the seismic qualification requirements had been satisfied, i.e., that the test response spectra envelope the required response spectra consistent with the proceduree of IEEE 344-1975. The enclosure provides this requested information for each of the equip-ment items of interest. For each of the seismic qualification tests, general discussita and data points illustrate that the tests satisfy the seismic qualification requirements with a margin of conservatism. 2312 082 c'o\\e q/ \\ \\ 7906260 76,0

c' 2 Mr. S. A. Varga, Chief This response completes the followup action items related to NRC's seismic audit of Sequoyah safety-related equipment qualification. Very truly yours, / o 1 J. L. Gilleland Assistant Manager of Power Enclosure 2312 083

f 4 ENCLOSURE SEIShtIC QUALIFICATION OF SAFETY-RELATED EQUIPMENT - RESPONSE TO NRC QUESTIONS RELATING TO SEISMIC QUALIFICATION DATA PACKAGE SUBMITTED FEBRUARY,, 1977 2312 084

t Auxiliary Feedvater Pumps Auxiliary - Control Building - Turbine Driven - Elevation 669 (base slab ) Motor Driven - Elevation 690 Applicable floor response spectra are attached. Ground motion spectra are applicable to elevation 669 ror the turbine driven pump. Figure B-3 is the horizontal OBE; the corresponding vertical motion is equal to two-thirds of the horizontal. Maximum earthquake levels, SSE, are equal to twice the OBE levels. Figures c-3 and D-3 are the horizontal OBE spectra applicable to the motor-driven pump, Because the equipment orientation in the building is not necessarily defined at the time ot equipment contract award, the equipment qualification would reflect the application of the envelope of the N-3 and E-W spectra in ench of the equipment horizontal axes. The auxiliary - control building is rigid in the vertical axis; therefore, the ground motion vertical spectrum (two-thirds of the level of figure B-3 for OBE) is applicable to all building elevations. Again, the SSE levels are obtained by doubling the CBE levels. 2312 085 (1)

2 g I. 980 2tE2 s D o nT { O co g a 2 = 0 o c

• -- GJ U

.- :e t1 1 ac e-- [L o - z we a 6 ea _a :. o o (c i-w +- .o LL

• - =

ue .- o e oc .O L1 _J o CW C a_ C. N e o o v: Z-uwco om __I O LJ oC ._J = J o ww g coo-o ~o > c. o.-. _a wzc _.s c uw x c: UZI t-C w ce m o >- = a *- wno-Nc o = a o C. -e ZoOE Z LJ u; g LJ M LJ G aC _o o .-oeo =o z t o [ U La ow I m -d z o O R bta -o a_ { <N L on _O ()D q/ o.a C. 3 o -f I. i o O i, OE*O S50_ 03 0 ,St'O 01 0 SD D 0 0

• CT,, _

m ..m -1 pe=n en m r=== m ar9 m3 pass 3 pas; pumq pang smug pag-s TEt!NESSEE VF.LLEY RUTHORITY 12/17/73 RESP 0tiSE ACCELERATION SPECTRuti g oJ St4P AUXILIARY BLOG l~ t1 ASS POItJT tJ0 3 CRi1PIl1G RRTIO 0.020 OPERATIONAL BRSIS EARTHOUAKE FLOOR ELEVRTION=688.S0 go N-S HORIl0NI AL ACCEL.E.9f!(10t< 8 a-8 a- ~ O a-Nu N a N CD ca /- S 0.00 0'.10 0 '. 2 d 0'.30 0'.40 0.S0 0'.60 0'.70 0'.80 0'.90 1.0 ~ PERIOD IN SECONDS i~ t G 0RC C3

,,3 3 - i.,, q -,qg;p3 g g g g g gg-- g.g.. p s TEtJf4ESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 12/12/73 RESPONSE ACCELERATI0fl SPECTRUt1 g cv StJP AUXILIARY BLOG .'~ 11 ASS POItJT tJ0. 3 oat 1PItJG RATIO 0.020 OPERATIONAL BASIS EARTriOURKE FLOOR ELEVATI0tJ:608.50 E-Il 50RIZ0tJTDL ACCELERATIO:1

o

] 1 j8 3d-J

o

\\ e _a- \\ N va o CD W / O l %.00 o'.10 o'.20 o'.30 - o'.49 0.So o'. s o o'.70 o'. s o o'.90 l '. o - PERIOD IN SECONOS pie u ;t e D. $

/ Heat Exchanger - Comronent Cooline Water Auxiliary - Control Building - Elevation 714 Applicable floor response spectra are attached. ilorizontal OBE spectra Figure c-9, n-3 Figure D-9, E-w Vertical ODE spectrum Two-thirds of the figure B-3 levels SSE levels are equal to twice the OBE levels. The general com.ments regarding the auxiliary building spectra presented for the auxiliary feedwater pumps are also applicable to the heat exchanger spectra. 2312 089 G (1)

~ n um ,<m n. rw ha, eam peu or..:( r=== ~~==== pang-u.y samt. s TEtitlESSEE V ALLEY AJTHORI TY 12/17/73 RESPONSE ACCELERATI0td SPECTRUt1 g m StJP AUXILIARY BLOG .4 t1RSS POINT NO. 6 DAt1 PING RATIO 0.020 OPERATIONAL BASIS EARTHOUAKE FLOOR ELEVATION =713.S0 i$ N-S HURIZGNTAL ACCELERATiGti 5 5g -o c J J go-J ) j o )T I _o-N j M "\\ N o o I e o a 8 r 1 r r-- 0.0^ 0 10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.00 0.90 10 PERIOD IN CECONDS F:SuRE C9

s I

m Pn co f.3 D o T 9 D' \\ Q Nr -D Z W (4) W M Z (g 5 >- O C O 9 p H bJ D ~ E +- Q. O H O O CE U) I C". CD U' O W O CC _e =Z %mW Q HO G

• )

D~ O ' J CO W CWD N ' mC CO O U3 b U >- % J (O

• m il C

,2 WWC.OWZ c) _J _J coa om-OOOmm n muzZm _Q >UC HJCZ T CC ~ H C C > O E W J Z CC Z bJ N W W Ld - - OJ-(O CO X O d m tu % U3 Z D Q. Z H O w t.a O C m C CC L O i Z Q. (D Q % C m W = m c m. _J _(D. <o z e>a.u> c W O 2 OO + e U) c O O b u g O 1 ow u, D O( l -a z }' O Q O-O~ -z

• ttj 1

a_ O O -a l 0 N -a / O -a 2,312 091 8 03*I 0 0 ' I, n 3 o n r i u si,,0,9,',O Or'0 03 0 00 0, 08 0 i o, n, i n i c., s,

.~ m .m re m s,e em e.,m ~v. - ~. e-.. s. en I E titJ E S S E E V F L L E t' A J I!iOR : T Y 01/06/74 GROUfl0 REEP0tlSE SPECTRUM .m SEQUOY Ati flUCLE AR PL AtiT $~ ORMPItJG RATIO 0.020 HORIZ0tJTFL GR0ut10 ACCELEPATI0tJ OPERRTIONAL BRSIS EARTHOUAKE p [ n v \\ / a n 7o-73-Nu N a 3 CD e N ) f 'O.33 0'.10 0'.23 0'.30 0'.40 0'. S 0 0'. E 0 0 '. "10 0'.80 0'.90 l '. J C PERIOD IN SECONOS 63

t Main Steam Isolation Vsives The WIV, as, an inline mounted device, is seismically qualified for the maximum response of the piping system (at the valve location) into which it will be installed. This criteria for TVA's Sequoyah plant is 3 g horizontal (two perpendicular axes ) and 2 g vertical. To ensure compatibility between the valve qualification and the piping system analysis response levels, the 3 g/2 g acceleration levels are considered as dynamic input motion to the valve at any frequency within the range of 1 to 33 Hz. As previously stated (seismic qualification data package submitted for faC-CQRT review) the MSIV's are qualified by analysis in conjunction with the vendors generic testing program. Attached are copies of bulletins provided by the MSIV vendor, Atwood and Morrill, which su marize the generic testing of their valve design. 1. Development of Msin Steam Isolation valves for I;uclear Power stations. 2. Technical Bulletin 77-02, Pipe End Load / Static Lend Test of 22-inch MSIV. 3 Technical Sulletin 77-03, sonic ilow Test of a Main steam Isolation V,1ve. 2312 093 (1)

A ~ p., 11. o 7 - j. ib., .g.f % e I N a44 .s @ Development h. ~ -N P. -r g w w. Main Steam I!o ti 11 ValV.. e+W ~ Rit ~~ for Nuclear Poi (v....}n'n-*\\eH tatio'ns , L..... 8 - 4.CJ 4 -1 , ~. } -- Ms j [',, j ' T W q z cd % ~,' ,7,,, D .k; i ^ g. Qg_ l r- ~

• g

[ A hh]' C'RN. -992 by Norman F. Prescott Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc., Salem, Massachusetts The Wy e ty pe Ntain Steam hola. moderated type. The primary coolant background for the Company to make tion Yah e with an.ur/sprmg operator of the PWR.3 circulated through heat a logical tranution from Nas y work n today the st.mdard deugn for Pail-exchangers to produce steam whereas to cornmercul nuclear work Atwoo t mg Water Reat:or mstallations. Thn m a boding water reactor (or BWR) & N1ornll Co. was one of the first vah e same s ab c. with some modi 0 canons, as designed by General Electric. steam manufacturets to take a special inter-has also become the most frequently is obtamed directly from the reactor est in the specilications for these new used design m Pressuri/ed Water Re-sessel wahout the use of a secondary N1am Steam Isolation Vah es. 'I bey actor instalianons. It is the type of heat eschanger As a result of the became actisely eneaged m a de m sabe wluth has had more esperi-direct contact with the reactor. the and engineering procram which L ' mental testmg than any other design. steam supplied in a BWR is radio-to the msesagation of several types and as dependable operatmg espen-actis e. of valves and ditierent methods of h ntory of suesessful .\\!ain Steam Iso l anon Valves were ena unh a operation, with a selechon procew installahons piosides the highest lesel ene of the most important safety re-considering the fu;Iowing vahe et conhdence m as use. Atwood i lated items neccoary for the operation desmns. Mornil hase m servae or on order - of a BWR plant. and the type of sake eser 400 Wse Type Valves for BWR best suded for this service became the GATE VALVES and PWR sers ice. subject of intensive studv. A perfor-mance specification was' written. de-A gate vaM would hase a low BACKGROUND AND scribine the necessarv functions and pn'wwe p and could rneci the DEVELOPMENT desirable features of'a valve suitable tightness requirements. howey er. the Ihe succen m the use of nudear for BWR use These included'. operanog faces agamst a dalerentul of 1000 pu or more would be verv power by the United States Nan soo" ( ) Lc'v pressure drop. high. A standa rd mothr opera tor led to a con.Jeraton for commercial purposes. I he tu o major U.S. turbmc u ou!J :cly on e!ct toc power and tooid neither (1) meet the closme i.me of manufactureis that had been promi. (3) 'I,he abiluy to open agamst a dit.- 3 ,g g gg g nent m the Nas al Nuclear Program terential pressure' fail fe entered the tield of commereul nu. (4) Closmg time adjustable between non m le d h g' clear power. u uly each takmg a dif. 3 to 10 seconds PLUG. BALL AND ferent prmciple for development (5) Means for testing through partial u i tmghouse. Lombusnon Engi-stroke and return. BUTTERFLY VALVES neenng and Babcock & Wdcos chose to f..llow and develop the prewunted ~ of Acceptable prewure drops could be (6) Simpheity and rehabihts operanon. oinamed wah vanous other forna of water ieattor as used by the Umted valves. such as p!ug valve 3. hail s altes States Nau. w hile General Llectoc The espenence and design ability and buttesdies. each wah unrestocted pioneered u uh a durerent m e t h ed. of Atwood & Morrill as proven in the port openings similar to the gate Hoth 9stenn were of the light water Navy nuc!e.ir program prosided tife valve. These Jeugns were aiso reject-Tu ',.7 79 2312 094 au - 1

i ed sur the same reason that the opera-main valve to be of the balanced type. movement of the valve stem. This tes forces neuded to open and close Since the design of a balanced type opening of the pilot substamially would be sery hyh. and seat tight-valve was usually found in a globe equalizes the pressures above and r.c w micht be ditheult to obtain or or angle valve. it was necessary to below the main disc. so thal further

maintain, recon >ider the unacceptable pressure movement of the valve stem causes drops of these body shapes. The line the mam valve to open. The Atwood GLOBE OR ANGLE VALVES of reasoning eventually led to the Wye

& Morrill de ign uses a spring acting T he body shape of a globe valve shaped body that provided straight-to open the pilot whenever the main ha 'he hichest pressure drop of most through flow with the least internal disc is off the seat. This spring forces of the sahes considered. An ancle obstruction. the main disc toward the seat without boJs has a prenure drop le>s th'an "Ihe only detas! left in the specifi-allowing the pilot to close. thus pro-a givbe valve. but still higher than cation for the ideal valve o meet was viding a smoother clusing operation deured. the adjustable closing time of 3 to IG of the main vahe. This also became seconds. Some speed control could be a patented feature of ti Atwood & realized by the use of throttling valves Morrill design. It was apparent that the final Isola-in the air discharge from the main The final A&N1 valve incorporated tion Vahe design must be a et mbina-operating cylinder. but the stem forces all of the features desired by the spec-tion of the desirable features of both would vary during the closing of the iticanon. and in 1964 became the de-salve and operator, and the study abo vahe. and a compressible fluid such sign adopted by General Electric Co. considered operators to obtain the as air would make precise speed ad-for their Doiling Water Reactors. The bee overAt design. justment quite di!1icult. valve is bric0y desenbed as follows: ELECTRIC OPERATION The A&N1 Ntain Steam Isolation Valve is a butt welded end. Wye type The u e of electric power would be "" ] body. hasing a single seated construe-limited to motor operators which are tion with internal pilot. The vahe too d."v to meet the required 3 to 10 l operator is dc>igned for a nominal air seconJ doime of these large valves. y**"i pressure of 100 pug and is composed Although some ball-screw operators j ca n p.s ude last stem mos emen t. [ of a pneumatic cylinder and an equal e dnplacement hydraube cyhnder for other p.oblems would then an>e from i speed control. The main valve is air impa t on closure and the need to i e opening, air and spring closing. with absorb the closing energy without j a control panel composed of redun- ( wear or damace to the val.e. 3 dant solenoid operated valves and \\ HYDRAULICS hydraulic speed controk. The vahes may be tested through a stroke of m Hydraube pressure could produce approximately 10"c. and arranged to pon s. and 3 peed. The disadvantage automatically return to the fully open woulJ occur m the amount of auul. -a posinon after the test stroke has taken sary celuipment m the foim of pumps. ,..,, '..,,, [,,,,, [.m...., j.,, < place. Limit switches indicate the n accumula toi3. and control valves, all open, closed and test stroke. of whath would be vulacrable to dam-f,,,ca, asm,g A,yacmm,a.gof sf;;f n age and the poribihty that the m.un n io<fc / pr anmc o"ic lo..ccn ismi m valve would fail to close if accumula-m "m/8 A&M VALVE INSTALLATIONS tor pressure was lost. The first valves were ordered by PNEUMATICS It became esident that a non.com, General Electric Co. from Atwood & pressible 11uid w ould nive more Aforrill Co. m 1965 for a BWR instal-A low prenure compressed air and dependable adjustment, arid an cyial lation in Tarapur. India. This order spring >> stem would have many de-displacement hydraulic tylinder was was closely followed by similar sabes sirable features. such as low first cost. installed in series with a pneumatic for the Nine Nhle Point station of reliabditt and cleanliness. and the operating cylinder havmg an adjust. Niagara N!ohaw k Power Co. the O)s- ~ simplest form of tored energy. l he able hs draulic bypass to cmrtrol ter Creek Station of Jers2y Central one dhadiantan uoald be the rela-spteJ. ~ihn Atwood & Alanill ms en. Powr & Light. the Ntonusel!o htanun tn ely small stem forces that could tion was unique and was granted a of Northern States Power Co.. and be generated by the low pressure air. patent. continuing succenively up to the The pressure balancine of the main present time of 1976. MM has e in-FINAL SELECTION OF BWR valve to accommodate tIie use of the stalled or on order 248 stain Steam VALVd. AND OPERATOR low pressure air cylinder was obtained Is lati n valves in I1WR plants. (Inch. ding Patented by the choice of a single seat pilot A&M Faatures) operated valve. This de. sign is com-ATWOOD & MORRILL VALVES posed ora main dhe or seated portion. FOR PRESSURIZED WATER ( / In.. seu. of all the design options. and a cylinder chamber extendmg the low piessure compressed air and upward and htted mto the bonnet REACTORS spimg system otrered the most desira-poroon of the body. The pilot vahe The >uccessful use of air and spring ble means of operation but the rela-which is part of or attached to the operated Wye type Main Steam hola. tn ely low stem loads would requa t the valve stem is opened by the nrst tion Whes for flailing W.aer 1(eac. 2312 095

a tors has proven their dependability. conventional seal such as piston rings. 1969 - A 26" full size valve. also with and has led to their use as Alain Steam Testing has shown the seal to be very various val.e openings. ~ Isolation Valves for Pressurized Water effective. Reactors. The valves for PWR systems 1970 - A 26" full sited vah e for are larger than those for the Boiling various valve openings and poppet Water Reactors. with the additional TESTING PROGRAMS conngurations. requirement that valves must clo3e The onE nal A&M valves were con-i with flow m either direction. Atwood & Morrill Co. initiated the structed more than 10 years ago. In mappygg- %q bi-directional valve by the use of an addition to successful operating expe-NW .. articulated" internal pilot that will rience. extensive testing has been ear-1% / perform all of the functions of the tied out continuously since that time e s ~ conventional pdot for opening in the f r verification and improvement of i normal 0ow direction. The articulated the design. The following is a li>t of feature of the pilot will also allow it tests awomplished and/or scheduled ^.s \\ to open on reversal of flow and permit n A&M type valves. pressurization of the balancing (1) 1966 - A 24" production valve h.. w, chamber.With the main poppet under balanced conditions, the sprmg clos-was hot tested at a temperature of

f. &

d IQ:' 4.]. 650 - 700* F and a pressure of 1000 ing mechanism will move the main valve to its seat psig, and stroked repeatediv to prove ~'. Tef the ability of the valve to'open and Another requirement w hich the r# 4 valve must nicet is that of tightness close under operating pressures and under a reverse flow condition. Al-temperatures. .v nnan r trcrcou trefr>. author, an / f o coat, pu,j,c, y,gm,c,,,,,,,,,.,,,,, iers r, g,3, p though the main valve is of single (2) 1969 - A 20" Main Steam Isola- '#"' 'h"f """# #"""K /'"'" 'c""/" /"Il u < seated construction there is a slip-fit in the balancing cylinder that would tion Valve was tested under guillotine break conditions by General Electrie allow back-Row leakage. Atwood & and Commonwealih Edison at the Morrdi Co. msented and patented a -A un med 24" produe-State Line Station of the Common-skirt seal that is normally disengaged tion v was tested under pressure wealth Edison Co. Some 40 flow tests from the cylinder wall throughout the "**CI """ I $l V"I"C' e w Us of the body."The valve under simulated accident conditions C.and wntact a special hard-surfaced tormal hte of the valve. !t will expand m showed that the desien would com-pletely and reliably shut off flow. The w s studied under both brittle lacquer ~ area within the cylinder wall only uhe, a back tlow condition anses. flows were combinations of postulated nd strain gage methods with internal Pressures raised in increments to 1800 actual conditions of water, mixtures of steam and water, and steam. P"S.The pressure was returned to . g,. zero in the same increments, and the MY (3) Development and flow testme body stresses showed complete lin. ' E *! Id 'M was conducted by Atwood & Morrill canty and were well within the design , =d Y.-- t Co. at the Alderi Research Labora-values f the ASME Code. ~ { tories of the Worcester Polvtechnie d^' P. Institute to obtain body desidns with (5) 197a, - A Licensee of Atwood & }s- 'q La Morrill Co. in Japan. Sippon Sea!ol. 'h manufactures MSIV's for the Japa-rr rr er, rr,,. dQ.@i [*, : TITtK,'p[ nese nuclear plants. Their tests in- %~ e 1' E V',, I,. ih-r...II.I,il N 5I I2I " ~' g clude opening and closing under full rl N ., -..,J...4; q.i, working temperature and pressure g a .,./C Y [. i..*-r-m.T Tig conditions. These tests.as well as other Z operational tests, were required hv the .m-..- '*h J p nese gosernment before permit-i [,. tme any Main Steam isolation \\ ah e An a t is mn. sun Iml.amn ral.c n><.d/c./ i ':' '.'> gg J)e installed in nuclear plants. on a kniraulu teu !.wp)or vertfacanon ofreverse flaw clawrc sharas scrnncs [ w... .n ~ (6) 1974 - A 26" valve wuh an artie-ulated pilot was tested for closure The seal is 3 elf-energized from the 0 w path characteristics that would with bi-directional Dow. This type of res crse direction and will expand out-E'M the least pressure drops. This valve speci6cd for i>WR use wa's orie. wardly and tightly against the hard resung was made with modek as wcll inated by Atwood & Mornli Co. Th'e nrfaced aica. The feature and a ' van-as full sized valves. Such tests were: purpose of this valve is to close on 'I\\ age of the >kirt seal is the complete receipt of signal including condaions freedom as the valve moves from open 1968 -- S" and 10" modeh tor forward of a guillotine pipe line break caher to close in the normal direction. 'I he and reverse direction Dow. on the upstream or downstream of the skirt seat in its disengaged position valve. This test conducted at the also eliminates excess friction that 1969 - A 20" full sized valve for* Alden Research Laboratory proved would be generated by other types of various amounts of vahe opening. the principle for bi-directional closure. Wo o 2312 096 b % enW 3RL b

e ecnn ca ouneun i / v4 ws x - w.i c w_ ,mnt,s.,.:__r "'W.1"l

a. w ' p rI.a.57 f [ '

h, P m mrb m kimit-7h h Da k

f, kl i.I d

b, I W WY - 1 r un en w r /* $ A Technical Bulletin by Atwcod & Morrill, Salem..',1assacnusetts 01970 U.S.A. 2:'e: H f""2" W :fli d Pipe End Load / Static Bend Development of Main Steam isolation u,,s t,,. v.o,, em, S, en, Test of 32-inen MSIV w Atwood & N1omll Co, designers and manufacturers of high-quality special P 7I i pressure and pipe end loads, and while sabes for more than three quarters of a ~l h[ the operator was subjected simulta-century, is well known for its N1am ~ r Steam Isolation Vab es for nue' ear pow er ~ neously to an equivalent seismic load. stations. The company has been produe-The several pipe end loads were consid-47 p ) hg. cred the maximum worst-case loads that ing these reliaNe "Y" type sabes since would be associated with a guilletine the 6rst commercial nuc! car power sta-yE (h u, pipe break resulting from an uiiset tions were budt, and today counts more ,a g ., y } 3 (earthquake) or other emergency than 400 vahes instal led in and on order for Hodmg Water and Pressurized Water c-e ' s condition. Res. tor systems worldwide. ~ t )1 Test Valve Design History 4 4 Since Atwood & N1orrill first began .* ' tlk; ,. j Re valve used for the Pipe End Load / s" M Seismic Bend Test was a full-scalc 02-s. k'[p'$.,'ra],cias developing sabes suitable for main steam service, it has used as the basis for in.) production valve conforming to design'perfonnance specifications'w hich estabitsh the fo!!owiag salve features as [0

• y' ASN1E Section Ill, Class 2 requirements.

(( It was scheduled for service in a three-rP ' ben"; ev.ential or highly desirable: 7 Water Reactor plants in the U.S. loop 900 N1W Pressunzed Water Reactor . O, .tmg rehability plant. th > jn sunpheity Pipe End Load / Seismic Bend T@t shutit Test Program Test Fixture

• Lo 4 ;newure Jrop

+ An a%hty to open against dif ferential The purpose of this test was to show that The valve test fixture, developed by prmure the Atwood & Nfoml! vabe would oper-Atwood & N1omll*> Engineering Statt, An aJpstable closing time ate as designed and within specified time was designed so that axial, torsional, and + A n. cans of testing through partial requirements while subjected to internal bending loads could be applied to the strok.e and retum The present Atwood & Niorrill valve, a "i~ T. / i m,,.e . [hD59EfMIQ@ E% "Y" type glebe valve with an air /spnng.

• V hT4/QVQh.

Q d )hh. gSa. operaung >y3 tem, combines a number at, g features to meet these critena. .MK.M Af "b',y i e The early success of Atwood & Stomil O %.YC$. } e-J

• *4.. ME}E "Y" type valves in Boiling Water Reac-tor plants led to their consideration for

, l $ "1.. .4 l-hg,,h4.ty g p ,h,/ c and use in Pressurized Water Reactor --ma %. wN, q plants. For PW R installations, the valves ~ s 3 inwrporate the esclusive Atwood & ,,? %. arf,,',_ _ .~$ . [f '.; ( + .m,p N1.a nit art:eulated pdct, and the patented

p-%i.

Q*[. $ a **ai* y,,,... g#g'8 /r g skirt seal w hich enaNes the vabe to pro-irl?

• M yJ vide shutoff w nh dow in either direction.

D, M@p[ht Y p"i k [L , _ [h t,,f b -jSh(JM h$ Qualification Test Programs V Frnn the time it produced its first Stain 3 ,%g % t% g Steam Isolation Vabes in 1966, Atwood h. 2 'q gh 's & mmll has conducted both static and op ational tests to qualify its designs t O d k.,Qffh3 g L /ggy 7 a.ii to ensure that the valves met current A,ct j i ) ,_ g e 6 x ..n g g]p] g.y MO4-ifM; - speiticatiens. One of the more signiti-v : 4 j ?p f,',

-

g j

c.u.t tats in this ongning program was a r g,. h te. Pg,e End Load and Seistme Bend Test. The test was a demonstration of operabd-The 32-in. test s alve mounted between son. thics stos - r.1 utes.n the pipe-load fixture at Atwood & Momirs Sa:em, V - msetts ity by full seale prototype testmg. one of plant. The come ned we.gnt of the r,xture ar'd va!'.e onceucem tons. the preferred methods described in viewing the test are personnel from comesteand in emattonal cus-USNRC Regulatory Guide 1.48. tomers of Atwood & Momil. ' i!, l i .\\ f L 2312 097

Y.*, y.q. 'E1,2 ci.. ?lCf""h' L

c

%.-:u. p :y 4

• %&.ga

-: 4 s.n. ,,.r. it nn%y.y. W.P... ^ j. y, ; pr 4 w;;;; et fx. s e w ~ d.. $alf 'N1 x ' '*" T} 11. [ p%

• ?

4,. - lW w g l &~ G t.. +q q u% Nmw%m:l%i h% hffW u&.. w ? ~ f m .s '~5tN5@$k$kl%$hg,N,tN s%eW*ern e%c ;f, ed@..rM N...k d i h,w'iscM P~ 'fL Nii i % qp %5d@k N

• • • • '"'*S

valve body whilc hydrostatic pressure @%nH5===rzB;g===fsp'lters " ~ "w m" g "g'. W ChT] was maintained within the valve, and ~3 ' ^'f".$' Y +f.$.M' ;;'w 'g79,M[rg h ir ;h',q% "'fl

c -

' ' r while an equivalent. seismic load was . * - ~ ~ ',, 3 U-hJ k ' ]p Q applied simultaneously to the operator. %{ Strain gages and other instrumentation /;. c ph - were attached to the test valve at strategic [q M f h hi, i Gb I,.k MKMQ e .j f*f locations so that both dynamic and static l' Q. ,. c. t M,, "n

• j measurements could be made to deter-y N

7 d "'F mine stem loads, body stresses, closure times, and other pertinent data. ,,, ; +,j.' gh g - - gg-wy y g y;.

4 g.,., y

,\\ N M f g 4 J/J b%f \\ f -: \\ Axial Load Test -f +Ji de R. P*- g. 3. g.5% ' g yA.,g,p.x. g g; % e h..<.,,;r /.fr ^f's g'gr,.p..n.% A During the asialload test. the vahe body m., t .:w g

12. Q '= g-. ~N !a'j e.

g [ h [v,7k g""5 -. T d. h 4 4 ~* Q - $ was subjected to hydrostatic pressure so. EE-that the loads on the end plates wcre . ' - g -a! W ' 4 transmitted through the body flanges to M*d .ziMh-A M ' E M 'f,,* A [ h hh.j/ create an axial or tensile loa,d on the L. r -iK4_} y.d s valve. By analysis. Atwood & Morrill Winng from instrumentation on the tes. alve was brougnt to a centrol had determined that a tensile load would center wnere informaton was taken from visuai readout de Aces. be more severe than a compressive load. (7' 3' " Kob"" " 4 m,; '$ %g r u m -* w r~ :.1 m r h,.;

3...myqw~h. ?! b,h:'.,E'Ti $U

..,-a,7. .K:.,22gnF-i M4 Internal pressure was increased gradually IG9 .y f f'. U'E.A ev to approximately 1300 psig. With an ef-v... fcctae.ad. plate area of nearly 700 sq. I %se..ua.y L,yys ...,, 9. c r. .g. - K.. m. r.: Iy,,.. ~!i- %:!:. F ?.'*.;.'fMJ-'. ' f,4 %g ".[p<.VT fJ~ _ @;dm'f,3'I [k in., the resultant force on the valve body . -N N. [. E was an axial load of about 900,000 lb. e . Nya ggj.2 '9 ~ ,After operating the valve to demonstrate f .Qg, gl'%*" i 1 ggg...l.,,*[ its ability to close withm the required

v.4 H e

time, i seismic load was applied to the p M*. lO *E*~

. rf..9 i.m..

,]lM:@1-k,;..g$3!N M'i i.42 O QEk l g operat.: structure at its center of gravity, p

" t,3.

M and bt,Jy stress measurements were IG7 tix^ - u, DUMMTZ"'" UMEDs'- " * ^ ' taken as the load was increased. At the f - m D5 \\ l / f' ' ' 3 E/ Q'iYdF[,M 6'eh- '2 maximum seismic load of 30.000 lb {T'. (equivalent to 3 g horizontally and 4 g /r.. Y.~ 4 ",-} - e x. W vertically), the valve was agam cy- / s., w,., ' 1< ..jf'.'." ^

• 7: p,y,

cled under full load, and dynamic {,' ~. - . f.g } ,g"{,, :q measurements and closure times were , ' ',g.pMrsiitab%%.M$.?W.Tt.ST NO.C AXI Atl.' TEST) 0." g.7,q:!try-recorded.Ky}mM @@(A Q' +2 W.E::i w w a. % w Gu n di.c.: m 2312 098

s Torsional Load Test h"" C @i% S N C F " M *- V ""' W M 5 5. 9[E.A.i" W.,M.2MQ g%g.p %MV * 'W. t y-;g':?:f.gfg.g.g; Imniediately following the axial load gg,,,y, ..,,.j D.-/; -;g _ ,,j.73;r y gl7]E g*g* g,g,r test. and with the valve body still pres-p- ,;.Q, " . gjg.py,.g>./.3 surized and the operator under seismic

c....,. 8

.w w

tms W -

m loading, a torque or torsion load of - g Z..,..- $':g.e. j, f v'Q ;. j,. g c -- . ~.... g.'., f*,, 7.Vf'fg l 2.600.000 ft Ib' was imposed on the

v. M.

4E q ..g{..lQ M vahe body by bydraulic cylinders whieh 2.es0.0 o FT.La s. y twisted the forward or free end plate. The .l ' ifhltj tached to the test frame to hold one end of . O.c, - .. 5 rear or fned end plate was rigidly at-fg g., f. % y j ' ' g _. I T' the body sceure, f Q'y,,.y _. Agg ;N3.5, g .i, .h,d Body stresses and other static mea. w G: ~.8:. M,...-c.... .gNtQfrg. ~.vphN x y surements were recorded as pro- \\ 6 gressisely higher loads were apphed to i:.agd.,.-A;in%{ggy,1 . q.g,g. the vahe body. The valve was operated ,4A g( v'g j K-@%c ,,,y scietal times while maximum torque l[j%m$rbgQgt-wwj@g[g ^ _r; wa., applied. and closing times were 2.* thfP-c recorded. h#.I k ,[. TEST,,qO.2gogslo,, sgg M,- g, g.(. hft one of the support legs (inset) approxim&tery % in. off the Note that the resultant force on the frame was great enough to {. ..p floor. d Bend!ng Load Test .i. For the bending test. the fixture was con-verted to apply a bending load to the Q } Y [ U Y. F f % 7. [ E U M N @ 7 E W M ] cr a t ed b tween he end r. A

h. y ni r..'v-pi n.,w - Kg..W4 gg j;,.p.-

.ggg,g:;,Gy,4 4.g.y.,..yg-u ,j, yf,..,.y nyy.g,g.f b7 7, , ' g: maximum benJing moment of 2.500,000 ,.,. y = :. g g. g i ft Ib' was imposed on the vahe body .C,. ' Y. m..Y;, /'.?.?T T. V'M M .,.a~,. together with the internal pressure of i g n o.ooo tas.' p,#.g g,r. / j s a; yN.e - sy .a '. 1300 psig and seism.ic load of 30.000 lb a on the operator. W.~drf d * %6. t W- . c-

g. ~,42

v..w($.

~p..k,. r-g',{O,,,,,,, gwc. m's w.. f b ght

• g' g,

., c1 ] y '%[) g(f.j -ib;q" y The salve was operated at maxi. mum loading and the closing times and % -,,. g'*'65 t-* ggk, g y other dy n.ume me.asurements weic re- .h.m.4 corded. Body stresses had been mea-NNA Dg.'- d~r.,ar. ten 4 a y/**p,,Ua.-n-w.e{ ins ky s u Me sured as the bending load was increased M. 4W G.g.b ,-,.c ,.yg,y,:40.s g

• . g'n.jp_ g_i f g-

=, gj rc 5. p. e$.gfr;<.,-, w w p<s.?j incrementally. eg W?* 14. tQr s.

• W % % lui.W L '

,.nl ~p? - Qv.% y - ;. s '.70%. AWUE$Mt.M T .?* $ib., G %s:: 2*9*Kiur [jy[* M7g egl;[N '7f(gh. +M"*.y[a [4,p()p% ...g e. g

• The fortes and mments imposed on the valve -

I

1. *Gy ends were calculated as the lo Jing that would v,

. s j.V. e. occur u hen the y se!J strength for the attached pip-h. dQd %h p.f f'hh. <w 7

• 5e.

[ dh%jhe<*, pE.s s T ,j .] ing of a typical PWR plant was developed. Smassa W'.s sunasastaammerasavaareEw NEEF""W'"EQT1*T.m*'*2,**fl"'MMMP*'B'F'"'*~_;u e m **T."M "O Test Results oU[,; ; W D c Simply stated, the Pipe End Load / Static Bend Test showed that: hL h _ $] _ j( j kf 3 U

1. Under all modes of testing, the valve closed in less than 5 seconds as required by the c'esign specifications.

2. Closure times were essentially the same under both full-load and no-load conditions, 73jd nao U//

3. For all test modes, stresses in the valve body remained within acceptablelimits as allowed under the ASME Code.

In essence, the valve opera ted under allload conditions as designed, and within the specified requirements. Therefore, Atwood & Morrillconsiders

• the test program a complete and realistic simulation of pipe end load and seismic load conditions.

v. c-

Future Valve Testing Atwood & Morrill is committed to the continuing development of Main Steam isolation Valves for both Boiling Water and Pres-surized Water Reactors. To this end, the company is fully pre-pared to carry on test programs which have, since 1966, verified the design excellence and performance reliability of Atwood & Morrill valves. QRi? UC 41, ' ' L F.I M;

• 4.: '

N r. _Y W b,,h f Y N$dk$ i ~ 37 M SIV nstalled vi test fixture. The hydraulic cyhnders Upper and lower hydrauhc cylincers were attached be-are connected to the " free ** end plate to create a torsion load on the valve body, tween free

• end and " fixed" and plates to create bend-log rnoment.

fIIPlM 5 i[M MJ h r = TgifFD If eOh g VALVES and ControlEquipment for [y-jhG PCWER PLANT DIL rNOUSTRY MAPINE & INDUSTRIAL SERVICE. NUCLEAR INDUSTRY g 6 i,' E r khvood & Morrill Co.,lnc. ['zy.h.PI ikhaY}S} ENGINEERS

• CESIGNERS e MANUFACTURERS / SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS Ots10, U.S.A.

2312 100 . e n,e s.. ..aa ......e e..

Technicai Uollet n // 03 { ,,,r gy gs q2ggyy, ; - p y g,3 m ' pa yTA,'.L k j kj b h[ I E[ h 1 j 'kT. ~~b" "M t"m% w M r 2Y Y'O ' *E M;k M $ A Technical Bulletin by Atwood & Morrill. Salem, Massachusetts 01970 U.S.A. - - ':-- m m-aw ,,m, - uu,, m n *z7-narvurm.v --r w m m

• syn;i.

Part of A Continuing Program by Il Son =a r="iow Test OT. a n Atwood &.\\forrull Dedicated to the De-s veloperserat of.\\tasire Stearrs isolatiors Valves for Nuclear Power Stations. QQ QQQ Qf f f&Q Atwood & Mernli Co., designers and manufactan:rs of high-quahty special ig" N.rL ]. j steel with stainic3s steel and hard. faced J ulves for more than three quarters of a I trim. The operator was an air and spring century, is well known for its Main I { l 7 __ n system of the " fail closed" design. The Steam hotation Vahes for nuclear power y; bi-directional vahe design is presently stations The company has been produc-I ing these reliable 'f Y" type valves since lf'. p i being furnished for acthe service in -N 5-l PWR plants, and conforms to ASME the hrst commercial nuclear power sta-p 4 Class 2 requirements. rions were oudt, and today counts more than 400 valves installed or on order for Q! ( ,1 4 g* Test System Bothng W ater and Pressunzed Water,i Reactor systems worldwide. Aftercan fully resiewing the capabihties Design History I f available now test facihties, Atwood y Since Atwood & Morrill tirst began 3 & Morrd! chose a nitrogen blowdown deseloping vabes suitable for main { q system to produce the required some kg flow. The flow test system located at the steam sersice, it has used as the basis for i m deugn ' performance specifications' ! au .i Naval Ship Engineenng Center facihtie, which estabbsh the following vahe { '{,p of the Philadelphia Nasy Yard.consnted features as being essential or hin,hly of (1) three accumulator tanks having.i desirable. maximum pressi.re rating of 1609 psig

• Operatmg rehabihty each and a combined storage capacay of e
• Design simphcity I

3000 cubic feet, (2) entrance piping and

• Tight shutoff I

an inlet header, and (3) exit pipmg and an

• l ow pressure.; rop l,

,,,.A %,,g, j exhaust stack system.

• An abihty to open against diffeential Qi[

^? pres 3nre . ;d The entrance piping, designed and fur.

• An adjustable closmg time nished by Atwood & Morrdi, connected
• A means of te ting through partial w% $w...)

The prewnt Atwood & Morrill valve, a w% E stroke and return. "Y" ty pe globe vahe with an airisp-ing A 32 inch MSiv ready for cackagir g and ship- , -y 4 7,m g operatmg system, combines a number of, ment to an 1100 MW PWR sta:;on. h L. ( / bg.,M A,$,,.;.vQf,,P"$: teatures to meet these entena. The early success of Atwood & Mornli The purpose of the Sonic Flow Test was .f 'g gg,y .s*S t Q' g@J y, .4 I g "Y" type s ahes in Boiling Water Rese. to show that the Atwood & Morrill Main $Q 3f ~ ~y for,Mants led to their consideration and Steam holation Valve would close h he-O use n Pressunzed Water Reactor plants. ; within specified tim.: limits against high q M; WQ + for PWR in>tallations, the vabes incor-reserse now rates and pressure differen- "'g T ~Q porate the esclusise Atwood & Morn!! articulated pdot and the patented skirt U,[M tiah such as would occur after a steam N DEC MEk se) ghich enaNes the vahe to pnnide line break in a nuclear power station. T he A.[C*(M. shutoll agamst ifow m either direction, idea of a pipe rupture n based on the Nt1 I gy y Qualification Test Programs piping could be Jescloped Junng an t n -g fri,d. ,' $li From the hme it produced its first Main carthquake or similat esent to cause a Steain bolanon Valves m 19f36, Atwood g ' (f' p % y,M g & Mornll hon conducted both static and guillotme break or complete separation

g. MW i of the pipe.

Y ,d , ;.3," j operanonal tests to qualify its designs , {j,a,- p. and to ensure that the valves met current i,v \\(7)fpl,, gecifications. A test of considerat,'e ) Test Valve -eg {E=g ,.j,. sigmlicance in this ongoing program was a Some Flow Tc5r designed to comply ! The valve selected for the Dow test was a O ' h- %- withoneof the preferred methodsof test.

26 m.ch production valve modined to ing described in USNRC Regulatory represent an esen larger 32 inch valve.

Om cf thenai steps danna the pmpara: ion tor Guide l.48,i c., full scale prototype test-l Both vahes are dcsigned to close and f,$[p,[7,e7c"{# cl, syg],[ ing. This test w as the first ever perf ormed - shut off Gow m either direction. Basic ' rna,ung the hooeup un :ne vaw in ino open on a vabe as large as a 26 inch vahe. > construction of the test vahe was carbon pos. tion reacy to inp closed ?P " 1 2312 101

J ""I % E 7 gg positioned in the system so that flow thru i' h dh d h El I the valve was opposite to the direction of ~Mk2 pf; 3 n rmal steam flow which would be from j{m # y -sEs 3 the c. a generator to the turbine. Such a 4 T,ct hg.,pgE '- i reverse flow condition woutd oecur in the g g ,C esent of a gui!!otine or major pipe failure

g

~w .= ~ ~ 9d3::;3m upstream of the Main Steam isolanon 'E MIN b U Valve. For each test, the storage tanks were filled with nitrogen, and the en-E ,t trance piping, valse, and exit piping up W.b E, e ' ' 3 to the rupture Jisc were pressurized The y' M C N ._J' explosive charge on the rupture di: sas 3j 9 5 - then detonated to initiate flow, and.aer a i i l,, -. ' ' .4 short predetermined time delay w;uch i u p, Q y \\. pernutted sonic Dow to be estabbshed, p the valve was signalled to c'ose. i e h E f

A The first test was made at approximaicly 1gh.

h h+- f., ic .-Q-50 per cent of full test pressure to verify 70s. i ".*

• the operabihty of the system and in-N g

K~ D strumentation. The second and third test, fy ?" .* - =. %,J ;w. a M,,,_ d g -i were run at full pressure and demon. strated that the speed of closure could be Q , e,p g-t h k ,'. sI " '7""JC 9,f7fyd *,.T Q6]* "),_ tJ .r/ f g r N ; "' n o ^ g ?. w e. L _,

1. ., 4

~8. Es- $g..- $ r.T 3 %Md 7 V

1. l s-d

": ~ w %. %=sQ g \\'. y 3. My;&*f e ,e g s 4 r .~ k B S $@dE$ $ OlI$h.,,,, Q7G

• • ' ~- @

g; _, ~. 0 Top. The entrance piping of the test system connected the storage tanks to the 4 M***1__.. M(,.Q$} } 1t header up3 ream of the valve. (The spool pece in the foreground is part of the esit 2 ppeng, and Contains one of the large holding flanges used to secure the rupture esc.) Bottom. The exit piping (minus the spool piece) downstream of the valve The Above. Shaped explosive charges were taped large flange on the exhaust header mates with that of the spool piece to hold the across the dished steel rupture d.sc to fracture rupture discs. The bndge like foundaten was specially des gned to absorD the thrust the disc pnor to t:ow. Below. Tuo frac:ure par-produced by the sonic flow. tern permitted the system pres 3Ue and f'ow ta 3 fald the d Sc ec]r9ents baC4 C!0dr;ly witrlout tragmenting tne disc. three storage tanks to a 26-inch header detonated, would tracture the disc to ini-pr g--gggmy pipe upstream of the valve. The exit pip-tiate the system flow. .a g ing also supplied by A&M, compnsed a .6-inch flanged spool piece immediately gg,. g .g y* ,.sh downstream of the salve, holding llanges stmmented to reco..! mlet and outlet

.g

,y q for the steel rupture discs, and a three pressures and temperatures, operstmg g NhgU. d pipe exhaust stack. The exhaust stacks cylinder pressure, poppet chatnber pres-74 were supported on a special foundation sure, stem strain, closing time, and other 4 ,%N fp d deugned to withstand an initial thrust of essential data needed to determine valse

• g f

1,000,000 lbs. and a steady-state thrust PC'f"unance.

'jt; of 500,000 lbs.

Reverse Flow Test @ify Each rupture dise was fitted with a A series of five reverse flow tests were di'.$ shi, ped esplosisc charge which, when performed dunng which the valse was 2312 102

controlled,and the valve would not "run " Poppet Position vs Time" For' Test A major purpose of the forward flow test away" and close too rapidly or with de-Nos. 4 and 5 note that the curves are was to demonstrate that the design mod-structise force. Following minor design nearly linear which means that the mo. ifications that had been made to enable modifications to the valse, the fourth and tion of the poppet remains virtually inde. the valve to close against reverse now. fifth tests were conducted at full f.ow and pendent of tiuid flow thru the valve. It is would not a!ter i:s ability toclose against pressure. The salve closed smoothly not sescrely affected by localized forec3 forward flow as originally demonstrated within the speatied time, and without developed by the flow stream. by the " State Line Test" in 1967. excessise forces on any of the compo-Forward Flow Test Another purpose was to demonstrate nents. 'lhe closure times are summarized that, w ith the same control >etting as used in the table below. After the rescrse flow tests were com-during reverse flow testing, the salse pleted, two additional tests were con-would again close within the specified One of the most significant aspects of the ducted with tiow from the normalinlet to time limit. rescr>c Ilow tests is shown in the graph. the normal outlet of the valve. The method of testing was the same as for the reserse flow tests, viz. the system was pressurized up to the rupture disc. Forward and flow was again initiated by detonat-Reverse Flow Tests Flow Tests ing the dise explosive charge, with the Test Numt:cr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 valse signalled to close af:er a predeter. Starting Pressure, psig 470 1300 1300 1200 1292 660 1280 mined time delay. The forward now clo. Closure time, secor'd3 4 14 12 3 3 3 3 sure times are also summarized in the table at left. 12 m g m ir/ m i[r%. % di.w., .q K.odN.,*, g ?!&Y? $$f M.k0YEfiflW&$ POPPET 9 . g.,, 4 9' hid g. g" "

• POSITION b

8"* 8[ $ YfN.N.Y'IEh VS. j M t{ Nr*4(gi@,$ TIME 6 N[2h-l(Q l'- Md 0.PM t.Ndd ".'.M 4 $8IOWkWI.'3\\' MYM f, f@y.; k VWj M;.p.p.. .. w. '4 5 g^a j ' " N". l _ j'.5 g6 ':: ' Ag : 0'0 .5 "1 1.5 2 2 3 seconds test 4

• • Poppet Position vs Time" test 5

.y m m m s mvT*-Pr? w *=ser m _=*rres g g j -lest Results Detailed analyses of the data recorded during the Sonic Flow Te.st show conclusively that:

1. The Atwood & Morrill"Y" type Main Steam isolation Valve will close satisfactorily against both forward and reverse flow and 2312 l03 within specified time requirements.

2. Because of the balanced disc design, valve closure can be controlled, and for a given control setting, it is virtually inde-pendent of fluid flow rate, fluid press"re, or fluid properties.

3. Closure against reverse or forward flow will not damage the valve or prevent subsequent operation.

Atwood & Morrillhas demonstrated thatits "Y" type Main Steam Isolation Valve meets or exceeds current requirements and the important criteria required for a bi directional shut-off valve in Main Steam service. " j 'D i [ ' L jllF1l!If !t 1 J m n

Future Valve Testing Atwood & Morrillis committed to the continuing development of Main Steam isolation Valves for both Boiling Water and Pres-surized Water Reactors. To this end, the company is fully pre-pared to carry on test programs which have, since 1966, verified the design excellence and performance reliability of Atwood & Morrill valves. '1 h D3hMy"gP-I v_ - Mk., r 7;. N-. 3 iU. N I .hPR@)s@S ~ i i i\\: '.' k Qt N,7*$ I :{} N Q.(' '). - bound Nitrogen was transferred a.4 3 i iMk j 7^N )] to the system for eaWow test. 9 '5" d W; ? Y.- 'e Q,dy Y-{dt fib$NWSk;;hLstGB M 2 D %--I, '2k 'h ss R g _ ;. ~ g" " ' = m; . p \\{ g-t w lJ M *- %.w fMAf, - Ndh $_$k ~.4 -. _ _', - to Y ^

ro7;n A television circuit enabled "hvo monitonng of g'

t each test, while a printed record of the various 4 .t-synals was recorded on the oscillograph pnnter M MA'*

• mumg

% ~ % ~ ~.. .._e pNg$$4) N J[, VALVES and ControlEquipmentfor ~*}$ }3}g }94 POWER PL ANT. OIL INDUSIIIY. MARINE & INDUS TRIAL SERvtCE

• NUCLEAR INOusinY Aw Cl. >

s p k.ood & h]arriR 00,lnc. I & ENGINEt9s

• DESIGNERS
• MANUTACTURERS 1 SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 0197% U.S.A.

l.;.k avs M S. I I 'p-c1970 by Ae it id & Morreil Co. Irsc. s 5m'c r*

Fnn The vaneaxial fans for which the seismic qualification analysis report was previously submitted was qualified for installation throughout the Sequoyah plant. Sbre specifically, the fans are installed at various elevations in the reactor and auxiliary - control buildings. The floor response spectra for the top elevation of each of these buildings envelop the response spectra for any lower floor elevations. Thece maximum floor response spectra for the two buildings are attached. Reactor building - Interior concrete structure Horizontal OBE spectra Figure D-30, U-S Figure D-60, E-W Vertical OBE spectrum Figure E-6 liorizontal SSE spectra Figure F-30, N-S Figure F-60, E-W Vertical SSE spectrum Figure G-6 Auxiliary - Control building IIorizontal OBS spectra Figure C-24, N-S Figure D-24, E-W Vertical CBE spectrum Two-thirds of the figure B-3 levels SSE levels are equal to twice the OBE levels. The maximum accelerations from these spectra are: OLE SSE Horizontal 3.5 g 4.0 g (D-30) (F-30) Vertical O.21 g 0.42 g (E-6) (G-6) 2312 105 (1)

~.-, f N ) O N O N W N E tr -O j[ O3De-HU >= O D LAJ WW% .t

• -* L H CZ O

CC V) U3 DO (D C OM I Z LAJ IH _e O HOH HC f D-w Cee 4 C H tr N C 14J C U V O tAJ J >= C Z ~ LaJ LaJ (AJ D O V) O t' _J J U wU O _.) LA) O O V) C D L CUZZ-C w >UO P- (n I (4 O C-HC H CL LaJ MZ%CD LAJ IAJ LAJ W Z O (D V)CD H O O

• -o U) O VJ Z Z Q Z H I tAJ taJ C m m C I CD j

7 O Z CL VJ CL % H = ca Z VJ Q V) EWMv eO j taJ LAJ Z CE C Q. O it OQ sewrOOZw Z 0 O O U La O tJ") in -g z til \\ ~u

s O 6 o-OM LL TZ

-f td a_ O CD ~b l O 'N ~b O N _7 O 2312 10 0 O I 4 I I i 5 00*9 00*S 00**/ 00*E 00 3 00*I 00*(P (0) NOTlHN77733H 79NO4Q7N

TENT 4ESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 02/21/74 RESPONSE ACCELERATI0tl SPECTRUM O SilP INTERIOR CONCRETE STRUCTURE m' HASS POINT tJ0 14 OAMPING RATIO 0.020 OPERATING BASIS EARTHOURKE EAST-WEST ACCELERATION oo E=4.8E06 PSI -u;- o $o --.9_ xx J Jwo u9-un x b.J uazo 09 a u- 'D N W u x N 8. ca w g .00 0.10 0'.20 0.30 0'.40 0'.50 0'.60 0'.70 0'.80 0'.90 l' PERIOD IN SECONOS FIGURE D. loo -g g

9 TENNESSEE VALLEY RUTHORITY 02/21/74 REGPONSE ACCELERATION SPECTRUM SNP INTERIOR CCNCRETE STRUCTURE $~ MRSS POINT NO. 14 ORNPING RATIO 0.020 OPERATING BASIS ERRTHOURKE VERTICAL ACCELERRTION S E=4 8E06 PSI ,a-o 5- _n_ a 1 ttJ __J w co o ~ oo 1 Ld W ZN 07 CL o_ (D La Z g o U i.00 0'.10 0'.20 0'.30 0'.40 0 50 0'.60 0'.70 0'.80 0'.90 I' PERIOD IN SECONDS FIGtA RE E.L, c i M N W W M W1 W M M

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 02/21/74 a RESPONSE ACCELERATION SPECTRUM y c-~ SNP INTERIOR CONCRETE STRUCTURE NASS POINT NO. 14 OAMPING RATIO 0 020 OESIGN BASIS ERRTHOURKE a NORTH-SOUTH RCCELERATION o E=4.8E06 PSI d-e v 200._ m CC a: w 3W8 o. oor C wwzo OT_ a-o w N W u cc o C1_ ca e o P T.00 0'.10 0'.20 0'.30 0.40 0 '. S 0 0'.60 0'.70 0'.80 0'.90 1 PERIOD IN SECONDS F IC,tt RE F.30 ~ na m m m em em w

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 02/21/74 RESPONSE RCCELERATION SPECTRUM

f SNP INTERIOR CONCRETE STRUCTURE

&~ MRSS POINT NO. 14 ORMPING RATIO 0.020 DESIGN BASIS EARTHOURKE ERST-WEST OCDELERRTION go E=4 8E06 PSI ,Ej 3 I 241 c C l J J JO PI Jwl i J ')co' Is 35_ /i 3 '" N Cr4 -d I\\ ~ l B l \\ N 4 ~ ca ,a i ~~ a t 3 00 0 10 C.20 0.30 0.40 0.S0 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1 PERIOD IN SECONDS .ELCo1R E F.L o _

TENNESSEE VALLEY RUTHORITY 02/21/74 RESPONSE ACCELERATION SPECTRutt o 9 SNP ItJTERIOR CONCRETE STRUCTURE o~ MASS POIllT t40 14 OAMPING RATIO 0.020 DESIGN BRSIS EARTHOURKE VERTICAL ACCELERAT10t1 E=4.8E06 PSI a-e> m Z08 C M L2J J L1J n I U1 Oo C 1 tu (D Zo oN Q-o-(D A ( 's L1J \\ M u ) N M M 8 00 0'.10 0 '.'E 0 0'.30 0'.40 0 '. S 0 0.60 0'.70 0'.80 0'.90 1 PERIOD IN SECONDS FIG 4 RE G,6

~~ w

===i

• ===

m m err + pa t~m nr.) Li'J; ma treC 01::3 EU TENNESSEE VALLEY RUTHORITY 12/17/73 o RESPONSE ACCELERATION SPECTRUM 9, StJP AUXILI ARY BLOG NASS POINT NO. 13 OAMPING RATIO 0.020 OPERATIONAL BASIS EARTHOUARE k FLOOR ELEVATION =701.2S g I 9-N-S HORIZONT AL ACCELERATlCN D 5g

~

3 J go~ s 3

o

)9 } -O t ) { N \\ u o N c;- N x 70.00 0.10 0..O 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0 80 0.90 1. 0-PERIOD IN SECONDS = <..:,E C. 2 L

t Is n E N d N a m Q O 'O NE~5 til in H 2 PJ >- O C C I' l HW D m U .-. a. O H o M (/J Z C ~ q) d a H in M _o IZ cf. N W HC C

• J Dm O id m Id CHd N

QU C C CO C (f) N O > cr. J m

• m Il C td tu CD C v3 Z C C _J O

JJ J tu > O C C3 *-* C b >UC HJCZ C - H CC CL > c tu J Z M Z Id N tu Id - m CIm U3 (f) M.3 6 m (d M f.o Z D a. Z H o td O C mCCI Z a. 03 a M C o (D L Z y) a. 03 E tu o = -oo .W td td Z C CO a. J l H E LG E C C IJ Id. i o LtJ oW I tn [ -d.Z I O C i, o~ w f_v -g i.o a_ I o O ~o O N ~ o 2312 113 e o l c O s 4 s - e 00*i OS*I 00 * (f', 03*I 09*0 08 0 w o r i w u a,0,6,* O rn1 ,u ,o u n.io m u

~

==

m m p.es m a==::a m ce eq n= rs e ewa we w! TEtJrJESSEE VALLEY A'JiHORITY 91/06/'74 oROUl!D RESP 0tJSE SPECTRUt1 o 0 SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLfit1T o~ DAt1PItJG RAT IO 0.020 {/ HORIZ0t4TAL GROUT 1D ACCELEPRTIDt1 OPERATI0tlAL SRSIS EARTHOUFKE a- [ Y a-a- ~ 7 u o N 8 n a-4 8 oGo o'. : o a'. a a o.3o o'. 4 o o.so o'. c o o'.70 o'. s o o'. s o l '. a PERIOD IN SECONOS Fi40RE 63

Auxiliary Air System Ccmcressor Auxiliary - Control Building - Elevation 73h Applicable floor response spectra are attached. Horizontal OBE spectra Figure C-lE, N-S Figure D-12, E-W Vertical OBE spectrum Two-thirds of the figure B-3 levels SSE levels are equal to twice the OBE levels. The seismic qualification test report (Wyle Laboratories report No. 42583-1) has been previously submitted for NRC-SQRT review. The equipment was subjected to a series of single frequency (sine beats,10 cycle / beat), multi-axis tests. The input acceleration levels to the equipment were: Horizontal 0.54 g - Equal components of 0.38 g in each principal horizontal axis of the equipment. Vertical 0.25 g Horizontal and vertical inputs were applied simultaneously. The sine beats were applied at frequencies corresponding to the observed natural frequencies of the equipment, i.e., 9,15,19, 21, 30, and 33 Hz. The test input acceleration levels were such that the corresponding response spectural acceleration was far in excess of the applicable floor response spectra peaks. The test procedure in effect applied the most severe seismic conditions (floor response spectra peaks) at the most critical frequencies (eculpment resonances). This testing represents a considerable amount of conservatism over sbr. ply enveloping the required response spectra. The attached plots illustrate the degree of conservatism provided by the CSE tests. 2312 115 (1)

~ O (1.3 G @ 9.4 HZ 2.6 G SSE) .0-TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 12/12/73 g RESPONSE ACCELERATION SPECTRUM g SNP AUXlLIARi BLOG o MASS POINT NO. 8 y 0AMPING HATfD 0.020 g DPERATIONAL BASIS EARTHOUAKE -s FLODR ELEVATION = 732.50 1.00- y E.W HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION M NOTE: Tile E.W SPECTRUM ENVELOPES THE N S. m O.80-k .73 G @ 7.7 HZ .65 G @ (1.46 G SSE) 11 HZ .66 G @ 7.2 HZ (1.3 G SSE) () (1.32 G SSE) 0.60- } .44 G @ 6.2 HZ (.88G SSE) 0.40- Nu N .33 G @ 12.5 HZ (.66 G SSE) 0.20-Ch .16 G ZPA (.32 G SSE) 0.00 3 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.00 0.90 1.0 PERIOD IN SECONDS FIGURE 0.12

7 o \\ i O M O cn g I NC .o D o M tLJ k X 2 de >O CE o M g k-tu D m O ~ c., o W % U3 I LC o G-o o Hox k r= ce v3 to Ho CC

• J o

l Dw a td N Lt1 C*O N mO Co o U3 & O >- Ct: J CD

• m Il C LLJ td CD o U3 Z JJ CE o.J o

J Lu >- o o CD m C N CE O Ct: Z~ H 6-- > 0 cc s a cc z o r c - - m Cr > c td J Z % Z td N to to - - o:~ m m x o e - tu % e z o c. Z w a t tu o c: - cc ce r Z Q. C/3 0 E o o t. Z w a_ m r tu o e g (n tu ta = c c o_ a - t -oo - cc w r o o u. Z Z I r. a I l O LU o CD -m. n o z m C3 O o-TZ - ; n_ tu c am ..o s a CJ o 2312 117 o C _7 i o o o 03'I 00 ' I, n s .,0 8.* 0,...., 0 9 O.. - -.O.t,' O. - -. 03'0 0C n .i

w.,, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 01/08/74 GROUND RESPONSE SPECTRUM SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT '23 G @ 6.9 HZ 0AMNG HATIO 0.020 3.30-(.58 G SSE) .O RT .27 G @ 2.4 HZ HORIZONTAL GROUND ACCELERATION n (.54 G SSE) OPERATIONAL BASIS EARTHOUAKE .36 VERT 0.25-G 1.20- 5 P 5$ .17 G @ 11 HZ g (.34G SSE) g .23 VERT 3.15-E 5 Si E N u 1.10-N g.075 G ZPA (.15 G SSE) .1 G VERI Q 1.05-1.00, 0.00 0.10 0.20 c.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.00 1.00 PERIOD IN SECONDS FIGURE B.3

i HORIZONTAL TEST RESPONSE SPECTRA DERIVED FROM 02. u ~ SINE BEAT (10 CYC/ BEAT) INPUTS AT EQUIPMENT NATURAL FREQUENCIES 10' TEST FREQUENCIES: ] NdM '.f 9.15,19,21,30,& 33 HZ H. -p fT-Tf- ' 2% DAMPING j NO EQUIPMEN : - . f- -+3-*i v ' 4 --- L t_. _L-i NATURAL FREQ. J'M 4 i i, e o _! _l._ i i i . _.__ p. BELOW 9 HZ

I -

'l h i: $ft .p., ___.p _. .,d. 'li' t p' : ; I l( !~ /N, !- i lc: -q! i ' l e m j 1. ' '. 1 j ) l. 4 1 l!i. ' l,l - .,l., .I. i{} ,_m g 2 ! 3_ '( ' ) il! , j [}, i: n.,

it.

[ -[_ A l.' i ! l i '-i l i i.o .l'.'

• f.4

. ll M; I',I ,,l.' ..I l, l m- ^ m .} l I~ ,6 m i L._.. {.a - L; ) ;W C 3. ,.i

4ii,

,,4 .i

i'

.i l a i. i , i, ,i z I' it -1 : i i / j H-(- o i-i i i: r r: 1.0, 2, .1y.,. .t-j i-g e i i i 1 F.3 i- ~ y 41\\t \\ \\ i -I l i l-3 d. ,t. .' A i, W \\ \\t .t-i ..i-l. l + 'i 4 i-i -f f 1, m I l 1 l-i l J i' - h %: iWI L[I I.I 'I;'i; . I,. I g,, l-I l-MN.h hW ' [I l'! ' l' "l i I i ~ y ".; M i l l / l- 'y 7 N ii ,ri: : i _ _ L_ I l _[ _ MIM@ .l1 i l-l 1 # -l ::: l- '.E i I i. l' '1 i i,;, h. i ,y 7 -- r-d p -i; --L l .. s ENVELOPE OF APPLICABLE l' m i, _i...i+.. i HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE i: m i-i l '. i ' i u I !!' f,h SPECTRA 2% DAMPING i ,.;.,Ic . l. : i 4 'i, ,., i: -*-- - t"h t- ,. i.., ,., i Y"h-t i , i.i. i. 1 t 6 i. i. 6 p., .I i.

,, t P

.i .I .i.i. 6.i .i .l-]._tJ'_..!_1. i i.i i., i, [~ i -- - i .l .l. , i j.. h... i, j .l .,,i, i .l.ji [: j l. l ~{

l:

l,

]T .lj 2 .....t. l l: l !n' i j -lv-

1

j. .... n, i i i 5 t.. i i I' f. , ; ll..' l' i p i l +

i',

m

u

.,j,- L! j; (. l- - q - ._L._....___.... _..__u _ _ _ _ _ E...J _i. _ l1 i I ;! l l i l' -[-,b l i p-- g-- j j !

i i

i t t-g i .h.... L. I l: l ! lt ...... _. fl I i l l j l! i { P lI. i i i i. l i i - i

.. ),.._. !,.. i,.!

'i _L, l _ a __ _Li._Lt ..__ l ,l, d L 1.0 10.0 100.0 FREQUENCY-HERTZ 2312 119

e e 10. ..i,- I. I, i i. .i .i,,, , i. - i .:i, ,4, ,+ i: i.i. .tg, i ii, _i

{

uhi.. i

ti!!:ii. ' il h l. 1 "-.:

i i i. ul ' m .nh 'l: i % VERTICAL TEST RESPONSE ,1 ~ 1 .l:, i, u 'l;, '.t '1 NO EQUIPMENT i 1 SPECTRUM DERIVED FROM 0.25 G H l" j

+,3 j

H fpJ :D itSINE BEAT (10 CYC/ BEAT) INPUTS I '. i',k

,i:,, NATURAL FREQ. .I1 -- BELOW 9 HZ ih9 7 AT EQUIPMENT NATUR AL

q. m. j :n i

.p tr i.i.e

m. -

-_..-t:.... .;. FREQUENCIES. .a _ - y.. r TEST F RE30ENCIES:

?:

2 9,15,19,21,30, & 33 HZ . }, u....... .p ./ 4: t ;i 0; i ....a;*;..l i W T., ;. - 2% DAMPING t (9 HZ TEST SPECTRUM SHOWN) :

. d..

i w =gI i id +h, t u m ....n. ,,, n.. l q i,,, , o i eu- = i q ;p;

- p i

+ t, i i i i i f',1 H [, I ' o p l.:it. ,., u

l e,

on n.1 t : g - r + 4 ad, r r*7 'm. tr' m 1 i

m i.

i i p rr !1H ih h ri n*' s P I H!, l o 1, ) n m.; ,i l'- i i i i- ...a >= 9 .,..1- ,,r., e q. -..y.i. n CC {.

l.

.lt-..l, .l, ,,jt,,, ,,.g .j., t... .gi. W 7 .t -+ 4., k-T' :' I ' t t! :l-l- ' t': If Iti 8 =J - l-j, f l, H t i l 61. + - l i, j ? itij ' ll ,,' '+i' w +t-j ..%..g.i!j. t i:[. .. :{: - LJ ij'- i.t:: i.

. ; ! } i. l M

.,l.. ,:[!E

l.

c2 l ,b k i I ' h' 6,~

• i ;.; 4 '!:

i ; i..i '.,,. *ij -,., T. %, 4*1 T*li ., ~. "

l:

l 2 ,-,..._F..,. ,,4.1 ;, - 11., ,,.t. f, +, 4. 1 I. 4 ..e ..i. t.. i ,ii. m li f

-i: @ '. hN.'

,1 4 !I; i! @ .i m-

M

. _. -+l : ,..g., g.

• ~

I I.f l ..,.'l:. '. :.! ll ~,,!4 . I.. 'l

• ,l

. !!, lIII j I ..w.., .r ,L.,,., 4_4. w. .o. n,,.;.. L. I ,_._ A.. ;., y..n. i 1, t. ,v 2 i

n. i.

1,.. .n m. .e a O, *, ti r,q s6 i + -, _. - 4 4..m4. A,,

t. t.' J' '.4'

-,1..H... {* h. -1

• ? I.'

t.' ' ;t t A j,1y e,t. t. i.* i .47.- ,t; i ;. i 1:r !!.,. p,

-t ;, er

: : t :,e

,o ;;;r H- .- ji o r _n-i 4+ _A !.l.; 4 .i. ,e 4 q. l ;-,.7 1 's . ENVELOPE OF APPLICABLE .i."..,,. IE ~' . l-J.,.ii.'t, .i.i. ..,, -..i. j . >..,. VERTICAL FLOOR RESPONSE.,..,..

.,n,r T

i

,,j. y:' . i... SPECTRUM -2% DAMPlNG { h ni,e io. nn i i ...+ l s, ny

j.,

n 1i d ', I ' i. '. I. I ; t ! !l' t. 1 - Di i I '1 '. i !. 8 ]. i. '!.!i ' !' i, h - .l';i + i 't I 1 2- . 6 1 + j-I M*; l.. 5I I

• fff.!!l.!!l $, H.I !. '

f i, ' l ..Il l ? 6 l . !., ' ; {'. ~ ...I. i .,i I d, ......- ?.. ,H. i.i,,,,.,. .i !,. is i l,.- ..i,! ,o l... i I. I i 1n1 t.- -.. i ,.,;, i i t. i.i. t .l. 4 o, ,i, a[. 3 .F.l' i t 3 i n. ,1 i. .p. ...___ L.._ _.' _ i_ t i t I l. j i. .; ;.1, ..__.._4.... . L- .o .i: j. + i

g.

___._..t,t . l.;

i. : l-

.l. g I ( i. ,i, f I i i f.'

k' t

[ .I,. .i I,l' i : - i I i J 1 l l 3 1.0

• ' " 10.0

' ' 100. FREQUENCY HERTZ 2312 120

GE Voltage Relays - Type IAV The IAV relays are qualified for installation in the 6900-volt shutdown board logic panels. The panels are located in: Auxiliary - Control building - Elevation 734 Applicable floor response spectra are attached. Horizontal OBE spectra Figure C-12, N-S Figure D-12, E-W Vertical OBE spectrum Two-thirds of the figure B-3 levels SSE levels are equal to twice the OBE levels. Pertinent excerpts from the Westinghouse teet report have been previously submitted for URC-SQET review. The logic panels were subjected to a series of single frequency (sine beats,10 cycle / beat), multiaxis tests. The input acceleration levels to the equipment were: Horizontal 0.44 g Vertical 0.13 g The sine beats were applied at frequencies throughout the seismic frequency

range, i.e., 1, 3, 7,11,15,19, 23, 27, 31, and 35 Hz, which included observed natural frequencies of the panels. There were no panel resonances below 18 Hz.

The conservatism of this test procedure is the same as that discussed for the auxiliary air system compressor. Similarly, attached plots illustrate the degree of conservatism provided by the SSE tests. The most severe seismic condition for the panel mounted relays can be established from the panel test data with its associated floor response spectra. For this particular situation, the maxiu=um horizontal seismic (SSE) response of the panel would be obtained from the response spectrum at a frequency corresponding to the lowest natural frequency of the equipment, i.e., 0.44 g at 18 Hz as shown on figure D-12. This maximum restonse acceleration of the panel in turn represents an appropriate inout acceleration criteria for the panel mounted relays. The panel is rigid in the vertical axis; therefore, the appropriate input acceleration to the panel mounted relays in the vertical axis would correspond to the zpa of the vertical floor response spectrum, 0.1 g SSE. The relays were in fact tested to considerably higher levels than those which could reasonably be established as discussed above. The actual test criteria for the relays was based on, and equally reflects, the high degree of con-servatism inherent in the panel assembly test procedure. Accentable input acceleration criteria for relay qualification Horizontal 0.44 g) 1 to 33 Hz Vertical 0.1 g ) 2312 121 -

Input acceleration neoliyd as relay test criteria. Horizoital 1.6 g ) O to 20 Hz Verticci 0.16 g) Horizontal 0.44 g) 20 to 35 Hz Vertical 0.13 g) The relays performed satisfactorily under application of the above test criteria and are therefore considered qualified for this installation. Note: This relay qualification would not be extended to any other installation without appropriate justification peculiar to that inst allation. 2312 122 9 J TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 12/17/73' RESPONSE ACCELERATION SPECTRUM O SNP AUXILIRRY BLDG NASS POINT NO. 8 DAMPING RATIO 0 020 OPERATIONAL BASIS EARTHOUAKE i FLOOR ELEVATION =732 50 0 N S HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION / \\ S i a t a-i s-1 Nu N O N / 8 h.00 0'.10 0'.20 0 30 0'.40 0'. S 0 0'. S 0 0'.70 0'.00 0'. S 0 1 PERIOD IN SECONDS 2 F16 ORE C.l'L

4 4 1.3 S 0 9.4 HZ TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 12/12/73 (2.6 G SSE) RESPONSE ACCELERATION SPECTRUM SNP AUXILIARY BLOG 1.20-MASS PolNT NO. 8 DAMPlNG HATIO 0.020 OPERATIONAL BASIS EARTHQUAKE FLOOR ELEVAT10N = 732.50 E-W HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION 1.00-I NOTE: THE E-W SPECTRUM ENVELOPES THE NS. G' s 0.80-9 .73 G @ 7.7 HZ i E, (1.46 G SSE) .66 G @ 7.2 HZ I IlZ g (1.3 G SSE) (1.32 G SSE) < 0.60 - El' 5 05 .44 G @ 6.2 HZ E (.88G SSE) y t

c 0.40-2@N Z

.33 G @ 12.5 HZ

• 1g

(.66 G SSE) RESPONSE SPECTRUM N 0.20-BROADENED BY 10% u .16 G ZPA N (.32 G SSE) 0.00, 4 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1 PERIOD IN SECONOS FIGURE D.12

n..

s...a. ..,c... p.v.s

y....

w.a-r.;. r TENNESSEE VALLEY AUT110RITY 01/02/74 GROUND flESPONSE SPECTflUM .29 C O 6.9 HZ SEQUOYAll NUCLEAR PLANT 1.30-(.58 G SSE) DAMPING RATIO 0.020 .39 VERT .27 G G 2.4 HZ HORIZONTAL Gl10UND ACCELERATION o (30 VEflT .54 G SSE) OPERATIONAL BASIS EAFITHQUAKE 1.25-2 1.20- 5 5 E uj .17 G G 11 ilZ (.34G SSE) = y .23 VEllT i.15-E y Si !E .10-N g g.075 G ZPA { (.15 G SSE) .1 G VEilT .05-N w 2 .00, y 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.00 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.DC PEll100 IN SECONDS ~--- FIGURE B.3

,n- .t. .I. ..I. I, ..g l ~ .i 6 T + - i< ...e. I' ,i a ' i e-3 ..t.. . 1.i il, I i: i i i , i .i. 1 i i ii ... lia.i ., j

i.

i j i lj; l., e i . l. i . l;'l 3 11 i t j ii; 'l

1;.

l

,,1 li

'l i l:!Ti i l' - ' ,l.,' 6 lI: .lt 4 i . l; l ,'! ! j !,,l l,,' i ll

'i.

j . i, 'l ll li I

n., i.,: '

i,j 'i , i 6,.

.4;,{.,

.tI, l. .I. i 6 ,i e ! 4 4 3 ' l.. . k, t ti '.'.! '.Y I f!! ;I '.' ' l '. I i J !'tl T i g. q_ i 'l. :: i ' .t!: i.. .i. l ,i. ,I t '. i !. l ' ~ '

l:

,1' ,l ,i..' l ' ' a,.. i j i i: i i. i., ,.,.i . l.: .p. ..ln i,1 ill. I,., ) 8 r . i i i.- l 1ti 43

4.

't' i*!e 'l: l' NO EQUIPMENT } ti

I!

H!. i!:: I i

ll ll !!D

} NATURAL FREQ N., Ii Hl; R H- .,h "..' BELOW 18 HZ !I '!ii i; t 10. .i.. '. 2_ .i. .i. q'.,.',. ~ ,i ..i., i., HORIZONTAL TEST RESPONSE J .l. ....{p is , SPECTRA DERIVED FROM O 44 G y-j

11..

iu .n- ,c A w,,, w - c:p. f; SINE BEAT (10 CYC/ BEAT) INPUTS AT m

I!i li'i.

e ~ i r 33,i[..I2

i EQUIPMENT NATURAL FREQUENCIES l

i ? :+ g ? l !:,

p a;'

- :::.p at p :::- r TEST FREQUENCIES: o i l'E.. ' t b

i t 1,3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31, & 35 HZ

%- ". H i i 3 t i %- 4 4 1

u...

4 2% DAMPING ,1 r1 E ' }i l'.! y l .; 1 j . I: 'i~ 'l. if j..!.'*. y* i 'i 1. 1 bl. i. ~ EI l ' l I l e 4 4. 1 Tf'Ill ; 1,' .l' .[. 7 ! '*

• 1 L

l t

t

.l;.:t n. '.;'I...:

i

( 4 - n

P

r

-

• 4 P.

1' 4. +. --..t.6 L.3 6, 4 ,. -.,e -,t-4 -+6-- a .t ++ t + 4 * ( v.a. g +. . y l. 44 4 4 i. t .,.i 4 ge. w. s .L, 4, .4.. .,_ 4 -;- .r , p _._p +9 g9 ., p. y. _,j: -.g-.g 7.,. 7..,, 4 i+ p ,.. 4;. r -+ - r.- v...n. n-g -4 ,.f g i e 1.0 .x. y ya _.s..; ., g. -, g.. y.y... x... g. ,.x.. j p . g_.. - + p.w... g.3..g g p..g. 6 a..,{ y ::,, ,,x .. i. N p . A .g..g...g.g. g.. g .o .,-.-- +,.. .p. ..i i.i. .,.N..p. ....). y .l 4 A.+ ( .. m.. .op. .F . !.. prr 4 L - e. a o.A. w v_w i.. N.. A.% m..

c..

n. 4. :

l

. l-r. ..z .o I. i. l. :m:..,l ; 1:

1. t m

. :s I' -.y} : e.W. . l'.. ...l. s t:

1...

y, t- + i

.r

. I.i.; o, !,.' t' s4 ;m i ra,,fv,gl:;i.n.,,'. ~ . : ' :i n,. - W .......L.. .e .i.., n, f -p .p 4 n,,.. .I ..i i v n.- 7 .._Li.. i.i q ~ d'." ., O.. ENVELOPE OF APPLICABLE u i gy.. !! HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE. "! SPECTRA -2% D AMPING l!!! i.1 e ,' l i!4 _._._l._. 1.'.,,,-,'.. . l..... . n. 1. -l. i. l i o ,i

i

I I t I i 1 5 - l lll' ' 1

l L

1 (,, i; e 3 4 s., 10. 100. 23l2 }26 FREQUENCY. HERTZ .\\

v 10" }......_.4-y,,

p. ;,

- 4; _i_ A ';-- 4 -4 it ,o i.; 1 le ..l1 i ;} t;i. j. ':lo -l.. i e .i e I ~.

l: ! l.

.j+ .fi + ll: f m !l. t '. l. :

y...

Li!

e. i.

, ill,:'

l

i. . l: .j:

: ::.i

'.;! ;n, !:. '-

• d; ' t M;1g:,0 T h ', " p:

n:

,5 N0 EQUIPMENT - i !n' ih l. yi: n NATURAL FREQ. : m g' ' 3 . ;{im i t, -l: ". l... ' - - BELOW 18 HZ i ._. t, l :u..J L. .a: Ll - pt:

4...

4. m c,_p. :. .r, ..u, . n,. j ::. j.r, ' :. : l.; i. r i..., m. r g o . t. a o. m. 2.-.. 5 ,i:. . + .} j

f.. _-.

4 J .j. . n g,- . + q *q *. e t4 !? +'l m .f. . 3 ,'n . * " - + l :l t t t 'I ' ij 't.,' 4 ii W4 + 'li$4ea t** ? m, 4 a t,

1., 3, n,

7,3. : n.'* VERTICAL TEST RESPONSE i 1 1.0 SPECTRA DERIVED FROM 0.13 G f ,. i. p. SINE BEAT (10CYC/ BEAT)lNPUTS AT 3 . i 4 .q. p,.,... . i. .l...p i. .] 9 .+.. h .h.. EQUIPMENT NATURAL FREQUENCIES. 7 7 s., -o'* TEST FREQUENCIES:

L. m.

i. L ' l..(E',il:: t t , p: -a .,.(.. g i l ;. - i. -l' .~j ~ d. f 1,3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31, & 35 HZ i .i n.

n.n a::

(7,11,19 HZ TEST SPECTR A SHOWN) u,

i

. : c,

J i"

2% DAMPING . j '.,: gg..... ' '. 'i r~ 2 ' 1 I i44 i. O J g p l-k.' !l' :b .t 1. 6 .it:1 -.1: .1' l.: ,'j. t g i

f i

' !!: l :: g. .?j '. i, w 4 2 a ,l,. y . l., ..I3,,, f,.,, F i y t. ,,i, 9, 4 L.., .l.. u g._ _. 4 ...-y i. ,s. .i ( ,:,.' '.t.q** ' '

5...*

i. _.- + -t p.. 3,b. l. i. l t t'< .i. i

. s,M

-,. p.. j ......,14

+ i t u {-,y]n j"t t

.p -._; .jh i r r m m:

r. -

n- + ,,, f. w.... .6 6 ...,..i.. . y... 4.. y.i. ,,-i.. ..r-n,. -_.._r.. .. i.

{.

p $d :-gl'

• Lj +

-+?it4 "it + rF-m + 't - l-i ENVELOPE OF APPLICABLE i.:Ii..

i..-. -

I n: :: o' '- - VERTICAL FLOOR RESPONSE i.

• i.ii.i,0 ;i

!. i. H i y a..< .I 3: SPECTRUM -2% DAMPING 3....,.... , ~.*r- ... i..,.. . i i. l~.. p, + 4 i, l I,n ..i. - e i i. I. .6 i l 1. !i: ib .{. .. -.!..j.

l i

._ r._ 1 .4.. i i 1 ::' n. i. i

.i.

' i; 1, '.il i 1 .. t i. ti il' l l. I i; 4 i-v 1 l i t. ).. !4, I, i.l) : i qi,.i: .,.l q '!,. 'l ,i, _I i. 3 3 2 4 . s. .m 100. FREQUENCY. HERTZ }}j} }}[ ~% s P @p- ]fg@ o

Static Inverter - System Cceponents Auxiliary - Control Building - Elevation,749 Applicable floor response spectra are included in the attachment. Horizontal OBE spectra Figure C-15, N-S Figure D-15, E-W Vertical OBE spectrum Two-thirds of the figu2 e B-3 levels SSE levels are equal to twice the OBE levels. The seismic qualification test report (Ogden Laboratories report No. F-73165) has been previously submitted to NRC-SQRT for review. Additionally, a present-ation was submitted to NRC which illustrated the conservatism of the SSE testing imposed on the static inverter assembly. A copy of the TVA to ::RC transmittal letter with the information partaining to the inverter qualification tests is attached. 2312 128

50CC Chestnut Street Tower 11 3AN 3 1979 Director of Luclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. S. A. Varga, Chief Light liater Reactors Branch :;o. 4 Division of Proj ect Management U.S. Luclear Regulatory Cocaission Washington, DC 20555

Dear Mr. Varca:

In the Matter of the Application of ) Docket hos. 50-327 Tennessee Valley Authority ) 50-328 In response to a verbal request by Don Lasher of the NRC staff during the telepnene conversation of September 21, 1973, enclosed is additional caterial on seisraic testing of neutron detectors and Balance of Plant (BOP) Class lE equipment qualification. The LOP Class lE qualification data includes the 125-volt vital battery charger, tuotor control centers, and seisuic qualification test of the static inverter. Also enclosed is a draft of TVA's revised response to Q6.36. Very truly yours, J. E. Gilleland Assistant Manager of Power .nclo.< ur o (2) 2312 129

SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PIANT SEISMIC QUALIFICATION TEST OF STATIC INVERTER STATIC PORER, INC. 06 en Technology Laboratories, Incorporated d

Reference:

Report F-73165 September 1973 The static inverter was subjected to a number of slow sine sweep tests followed by a series of sine dwell tests for qualification to safe shutdown earthquake levels. The sine dwells were performed at frequencies corresponding to the observed natural frequencies of the equipment. The test input acceleration levels vera such that the corresponding response spectral acceleration was far in excess of the applicable floor response spectra peaks. The test procedure in effect applied the most severe seismic conditions (floor response spectra peaks) at the most critical frequencies (equipment resonance). This testing represents a considerable amount of conservatism over simply enveloping the required response spectra. The attached plot illustrates the degree of conservatism provided by the SSE tests. The updated applicable floor response spectra are also attached. 2312 130

a i e 7_.7Am% \\CO%... _,..., _ _, F .p l .- r.. ,, r- .t n era rgw L..g.. + - ~r-+. .4 9 p_.. .._F - e --i+ H r.- M R g M C S.. T _. q...R@S3 A%E.. 4 _F.,. H -, + ++,4.. - r4 r.>,, e + + , ?!$ ??r?.i!. '.9 p :.r%.LM_t-M_PH g g ggg g :gg;g g,gg j I t .. _ _.t.w. -,. i g.2.. %...=. %. J.y; =. =.. - t [ - I =.:-. T.-._ t + ... L=;3_ := -.._. m - 2 =r -_ _g.- p _i, NE 'DW.L t_..\\wM'%._R r=@hs,iL.. 3 +b,M,-f -' :. M K"U d.iM. 3 4 E Q 0 G L.C E. L..'__.. _. j_

r._; r._v

. ~. ' - ~* _' -,F t r ~,-- ,. r.f a t .I r ..,4 r r +, r.-r-i e 3 g g 1. g g y ]- { (" g"~* %..* } .= tr=_

• L

,_:..._ g._ - 6 9 2 l i pggg;;;---t-*-*+6-~ - + - - -

,b;_..- w r

g - - - - - - c = 7,m . - _ - y _ 7u__%,A.3,. y..j. __.. 6 (.' C Q ] R, S.; V'} g._ Q. g.) i' ~~ i 3 .3 1 4 e% e -,-.e 3 4- ~-- ' \\h,.pT -- -1 i\\ 7 Wa,- [.Q c7 0

1. & p r

,% +-. g@.+E.o'l -hg a+- g. - + 4-+~ i [ ^ rn tr r,- t' t,- -r r ao.. i ,, o tm rT r ., 4r rM trrmr rr*- hd t-r f F-F-.*Nttr -t+t,- F+t'~ti - +._T.3, \\bgqq gpgr. gg. gg __ b ~ - T * - - " --m-ri --r \\og _4 _._,_ _ _q-,-.- l T-'d* *' OHWF t't 'H ' * ?'i-F # ' ' } -i-W -H-tt t+'+tth* t4T rH' W '4 E f e---+ *-*se m m. --t + j r++n-rmM+ H-- M+ + +H -t-:.. m++H+m*+HWrai * -' -r + , hi-p= eiusE==9MHbe E O =e

1. Et=i4=#RR e#1)M@mE+== ~==l?" "=*===- EePW4

- i 5 g@;-_rs,,s._,:s._[=._E.!=..=_n. p.s..

59. =ntgr==7'a=..m _.-"EE.r.=.

_E=E i i. g--y.=.. a= = p= = p.. =.. _-y = . y. r, -_r i . _. a ,.a. .t._...,,.._.-__,,., _, _ t___$ - -,...o., . r, .-, p. r M,. .l w,,.r, M... l + -. __ r,-- _.._, v. .._E c, H 4+ +...-. / LJ -- +t

.._.

w - p___ '._t=....g. =..3._:.=4 k_..-

1 . ' '.. t. 3 gJ..n.,r._ ..- p. - _.._. _f,_,_ ~_ k.... .=_ .. _.= _:= =.. :.v._ :p. r =.._ >_._....[_-- _- a -.: , t+: = =._= __ .... =e. __=.._.._ -- ~ ~ t.~ ;=,:== p..nb.=. :* =tn-g- ~ ~ =

u y

-d.u:2 :=:Ei.::n=:::r_m = y. S.

= = : c== ;;z

. := \\tr=r.3-- E = r=._... =__.= u ut.p=.=={a: n= - r

T

=

3 .a -e.., r*. F_ -_.,_/ t. a_ 7 ~.r...nc . -) ,,. t._u. h-.A.. _, w.., _r. .... t..: ~ -. -.tq .+ ,,o .i .r.&,. . -. 2. % _.- D -4~~'i- -4 .+ +-m -r. , s -J .H.. -~-+ 4+s a~ 4W '++ r *1 --+ - - tti-W ttt,- - - ' F-- ++..'. s,+ + -,-' , + H++ -v v s- .e + M W-:# m. - %, r--,..i m"a " m r e/-r0-]O,. b ^ M"a-.-%. 4. H L4y ' .1.1 y4.1j L ++ i 4 .Jr r_r s_ .a r.+4 {. - - - 2 4.. .;+- l'* ! i 1 44 i 4 a.. g. .2 i

1. g... sbHHbfh, t WH-FtH Ht.

.,......,,_"....._r..._,_..-_._.2' D' l:,i Hb % 4.Ng .W' M N 4 H,ll l" m E h r 5.0a

3.._.,

. g,. - ,__ _ -.. y.., 1 ll jy.- - >.. .,t--+---.+e 4+- , / M r++ t-.-t+r-.-- -t-- n r.t-.--+- a-~ e.+ F+ - F

• 7 p-.-- t - -- -

5.:: HF--+r-4- . r* r--vf rt-r r,- re -r e -r--H 4 en -i + r+ t-t- -, N 4 +. -eH +.t r m r i ' --

• r m 6- + F-' tW %

H+i-H+ t #@t"-t-i+ R .rHI

ll.

.M ,.. MH-- i ++4 5 ! { [ t..... -. '.= _!.._ FEr=u. n:a.EE:=.=b.u=r. i=_ - =r, u- _ Ci- $-itif5 # 5 in.5: EdfWii EWEUMN:EE4ELMEEiEE5Ml-E.355En=hi-P E M5 i i .i== 0. - r==de:.= r. = - - - - - - :. = =

=r==~

r:2: =fiPEI= =.t '.n:l==_=S :t::c h=_r=d=_- :== L* =_ _ _ ;

r_n =

er-4 __ _ _. . r:N:= = t 4 7....__..W._ _. _. .: r .. _ _ - - ---.e .,....u... . - r.u., r,,m.,. r.. .t..- py., 4 n,. b- -Fr. "a,...,r '.t",-." p i- " r~v. a. r7 _.. . e _. .... l*. m. ~

• t

-*. -."6."..p-M+._.-_. .y _.,._,c.

• +

+ t:r l 3 .... l : : - Q.r= h.... fn.. [ E h. 7 -.h O.R._2 [.' : _- -- d..

• n.1=;[

_1 i. 0.- ..g_.:' g.--.......7 O...=. )y..__:_:. t rn. ;*_.- _ f. _ _C , u. U. -.T. au. -- *. {.- ,A. = r.- _: t-UD9 k. QY. ,b ': M D - ih =*~-' t-

.._ hM. MQ*g"'Q\\,,,,,,,

( . ~.7 ' '. '.~~ 7 I. *i.',i t.I1..'. .4 i g t r... ., 7 v.. p,. 'j.. '.-~y 'm,,T. ;h,. ~-,-*.7 T . r., _r. .4 @l q.f ' ' ]t-h+1 r$r n ' ~. . 4 + .3Ni~'.I 'T l t i e H&II# g: i + r i H rtq p f n r h on 1 n i i e i : i i p u m n, i m o nir.,m i i i i u rrrrri rti-rrrarrm-.n r T p,t 2 a + e e 7 e s to 2 3 4 6 6 7 o 9 10 2 3 + 6 6 7 a e ic \\.O lo. \\ccs, f Y ~ s 2312 131 fB M NO N

k. *4

6 %- w- ' 6 u TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 12/17/73 RESPONSE ACCELERATION SPECTRUN g m SNP AUXILIARY BLOG d-NASS POINT NO. 9 oat 1 PING RATIO 0.020 OPERATIONAL BASIS EARTHOUAKE FLOOR ELEVATION:748.50 N-S HORIZ0!!TAL ACCELERATION 8 8 c;- Nu N 8. u O N 8 s-S r 00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0 40 0.S0 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.0C ~l! PERIOD IN SECONOS ms, # - c. is

b=end W W 6.s bas b=d /w w w w u G a TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 12/12/73 RESPONSE ACCELERATION SPECTRUM om SNP AUXILIARY BLOG ~~ NASS' POINT NO. 9 DANPING RATIO 0.020 OPERATIONAL BASIS EARTHOURKE FLOOR ELEVATION:748.50 om E-H HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION l-j 5S 1 )S Nu N i .'o

w u

U b j S a- ~ ~ 8 cO. 0 0 1 i r i T-i i i i i 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0 80 0.90 1.0 PERIOD IN SECONOS ~ T Ft 40 RE. D. I 5

b w w w 6 w TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 01/08/74 GROUf10 RESPONSE SPECTRuti gn SEQUDYAH NUCLEAR PLANT a-DAMPING RATIO 0.020 HORIZ0tJTAL GROUND ACCELERATION OPERATIONAL BASIS EARTHOURKE m l [ 'V = a-a- N V o 7_ N o u 4 o .o. S. Y. 00 0'.10 0 23 0'.30 0'.40 0'. S 0 0'.60 0 '. '7 0 0'.80 0'.90 IkJC i PERIOD IN SECONDS c FIGURE B3

Motor Control Center and Switchgear A. Motor Control Center (MCC) Auxiliary - Control building - up to elevation 749 Diesel generator building - up to elevation 740.5 Applicable floor response spectra are attached. Auxiliary - Control building Horizontal OBE spectra Figure C-15, U-S Figice D-15, E-W Vertical OBE spectrum Two-thirds of the figure B-3 levels Diesel - Generator building Horizontal OBE spectrum Figure 10 - Applicable in each of two perpendicular horizontal axes. Vertical OBE spectrum Two-thirds of the figure 10 levels SEE levels are equal to twice the OBE levels. Excerpts of the seismic qualification test report (University of Cincinnati report for Arrow Hart, Incorporated, dated March 1972) have been previously submitted for NRC-SQRT review. Initially, a typical 5-section MCC was tested as a complete assembly to determine its dynamic characteristics, i.e., natural frequencies, mode shapes, damping, etc. Low level sine sweep excitation and mechanical impedance transfer function analysis techniques were applied. From this testing, it was determined that the lowest horizontal natural frequency was 15 9 Hz in the side-to-side axis. The MCC was found to be rigid in the vertical axis. The most severe seismic condition for the combination starter units, as installed in the MCC assembly, can be established from the MCC assembly test data with its associated floor response spectra. For this particular situation, the maxi =um horizontal seismic (SSE) response of the panel would be obtained from the response spectrum at a frequency corresponding to the lowest natural frequency of the equipment assembly, i.e., 0.92 g at 16 Hz as shown on figure 10. This maximum response acceleration of the MCC assembly in turn represents an appropriate input acceleration criteria for separate tests of the starter units. The "CC assembly is rigid in vertical axis; therefore, the appropriate incut acceleration to the starter unit in th'e vertical axis would correspond to the zpa of the vertical floor response spectrum, 0.49 g SSE. 2312 135 1

The combination starter units were subjected to a qualification test program wnich conservatively envelops their installed maximum seismic requirements as discussed above. 1. Each of the combination stcrter unit configurations was tested (slow sine sweep) to an input acceleration level of 0.72 g in each of three mutually perpendicular axes. 2 A representative unit (heaviect, most sensitive) was subjected to additional testing in each of its two perpendicular horizontal axes to a 1.2 g input acceleration level. 3. Although test records were not retained for documentation, it should be noted that the starter units were tested to levels far in excess of that required for seismic qualification for Sequoyah installation. Slow sine sweep testing was conducted at frequencies up to 50 Hz and at acceleration level in excess of 6.5 g's. Similarly, other devices were seismically qualified separately to levels which exceed the requirement for MCC installation. Relays, circuit interrupter units, and motor starter units with auxiliary contacts were tested (slow sine sweep) up to a frequency of 50 Hz at 2.0 g inout acceleration. The design configuration of each of these devices was such that each clearly had a "most sensitive axis"--along the axis of the moving parts of the devices. Because of this single axis mode-of-failure characteristic, the sirgle axis tests applied along the most sensitive axis of the devices provided adequate demonstration of seismic qualification. All of the devices withstood the test program with no equipment failure or misfunction during the tests, nor any degradation of equipment performance following the tests. The devices are therefore considered seismically qualified for installation in the MCC's. Note: As with the GE relays, qualification of these devices would not be extended to any other installation without appropriate justification peculiar to that installation. 2312 136.

e.-, m m m e,.,. s,,a n-~., TEtJNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 12/17/73 RESPONSE ACCELERATION SPECTRUN gm SNP AUXILIARY BLOG NASS POINT NO. 9 OAMPING RATIO 0.020 OPERATIONAL BASIS EARTHOURKE FLOOR ELEVATION:748.50 g m N-S HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION h 75g E du J Jg a. Jo-N C u j N !=*_ u 3 N J d S N ~ 8 ~[0.00 0'.10 0.20 0'.30 0'.40 0'.50 0'.60 0.70 0'.80 0'.90 l '. ( ~ PERIOD IN SECONDS F4ugE c.15

m ,ac.~. es:.<s ena* s.% H gw.3 614 6 w, vue, p 4 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORIT *....."273 RESPONSE ACCELERATION SPECinu .,y ~ 1.80-SNP AUXILIARY BLOG MASS POINT NO. 9 OAMPING RATIO 0.020 OPERATION AL BASIS EARTHQUAni. FLOOR ELEVATION = 748.50 E.W 110RIZONTAL ACCELERATiuis 1.50-J NOTE: THE E.W SPECTRUM ENVEu,r g Tile N-S. Tile Il0RIZONTAL FL0u"' *?S*0NSE j SPECTRA FOR ELEV. 748.Lg,VELOPE l Tile FLOOR RESPONSE SEce**R A Of ALL LOWER ELEVAT10N4,, 1.20_ 0.90-3 N U 0.60-u CD 0.30-NOTE: ACCELERATION LEVEL @ 15.9 IlZ IS ENVELOPED ~ BY Tile OlESEL-GEN. BLOG SPECTRUM -t-O.00 l 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.h ti 0.90 1. PERIOD IN SECONOS ' ' M 11111 0.15

~ m e=== a= p===t m paag powg m p==g meg sang as TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 01/08/74 GROUr10 RESPONSE SPECTRUM aq SEQUDYAH NUCLEAR PLANT o~ OAMPIrlG RATIO 0 020 HORIZONTAL GROUND ACCELERATION OPERATIONAL BASIS EARTHOURKE g i ] V 3 V z DS.. j -o Iru Jum J7 'J o~ I a go ~ D7 u L o-n N dg u* o 8 ~ g, O '. 0 0 0'.10 0.20 0'.30 0'.40 0'.50 0.60 0'.70 0'.80 0'. S 0 l. 7 PERIOD IN SECONOS Fi c,u RE 63

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY omr RESPONSE ACCELERAT10N SPECTRUM n DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING BASE SLAB EL.721.0 OAMPING RATIO 0.023 SEQUDYAH NUCLEAR PLANT OPERATION AL BASIS E ARTHOUAKE NOTE: THE HORIZONTAL OBE SPECTRUM m FOR ELEV. 740 IS OBTAINED BY MULTIPLYING THIS BASE SPECTRUM d BY 1.10 e O o- @ = w S tf z a a b $e N y m N O a m M U Y N Ei di. z O; N a =. E u E: 4 m SW N a o C o Eb A - RESPONSE SPECTRUM C N-BRO ADENED BY 10% o 0.37 g. E MAX. SLAB ACCEL. (.74 G SSE) .49 G VERT) r 0 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 'l.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 PER100 IN SECONDS FIGURE 10

Motor Control and Switchaear B. 6900 volt Switchgear Auxiliary - Control building - Elevation 734 Applicable floor response spectra are attached. Horizontal OBE spectra Figure C-12, N-S Figure D-12, E-W Vertical OBE spectrum Two-thirds of the figure B-3 levels SSE levels are equal to twice the OBE levels. Excerpts from the seismic qualification test report (Environmental Tectir.z Laboratories report No. 3720) have been previously submitted for NEC-C(hT review. The equipment was subjected to a series of single frequency, multiaxia seismic shock tests, i.e., decaying sinusoid. The input acceleration levels were: Horizontal 2.k g Vertical 1.75 g Horizontal and vertical inputs were applied simultaneously. The single frequency tests were conducted at 4, 6, and 10 Hz. There were no equipment natural frequencies below 17 Hz. The single frequency test input motion was in the nature of a slowly decaying sinusoid. Although a precise response spectrum for this particular input wave form is not readily available, the conservatism of the test should be obvious from the comparison of test ineut acceleration levels relative to the required response spectra levels. However, for the purpose of illustration, the conservative assumption is made that the response spectrum for the test =otion can be approximated by that of a Seycle/ beat sine beat. With this assumption, the degree of conservatism provided by the horizontal test ce=ponent is illustrated by the attached plot. The vertical axis is even more conservative than the horizontal. 2312 141 (1)

w ~ - c w pea-~, sag' - m smag - epwe~ anse, W peil '

• HM TENNESSEE VALLEY RUTHORITY 12/17/73 RESPONSE ACCELERRTION SPECTRUM SNP RUXILIARY BLOO MRSS POINT NO. 8 DANPING RATIO 0.020 OPERATIONAL BASIS EARTHOURKE FLOOR ELEVATION =732.S0 8

N 6 HORIZONTAL ACCELEt<RTION 6 m zo8 Wo. Ir Lt.J Jwo J'i~ 'J o I N UJ B Em ~ 01 fy t I N 2Jr 8 c;- N 8 ,9 0 00 0'.10 0.20 0'.30 0'.40 0 '. S 0 0'.60 0'.70 0'.80 0 90 l '- !y PERIOD IN SECONOS n Fl60RF C.I'L

m ~ .a4 i.-4 a

...i F...y

g.., g

e..,

g...

9 1.3 G @ 9A HZ S (2.6 G SSE) l TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 12/12/73 RESPONSE ACCELERATION SPECTRUM 1.20 SNP AUXILIARY BLDG MASS POINT NO. 8 DAMPlNG HATIO 0.020 OPERATIONAL BASIS EARTHQU AKE FLOOR ELEVATION = 732.50 E.W HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION 1.00 NOTE: THE E-W SPECTRUM ENVELOPES THE N4. 3 0.80 -5' .73 G O 7 7 HZ (1.46 G SSE) '11ffZ .6 2 u. HZ O j (1.32 G SSE) - (1.3 G SSE) 0.60 a <t Nf .44 G @ 6.2 HZ (.88 G SSE) x 0.40 - .3', G @ 12.5 HZ (.66 G SSE) N 0.20 - u .16 G ZPA y (.32 G SSE) N bu 0.00, i 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.? ' O.80 0.90 PERIOD IN SECONDS FIGURE D.12

m > = <a m poorg m >=e sw m ps TEtit4ESSEE VALLEY AUTriORI TY 01/08/74 GROUf10 RESP 0tJSE SPECTRUM S SEQUDYAH NUCLEAR PLAT 1T $~ ORMPING RATIO 0 020 HORIZONTAL GROUNO ACCELERATION OPERATIONAL BASIS EARTHOURKE gy < vf 5g

a-C J

J JW 37* Jo J h 3 l ~ j$~ ) N J u / N m. o u b 8 ('0 30 0'.10 O.20 0'.30 0'.40 0'.50 0'.60 0'.70 0'.80 0'.90 l '. t PERIOD IN SECO.NDS c-piques B.3

w 100.,..--- l l 1 !_l } 3 L --l 1 l i i i i i u g.-..T l l 7 ... l I I 1 .') 1: I j i- -l- .t - -.----...r-..;. .,i -- ...--......-.t. ..j... . q _.. -.,. l'.- .j t v. r i q 4 .p.. l 4. g .~ ..se E., ~% - _ q *. ~ - .7

• 7.-

I t F NO HORIZONTAL ' -- e i F j id - NATURAL FREQ..'. . j.- L j. , :] i : ' , [.. E BELOW 17 HZ. I ' R,, l. e ;c p -py s ', ' i-i p p 4 i I i. T .~~- ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~~ ' - - ' ' ~ ~ ' i' i 1 l. i ( . i: .b I y* 3, L HORIZONTAL TEST RESPONSE l i I w g SPECTRUM DERIVE 0 (CONSERVATIVE y l r i APPROXIMATION) FROM DECAYING l 5

10. '

.- SINUS 010 TEST INPUT. ) .? I TEST FREQUENCIES: l \\ i i

1. -. :

i. m 4,6, & 10 HZ - I i .s U (10 HZ TEST SPECTRUM SHOWN) + !\\. l I i . l W / g 2% D AMPlNG lj .\\ j l j ^.. _. -. _..~ -... - - e .q1] .; q._.... :.. j i L.. i..., _, ....i ' -L : { d i l i . _.._..f.. -.l..-j: -.. j:. i ..-..--a.---. l g 3..__.._. j ,I... J.i .i .I j.. 's I t- 'I g.: m-----.....;---.-.,.--. _. _ a...,. _. l-.....J.. i-1 .a l' l p

t s-I

{ti i f-(; 9 .[.

.p.

? l . i i- ]j: .] - j l j. .2._.. 1. ..w._.-_.. 3 t.r gj. p- - - ENVELOPE OF APPLICA8LE 7 l.. ~p HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE I <p' + t , l'.l SPECTRA -2% DAMPING w

i. T 'i' l ' I '.

o g' i i 1"0 t - L--- of7

• i s, 2

'. s a s

1.0 10 1.5

2. ', a

.s u 100. FREQUENCY. HERTZ 2312 145 m t \\

Motor Control Center and Switchgear C. 480-Volt Switchgear Auxiliary - Control building - Up to elevation 749 Applicable floor response spectra are attached. Horizontal OBE spectra Figure C-15, N-S Figure D-15, E-W Vertical CBE spectrum Two-thirds of the figure B-3 levels SSE levels are equal to twice the OBE levels. Excerpts from the seismic qualification test report (letter report from Westinghouse Switchgear Division) have been previously submitted for NRC-SQRT review. The equipment was subjected to a series of single frequency (sine beat,10 cycle / beat) single axis tests. The input accele-ration levels, applied in each of three mutually perpendicular axes, were: Up to 10 Hz - 0.8 g 10 to 13 Hz - 0.8 to 0.5 g (linear) Above 13 Hz - 0.5 g The sine beat tests were conducted at 5,10,15, 20, and 25 Hz and at equip-ment natural frequencies established from low level frequency sweep tests. Observed natural frequencies were: Pront-to-back axis - 15 Hz Side-to-side axis - 6.5 Hz Vertical axis - None below 25 Hz The conservatism of this test procedure is the same as that discussed for the auxiliary air system compressor. Similarly, the attached plots illustrate the degree of conservatism provided by the SSE tests. 2312 146 (1)

. ~. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 12/17/73 RESPONSE ACCELERATION SPECTRUM am SNP RUXILIARY BLOG ~ NASS POINT NO. 9 ~ OAMPING RATIO 0.020 OPERATIONAL BASIS EARTHOURKE FLOOR ELEVATION =748 50 g u; N-S HORI7DNTAL ACCELERATION 3

1. go_

Iru J >5 d J o-I rv u u D b L o-D N r S a-N ~ O 1 %.00 0'.10 0'.20 0',30 0'.40 0'.50 0'. G C O'.70 0'.80 0'.90 PERIOD In' GECONDS F tG d.c E. c.ts

1.80-- TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTiiORITY 12;12.73 RESPONSE ACCELERATION SPECTRUM SNP AUXILLARY BLOG MASS POINT NO. 9 0AMPlNG RATIO 0.020 1.5 G = 3.0 G SSE OPERATIONAL BASIS EARTHQUAKE y 9.43 HZ 1.50 e FLOOH ELEVAT10N = 748.50 f E.W HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION NOTE: THE E.W SPECTRUM ENVELOPES Tile NS. 3 5 1.20 3 s y 0.90 - 10.8 HZ 7.7 112 ,f h-W .82 G = 1.65 G SSE 3 0.60 12.2 HZ \\ 6 r 'A. j \\W.3 HZ .48 G =.96 G SSE Nu _ 0.30 - - ZPA.19 G =.38 G SSE 33 HZ CD 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.1 PERl00 IN SECONOS FIGURE 0.15

w TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 01/08/74 GROUND RESPONSE SPECTRUt1 S SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT $~ DAMPING RATIO 0 020 HORIZONTAL GROUND ACCELERATION OPERATIONAL BASIS EARTHOURKE g ( ~ (, ,5~ [* / . k/ 3 V IDo ~._ -o r ro _J uto J7 J o~ N a u o Io N 37 L o' O. a D e o~ ~' ~ 8 (r O '. 00 0'.10 0'.20 0'.30 0'.40 0'.50 0'.60 0'.70 0'.00 0'.90 PERIOD IN SECONOS o pi c,u ze .6 3

HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA DERIVED FROM SINE BEAT (10 CYC/ BEAT) TEST m INPUT MOTION. TEST INPUT ACCELERATION WAS: 0.8 G @ 5,6.5*, & 10 HZ 10.i

• SIDE.TO. SIDE AXIS ONLY np n

' T ~~ ~ ' ~ 3 "]' }~" l ' [- ~~~ ~ 0.5 G @ 15,20, & 25 HZ h; 6 l-------- (SPEC 1 RA SHOWN FOR h i 1 i l c .i. l _ _..._.-. 6.5,10, & 15 HZ TESTS) ~ . - -.-..-.! - J.. J 2% DAMPING Q i I [ i g .. I q. i-g.q, b I i i s i I- .i .i ._..{._ . - ~. i t w i . t..- ' __.-. 7. _ i j M ...l.. I ..t..: ~.. a..,

.l.. '.

t,

:: n

..q. t.: Z p- .. i tr p -l

(

I h',~ ,ID l q l j L T r .a a: 3 f . b i J. i I ' ^ .jd ' M /h. I: i I I _a P w l-l m u l . i. u., - -. -. i . --- +f

---

4-----

et i f5:

l l

i.- j t. il-l 1: { i l i 5 t I ....._.a. l. 4 ......, ~.... _ - - 1 ..... j j [

j., Q:'al: - l/,

4..

/ + t t' / l i --h_7_".-! 1.0 - i f l/ u_,N ; .j l 6 y._ N I ../ !

a.,.

i l ( .h i - -.. -. -. h. lT ' ~ -l,-, - ' J. l m -- - r- ..._.__....___.,i. N e i g _.--.r..... { .]. j.. I a g l .3.. g N i, 1

N l l

., 7, } -g = i. 's,._... l l. .I l. .]:

l l

j !D l 1 ...p.._.._. .. _. u.t.r. i,. r... ' ~ n i t I 3 i r' '--- ENVELOPE OF APPLICABLE ~~n V,S ! SPECTRA -2% DAMPING HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE .i ..).. 9-e' p i. i i i (VERTICAL FLOOR RESPONSE l t~-- ~~ SPECTRUM IS CONSIDER ABLY i j LOWER) 1 . j..{..- .j...{. 3 ln .L i e r l M., li i, i.__..._ .i j 1 1.s 2 2.s 3 4 5 6 7 1.0 10.

1. 3-2.s a

s 100. FREQUENCY. HERTZ 2312 150

Diesel Excitation System Diesel generator building - Elevation 722 - Base slab The applicable floor response spectrum is attached. Horizontal OBE spectrum Figure 10 - Applicable in each of two perpendicular horizontal axes. Vertical OBE spectrum Two-thirds of the figure 10 levels SSE levels are equal to twice the OBE levels. The seismic qualification test report (Exide Power Systems Division Technical report No. QCC-12) has been previously submitted for NRC-SQET review. The equipment was subjected to slow sine sweep, multiaxis test. The input acceleration levels to the equipment were: Horizontal - 0.7h g Vertical - 0.74 g Horizontal and vertical inputs were applied simultaneously. The frequency sweep rate was sufficiently slow to ensure full resonant buildup throughout the sweep range of 1 to 30 Hz. The conservatism of this test procedure is the same as that discussed for the auxiliary air system compressor. Similarly, the attached plot illustrates the degree of conservatism provided by the SSE tests. 2312 151 (1)

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 3.66 G @ 4.75 HZ RESPONSE ACCELERATION SPECTRUM 3.60 r (7.3 G SSE) OIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING BASE SLAB EL. 721.0 OAMPING HATIO 0.020 SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT l OPERATIONAL BASIS EARTHQUAKE 3.00- $ 2.40 3-5p. =tc 5.9 HZ 3.3 HZ $ '.8 0 1 1 -O-18G U (3.6 G SSE) E = E-ni E 1.20-U 0.60-

1. HZ 0.37 G.

~ ~ .37 G MAX. SLAB ACCEL. ( 74 G SSE) tn N 0 t t t-- 0 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 PERl00 IN SECONOS FIGURE 10

v ~ ~ ye i l- .i i, ,..{ l. i .i. .e t:> .i i 1 j .t. 4 HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL j ;. . j,.'.l ,j ..~ ~- L RESPONSE SPECTRA DERIVED lUi ' he. ,.. SINE SWEEP.

6e

_ b FROM 0.74 G INPUT SLOW i i.,.... p : ; r f 1. . :'l:'..., /,,"i

4...l. !....j FREQUENCY SWEEP RANGE

',_j@ 1 1 T0 30 HZ ![. t'* h 'l' Mlj j! ijn 2% DAMPING i 9 'P WW h ~l i ill' l. .O i .l! I l ' 'j ^j, ['; IU! i; fO' I i,Il l' .i-t. ..,y q., 6 l 't; M.

l. [i f m

i ,j' i - D* i 3 , t' I ' l t f.' f*jj ~ l ' a, ; l;- f l . j' t 8* I l .l,

i}.il r6 j

I -,.

.j e lj i,jj l ,g, i i, 2 10. o .I. t. ,s. .i-9 4 1 g .). 9 i. . ~t. i6.... . p. f P la l 'l l- ?I ' l' l l. it-i.i '*l-l l t d I; 'l ili.

':/

,.l .l!l El!'il tli l: !It!:

l

[ ~ U to

• f

i:

I f !!! i , ' :, : :.i n : i n n, i' l. .i i :,, mi. 48: 3 e .i... ,46., i,, im 8,e, l t .' [i I' [f I* } tin II \\l ! g..'I I! 't'! g i I ; l3 11. i .l . l -- ,q.. 1 '.9N.f.f.llji III' 1.; IN : i: M' It; :!: 1 .l;' < a i_.% f ;i Ni j d. lin, l: i tj;;

l:

i,'i . l l.i:" !. ::J U; id !d;,, : L, o. -l l1 h. .ij ..t,t 9, -t .+ y Il l 7. ; 9_ p. 7,.,. 7i.3 .1 4 i , i .4 6 i. e i e g, 6. 1 Li .1 -{ l 1.0 ,,i,4 4 6 i t i .l.; g !' :. I!: i .i 8

g.,

.,.g. ,,.3,. 3 ,..x - 3 y .i . w.., .. r s f,.., .in... y, ..... e ,,.i i. ,,,,i r l l.,..). j.l, .f..l..t. 3. l .'rh 't- 'il' h>l Ifi. ~[ l; l:ihhp-l l i l: /;-i + II!ii.%hj!!, ^ 'j t: i l l' p. 1. f' E:[! ENVELOPE OF APPLICABLE ! l ';.. . 1 .j.-- o' HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE -_ F {' : ,A l' I.. i SPECTRUM -2% DAMPING R ,,U 1: 'i l'i; 4, 2, 1 8 VERTICAL FLOOR RESPONSE .J, -i l- - SPECTRUM IS EQUAL TO .i.. i' 2/3 0F THE HORIZONTAL .l -+- t Fv t i + j,. 'N.. l' .j-i i q. i j 1 j li t. j i,

l.

.[. 'l i 2 4 3 2 4 e i, n. 1.!! 10. 100. s 4 FREQUENCY. HERTZ 2312 153

125 Volt DC Batteries Auxiliary - Control building - Elevation 749 Applicable floor response spectra are attached. Horizontal OBE spectra Figure C-15, N-S Figure D-15, E-W ~ Vertical OBE Spectrum Two-thirds of the figure B-3 levels SSE levels are equal to twice the OBE levels. The seismic qualification test report (TII Testing Laboratories report No. 55h7) has been previously submitted for ERC-SQET review. The batteries, installed in the battery rack, were subjected to a series of single frequency (sine dwell), single axis tests. The input acceleration levels to the equipment were: Horizontal Parallel to plates - 1.6 g Perpendicular to plates - 1.3 g Vertical - 0.51 g The sine dwell tests were applied at frequencies corresponding to the observed natural frequencies of the equipment, i.e., Horizontal Parallel to plates - 12 Hz Perpendicular to plates - 11 Hz Vertical - No resonance below 33 Hz, tested at 33 Hz The conservatism of the single frequency sine dwell test procedure is the same as that discussed for the auxiliary air system compressor. Attached plots illustrate the degree of conservatism provided by the SSE tests. For this particular equipment configuration, single axis testin6 is justified due to the absence of cross-axis dynamic coupling. 2312 154 (1)

~ TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 12/17/73 o RESPONSE ACCELERATION SPECTRUM 9, SNP RUXILIARY BLOG MASS POINT NO. 9 OAMPING RATIO 0.020 OPERATIONAL BASIS EARTHOUAKE FLOOR ELEVATION =748.50 N-S HORIIDHTAL ALCELERATION

• b z

D O._ I E D J dS a. J o-I N) u a 20 on. }3o m a w e S a- / h- ~ 8 N.00 0'.10 0'.20 0'.30 0'.40 0'.50 0'.60 0'.70 0'.80 0'.90 l' L PERIOD IN SECO.NDS FIG').9E. C.15

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 12/12/73 RESPONSE ACCELERATION SPECTRUM .80-SNP AUXILIARY BLOG MASS PolNT NO. 9 OAMPlNG RATIO 0.020 OPERATIONAL BASIS EARTHOUAKE FLOOR ELEVAT10N = 748.50 1.5 G = 3.0 G SSE E.W HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION 9.43 HZ 1.50-NOTE: THE E W SPECTRUM ENVELOPES Tile N S. THE HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR ELEV. 748.5 ENVELOPE THE FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA 0F 1.20-ALL LOWER FLOORS. 2: til-e U' <l e[ 7.7 HZ d 0.90 - 10.8 HZA o .82 G = 1.65 G SSE E N 5 u m g. N D.60- /.3 HZ 6 12.2 HZ ~ \\ .48 G =.96 G SSE m m 0.30- - - ZPA. G =.38 G SSE w 0.00-0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.'60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.0 PERl00 IN SECONOS FIGURE 0.15

}- N N l D O N O m, gg , a Z O O y lN HM Q CC W ED g l M E Id O O O WD JI 0 LL. OM> td W IHZ U CC O i >- a C UC 1 DWJO C Id l C Q. L N t/J O. O t/J cc Z e-. Id td C O D t/J J VJ W OC O JZJO CE CD l C COoM O r > CL 3 H _J O t/J Z C JC LJ 14 CZ td M I HO t/) CO Zm (O O >- Z OH idZCM NC O Z D D Q. M M m ZOOr tc 14 ..D td Cd td C C Q. OO H O v3 O =0 z l O J U w O V) m -d z i O a o O*

• Z

-y L I 2312 157 ~ O n -f 1 d o N . t C _] L 1 O O i i i , m..T

• 0 90 0 00'01.!

OC'O S 3 ' O, n. ..O Z,' O, i i s,,, S,i,* 0,, O n e om,s,

y *. I 0! I.. <w 9rD D g D [ b), ' o31 da b l w 100.

i.,,.

y o....... . wi, i. ., i., .i i ~' .,p. j. N0 HORIZONTAL i. .. { {~ .q i;,, . p' i NATURALFREQ ,,,q 1

'i

.l, ,i: BELOW 11 HZ. -}. . l. t. : l : ',lt;;i a j.' .j: q 1.. 9 i L[lli!,,A l l] ',.!.' , j ll.. 9.,..i '.. l ,ji: 6 3 Ilf. 3:' f If5 I i !lt:I! ll ' ~ 1,1 jjj ' ; 1' i i. .[] .u- = f.:' _,;:l. } i

i i

!: ' t.. :l'. I I l'i li; 'l: ..l' j l" ~~ ,';;4 " ' 7 :i.'".I HORIZONTAL TEST RESPONSE ~ ~~ g 1f ! j.}:: 3 N .l .i.. e .. SPECTRA DERIVED FROM SINE ..i..J. .i. .t t.

a..

},--..,;.. DWELL INPUTS AT EQUIPMENT

.,1. a %.t*'* = 4 o - NATURAL FREQUENCIES

f..

PARALLEL TO PLATES ...g. 5 ,ia.. 1.6 G @ 12 HZ + I-

4.,f....,...+

.i d .i. q. _pg ,.. l.... p. n, /a.4-- PERPENDICULAR TO PLATES j-n y, u i t- -l ._ b}..

• M, H : X..

y 1.3 G @ 11 HZ - A 4 ,.jiN!Y 'MH f i ? 'I' .!li.

Wl'

' Ll ~ [~ i ^ i i, ;l 'i,. 'i. tl:: ::',,i ;. :. 2% DAMPING

t. :

.i i ;. . i I. l.. ,,4, q. .1.,

m..

3 e .i, i; e .+t 'tll di ![ i : ' I k:M !b

{I ii!

d I E! ii lL t llt; j [1-[f !l';fjf 'l'

'i

,{, lll 4 ..L ' '.

• _*..: I..;. *f....W., ;.h.....

..I;,. .h I;i .!l. i: T I .,r; ..l ;. l.. : '.59en.. -t.-- n- __4....m. .m,. . 3... j. . j .( ...,.l. _u _+ n. i.e .... ~ +. i' ' . p.._ .p. p. y.

u. p.

y, 3 n, i .4, i... ~. .6 14 . J,.. )_f.L - p, ..j ' LJ ,c , i 4 1. . e. ..i..e....... .e,. .,...rN ..n.- .6.. .-i. ..f F._p. .j.... q.. .ni.. .i_._-, ...p. +.. e. ,_,,*7 j .l .{, ji. . l[.. . -.-,, [.. g.#.l.. j, 4, 4 i .l. i..q.+ .. l.. .g. .). 4, ![i' }! ";g i

_. pg Ej:-

l- - a p.:. q .l t 1 h$ M;. p [j j ' ',4l.Ny t; ill 7d;; [ J ::p l.j. L e

t.

.l- ,,..':i.44, ,r r. l-N. .,.4 I. + i. 1-I . HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE - ENVELOPE OF APPLICABLE ',L il! ._._t__ j

t.

il l SPECTRA --2% DAMPING - + - l-u ..;,o i .f. a - t j 1 l .'jj i l t,t; j i. ,{} I: {, I 'i l, I L_ L_ L 2 10. 100. FREQUENCY-HERTZ v 2312 158 k

t ,: s v s f J g[ { g M .,o ( iD 1 a i D j, s - d N m 100. i. 4 o 4 6- .l- .l. ,l .l. .*f,.$. ,.},e i. .,tj l

• t<

t g.. i .j g ..p.

i.

.p 3 ii 'il Unl l':'- 1. l: .l- @.t !!lllj !n: 'ij. l I: I.. .., : 1 : u. ' ;;r;p, i .i : 1 6_.. m. 3 ..i.... t. l NO VERTICAL .I L i l. t. 6 NATURALFREQ . l-

f. i. --

m . BELOW 33 HZ. i i i !l:u a ' '~ . :p t. t i. 94.f.. ,.,.. q. : 4 .;u

. i.,..;; a u.

I 4

d.,

.I ..,_i ,n ...I s.. n. .e., ,.1 {..ii 6,4. m- .g 4W. 1y. l .6, i;. .t., ( 9,

4..

l i ,j3, ,t i 4-r 2.c j -j p i iq { 6 j .~+.4 fiJ i }:.I 10. 6 l a ,.a. .c. r. VERTICAL TEST REPONSE 4 6 6.., j ,..e .p. .= a i + SPECTRUM DERIVED FROM,4 ...e.,.... mF-C

b 7..

4 0.51 G SINE DWELL INPUT .i . AT 33 HZ. ...t...i. 1 ~,, . [. n

g e.

~: M "o ': :::, ~;; la:3 2% DAMPING ? i. oj ,,1. 't,,. u.. ...t.. - 4, .,,......,,.1. ea, .i ., s.., o E c: ,h .i: i:h !!N'. U

l

i .. [--+--- w . t i, ' i : %(..

L.

t

: i.

' f. a d .1:: it,

• l J I

  :

i 1'l6'n' W...', i - ti'. . j: ~ u i.* k., 6',.' ,. ~. '.. l i .i6 3, i

u t.

..n .n i 37 6,e .p r. 7tt a ( l,9 ( 14.; i e

• =

o j i "j ? e i. 6 4 3; r r t: > t :; 4

- +

Itl F'. e

• -- i+

i. ',--t . f t: t t,- tj a 1.0 - t i. ..,y y,, .r. l o -i.. .p..... ,_p.g.,.i, u .,,.c e i. t + o 3;. r n.p y. r-- : t. n, e, r.. n. .a q.... i.

i :2

.i-L4

[!

!l::..

tv

:i: H :j 4.i z

6 NI I' !

• i:;

k,:l !:!IN!! :/i$ : N: F ',tllii' l d' t a-N y'..o ...,.,..g .,- l i '

• o i 6

i

. i o' '

L 't 't- ' ::, ::,4 .i-4

i 4

a .y i ENVELOPE 0F APPLICABLE i 3 i :tl: f "r yp::,j' VERTICAL FLOOR RESPONSE d -. ;- -. i ;. ' --+ i I,

l!.

N t :l:[. M:,. l SPECTRUM --2% DAMP!NG I i i ....i } ,f,l , - i. 1 i ej,. 4 - ~ + g l, ;,j..% 1. ,r, - ' I I ' ' l l \\ '. ' ' ' '. l I, L 0.1 2 a 4 s e 2 e 1.0 10. 100. 3 ., s,,,,,.,,,, FREQL'ENCY HERTZ 2312 159 \\ g' r}}