ML19259D291
| ML19259D291 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Skagit |
| Issue date: | 10/01/1979 |
| From: | Deale V Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| To: | |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7910170598 | |
| Download: ML19259D291 (3) | |
Text
NRC PTTBLIC DOCUMENT ROOM
[
{@ ~3 UNITED STATES OF AAIERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMAIISSION
(~
ig-4 ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BO ARD 6f,A bs a** d,' k 9
eg..g -
' %8
'3 In the' Matter of
)
PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT
)
Docket Nos. 50-522 NN COMPANT, et al.
)
50-523
)
(Skagit Nuclear Power
)
Project Units 1 and 2)
)
Schedule of Hearines 1.
Addition:; cvidentiary hearings are hereby scheduled to begin on Thursday, October 25,1979 at 9:00 a.m. and to carry forward on Friday and Saturday, October 26 and October 27 and thereafter, on October 29 through November 2.
The subjects of the hearings will be as follows: Geology and Seismology: Site Suitability for Development of Evacuation Plans: Alternate Sources: Coal vs. Nuclear (health effects, excluding radon 222) -- Gotchy testimony; and Floodplain Management.
2.
The place of the hearings is Room 308S, New Federal Building, 915 Second Avenue, Seattle, Washington.
3.
The order of presentation will be prepared by the Applicants after consultation with the other parties and copies of the order of pres-entation will be submitted to me mbers of the Board in time so that each member will receive his copy ' y Monday, October 22, 1979.
'1160 085
~
791017097f
]~
. 4.
In the event the agenda of the above scheduled hearings are not completed within the time allotted, the Board anticipates the schedul-ing of additional hearings, as may be necessary, on Thursday, Friday and Saturday, November 8, 9 and 10,1979, and during the week beginning j.)
Monday, November 26, 1979.
3M.
5.
The Board's focus on the testimony about Geology and Seismology will be on what are the answers to the below three questions.
It will also be on answers of the Board's questions about earlier testimony of the witnesses. The referenced three questions are:
A.
What is the worst-case seismic event having reasonable probability of occurrence affecting the pro-posed plant during its. lifetime ?
B.
What is the corresponding ground acceleration, including allowance for uncertainty, that should be used for purpose of safe shutdown plant design?
C.
Does the proposed aseismic structural design of the plant accommodate this safe shutdown ground acceleration value ?
The parties are advised ;o bear in mind the Board's interest in the ultimate answers to the aoove three questions while they are examining witnesses on Geology and Seismology; otherwise, their examination of the witnesses, especially if tangential or remote to the Board's desig-nated central interest, may prove to be of little or no value to the pro ceeding and indeed, may be curtailed.
1160 086
........O
12
,.1. 6.
The parties are put on notice that 10 CFR 52. 743(b) is appli-cable to the forthcoming hearings with the exception that with respect to the testimony on Geology and Seismology for SCANP and FOB /CFSP the requi ement of fifteen days of advance notice of proposed testimony is i=9=##
reduced to seven days.
Done this
' day of October 1979 at Washington, D. C.
ATOMIC SAF TY & LICENSING BOARD m
i...
/r By Mh/-
~,
Valentine B. Deale, Chairman
- ?
1160 087
' ~ ~ "
"=
- ...