ML19257D833

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC 791010 Request & Forwards Draft Revision to Emergency Plan.Revised Plan Will Be Implemented Upon Satisfactory Completion of Written Procedures & Training Program
ML19257D833
Person / Time
Site: Hatch  
Issue date: 01/31/1980
From: Widner W
GEORGIA POWER CO.
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML19257D834 List:
References
NUDOCS 8002060571
Download: ML19257D833 (1)


Text

Georg a Pocer Ccmpan/

220 Feacntree Street Post C;f ce Got 4545 At:vtt Gecria 200C2 Te:epnre 404 C2 00C0 January 31, 1980 m

Pcwer Generation Department Georgia Power Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 Gentlemen:

As requested by your letter of October 10, 1979, a draft of an updated Emergency Plan for the Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant (HNP) is enclosed. This revised plan is believed to meet all the requirements of: Appendix E to 10 CFR 50; the regulatory positions set forth in Regulatory Guide 1.101; the acceptance criteria contained in Emergency Planning Review Guideline Number One - Revision One dated Se,cember 7, 1979; and NUREG-0610. The plan was restructured to the format of Regulatory Guide 1.101.

The PRB and SRB have been briefed on this revised plan; they approve of the general approach being taken to incorporate the revised regulations into the emergency plan. Horever, Georgia Power Company is not yet r <ady to au:1vate this plan as explained below. The NRC has previously stat.d in the Safety Evaluation for HNP-2 that our current plan meets the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50, and the regulatory position statements of Regulatory Guide 1.101.

This completely revised plan has made necessary the revision of nearly all of the emergency procedures, the addition of many more emergency procedures and the retraining of all plant parsonnel.

Consequently, this revised plan cannot be implemented until the procedure writing and training are satis-factorily completed. Completion of the writing should be completed by late April in time for the NRR review team's site visit.

It should be noted, however, that the Technical Support Center and the Onsite Operational Suppert Center are new in place.

Implementation of this revised plan, along with any further changes resulting from the visit by the review team, is currently planned to take place sixty lays after said visit; a for=al submittal will be made at the time of implementation. In the interim Georgia Power Company will be refining and further revising the enclosed plan and its implementing procedures to comply with additional rules, guides, and other criteria as they are adopted.

Very truly yours, W. A. Nidner Vice President and General Manager Nuclear Generation WH0/mb Enclosure I

l xc: Ruble A. Thomas k

George F. Trowbridge, Esquire R. F. Rogers, III scos os 0 57/