ML19257D189
| ML19257D189 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 01/25/1980 |
| From: | Rothschild M NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD) |
| To: | Ellis J Citizens Association for Sound Energy |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8002010510 | |
| Download: ML19257D189 (2) | |
Text
.
p,t Rigg
+i h
UNITED STATES 8 %)
g4 ' ( (,g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION s, v }/. E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 o, Q
}
++.**
January 25, 1980 Mrs. Juanita Ellis, President CASE (Citizens Association for Sound Energy) 1426 S. Polk Dallas, TX 75224 In the Matter of Texas Utilities Generating Company, et al.
(Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2)
Docket Nos. 50-445 and 50-446
Dear Mrs. Ellis:
Enclosed is the stipulation covering the contentions proposed by CASE for admission as issues in controversy in this proceeding. The stipulation has been signed by counsel for the Applicants and Staff and includes as an attach-ment a statement of CASE's proposed contentions.
The stipulation and attachment differ in some respects from the draft statement of' contentions and draft stipulation forwarded to you in August and October 1979, respectively. The draft statement of contentions and draft stipulation reflected the positions taken by the parties at the July meeting of the parties and in the parties' telephone conferences of August 31, 1979. As you recognize, these positions were not final.
As a result of further negotiations between the parties subsequent to the meeting of the parties in July 1979 and telephone conference of August 31, 1979, and consideration of the comments made in your letter of October 30, 1979, there has been a change of position with respect to several contentions.
In particular, we note that the draft stipulation indi-contention 12. garties had agreed to defer consideration of consolidated cated that the However, the parties have now agreed that deferral is no longer necessary and have taken a position with respect to this contention.
Also note changes in position regarding contentions 1.,
4., and 5.
The stipulation and attachment also now reflect the request of the Applicants and Staff that the Licensing Board defer ruling on the admissibility of contention 7.
Based on our records, these are the only changes of substance in the stipulation and statement of contentions.
- j As the stipulation and statement of contentions indicate, the contentions have been renumbered. We are referring to the contentions as renumbered.
1855 146 8 0 02 010 00 ' g
I would appreciate it if you would review the stipulation and attachment on an expedited basis.
Please return the stipulation to me after signature, with the attachment, so both can be submitted to the Licensing Board for its consideration. An extra copy of each is enclosed for your retention. Thenk you for your cooperation.
Sincerely, N
N C tk Marjorie Ulman Rothschild Counsel for NRC Staff
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/o encl: Service List 1855 147