ML19256F479
| ML19256F479 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png |
| Issue date: | 12/03/1979 |
| From: | Johari Moore NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD) |
| To: | Grossman H, Paris O, Shon F Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7912190206 | |
| Download: ML19256F479 (3) | |
Text
'It yv l'E c.o c;
UNITED STATES 8 yp '.e, f' h NUCLEAR REGULATORY COT.~. MISSION g,
j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 g w*/
December 3, 1979
- ...+
Herbert Grossman, Esq.
Dr. Osca H. Paris Atomic Safety and Licensing Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissicn Washington, D. C.
20555 Washington, D. C.
20555 Mr. Frederick J. Shon Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555 In the Matter of CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY (Big Rock Point Nuclear Power Station)
Docket No. 50-155 Gentlemen:
During our meetings to discuss Christa-Maria's contentions, counsel for Christa-Maria, Consumers Power Company and the Staff also discussed a possible agenda for the prehearing conference and a proposed hearing schedule.
Mr. O'Neill, who was not present at those meetings, was informed by telephone on November 28, 1979 of the results of our discussions. Since the two proposed schedules are rather detailed and Mr. O'Neill did not have a copy of them at the time of our telephone conversation, he was unable to express his opinion as to their acceptability.
I am attaching the proposed prehearing conference agenda and the proposed hearing schedule to this letter on behalf of the Staff, Christa-Maria and Consumers Power Company for your consideration in determining how the prehearing conference will proceed, and in formulating a schedule for the parties to follow after the prehearing conference.
Sincerely,
(
HAT Janice E. floore Counsel for NRC Staff Enclosures As stated
- h.
j cc: See Big Rock Service List 7912190 c1 0 G
PREHEARIllG C0::FEREfCE AGEi;DA 1.
Christa-Maria:
a.
Board approval of Stipulation.
b.
Oral argument, if any, on Contentions fios.
1, 7, 8, and 9.
2.
John P. O'fleill, II:
a.
Board ruling on standing.
b.
Oral argument on contentions.
3.
Leithauser et al.:
a.
Determine status of petitions to intervene.
4.
Discovery and Hearing Schedule.
5.
Limited Appearances, if any.
- 1626. (gf'
HE/J,ING SCHEDULE 1.
Discovery commences as of December 5, 1979. All parties agree to use informal discovery procedures and to abide by the Commission's regulations concerning the time for responding to discovery.
(All parties as used in this proposed schedule refers to the parties present at the meeting at which this proposed schedule was discussed.)
2.
SER and EI* estimated to issue by mid-February 1980.
3.
Requests for additional discovery permitted within 20-days after issuance of SER and EIA.
4.
Replies to discovery requests under 3. due within 40 days of SER and EIA issuance.
5.
Filing any new contentions based on new information contained in SER and EIA within 47-days of SER and EIA issuance.
6.
Responses to new contentions filed under 5.
due within 54-days after SER and EIA issuance.
7.
Motions for summary disposition filed within 74-days after SER and EIA issuance.
8.
Replies to motions for summary disposition filed within 94-days after SER and EIA issuance.
9.
Board ruling on summary disposition motions within ll4-days after SER and EIA issuance.
- 10. Written testimany filed on remaining issues 134-days after SER and EIA issuance.
- 11. Hearings commence 154-days after SER and EIA issuance.
...,. s
-