ML19256F049

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 790813-14 & 0904-07
ML19256F049
Person / Time
Site: Marble Hill
Issue date: 09/24/1979
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML19256F046 List:
References
50-546-79-18, 50-547-79-18, NUDOCS 7911210038
Download: ML19256F049 (3)


Text

Appendix A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Public Service of Indiana Docket No. 50-546 Docket No. 50-547 L*

Based on the results of an NRC inspection conducted on August 13-14 and September 4-7, 1979, it appears that certain of your activities were not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements as noted below.

Items 1 and 2 are infractions.

1.

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, requires that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings.

Marble Hill PSAR, Chapter 1, Section 1.7, commita to Regulatory Guide 1.28 (June 7, 1972) and therefore to ANSI N45.2-71.

ANSI N45.2-71, Section 6, states that " Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings of the type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings.

Contrary to the above, the RIII inspector observed the following:

a.

The loading rate applied to two compressive strength concrete cylinders were observed to exceed the 20-50 psi loading rate specified in ASTM C39.

b.

Several instances were noted in which the sample fraction retained on an 8-inch diameter sieve at the completion of the sieving operation exceeded the maximum of 200g allowed by ASTM C136.

c.

The specific gravity of the heavy liquid (Zine Chloride) used to perform the Test for Lightweight Pieces,in Aggregate was not monitored during the test with a calibrated hydrometer to verify that it remained within 10.01 of the specified value at all times as required by ASTM C123.

d.

The specific gravity of the heavy liquid (Zine Chloride) used to perform the Test for Lightweight Pieces in Aggregate was not confirmed to be 2.0 as specified by ASTM C33 for the coal and lignite test.

a I3/3 258 7 911210 ()_3l 2f

Appendix A e.

The 2" grout cube molds were not properly pre-treated prior to use with a mixture of three parts of paraffin to five parts rosin as specified by ASTM C109.

~[

f.

Field cast 2" grout cubes were not being initially cured in accordance with ASTM C109, Section 8.5 as referenced by S & L Specification Y-2850, Section 411A.1.

g.

Four occassions in which UST Level II personnel were evaluated for certification, other UST Level II personnel. This is not in accordance with UST Procedure No. UST-TQ-1, Revision 9,Section IV, paragraphs 1.5 and 1.6.

h.

Five occassions in which UST personnel were certified to Level I requirements prior to completion of the interview and practical demonstration of their proficiency. This is not in accordance with UST Procedure No. UST-TQ-1, Revision 9,Section V, paragraph 4.1.

i.

Two occassions in which UST personnel were certified to Level I requirements prior to receiving visual examinations. This is not in accordance with UST Procedure No. UST-TQ-1, Revision 9,Section V, paragraph 5.0.

j.

Four occassions in which the required physical and visual re-examinations were overdue for periods up to two months.

This is not in accordance with UST Procedure No. UST-TQ-1, Revision 9,Section V, paragraph 7.2.

k.

At least seven UST personnel were certified to Level I that did not meet experience requirements. This is not in accordarce with UST Procedure No. UST-TQ-1, Revision 9,Section V, Paragraph 3.2.

No response is required for items 1.e and 1.f since prompt actions were taken and completed to correct the matters and to prevent recurrence.

2.

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion III requires that design changes, including field changes, shall be subject to design control measures commensurate with those applied to the original design, and be approved by the organization that performed the ariginal design unless the applicant designates another responsible organization.

s Marble Hill PSAR, Chapter 1, Section 1.7, commits to Regulatory Guide 1.28 (June 7, 1972) and therefore to ANSI N45.2-71.

ANSI N45.2-71, Section 4.4 states that, "It is the intent of this standard

)3/b bh

Appendix A that design change be reviewed and apprcoved by the organizations that perform the original design, review, and approval.

In the event that it is not practical for the original organizations to perform the required review or approval, other responsible design organizations may be designated.

Contrary to the above, the RIII inspector noted the following examples of nonconformance reports which had not received the proper design organization evaluation.

a.

PSI FCAR No. 69, dated December 22, 1977 b.

PSI FNR No. 018, dated February 21, 1978 c.

N-MH FCR No. 314, dated January 8,1979 d.

".1-MH NCR No. 316, dated January 16, 1979 e.

N-MH NCR No. 183, dated June 8, 1978 13/S

_60

?

1 o