ML19256D191
| ML19256D191 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 05/18/1968 |
| From: | Morris P US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7910170689 | |
| Download: ML19256D191 (2) | |
Text
g.=,.a.
LDITED STATES GOVERNMENT demorandum To Files DATE: Vf( 1 c $33 7
FROM Peter A. Morris, Director [,,
j,,y,
[,
Divisicn of leactor Licensing'
SUBJECT:
FI ! DING IN THE MATTER OF ISSUANCE OF A PRCVISIONAL CONSTRUCTION PER'41T TO METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY, DOCKET No. 50-289 Pursuant to the initial decision by the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, dated May 16, 1963, in the matter of Metropolitan Edison Company, Docket No. 50-289, I hereby find that:
1.
In accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR, Section 50.35(a)
(a) The applicant has described the proposed design of the facility, including, but not limited to, the principal architectural and engineering criteria for the design and has identified the major features or components incorporated therein for the protection of the health and safety of the public; (b) Such further technical or design information as may be required to cceplete the safety analysis and which can reasonably be left for later consideration, will be supplied in the final safety analysis report; (c) Safety features or components, if any, which require research and development have been described by the applicant and the applicant has identified, and there will be conducted, a research and development program reasonably designed to resolve any safety questions associated with such features or coepenents; and (d) On the basis of the foregoing, there is reasonable assurance that (i) such safety questions will be satis-factorily resolved at or before the latest date stated in the application for completion of construction of the proposed facility and (ii) taking into consideration the site criteria centained in 10 CF2 Part 100, the pro-posed facility can be constructed and operated at the proposed location without undue risk to the health and safety of the public; 1446
% 6
,D 7910170 Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan
tiles (Occhet ::o.30-289) 2.
The applicant is technically qualified to design and construct the proposed facility; 3.
The applicant is financially qualified to design and construct the proposed facility; and 4.
The issuance of a permit for the construction of the facility will not be inimical to the coccon defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
FOR THE ATCMIC ENERGY CCIO!ISSION Peter A. !! orris, Director Division of Reactor Licensing Date:
u(6 357
O Files
$7 1 6 1353 Peter A. Morris, Director Division of Reactor Licensing FINDILG IN THE MATTER OF ISSUANCZ CF A PROVISIONAL CONSTRUCTICS PERMIT TO METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY, DCCIET ID. 50-7 D Pursuant to the initial decision by the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, dated May 16, 1968, in the matter of Metropolitan Edison Company, Docket No. 50-289, I hereby find that:
1.
In accordam = with the provisions of 10 CFR, Section 50.35(a)
(a) The applicant has described the proposed design of the facility, including, but not limited to, the principal architectural and engineering criteria for the design and has identified the major features or components incorporated therein for the protection of the health and safety of the public; (b) Such further technical or design information as may be required to complete the safety analysis and which can reasonably be laft for later consideration, will be supplied in the final safety analysis report; (c) Safety features or components, if any, which require research and development have been described by the applicant and the applicant has identified, and there will be conducted, a research and development program reasonably designed to resolve any safety questions associated with euch features or components; and (d) Cn the basis of the foregoing, there is reasonable assurance that (i) such safety questions will be satis-factorily resolved at or before the latest date stated in the application for cecipletion of construction of the proposed facility and (ii) taking into consideration the site criteria contained in 10 CFR Part 100, the pro-posed facility rean be constructed and operated at the proposed location without undue rick to the health and safety of the publi,c.
w-s 9..u..,
I
Files (Docket No. 50-289) 2.
The applicant is technically qualified to design and cotstruct the proposed facility; 3.
The applicant is financially qualified to design and construct the proposed facility; and 4.
The ise;4nce of a per=it for the construction of the facility will not be ini::ical to the cocnon defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
FOR TE ATOMIC EERGY CCl2iISSIGN Feter A. Morris, Director Division of Reactor Licensing Date: N I 3 000 Dis tribu tion:
DRL Reading RFB-3 Reading F. W. Karas (2)
R. S. Boyd D. R. Muller C. G. Long T. F. Engelhardt, CGC I
i
-- _(
R.P.M
.. 5.
omcc >
3?.h-32 U?A-. -
CC summaut > @
?I?E-U- --
-- ' ~ - -
i 5-
-68 j a_-
-oS
!5-O -63
_ 5.. - 61
.j....
DATE >
' ^ - - '
Wrm AEC-319 (Rev. W u s somwt*T ***?me OnKI 1*+-C-2'* 4 S