ML19256B302

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards IE Circular 79-08, Attempted Extortion - Low Enriched U
ML19256B302
Person / Time
Site: Framatome ANP Richland
Issue date: 05/18/1979
From: Engelken R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To: Nilson R
SIEMENS POWER CORP. (FORMERLY SIEMENS NUCLEAR POWER
References
NUDOCS 7906080218
Download: ML19256B302 (1)


Text

'

9 p /w

^

g a

r,0

'g, UrJITED STATES y

,4 NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMiss!ON f 7.h,'E ',

I REGIOrd V 0,

[A f

SUITE 2 02. W ALNUT CRE EK PLAZA

,0' 1990 N. C ALjFORNI A SOULEVARD q

9 *eee*

W ALNUT CREEK, C ALIFORNI A 94596 May 18,1979 7

>;s

'4 J'-

Docket No. 70-1257 Exxon Nuclear Company 2101 Horn Rapids Road Richland, WA 99352 Attention:

Dr. R. Nilson, Manager Quality Assurance and Licensing Gentlemen:

The enclosed IE Circular 79-03 is forwarded to you for information.

If there are any questions related to the contents or intent of the Circular or its attachments, please contact this office.

Sincerely,

/

/

l,,.

I

,)j2 CMC -

R. h.( ngelken.['[

/ irector V

Enclosure:

IE Circular No. 79-03

'r w/ attachments

?

H 1

IS U 6 0 8 0k8

^7-73:.--

,s..<-

Uti!TED STATES fiUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSI0ti 0FFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMEtiT WASHitiGT0fi, D.C.

20S55 May 18, 1979 IE Circular No. 79-08 ATTEMPTED EXTORTION - LOW ENRICHED URANIUM

Background

In.!anuary 1979, a temporary contractor employee who was working at the General Electric plant in Wilmington, North Carolina, allegedly entered the plant and removed a drum containing two 5-gallon cans of low enriched uranium from the facility with the intention of extorting money for the return of the material. The Federal Bureau of Investigation conducted an intensive investigation leading to the arrest of the employee on February 1, 1979. All material was recovered and returned to the plant.

Discussion Based on preliminary information provided the NRC, the thef t was allegedly carried out in the following manner:

On Friday, January 26, 1979, the subject worked the day shift.

At 10:50 p.m. the same day he drove back to the plant and entered with the night shif t.

He showed his Florida driver's license at the entrance gate instead of his yellow contractor badge because it had a blue background similar to that on the picture badge which he thought was required to gain access to the area of the plant that he wanted to penetrate.

He had allegedly gained access using his driver's license on previous occasions.

Once inside the plant, the subject would have been guided by gates and fences "ato a parking area had it not been for the fact that one gate hao been removed to allow installation of truck scales.

He proceeded "wn the unprotected road to an area adjacent to the building he wanted to enter.

Af ter the subject entered the building through a personnel door, he proceeded to his normal working station which was the Chem Tech Lab and entered, using his own key.

In the lab he picked up his protective d +^ -

"-N

"~

^ i clothing, a two wheel cart ue used to ship chenicals.

The He then proceeded to a door DUPLICATE DOCUMENT Entire document previously entered into system under:

7 h$d(bh/7J ANO No. of pages:

_