ML19256B240
| ML19256B240 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute |
| Issue date: | 05/18/1979 |
| From: | Grier B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Mcindoe D DEFENSE, DEPT. OF, DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7906080011 | |
| Download: ML19256B240 (1) | |
Text
y[" ' 3, <
[o, UNITED STATES N
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I 8M'$d
$ J-0, '
8 631 PARK AVENUE
,e KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19406 May 18, 1979 Docket No. 50-170 Defense Nuclear Agency Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute ATTN:
Colonel Darrell W. McIndoe, USAF Director Bethesda, Maryland 20014 Gentlemen:
The enclosed IE Circular 79-08, is forwarded to you for information.
If there are any questions related to the contents or intent of the Circular or its attachments, please contact this office.
Sincerely, K
i b Y.L&
Boyce H. Grier Director
Enclosures:
IE Circular No. 79-08 w/ attachments cc w/encls:
Captain R. Schaffer, USAF, Chief, Physicist, AFFRI Reactor 79060800//
i
4 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT WASHINGTON, D.C.
20555 IE Circular No. 79-08 Date:
May 18, 1979 Page 1 of 2 ATTEMPTED EXTORTION - LOW ENRICHED URANIUM
Background
In January 1979, a temporary contractor employee who was working at the General Electric plant in Wilmington, North Carolina, allegedly entered the plant and removed a drum containing two 5-gallon cans of low enriched uranium from the facility with the intention of extorting money for the return of the material.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation conducted an intensive investigation leading to the arrest of the employee on February 1, 1979.
All material was recovered and returned to the plant.
Discussion Based on preliminary information provided the NRC, the theft was allegedly carried out in the following manner:
On Friday, January 26, 1979, the subject worked the day shift.
At 10:50 p.m. the same day he drove back to the plant and entered with the night shift.
He showed his Florida driver's license at the entrance gate instead of his yellow contractor badge because it had a blue background similar to that on the picture badge which he thought was required to gain access to the area of the plant that he wanted to penetrate.
He had allegedly gained access using his driver's license on previous occasions.
Once inside the plant, the subject would have been guided by gates and fences into a parking area had it not been for the fact that one gate had been removed to allow installation of truck scales. He proceeded down the unprotected road to an area adjacent to the building he wanted to enter.
After the subject entered the building through a personnel door, he pro-ceeded to his normal working station which was the Chem Tech Lab and entered, using his own key.
In the lab he picked up his protective clothing, a two wheel cart used to move 55 gallon drums and a container used to ship chemicals.
The container could hold two 5-gallon cans. He then proceeded to a door leading up a stairwell into the radiation controlled area.
The door was normally locked even though not required by regulations; however, at this time it was slightly ajar due to malfunction of the locking mech-anism.
Once inside the door, the subject put on his protective clothing
I IE Circular No. 79-08 Date: May 18, 1979 Page 2 of 2 and proceeded up the stairs to the Blend Queue Area.
He removed two 5-gallon cans of UO2, carried them down the stairs and put them in the shipping container.
He then removed his protective clothing and retraced his steps in to the Chem Tech Lab.
Once back in the lab he opened one can and removed some of the material which he intended to use to effect his blackmail scheme.
Using the 2 wheel cart, he transported the remaining material to his car and loaded it in his trunk.
He retraced his steps and left the plant just before midnight on Friday, January 26.
Procedures require anyone leaving the plant after midnight to sign out.
He had been in the plant approximately one hour.
He had come in with the incoming plant change and had left with the outgoing shift.
Conclusion The G. E. Wilmington plant had an industrial security system in operation at the time of the incident. This theft was facilitated by a failure of this system.
The failure to check the subjects identification badge closely enough to dis-tinguish a Florida driver's license from a General Electric badge authorizing access other than normal working hours and the failure to protect a disabled remotely operated gate which would have denied automobile access to the immediate area where material was stored were significant factors in the success of this theft. A third contributing factor was access to the material through an emerg-ency exit which was normally closed and locked against access to the area where the material was stored.
Although the circumstances surrounding the possible occurrence of an event similar to this will vary according to each licensee's operation and safeguards system, the attached sunmary of this event clearly demonstrates the interrela-tionships of minor problems that seem insignificant if taken alone, but when combined, can allow a loss to occur.
It also emphasizes that the possibility of an insider threat against a licensed facility does exist.
This Circular is issued for your information.
No action is requested of you and no written response to this Circular is re-quired.
If you desire additional information regarding this matter, contact the Director of the appropriate NRC Regional Office.
Attachments:
1.
Sanitized Summary of GE Wilmington Incident 2.
List of IE Circulars Issued in the Last Twelve Months
Date:
May 18,1979 Page 1 of 2 Sanitized Summary of G.E. Wilmington Incident I.
Summary On Monday, January 29, 1979, at 11:45 a.m., Region II was notified by telephone by the General Manager of the Wilmington, North Carolina, General Electric Company plant, that an extortion letter and a sample of UO2 powder were found at his office door when he came to work about 8:00 a.m.
The letter stated that the writer had in his possession two 5-gallon containers of UO2 powder which he had taken from the plant.
The containers were identified in the letter by serial numbers and by the gross' weight (approx-imately 145 pounds total). The letter further stated that enough UO2 had been removed from one of the containers to furnish samples to newspaper editors, senators, anti-nuclear group leaders and others if his demand for
$100,000 in cash was not met by Thursday, February 1.
The writer further stated that after the samples had been delivered, if he had not received the money, one container of UO2 powder would be dispersed through one unnamed large American City.
The U02 powder from the second container would be dispersed through another large city if an additional $100,000 in cash was not provided at that time.
The General Manager verified the authenticity of the container numbers and the fact that the containers were not in their assigned locations.
Region II advised the Office of Inspection and Enforcement, NRC, Head-quarters, and the Atlanta office of the FBI.
The Atlanta FBI turned the case over to the Charlotte, North Carolina FBI office.
The FBI assumed investigative jurisdiction on Monday, January 29.
It was decided not to send NRC investigators to the plant at that time, but that the NRC would wait for further developments and concentrate on planning and related safety evaluations. On Tuesday, January 30, two Region II investigators, knowledgeable in accountability and health physics, were sent to the plant to furnish technical expertise in the areas of material control and account-ability and health physics, and to review GE activities to determine how the event occurred, without interferring with the FBI investigation.
A temporary employee of a General Electric Company subcontractor was subse-quently arrested by the FBI on 2/1/79.
The containers and all the SNM were recovered by the FBI and returned to GE.
Date: May 18, 1979 Page 2 of 2 II.
Conclusions The special inspection disclosed that:
(a) the material control and account-ability system functioned as designed and identified the missing containers in accordance with regulatory requirements; (b) health physics procedures were followed in accordance with regulatory requirements; (c) normal indus-trial security procedures were followed; and (d) no items of noncompliance with regulatory requirements were identified.
IE Circular No. 79-08 < -
Date:
May 18, 1979 Page 1 of 3 LISTING 0F IE CIRCULARS ISSUED IN LAST TWELVE MONTHS Circular Subject First Date Issued To No.
of Issue 78-03 Packaging Greater Than 5/12/78 All Power Reactor Type A Quantities of Facilities with an Low Specific Activity Operating License Radioactive Material (0L) or Construction for Transport Permit (CP); and all Fuel Cycle, Priority I Materials and Waste Disposal Licensees 78-04 Installation Errors 5/18/78 All Power Reactor That Could Prevent Facilities with an Closing of Fire Doors OL or CP 78-05 Inadvertent Safety 5/26/78 All PWR Power Injection During Reactor Facilities Cooldown with an OL or CP 78-06 Potential Common Mode 5/31/78 All Power Reactor Flooding of ECCS Facilities with an Equipment Rooms at OL or CP BWR Facilities 78-07 Damaged Components on a 5/31/78 All Power Reactor Bergen-Paterson Series Facilities with an 25000 Hydraulic Test OL or CP Stand 78-08 Environmental Qualifi-5/31/78 All Power Reactor cation of Safety-Related Facilities with an Electrical Equipment at OL or CP Nuclear Power Plants 78-09 Arcing of General 6/8/78 All Power Reactor Electric Company NEMA Facilities with an Size 2 Contactors OL or CP
IE Circular No. 79-08 Date: May 18, 1979 Page 2 of 3 LISTING OF IE CIRCULARS ISSUED IN LAST TWELVE MONTHS Circular Subject First Date Issued To No.
of Issue 78-10 Control of Sealed 6/14/78 All Institutional t
Sources Used in Medical Licensees Radiation Therapy 78-11 Recirculation M-G Set 6/15/78 All BWR Power Reactor Overspeed Stops Facilities with an OL or CP 78-12 HPCI Turbine Control 6/30/78 All Power Reactor Valve Lift Rod Bending Facilities with an OL or CP having a HPCI Terry Turbine 78-13 Inoperability of 7/10/78 All Power Reactor Multiple Service Facilities with an Water Pumps OL or CP, except those located in: AL, AK, CA, FL, GA, LA, MS,
SC 78-14 HPCI Turbine Reversing 7/17/78 All Power Reactor Chamber Hold Down Facilities with an Bolting OL or CP having a HPCI Terry Turbine excepting Duane Arnold and Monticello 78-15 Tilting Disk Check 7/24/78 All Power Reactor Valves Fail to Close Facilities with an with Gravity in Vertical OL or CP Position 78-16 Limitorque Valve 7/26/78 All Power Reactor Actuators Facilities with an OL or CP 78-17 Inadequate Guard 10/13/78 All Power Reactor Training / Qualification Facilities with an OL; and Falsified Training Susquehanna 1 & 2, Shoreham, Records and Salem 2
IE Circular No. 79-08 Date: May 18, 1979 Page 3 of 3 LISTING OF IE CIRCULARS ISSUED IN LAST TWELVE MONTHS Circular Subject First Date Issued To No.
of Issue 78-18 UL Fire Test 11/6/78 All Power Reactor Facilities with an OL or CP 78-19 Manual Override (Bypass) 12/29/78 All Power Reactor of Safety Systems Facilities with a Actuation Signals CP 79-01 Administration of 1/12/79 All Medical Licensees, Unauthorized Byproduct except Teletherapy Material to Humans Medical Licensees, and all Licensed Radio-pharmaceutical Distributors 79-02 Failure of 120 Volt 1/16/79 All Power Reactor Vital AC Power Supplies Facilities with an OL or CP 79-03 Inadequate Guard 2/23/79 All Holders of and Training / Qualification Applicants for and Falsified Training Special Nuclear Records Material Licenses in Safeguards Group I 79-04 Loose Locking Nut on 3/16/79 All Power Reactor Limitorque Valve Facilities with an Operators OL or CP 79-05 Moisture Leakage in 3/20/79 All Power Reactor Stranded Wire Facilities with an Conductors OL or CP 79-06 Failure to Use Syringe 4/19/79 All Holders of and Bottle Shields in Medical Licenses Nuclear Medicine Except Teletherapy Licenses 79-07 Unexpected Speed 5/2/79 All BWR Power Reactor Increase of Reactor Facilities with an Recirculation MG Set OL or CP Resulted in Reactor Power Increase
.