ML19256B204
| ML19256B204 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 01/16/1979 |
| From: | Goldberg J NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Luton E, Mark Miller, Wenner S Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| PROJECT-564M NUDOCS 7901240272 | |
| Download: ML19256B204 (2) | |
Text
kn nic
- o UNITED STATES 17' NUCLEAR nEGULATORY COMMisslON
'a s %. 'Sig,'o,8
- s WASillNG T ON. D. C. 20555 p,
t
....+
January 16, 1979 Marshall E. Miller, Esq., Chairman Edward Luton, Esq.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. fluclear Regulatory Com. mission U.S. fluclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Washington, D.C.
20555 Seymour Wenner, Esq.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 4807 fiorgan Drive Chevy Chase, Maryland 20015 Re:
Pacific Gas and Electric Company, (Stanislaus Nuclear Project, Unit No.1), flRC Docket flo. P-564A
Dear Chairman and Members of the Board:
Due to typographical errors in the citations contained in footnote 27 on page 11 of the Staff's January 15, 1979, Answer to PG&E's Motion for Extension of Time, I would appreciate your substituting the revised enclosed page 11 for the original in your copy.
Thank you very much.
Very truly yo rs, lb
/ack R. Goldberg Counsel for flRC Staff e
Enclosure :
As stated cc: William i t/
ong, Esq.
Michael.. St3c.. esser, Esq.
Daniel I. Davidson, Esq.
Pcter K flatt, Esq.
790124 0 274
Regardless of whether or not Staff agreed to PG&E's requested 25/
extension, however, the Rules of Practice require the approval of
~~
the presiding officer bercre any extension of time can be secured, flot even the agreement of all parties can obviate the need for Board approval of. time extensions. Therefore the Staff's position during a telephone call has no bearing on PG&E's failure to move for extension of time before expiration of the allotted time.
IV.
MR. ARMSTR0ilG'S ACCUSATIONS AND INNUEND05 C0f1CERf11NG THE STAFF AND MR. GOLDBERG ARE FALSE Mr. Armstrong included in PG&E's Motion for Extension of Time certain accusations and innuendos concerning the Staff in general andi Mr. Gc'd'arg in particular.
The Sta ff, in general, and Mr. Goldberg, in particular, emphatically deny each and every accusation and innuendo for the reasons set forth above. ---26/
The Staff considers Mr. Armstrong's resort to such personal attacks to be unprofessional and inconsistent with the standards of conduct required of attorneys at law. --27/
25/ 10 C.F.R. 52.711(a).
26/ Part III of this Answer.
27/ 10 C.F.R. 552.708(c), 2.713(b), 2.713(c)(2)-(5); Federal Rule of Civil "cacedure 11.
8