ML19256A398
| ML19256A398 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 12/20/1978 |
| From: | Lainas G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Schwencer A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7901050158 | |
| Download: ML19256A398 (2) | |
Text
h 0
W
~
q g. D DISTRIBUTION:
i OO Central File 3]c k g r0 A
PSB Reading D
3
-l(
e i
- v
/
MEMORANDtM FOR:
A. Schwencer, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #1, 00R FROM:
G. Lainas, Chief, Plant Systems Branch, DOR
SUBJECT:
SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT. FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM REVIEW. INDIAN POINT STATION - UNIT 3 (TAC 8778)
Plant Name:
Indian Point Station - Unit 3 Licensee: Power Authority of the State of New York (PASNY)
Docket No.: 50-286 Project Manager:
L. 01shan Responsible Branch: Plant Systems Branch Requested Cogletion Date: December 31, 1978 Status: DSED completed: The Indian Point Unit 3 Fire Protection Program review is essentially complete.
We have completed our Safety Evaluation Report dealing with fire protection for the Indian Point 3 plant. Our review was based on the licensee's proposed program for fire protection at the Indian Point 3
, plant as described in:
(1) The Fire Protection Program Resiew Report from Consolidated Edison Cowany and PASHY dated April 15, 1977; (2) licensee responses to requests for additional information and staff positions, dated June 29,1978 and (3) the fire protection review team's site visit of September 6-9. 1978.
~ ' Based on our review, we find the licensee's fire protection program p acceptable subject to resoluttaa of incomplete items.. The results of
~
our review are described in the enclosed Draft Safety Evaluation Report.
~
c Section 3.0 of the report summarizes the licensee's proposed modifications which require implementation, and the incomplete items which require resolution.
Incomplete items which are not resolved prior to issuance of the SER will be addressed in a supplement to the SER as these items are resolved.
Proposed modifications 3.1.2(1), 3.1.2.(3) and 1.1.10 have been cortnitted to verbally by the licensee, and the letter from the licensee addressing these items is due shortly. The SER should not be issued until formal commitments are received.
7901050152 EW '4 A M E
- O ATE P NRC FORM 318 (9 76) NRCM 0240 W u. s. oovu==as sNT PRINMNe OFFICEJ 1974 = us-ead
Q A
s.
s 2-DEC 2 0 W A. Schwencer
'a'e have prepared Section 9.0 " Consultant's Report" and Appendix B to the SER, which provide staff responses to those consultant recornendations which were not adopted by the staff in the SER, as identified by the consultant in a draft of his report. The consultant's report is scheduled to.be completed two weeks from the date of this. memo. We will provide a copy of the report to you when it is received. The SEB should not be issued until the consultant's report is received.
'de request that at the time,the SER is to be issued publicly, the lead SP reviewer, H. George, be requested to concur in the final document.
G. Lainas Chief Plant Systems Branch Division of Operating Reactors
Contact:
~
H. George X23077
Enclosure:
As stated O
D cc w/ enclosure:
E. Case V. Stello aw D. Eisenhut_
n i
D G. Lainas R. Ferguson
_[f V..Benaroya
'~
P. Matthews
- ~,..~'< _
~
,T. Wambach
~
S. Hannuer.
J. Stone L. Olshan P. Heman, Consultant R. Hall, Brokhaven National Lab J. Riopelle, Consultant PSB:D'OR 4 ~
SL-P,S,B: DOR C,: P,SB_: D0R HGeorgg.dn RFerguson
,Glatnas_
.u...,
12/,'/78 1 2/,,7 /78 12R'/78 ac com ne o.ui mm ono
- .... -.. - - -.......... -..