ML19256A150
| ML19256A150 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Lynchburg Research Center |
| Issue date: | 10/24/1978 |
| From: | Reid R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Olsen A BABCOCK & WILCOX CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7811030166 | |
| Download: ML19256A150 (1) | |
Text
~
~
ma arco
/
'o UNITED STATES i
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISd.ON
^
e-*)
}
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 7%
o
'S
%,'.../
October 24, 1978 Docket flos. 50-13 and 50-99 Mr. A. F. Olsen License Administrator Lynchburg Research Center Babcock & Wilcox Company P. O. Box 1260 Lynchburg, Virginia 24505
Dear Mr. Olsen:
My October 6,1978, letter to you about the physical security plan for the Lynchburg Research Center should have referenced Docket No. 50-13 in addition to Docket No. 50-99.
I have end osed a copy of this October 6 letter so that we may each correct our records.
Sincerely, D
g, p E h l. s --vl
' Robert W. Reid, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #4 Division of Operating Reactors
Enclosure:
Letter, Reid to Olsen dtd.10/6/78 e
~
UNITED STATES
{ y ',- g, j ~g f 'y_
NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISslON j
W ASHIN GTON, D. C. 20555
, e
.fjyl;.[f Cttober 6,1978
~
iN
....+
Docket No.:
50-99
~
e Mr. A. F. Olsen License Administrator Lynchburg Research Center Babcock & Wilcox Company P. O. Box 1260 Lynchburg, Virginia 24505
Dear Mr. Olsen:
We have reviewed your physical security plan for the Lynchburg Research Center (LRC) and the latest revisions submitted June 2,1977 and June 23,1978, as part of the license renewal process for License No.
R-47, for tne Lynchburg Pool Reactor (LPR).
Our review consisted of deternining if the revisions decrease the effectiveness of the security plan pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(p) and an evaluation of the ccmplete plan with revisions. The recurity plan consists of the basic document dated August 23, 1978 and entitled "Lynchburg Research Center Reactor Security Plan" and revisiens dated as follows:
May 19,1976 September 21, 1976 October 22, 1976 April 15, 1977 June 2, 1977 June 23,1978 Our evaluation of the revisions shows they do not decrease the level of protection and are acceptable. An evaluation of these tvisions is on
- i g file in this office and is withheld from public disclos :e under pro-vision of 10 CFR 2.790(d).
From our evaluation in conjunction with the license renewal, we have determined the level of protection afforded by the provisions of the security plan is acceptable for the protection of both the LpR and the CX-10 reactors.
This evaluation is on file in this office and is withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790(d).
4
?
-4 Babcock & Wi.lcox Company 2-As there have been extensive revisions to the basic plan, it is requested that the plan be reconciled and resubmitted as a single docurent for inclusion in the renewed license. To facilitate future amendments it is further requested that it be in loose-leaf
- format,
\\
Because of the possibility c,' changes to portions of 10 CFR Part 73 under development by the staff that ray affect the LRC security plan, the resubmittal may be delayed until May 31, 1979, You will be kepti.nformed of developments in this area that affect your facil-
- ity, Please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Steve Ramos (301492-7435) for any question you ray have, Sincerely, j'
i Robert W. Reid, Chief Operating Reacte's Branch f4 Division of Operating Reactors 9